Spyke

Replies

Comment on

Canadian healthcare staff decry ‘cruel hoax’ after scam email promises paid day off

Reply in thread

Well, exercises like this aren't just about gathering info, they are IT training too. If one of the people who fell for it gets another email promising a day off for clicking a link, they should now think twice. Hopefully they start checking all links before clicking them.

I understand they are overworked and the day off was enticing, but who doesn't view every email with distrust and suspicion these days? Yeah, it sucks, but that's the reality we are in.

Comment on

Canadian healthcare staff decry ‘cruel hoax’ after scam email promises paid day off

Reply in thread

They might not trust the security team to be their friend, they have no reason not to trust them as a coworker doing their assigned job.

They may perceive the personal cost as being low, but that is the real issue. If digital security is breached because of their actions, when a small amount of due diligence can easily prevent it, they are responsible. Losing your job because ransomware you let in took out your employer's computer system is a pretty big personal cost. May make it hard to get hired somewhere else too.

Locking down work computers further and further until users can't possibly do anything damaging also makes doing work on those computers slower and more frustrating. It's cost me many many hours, because coworkers can't take 2 seconds to think critically.

world

Comment on

World Cup tourists aren’t leaving tips — and restaurants are fighting back

Reply in thread

No, that is not normal practice. If you do that, you aren't just eating the loss of what your employer should have paid you, you would be paying taxes on money you didn't make.

I had a manager at a bar try to feed me that line after a very slow shift and I refused. Anyone pushing that as standard practice either has been direly mislead, or is screwing you over for the company's profit.

Comment on

Built to last

Reply in thread

More water and energy efficient to run, yes. If you have to replace them every couple of years the resources used to make new ones need to be included too though, and that will have a big impact on the comparison. That said, I have had a modern front load pair for at least 5 years now, no issues.

funny

Comment on

Tough economic times ahead

Reply in thread

That chart isn't of "how low" the men in the study would go, it the age of the women ranked most attractive by the men in the study. Still isn't great, agreed, but it is talking purely about physical attractiveness.

Here is the chart from the same study about what age ranges the men in the study said they would find acceptable to date. By 28 years old, 20 is no longer within the field.

energy

Comment on

Trains in Switzerland Are Now Running Over Solar Panels in a First-of-Its-Kind Test

Crazy cheap deployment, but I don't think those panels will stand up to it very well. The vibration is bad enough, but metal fragments are the real threat, I suspect. I've been in a few rail yards, and vehicles that habitually get parked close to rails that are in active service have paint damage from tiny metal chips flying off the rails and wheels. Unless they have some kind of replaceable clear shield, those panels will not just get dirty, they'll get slowly sandblasted till not much light is actually reaching the photovoltaic panel.

til

Comment on

TIL about skeleton watches which deliberately have all the moving parts visible

Back when my wife and i were dating I kept talking about wanting a skeleton watch, but I never thought to communicate what that was, and didn't know why she was always so profoundly unenthused by something I was showing interest in, it was unlike her. She was much happier about it when my folks got me one for x-mas and she found out it it was not, in fact, a watch decorated with skeletons, lmao.

Comment on

Dozens of Stanford grads walk out on Google CEO's speech

Reply in thread

These people literally got off their chairs during their college graduation from a prestigious university to protest the shit Google is doing!

Each person who did that made a bigger impact, and probably a bigger sacrifice, than a person who degoogled. That was my point.

Ultimately we need people to degoogle, but until way more people pay attention to why they should, it will remain a niche thing.