Spyke

Replies

Comment on

If your art trained the AI, MIT says you may never be able to prove it

My takeaway from that is that every ai model should have a disclosure as to what it was trained on. If it can create art with significant resemblance to work that was not included in the disclosure, that would be proof of a failure to disclose, which should come with repercussions.

Imo plagiarism machines should face the same repercussions as humans that do plagiarism. Obfuscation by a black box shouldn't protect the plagiarist from liability.

Comment on

If your art trained the AI, MIT says you may never be able to prove it

Reply in thread

Ignoring the fact that that would be so unlikely as to be nearly impossible, art that is almost identical to other art is a clear case of plagiarism. The method that was used to create the copy should not matter. A painter copying a photographer's art without proper attribution or renumeration, is still plagiazing. They might have used different tools, but it's still a copy.

Comment on

U.S. preparing to force Netherlands to ban ASML from selling to China

"NU.nl noted that, under the Match Act, American companies would still be allowed to sell their most advanced chip etching machines to Chinese customers. China has discovered that, using these etching techniques and DUV machines, they could produce chips that typically require an EUV machine."

Rules for thee, but not for me. Nobody likes a bully, decoupling from the USA becomes ever more inevitable.

Comment on

Why don't smaller countries get together with other smaller countries and form a "bloc" that could go in the game of the big "Superpowers"? Instead of the US, RUS, and China all the time?

It's generally not attractive for leaders of the countries because it means giving up some of their powers + getting extra external oversight would curtail their remaining powers. People have a really hard time giving up power and/or control, and for the big egos that become head of state, it's especially hard.

That unwillingness to give up power is why every EU member state has veto rights and EU decision making can be paralyzed by a single rogue member. EU oversight against corruption is also limited to corruption with EU funds, national politicians their grifts are not directly hindered by the EU.

The way that the EU gets most improvements done, is by creating a directive (which could be blocked beforehand by a single member) and then members have x years to implement the directive into their own laws/governance in their own way. Failing to do so will result in fines for that member. It's a slow process, but it's been very good for gradual improvement. Crises however can only be tackled by the members having a meeting and searching a consensus amongst their selfish interests.

This slow hands-off approach also means that there is a lot less political whiplash as one party loses and another comes into power, which makes the EU directives easier to digest for the varied members and their diverse circumstances. With a fully federal Europe, it would rip itself apart sooner or later by politicians who put their nation's short term self interest above the collective (see Serbia in Yugoslavia for an example). I'm personally in favor of a more federalist Europe (in particular for foreign policy + external borders + military, and less veto power), but it should still leave most powers with the member states, directives good, dictates bad.

europe

Comment on

Belgium open to using frozen Russian assets to help Ukraine if Europe shares risks

Reply in thread

Yep, this has consistently been the message.

"After the European Council meeting, De Wever explained that too few member states had agreed to back a liquidity safety net to guarantee the value of the Russian assets, leaving Belgium holding the bag if Russian claims in court succeeded or if the assets had to be returned under a peace deal. " https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/nov/28/belgium-hits-back-at-eu-plan-to-use-frozen-russian-assets-to-aid-ukraine

Every plan after that involving the Russian money had the same fundamental problem: no protection for Belgium. If Belgium would have to repay the entire sum on it's own, then it would be about €16000 per citizen.

Comment on

Reddit’s garden walls raised to exclude outside readers. (and wtf codeberg becomes exclusive access)

I had that last week on my pc and I found some Firefox ublock origin filters on reddit. This is probably only a temporary solution, reddit is likely to block it as well eventually.

Go to Ublockorigin > Settings icon > My Filters

Copy and paste:

! Reddit login/signup modal
www.reddit.com##div#desktop-dynamic-upsell-dialog
www.reddit.com##[id="desktop-dynamic-upsell-dialog"]

! Restore scrolling after hiding Reddit login modal
www.reddit.com##html:style(overflow: auto !important;)
www.reddit.com##body:style(overflow: auto !important;)

www.reddit.com###left-sidebar-container

And click apply changes

EDIT: Mobile formatting is weird. Should be fixed now.
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/help/comments/1v8ctd4/comment/p08voub/

Comment on

Debunk this: Things that happen while Ronald Reagan was a US President

I did not see repealing the fairness doctrine mentioned.

This is what is basically allowing media like fox "news" to spout straight up lies and made up news, while selectively not mentioning, twisting or brushing over actual news.

It's also what allowed Sinclair to start their buying spree and create a hidden broadcast network of similar right-wing propaganda and lies. John Oliver had a very good episode on them: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GvtNyOzGogc

For me this is the biggest sin of Ronald Reagan. Without this change to content quality control, there wouldn't be so many Americans who live in an alternate reality, which is also what is allowing the republican party to not even try to govern & is allowing them to be as despicable as they are. Those rightwing "news" channels will after all just brush over their gaffes & instead conjure some made up scandal again over something democrats or one of the designated out groups has allegedly done.

Comment on

Why Would He Help Putin?

Reply in thread

Plenty of articles on Trump his private meetings with Putin. A short one: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/15/us/politics/trump-putin-meetings.html

The CIA circumstantially complaining and warning their agents of an increase of dead informants: https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/575384-cia-admits-to-losing-dozens-of-informants-around-the-world-nyt/

Apart from leaking, Trump also erroneously declassified secret documents, leading to the disappearance (and likely deaths) of some informants. Best case was that the western agency was able to extract their informant in time, but that still means that there is 1 less informant. Here's one case, but there were more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/17/russian-sources-disappeared-after-trump-declassified-ex-spys-evidence-uk-court-told

Trump his public obeisances towards Putin are also clearly recognizable as such. Trump Putin meetings are not meetings of equals, but one is clearly there to do the bidding of the other.

Put 1, 2, 3 and 4 together and there are many who believe that it was Trump who purposefully gave top secret information to his master. Including basically all western spy agencies, who now no longer can trust the USA with secret information. Trump is a traitor and everyone knows it.

world

Comment on

Russia arrests US dual national over alleged $51 Ukrainian charity donation

Every citizen of a democratic country, who is still inside Russia at this point, is a potential hostage and bargaining chip for the Russian government. There's no independent press or judiciary in Russia and the Russian government has no morals and few scruples. If they need a hostage, they'll take one.

Griner (a basket ball player convicted to 25y in prison for petty charges) was exchanged for Viktor Bout (the person on whom the movie Lord of War was based).

The Russian laws are also a minefield of post truths and petty rules, so it's not hard to find some kind of charge against any individual. Basically everyone will be breaking the law in some way in Russia and the crooks in the Russian government can decide when and where to go after someone.

Comment on

LegalEagle Suing PayPal's Honey

Honey in the chrome webstore: 4.7 stars. With no clear way to see written reviews, just the aggregated stars are visible.

Honey in the firefox add-ons store: 3.2 stars.

Honey in Trustpilot: 2.7 stars. Closed for new reviews since 4 days, but old reviews and history are still accessible.

Google manages to do worse than trustpilot. Google is once again confirming what a useless company they've become.

196

Comment on

reminder rule

This has got to be one of the most stupid memes ever.

The percentage of Soviet citizens that were put into prisons/gulag camps/colonies will have far exceeded the percentage of us citizens currently incarcerated in the usa, and in far more inhumane circumstances.

Unless the op is trying to deflect from the problems of the USA penal system by drawing attention to a far worse system, I don't get the point of this meme.

Comment on

Anon's dad teaches him a secret language

Reply in thread

You can carry white lies, that you were told at a very young age, with you for many years. There's loads of stories of people being told some fairytale incorrect information at a young age and then just believing that for years until they suddenly have an epiphany as an adult.