Spyke

Replies

linux

Comment on

Linus Torvalds shares his thoughts on Anti-AI coding rules

Reply in thread

essentially disruption will always keep happening, its how its handled thats the important part.

I do agree. We can look at countries with different economic and political systems to see which ones handle them best. Countries with socialist economic systems are able to use AI for the benefit of workers. While companies with capitalist economic systems use AI at the expense of workers.

linux

Comment on

Linus Torvalds shares his thoughts on Anti-AI coding rules

Reply in thread

AI in school is an interesting issue, we can't discount the fact that there are benefits to using AI in school as well. It needs to be up to countries to regulate usage and educate children on it's use. Socialist countries seem to be doing a pretty good job at this.

The US’s dumbfuck government almost started a war with China

"sources say" hmm I wonder what those sources are, I'm sure the CNN would never extrapolate information out of nowhere to spread sinophobia and call for AI regulation (which is exactly what AI companies want at the moment.)

Calling something just a tool is whitewashing who’s making it and promoting it and what it’s used for. Stop saying that AI is just a tool and it only matters how it is used

I'm not sure how calling AI a tool is whitewashing. Of course tools don't exist outside of their material conditions, however, AI has many benefits, it's just that capitalist economies will always use tools for the detriment of workers. Socialist countries have economies that are orientated to benefit the working class. They recognise the problems that arise from AI and work to fix them while using its benefits as much as possible to liberate workers rather than burden them.

linux

Comment on

Linus Torvalds shares his thoughts on Anti-AI coding rules

Reply in thread

Now do it for the planned capacity of every AI data center currently planned or under construction or waiting for compute manufacturing by the big tech monopolists, and the trillions of dollars of labor that they’re telling the world they’ll replace whether the product is capable of it or not.

No you. My statistic still stands, if you would like to provide a different one please do. Maybe it will be 2%.

Your second paragraph is shifting the blame away from capitalism and towards AI. Economic bubbles and mass layoffs are features of capitalism, this is a pattern that has been repeating since capitalism was born. If not AI it would be something else.