I was trying to understand who would downvote science, then I remembered too many people limit themselves to just the one book. 🤦‍♂️

The plane flies badly, shits itself and declares victory?

Not just any head unit, DoFun head units.

What's someone who uses LFS?

Nothing new that the internet at large would latch on to.

https://auspublishers.com.au/laina-morris/

Sorry, I have at least two layers of ad blocking, I forgot to check that.

Nobody gonna talk about what happened to all those wild horses huh

That plastic is holding up admirably though.

What the hallucinated bullshit fuck is grokipedoa?

Dev shit all over it with AI slop code

Even if it runs fine there are still problems

• Slop code can't be licensed, the license Lutris had is invalid. That means you can't even fork it unless you can identify the point slop started and fork prior to that.
• There's no guarantee the developer who uses slop code even knows what it's doing. Github is full of nonsense like that now.

AFAIK the dev had committed a bunch of AI nonsense intentionally not labeling it at such or keeping track of what was slop in any way. Do you have newer information that contradicts that? Because otherwise you don't know what you're talking about for no reason.

It's right in the meme

https://qgis.org/

Data centers: Nuclear facilities hate this one simple trick

Compounded by it being mostly bots doing that.

The way the Linux kernel developers use llms is to help identify potential problems, the llm doesn't write any code. It's a human that looks at the potential problem to determine if it actually is one and then writes the code to fix it.

Microsoft generates large swathes of code and judging by how poorly it preforms when they immediately push it to production there is little to no human oversight.

To answer your question, no to my first example and yes to my second.

The lane keeper fucks up and tries to drive on the shoulder, driver turns it off, research group acts surprised that it's turned off