Inspired by France

Literally zero citation about the relation of this to France while also posting multiple videos trying to portray France as some ongoing hellscape. All while doing nothing to bring up why French citizen are protesting. How utterly pathetic.

LE - Law Enforcement, ND - Negligent Discharge

Consented

Drunk

Drunk people can't consent, dipshit.

Edit: And that's before mentioning she was given high amount of other substances that she was not used to.

The thing is a very obvious death trap to anyone that knows simple physics. There are videos testing what happens when a Cybertruck hits a hard wall at certain speeds. That thing didn't crumple at all until speeds greater than 35 mph. And even then it only barely crumples at all. The damage it could produce hitting another vehicle would be catastrophic and fatal.

The man being looked at and surrounded by police is the murderer of Lauren Giddings. She was a Georgia law student who disappeared June 26th, 2011. This shitbag is her murderer. He was originally giving a news interview about how she was gone and people loved her, only to be informed that police were starting to locate the remains of Lauren Giddings.

He proceeds to shut down before freaking out in the interview. He was brought in for questioning where he said pretty much nothing for 12 hours. He was also a law student at the same university, so he knew better.

What the picture got wrong was he didn't win at all. It was still obvious as can be he did it based on the evidence and what was found. After a little bit more investigation they had him dead to rights. He is currently serving a life sentence.

K. And what does this have to do with Trump being a pedo?

You're jumping through a lot of hoops to portray Joss as aggressive so you can justify his murder. Let's start here:

1.) All three dogs were found

Nothing in the article confirms they only had three dogs. On top of that, other sources you posted said they only found 2 dogs. Including this video from earlier today that is even more recent than the article that alleges they lost their three which is from Janurary. We also have no idea if there were more than 3 dogs, because the term they found all three dogs isn't anywhere in your source. Simply that they found 3, and that number isn't even likely correct. (Edit: On re-read, Sources 2, 3 and 4 all cite 2 dogs being lost in the fire. Did you even read your own sources and confirmed you had the correct number before you started spouting off?)

2.) 3.) What caused the fire?

This is a weird, semantic, pedantic, hill to die on. The police themselves say they don't know what caused the fire. If it was an accidental fire from a propane heater, grill, etc, it would be incredibly easy to determine if that was the origin point of the fire. The fact they couldn't determine the cause is either a sign to their utter incompetence, or that there was foul play. Even your own source for 4 had this quote:

I have classified this fire to be undetermined in nature at this time but cannot rule out human involvement intentional or unintentional

They already knew there was a heat source, but they can't confirm the fire started from there? That's extremely suspect. Meanwhile getting away with arson is fairly easy due to the nature of fire. Given these circumstances, you needs a lot more evidence to prove Jonathan Joss was the person responsible for his house fire. On top of that, Joss' house wasn't insured. So it's not like he or his husband caused it for the insurance payout.

4.) 5.) Previous incidents.

He was loud and brazen in his neighborhood, likely because of the abuse he received. However there is zero evidence that Jonathan ever aimed his crossbow at his neighbors house. The only evidence for this claim from a few anonymous sources, and the fact they found a crossbow on his property during a search. The pitchfork wielding was because he found his dog dead. Again, nothing in your first text proves whatsoever that Jonathan didn't find his third dog. Or even that Jonathan only had 3 dogs. Considering even the NBC source says 2 dogs found, that's 2 sources to your 1 saying otherwise. So it seems like there were only 2 dogs found.

6.) SAFFE investigation

First off, I'd like to see any evidence to the claim that Johnathan would shoot guns pr fire his crossbow from his property. I haven't seen a single substantiated claim that has ever happened. Second, the crossbow incident can't be substantiated whatsoever either. Jonathan had a crossbow, but there's zero evidence he ever brought it to his neighbors house. Plus it's weird that you bring that up like it happened repeatedly. Even if it did happen, which again there's zero evidence to it having happened, it only happened once.

And literally none of your sources ever once ask or answer where all of this animosity stemmed from. It very much seems like it could be a hate-crime, and its weird that you're in multiple threads railing against Joss. You have a weird vendetta it seems.

Not reading all that. Fuck off, transphobe

I've never seen people care this much about Micheal Phelps biological atheletic advantage. That alone tells me that this argument is disingenuous and a way to be transphobic in a public way.

There are actual verified cases of olympic tier athletes winning because of their biological make-up. And yet the only time biological advantage is brought up is to shill tranphobic talking points. You don't even have to be trans to be accused of being trans. These same people claiming to be advocates of women's sport are the same people who will falsely accuse biological women of being biological men

It's both. Kids suck and can be clique-like over the dumbest things. But these corporations also realize the amount they can make when their brand is a "status symbol", and they purposely market around that.

If we're using material harm to a person or region as the metric for measurement: objectively yes.

Both are terrible, but the US is pretty clearly worse.

Cheney doesn't deserve tact. All he deserves is a piss-soaked grave.

There is objectively a genocide occuring in Palestine, caused by Israel, against the Palestinian people. Even the UN says that it's a genocide.

Israel also funded Hamas for years prior to the kidnappings. They used Hamas as an excuse, after years of funding them, to manufacture consent for their genocide against every Palestinian. Israel has even started operations in the West Bank following their "ceasefire" in Gaza. Proving that this is about the ethnic cleansing of every Palestinian within Palestine.

Legally, schools and teachers can't force a student to perform the pledge of allegiance. But it's also taught so early in school that most students don't even question it as something to do.

Anectdotally: I was regularly performing the pledge of allegiance (literally said every morning of school) since kindergarten in the US. Also anecdotally: I've literally seen a teacher scold student(s) for not performing the pledge of allegiance. The latter case may not be as common; but the former definitely is common in the US.

You're being pedantic. The original point is referring to how indoctrinating the pledge of allegiance can be. If you're being made to do something since you're a very young kid and risk being scolded when you don't do it: you're essentially being forced.

Looks like a witch hunt

Tate has multiple sexual assault suits and charges in multiple countries and has a history of violence against women at his own admission.. Hell, he even claimed the biggest reason for moving to Romania is to avoid rape charges.

He is a raging misogynistic piece of shit that is almost certainly guilty of things like rape. Regardless of the incompetence of the Romanian legal system.

Fuck off nazi

My life choices have been good. After all: I'm not a callous cunt like you.

Unless the arguments they had stemmed from Jonathan being gay. Which is the claim his husband is making.