Look at the number of tabs 💀

That’s not the point. It’s not always about changing your view, but being able to defend and maybe refine your view to a more logically consistent position. Even as a lurker, it’s nice to be able to watch debates on positions that you almost entirely agree or entirely disagree with and read the arguments for and against it. I feel it helps solidify my logically consistent moral views of the world and makes me rethink the ones that are not.

I agree with op that this kind of topic and I would say realistically any topic should be allowed. As long as it’s actively moderated and both sides are constructively arguing for or against the position. It’s definitely one of the few communities I missed the most from Reddit and I wish it was as big here as well.

Is it not mate in 1 either way? King takes, Rook H8 is mate. Pawn takes, Rook takes Pawn is mate. Am I missing something?

Jfc I can’t read these shitty websites on mobile. It’s hard to tell what is the article and what’s an ad and where the end of the article is. It makes me want to never click articles again and just keep reading the headlines and comments assuming nothing is being left out or any of it is being exaggerated…

Thanks for coming back. It sucks a lot more here without your shitposting :)

Why don’t you have the ability to create tickets on behalf of someone else? It seems like a weak excuse to waste time for something that needs to happen anyway and could be easily explained away to supervisors. I understand the person in the meme is still adding bs on top of the original request but after their account is created then they could make any new requests themselves. Maybe I just don’t really understand the whole ticketing tied to job performance anyway… I don’t really have to deal with this kind of concern myself as my supervisor understands tickets aren’t always filled out properly and I’m also not IT.

Yes I would be ok with that kind of question. That argument would be torn apart pretty easily. If you’re curious, at some point some of those topics were allowed on that subreddit and you should still be able to find them.

If your concern is that it’s possible it becomes a weakly moderated cesspool of propaganda or whatever then fine. Until that happens, I don’t understand what the issue is with allowing a moderated debate on sensitive topics by people that are genuinely arguing for or against some position.

https://www.payscale.com/research-and-insights/gender-pay-gap/

Idk if this is a good source, but if it is then how can you really point to generally .99 to every 1.00 as a really significant issue? If you want to say that women aren’t getting the same opportunities for better job positions then sure that’s probably generally true. However I don’t think you can legitimately say that the adjusted/controlled wage gap is that bad. At least there are many valid arguments for why the unadjusted/uncontrolled wage gap is bad.

Can’t wait to be 800000th in the login queue

They did for the god helmet. The wiki page references it as [17] https://doi.org/10.1558%2Fjcsr.v2i2.24573

How exactly can you fit this onto 1 sheet of paper?

https://twitter.com/FordFischer/status/1757536607572279482

For those who don’t want to go through the cancerous ad website.

8 meters for logistics? Isn’t that a lot or is it necessary when everything is packed that tightly?

It’s called a platformer, not a racing game 💀

Idk if this has been a thing or not but why isn’t there a way to “merge” viewing of communities with similar content? Like why can’t I just say show me all posts with the community named “asklemmy” and show all posts regardless of the instance it’s on as long as it’s federated with your instance. If that is a thing, why is that not extremely obvious and easy to do and arguably not just the default behavior when looking for communities? Different instances will probably have different rules but the content will probably be similar and relevant.

So you typed \\> to say that?

Keep an eye on Fellowship. It’s in EA and if you liked M+ from wow then you’ll probably like Fellowship as well.

I don’t find the data nor the visualization beautiful. It’s just an “interesting” topical post that’s mediocre at best. The same kind of posts kept making it to the top of r/dataisbeautiful. IMO from observing the same thing happen on reddit, these kinds of posts will hurt this community by lowering the standards in both data and visualization.

I do think that there should be other communities that these kinds of post should be allowed in. At least until they are critiqued for being misleading, poorly sourced, or just too low quality.

I feel like this isn’t a real thing. What you described is how I feel and how I would describe the vast majority of the people I know. The people that I wouldn’t say fit these behaviors I would consider clearly have some other mental disorder.

Maybe I’m in a bubble of people like me? Idk it just seems like the default behavior…

gross… grape is best