An interesting thought for sure, a thought about preparing for winter with, eh, expected uncertainty and fuel crisis started to form in my head. Like framing the balconies and additionally insulating old balcony doors and such stuff. Not even speaking about a reserve of matches, salt, sugar, canned meat and such.

Efficiency of processes is different in every situation, including long-standing ones, like one area having plenty of seawater and some other area having just lots of sand, some places being moderate-temperatured and some like central Siberia with hot summers and cold winters, things like that.

Meaning that one can't say that gas cars are "better for the planet" or "worse for the planet" than EVs. Period.

This study is true for some set of conditions, but it's pretty clear that people referring to it will use it outside of the scope.

There are better arguments than unprovable claims. Say, EVs use "universalized" energy, that is, can be charged from the grid, while gas cars require different kinds of gas depending on the specific engine and regulatory requirements. EVs have electric machines in them, pretty similar to those in electric trains or whatever else, but that's not as important as less wear and more universality. EVs in theory should require less maintenance, but since these are usually new fancy cool things, their electronic components might have the common downsides of all new cars. Fire hazards are different between them. On the other side, gasoline can be stored more easily.

I mean, one would think civilization can exist without choosing just one.

That's the eco-friendliness we deserve, and from Japan no less.

Isn't Skillet kinda fine?.....

And that's one example of how one progressive goal (of reducing emissions, ecology, regulating industry etc) and another (of right to repair and tinker) can require a compromise.

OK, from where I am your problems in US are cool to read about, here that kind of customization is in the "fuck around and find out" territory with huge fines, but I see no concern about ecology either.

I've just realized that this is much like having multiple identities.

A way to deceive market reputation mechanisms.

Should be made illegal, there should be one main brand seen on everything, then whatever secondary brand they want is possible, but you should clearly see that those 3 niche-optimized goods are from one corp.

So that the choice were, eh, real.

Self-critique is good, but as someone living in Russia I take issue with this claim.

So here in Russia there's such a thing as dachas, it's small plots of land with non-winterproof (sometimes not) small houses (sometimes more like a chickhouse for a human) on them, people go there at summer to have barbecues, grow stuff, have fun.

We have that, it's on a place with a lot of clay (good for growing apple trees, too) and I have always felt weird from eating and drinking anything with local water (from the well, boiled).

That is, I have ASD and BAD, and my mental condition is always different when being there a lot with that water, it's both more intense emotions, but also less like BAD symptoms. Also that somehow makes me feel full faster. And stronger.

Honestly it's as if in the city I had BAD, but there I had BPD. I become more touchy-feely there. Still it feels good and human, just not very safe.

But I've also read that water with such contents is not too good for one's kidneys, shouldn't overdo it. Better use filters.

The point is, I do feel as if my nutrition were better when using that water. Even a few portions of rice a day with lots of tea feel quite different there. But might also be the cleaner air, it's a relatively low place, though not a swamp, and a very pretty one.

... lost in recent like 20 years, in my childhood dissent was far more normal than now. I think it's social media, but also the commonly pursued concept of what's socially respectable, solid and real.

And dissent is, by normalization, what allows peace in society.

I get depressed after long periods of remote work, go to office, then remember why I didn't particularly value the experience, get back to remote.

It's group identity shift conflicting with memory, I think. Group identity did allow agreeing with "you guys" 20 years ago, but now it doesn't. It's hard to choose in favor of things you liked and against your group.

I'm from a completely different country and all, but 20 years ago my sister had a friend from such a family that she mostly was interested in Christian versions of all the same art, Christian fantasy, Christian rock, it's strange. At the same time Harry Potter was allowed, and, eh, USSR nostalgia too. Now the former wouldn't be, I think, and the latter has turned into something almost national-socialist, nothing cool there, in such groups. (OK, this might seem more contrast than it really is, honestly for such people USSR nostalgia even then had such traits, even a bit before I was born probably.)

Electricity you can expect to always be there, and computers too, they are a staple technology by now, it's like paper. I'm talking personal computers, because with microcontrollers and specialized signal processors and so on nobody even thinks about them.

Food and shelter and medicine - by the measure people had 100 years ago, it'll never be bad in developed countries.

The last point, about discerning truth from fiction, is the important one, because for that purpose things are and are going to be just the same way as they were 100 years ago and 200 years ago and so on back. There have been a few decades when it seemed that we can do that without authoritative chain of proof, from, in case of a criminal investigation, police assembling facts following due process, them being registered and vetted and verified following due process, everything being documented following due process, then court proceedings and so on. Eh, as someone from former USSR, I feel funny typing this. Well, not entirely, for non-political things this was followed very rigorously even there.

So - we've had a timespan of few decades when techno-optimism was misused to erode common respect for due process and following chain of trust in establishing facts.

That's also a problem with mass media, both with freedom of press and press neutrality and ethics and reputation.

We'll have a bit of a rough ride until, very slowly through collective experience, we'll have it as good as before the Internet (the Internet is fine, it's more about people being eager to believe that technology can remove deontological and social and other philosophical components).

I've read this happened because sometime in the 80s comrade Reagan decided to own the Japanese instead of letting competition do its work (for cars, but with electronics similar things followed). He's somehow often associated with liberal capitalism and so on, but the guy believed that "monopolies are efficient", but at the same time by some magic if a monopoly stops being efficient, then all the capital and technology base for competition to replace it will just materialize in one place in one moment all by themselves. So I'm not even sure if "comrade" is irony. The ironic part is that the US president whose term coincided with Soviet system conclusively losing the Cold War is also the one who supported state capitalism and ideologic pressure in society.

Some people might think it's nonsense to pay more to reach some group than it gives directly, but there might be a degree of diffusion such that it's not.

Suppose, that computer-savvy woman is the source of advice for her many friends after trying some things out or whatever.

Suppose, that professional man uses occasionally a free tool for their task, that seems to be "first page in Google", but is in fact the most familiar from 8 things listed on that first page.

Then they use it again or their coworkers or friends know that the tool exists. Then eventually they might buy it.

It's all probabilities, but those that spread.

Why did I even write this, it's obvious.

defeating which point? of using it conveniently? you know, without suddenly your mouse discharging and you not being able to use it until you charge it in unusable position?

In that light I'm glad I never played that, living in Moscow near an internal troops division. Doesn't matter, though, someone has.

It's not about EV vs ICE, it's about automation in production, which really is important, if you like to talk about billionaires stealing the future, then from Marx to, eh, Norbert Wiener many people wrote that eventually heavy industries won't need low qualification labor anymore, and where the society turns at that point is a political problem.

It's those conceptually capital "means of production" right here. Or you can look at TSMC, though. Or Windows, or Linux, or Firefox. All capital things.

But yes, those who can't make the transition are at a disadvantage. Unless the gap is reduced in some way, it's political again.

Anyway, those unfit dying have been a thing for a long time.

Since it's known how much water they've used, the problem is possible to rectify.

At the same time the accident's father in local government should be in a place where you carry your soup very carefully.

There are different kinds of "old cars", the kind of old cars made before 70s that are really inefficient with gasoline, but might last another hundred years if maintained, and the kind of old cars made up to 90s that are harder to keep from falling apart, and then the kind made later, which is - not really for future generations.

The more optimized their production is and the less luxurious they are as a thing, the closer they are to something that'll only last their guaranteed time. Preferably for the producer - falling apart into rust a couple of days after that.

Yes, that's what they are officially talking about, to reduce the amount of foreign traffic so to reduce the load on TSPU (which is the Russian alternative to China's GFW). Pretty open about it.