It's right on the courts' info page

https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/about

Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices.

Remember to leave a review on the official reddit app regarding it's porno abilities - if there's anything google/iOS app stores love more than anything it's an abundance of apps dedicated to viewing porn

I may be misinformed - but I was led to believe this is a book shop and therefore unlikely to lose many customers

TIL about Italy's shunning of their past in contrast to the "collective guilt" felt by Germans after WWII

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italiani_brava_gente

Tbf , we are trying to recreate certain elements of that platform in the fediverse and such a take would be needlessly nuanced

"Stop the corporations" or "save the API" just isn't as effective as saying f the guy who decided to change things

Sir, this is a Wendy's

I came here to talk about methyl groups and no one gives them a mention :(

What's the reasonableness standard? (to me that's just a standard of review in appeal courts)

Only if you have a valid excuse - like being drunk apparently

Indeed, I posted this on another thread about the court

Thomas Jefferson to Abigail Smith Adams, September 11, 1804, "but the opinion [Marbury v Madison] which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional, and what not, not only for themselves in their own sphere of action, but for the legislature & executive also in their spheres, would make the judiciary a despotic branch."

For .ca specifically: as long as you are a Canadian individual, or have a sufficient connection to Canada, or a Corp with a trademark registered in Canada then you are qualified to own that domain - but as to who is really checking I have no idea... CIRA complainants maybe?

Here's some info about .world domains https://support.google.com/domains/answer/6300841?hl=en#zippy=%2Cterms-restrictions

Beats them speaking up about how they could afford property so why can't the younger generations

Couldn't help looking it up - so satisfied that it's called a lounge of lizards

clerics

Unsure if intended? You probably meant clerks

But then again clerics also works since they probably do worship capitalism as if it were a religion

It absolutely is worse for users because we can only find the content via channels that spez approves of - removing the content just means you can find the content to be unavailable faster than if you had to scroll through the ads

Isn't this doomed to fail in light of the SC's guidance in Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v Taamneh ??

Edit: "The platforms’ failure to remove such content, Justice Thomas wrote, was not enough to establish liability for aiding and abetting, which he said required plausible allegations that they 'gave such knowing and substantial assistance to ISIS that they culpably participated in the Reina attack.'” (copied from a NYT article)

Whoever taught this can how to be a can failed miserably

Easy solution - unless you want to actually be there, don't show up to events you have no business being at lol

https://mylemmy.win/post/89871

Any instance admin, proper or rogue, gets a ton of information that users won’t normally see.

I wonder what their response would be to a bunch of lemmings outside the reach of Germany's laws doing the same?