Objectively funny, but super petty and kinda fucked up.

Why was this man's license plate being tracked for him to be caught? If you can answer that question in a manner that implies the cops had suspicion before they did the license plate tracking then you've got a strong case that this gentleman's 4th amendment rights weren't violated.

But I don't think there's any way they knew to search his car where the first step wasn't "Flock told us he goes to Michigan a lot" which, again, isn't a crime nor is it suspicious. But more importantly, it means that the only justification for the search of the car came from an UNNECESSARY search of all the activities of all drivers in Brown County.

Yes, in public there's no expectation of privacy, but that argument hinges on the idea that cops need to spend resources to follow people's movements when they're suspects in a crime. Recent SCOTUS cases have drawn the line that full sweep movement tracking could violate the fourth.

But the bigger deal here is how they knew where to be and when. They setup a sting because Flock pinged that he'd just crossed the border back from MI. So, based on Flock's evidence that this man travels to MI, they began tracking his whereabouts OUTSIDE OF THEIR JURISDICTION. Reminder that reasonable suspicion of law breaking is required for tracking like that, but, more importantly, so is a warrant.

https://youtu.be/gmnL_Y9CsI0 video on Flock's "legality" especially concerning unwarranted mass surveillance

Absence of evidence may be enough for you

I'm gonna hand you back this part of your argument. Trying to force me to prove a negative is a bad look and screams of desperation. But, if you do want to go down that road, I will remind you that you've never given proof that you're not a pedophile and I find that very suspicious. Only pedophiles don't have proof that they're not pedophiles.

They deeply broke the 4th amendment while doing nothing more than profiling a man for traveling. They then laid in wait for him to return to the city and performed an illegal search (illegal because the justification for said search comes from a 4th amendment violation) once they had him. Without the illegal search prior, they had no justification for the search that actually found the pot.

Even though he broke the law, there's no way the conviction will stick because the cops fucked their case by doing this shit.

No, I have the proof in this article of wrongdoing. Your argument hinges on this not being all the evidence used, sans proof. You're the person asserting a claim without proof.

So yeah, you're a pedo. Got it!

They arrested him in Wisconsin after laying an extremely illegal search trap for him.

More Perfect Union does a good job. Yeah, clickbait titles, but that's the nature of the beast. Their shit is always rock-solid

They basically stated it themselves when I said the image was generated a couple of months ago and then they made an article about me in an impossibly short amount of time in retaliation

https://quokk.au/comment/4877476

This is unlabeled ai slop

No? It's OP's desperate attempt at being funny or relevant but without having the talent to be either.

Nope. Doesn't even make sense. Gold standard wouldn't fix income inequality, that's like saying changing your house's plumbing will fix your diarrhea. It's something else entirely.

Oh, I know it is. OP posted an article about me once that couldn't have been written that fast any other way. They're abusive and, in my opinion, shouldn't be allowed to post here .

Butter makes me feel good!

Sad that the ai upscale version of this meme is the more common one.

My man isn't concerned in this clip, he's asserting dominance by chewing aggressively. The Tom ass concerned face was ai nonsense.

Didn't you hear that "He's for you, She's for they/ them" was the most influential ad in 2024? They found a button, you better fucking believe they're spamming that shit.

Problem is, they don't know why that ad worked (it wasn't the transphobia, it was highlighting the status quo ness of Harris' campaign) so they're just shouting this point for nothing. Well, hatred is their goal, so I guess not nothing nothing

"Oh, that's-"

The speaker was crushed as OPs sudden extreme gravity ripped the earth asunder

I mean, not really. The security does basically nothing except let the government harass everyone traveling by air. The locking cockpits are the actual thing that stopped hijackings, not whatever the fuck TSA is doing.

Man, I'm gonna blame the perpetrators rather than the victims, but, uh, you do you, I guess?

She's self-isolating because of her fame (probably was an introvert before becoming famous, as well). She was abused as a child for not being a boy by her father. She's been sexually assaulted. Then the "gender criticals" used those access points to wrench open her brain and fill her with fear. That fear made her question, and when she finally did so openly, she was met with intense anger. That drove her further into the gender critical community, where she then doubled down. The rest is history.

She became hateful the way everyone does... by thinking her hate made her a savior to those who were voiceless. It didn't, though. Just made her horrible.

Do you what indoctrination means? Intelligence has very little to do with it. Smart people can also be indoctrinated.