That's a great point. Alternative is that once you build enough housing (admittedly that would take some doing to redo everything, best bet is slow replacement) you wouldn't really need that large industry to begin with. You just have houses everywhere that are good and you build a few here or there to replace accidental damage or the slow turnover of old ones.

Idk if that's possible. Humans never did it before.

It's true. But also could be less true. With our modern tech, we could build like they did back then, but much better. If we built for longevity. But we won't.

Unless you build the house to last 200 years, with occasional maintenance. No drywall monstrosity will survive that long.

Well we didn't have these magic boxes in every corner of our planet, always within line of sight of every human being alive, constantly whispering things to irritate, anger, divide and corrupt every aspect of society.

So there's that.

Also we used to execute or exile people the group found distasteful, which certainly has its own issues.

Yes.

Unfortunately I tried that earlier. Nothing helped. Turning off cross play, and using sos beacons both failed.

Burn one billionaire or politician and you'll see some movement.

Have you been able to get multiplayer working? I was playing fine for a while then like 2-3 months ago or something an update broke it or something. I can't connect to any lobbies.

It's clearly a moral failure to not own property.

If we go the way of france, I am quite certain that the utter depravity of the violence here will make Europeans go pale.

When the midterms go the way everyone knows it will and the fascists prevent the peaceful transfer of power once again, my plan is to march directly to the capital. Trunk full of bricks and gasoline.

Sorry, on rereading, I came in a bit hot. Others in this thread are wacky.

Also yes. A McDs would be good. Or a bank. Or parliament. There are levels to it I think.

Is it more a less replaceable than the literal human beings who are dying due to the material conditions imposed by the state? A serious question for you. If the people dye because the government is not acting in their interest, it's "regrettable" but when a building is burned, suddenly it's MASS VIOLENCE. But not the state sanctioned starvation and abuse of the masses. That's not violence, you see, because the state or corpos did it.

I am curious if the people bemoaning the loss of a building would bemoan the loss of a billionaire in the same way. Like if they had instead literally set a billionaire on fire in the streets instead of a public building, would there be more or less support for the action?

I'm genuinely curious.

I don't understand, does Elon think we all forget that he was begging to go too?

I cannot stop seeing this idea overlaid on every thing that I see or do or hear about. Every action is filtered through the lens of it being extractive and manipulative.

I feel extremely stressed because I see the bars of the cage and no one else around me wants to acknowledge them.

I do not like this. I would like it to stop please.

I think you should tell her. Explicitly. Be very detailed about your feelings. Ignoring these things will not help.

Sounds like a solid take. More people should be encouraging violence against ICE.

If they came with a bunch of beach chairs and vodka, the mood would be a lot different. Instead they came in with tanks and planes and artillery.

They are joking. It's a real picture.