I feel like there are two things

1. People with limited knowledge using AI to achieve things that they personally aren't able to do
2. People with knowledge using AI to achieve things human brains can't do

I'm not smart enough to know which one of these actually applies in this situation, but I feel that they are distinctly different and justify a use case. My layman understanding is reverse engineering software like this is completely not feasible with just sheer human willpower

If you are informed on this subject please enlighten me which of these apply if any

pausing during cutscenes - it's weird that this isn't always an option even in AAA

sorry but, isn't 'shooting people' serious shit everywhere?

This feels like unecessary absolutism and fear mongeting. I am by no means an AI lover, but people shouldn't let the worst implimentations of something cloud their judgement.

I feel the question should be "Does this project use AI responsibly?" not "Was AI used?"

Maybe what we should be advocating for is transparency with these decisions?

hyperbole

it runs perfectly on proton.

seems like an unnecessary workload for an already busy team of developers

Calling it complex only serves Israeli agenda.

The issue is simple - No amount of complexity justifies a genocide.

If this is genuine you are quite the interesting specimen

Yeah, because they have the freedom to even make those choices in the first place, lmao.

You can be united under democracy and by necessity still disagree over different ideas

"That's kinda how announcement trailers usually go?" Isn't an appeal to tradition or a moral preference statement, which you seem to interpreted it as.. It was just questioning your expectations. They are simply pointing out that you judged the trailer for being something it was never expected to be.

Announcement trailers are non-committal by design - it's the formal declaration of a project without making promises that are too early to make.

I think this is a very priveleged take if we actually care about advocating for digital sovereignty.

In a perfect world, sure, build and manage a server with self hosted infrastructure. In reality people care about this stuff rarely actually have the money, time, skills or drive to manage a project like that confidently.

Its normal for people to want to allocate management of their services to a provider with trust to circumvent this.

For actualnconstructive advice to the people who can't do this: Try looking up to see if their are any nonprofit email hosting services in your country - they exist but usually don't do marketing and are often built on strong values. If not I really think using services like Tuta, proton, etc is leaps forward for your safety, privacy and ethics compared to Google, Microsoft, etc.

"Signal: CIA"

Seems unsubstantiated

I'm doubtful there is like a 'study' on this but steam takes a 30% cut, which is absolutely massive considering its no secret plenty of developers say they really don't justify it by having poor communication.

Unfortunately however, more importantly if you are a developer or create a project that is an easy target for bigotry you will see absolutely no help from the platform in protecting you. Which is crazy that you would be required to participate in the platform in order to succeed, then be abused on it and have the people profiting ignore you. (https://www.theguardian.com/games/2026/feb/16/bigotry-steam-pc-moderation-developers-speak-out)

When artists arent available a rendered placeholder would give a more appropriate proof of concept than blank textures with text on them.

Jesus - how do you all sleep at night?!?!??

How is this pervwear not the main issue

Im not from the US, so while im an english speaker it looks like I would not be the target for this kind of cultural localisation - but wouldn't you go to jail for owning an illegal firearm in the US too?

Disco Elysium Rimworld Cyberpunk 2077 Expedition 33 Dragon Age Origins

Yeah this is it right here, said more elequently than I could have managed lol

Palestine needs support, and the rhetoric that its a complex or morally grey situation just needlesly complicates and delays progress.

Sure, that works too.

I could think of of plenty examples, but a good use for pirating would be Disco Elysium - the publishers stole the IP of the creators unjustly, so it would be cobsidered by many ethical to not purchase the game and instead pirate it and donate a comfortable amount to the actual creators patreons. You are actuallu combating theft, in this instance.

But of course it would not be responsible to pirate most indie games