Fellas, is it icky to have an imagination?

Isn't that like $900 worth of IPv4 addresses?

The realization that if I won the lottery I would browse 4chan all day

I'm confused. Are you running out of games to play? Do you only play on console or something?

This article is written in such a heavy ChatGPT style that it's hard to read. Asking a question and then immediately answering it? That's AI-speak.

I've found online feedback useful. You just have to be careful about where you get it and take it with a grain of salt. A very large one.

"…" (Unicode U+2026 Horizontal Ellipsis) instead of "..." (three full stops), and using them unnecessarily, is another thing I rarely see from humans.

Edit: Huh. Lemmy automatically changed my three fulls stops to the Unicode character. I might be wrong on this one.

there’s no fair use/dealings defence of them.

The OTW, who run AO3, would disagree with you: https://www.transformativeworks.org/faq/#faq-WhydoestheOTWbelievethattransformativeworksarelegal

That said, I'm not sure why they say 'transformative works are legal' rather than 'transformative works are sometimes legal and we believe noncommercial, transformative fanworks are legal but no one has actually tested it in court and it's unspecified in the legislation'.

Not that it matters at all, but tumors grow on (or in) roughly 100% of people. A mole is a tumor, for example.

I lean anti-AI, but comparing generative AI to NFTs is very strange to me. Even if you didn't intend to imply any similarity beyond both being scams, surely generative AI is at least a much more compelling scam.

LLMs can now understand, to some extent, almost any text humans can. They might not be able to reason about it well, but they can at least translate it, summarize it, etc. If you had asked me 10 years ago, I'd have told you there was a near-zero chance of that happening within our lifetimes. NFTs were just "if we put baseball cards on the blockchain, people might buy them because of that same quirk of psychology."

I swear to god this is true. The recruiter said it was my personality. I didn't even ask.

::: spoiler divulgâche They were actually quite nice about it and I was happy to get the feedback.

:::

You should complain and get your money back.

Why would anyone choose to know that?

To a developer, "jqwik tests and code" doesn't mean jqwik itself. It means the tests and code written using jqwik.

Wait, you can do color?

My take away is that it's mainly children who are still using the free version of ChatGPT. Surely everyone else has moved on to better models.

If you want to know what people are typing into chatbot sites, here's 140,000 examples: https://huggingface.co/datasets/lmarena-ai/arena-human-preference-140k. It's mostly nonsense.

I haven't even tried it. GPU is too important these days. They recommend using a separate system entirely for GPU-intensive tasks. I actually do have that setup in a way, but only for the most GPU-intensive tasks. I don't want to have to switch devices just to watch a video without draining half my battery.

It's the GPU companies' fault, of course, but that doesn't change much.

I'd assume "FEX" in the last tweet in the OP is referring to this: https://github.com/FEX-Emu/FEX

As a disabled open source developer, it's almost as if the universe guided me toward this horrendous take specifically to annoy me. If you're trolling, you did a good job of it.

• Spends the first 90% of the competition developing specialized subagents and custom MCP servers to allocate the problems and most relevant information efficiently into the LLM's contexts.
• All of his agents easily escape their own sandboxes and one accidentally configures itself into "delete-only mode".
• "Codex, how the fuck do you not have access to your own documentation?"
• Places 29th globally after one of his subsubagents finds a way to reconstruct the full solution set from filesystem metadata in the online judge VMs.