Spyke

Replies

Comment on

Moderation conflict involving c/vegan

@lwadmin For full disclosure I agree with rooki on this topic.

I may have missed it in the write up but I think the vegan mods needlessly escalated the situation by trying to ban and remove comments from an admin.

I am not saying I always agree with rooki but I respect his job as an admin.

The mods of vegan treated him disrespectfully in his capacity as an admin by deleting and banning him.

You should cover this in your terms of service.

unions

Comment on

Amazon: hiring anti-union consultants who advise companies on ways to skirt or violate federal laws in order to crush labor organizing

Reply in thread

As far as I know they’re civil penalties and not criminal.

The only way this stops is sending people to prison.

I’m not a union person myself, nor do I want to be but companies unfairly try to smash legal unions activities.

They get a smack on the hand, a fine but the union is smashed.

Do you think the ceo would allow illegally activity or even questionable if he was looking at twenty years in prison ?

Comment on

Ohio is not Appalachia.

Reply in thread

You’ll see that in Oregon. Middle of nowhere then off in the distance you’ll see the compound.

There is a house by me that has a foot ball field in the backyard a pond and a running track.

Who builds a football field field in the backyard?

Comment on

Moderation conflict involving c/vegan

Reply in thread

The mods deleted the admins comment and tried to ban him from the community. That’s a no no in my book.

If the mods felt rooki was wrong, they shouldn’t have tried to display a power trip with their actions. They should have escalated to other admins.

Rooki deescalated by removing them as mods. That stopped their childish behavior.