Difference beeing, you can download resolve onto your pc and use it forever without updating, even if they decide to cancel the free version or get bankrupt. Figma runs entirely web based and if Adobe buys it it can be killed off at any point.
People who promote gimp likely never actually tried to use that piece of shit. Try Krita instead, holy fuck is it so much better as a useable piece of art software.
Gimp 3 is actually a massive improvement and they are releasing updates on a routine basis now. Try Photogimp if you like a more standard interface and layout
Blender is an alternative to 3DS Max in the same way an actual car is an alternative to flintstoning a burnt out wreck. Even in college a lot of our very basic rendering exercises with Max got the whole grade just on demonstrating correct setup because the software is so prone to crashing or taking 20h to do what most alternatives (paid or free) can do in 20 minutes.
Yeh, admittedly I have a lot more experience with blender than 3DS Max, but from performance differences alone I'm pretty sure if Max released today without its massive pre-existing industry adoption it would be laughed out of the room.
Davinci Resolve has a free version that is missing some features. They are important features, mind. But it definitely allows you to edit videos and get a good feel for the software to see if you want to purchase it or you can just keep using the free version even.
So it's free*.
And the paid version is buy once and get a perpetual license. Very non-scummy for a full professional video editing tool.
As someone who loves linux and FOSS some of these are far from being replacements and some of these are even upgrades. It does depend on one's usage though. Like I couldn't tell a Photoshop power user that gimp is a full replacement. I could say though that blender is an upgrade from cinema 4D.
You couldn't pay me to use Adobe. The predatory pricing, required internet, Linux incompatability, file scanning, Adobe Bridge, bad privacy policy, bloated install, useless launcher, DRM, and use of AI offends me.
You can theme it to change icons and sizes and such, which helps a little. But I agree, the interface is a nightmare. Ever since v3 came out, my layers window has disappeared and I can't find it. That's a kind of important panel to hide away :(
Free as in beer, not as in speech, and DaVinci Resolve at least has a $295 upgrade for additional features, although last time I looked that upgrade is included with certain hardware purchases from Blackmagic.
I still like the traditional model for paid software where you pay once, and then future major upgrades can be purchased for a discount; it seems like a fair way for the developer to support continued development while allowing the customer to decide if they prefer to stay on an older version.
Idk about the rest of the software on this list, but presenting gimp as an "alternative" to photoshop seems disingenuous to me.
Gimp is an alternative to photoshop in the same way that a 56K modem is an alternative to a 1 gig fiber line. Yes, they technically do the same job. But to suggest that your experience is going to be comparable to photoshop is a stretch.
I've been using Photoshop for 24 years and I gave Affinity a try. Affinity still has a lot of kinks to work out. Cross compatibility wrt brushes and tools is spotty at best, unusable at worst. UI and workflow/workspace definitely needs improvement. No right click to adjust brush size and no saveable workspace option was a dealbreaker for me.
I'm switching to Linux right now and I haven't really looked into replacements for each piece of software. Used Paint.net for at least 10 years, tried Gimp first but didn't like it. What do you use?
Dunno how advanced its vector graphics features are, but krita does support making them at least, you could try that. The overall interface is good at least.
Depends what you are doing. If you are drawing-krita, if you are manipulating images-gimp, making svg stuff-inkscape. I've been using gimp long enough that the newest photoshop makes me want to crashout.
Oh. Hands down. I miss the old creative suites. But the current product? Glitchy pos. Fuck em. Once you use gimp for a few years the pain dulls. Now how you think inkscape is comparable to illustrator is baffling. Is illustrator also a shitshow now?
The GUI/UX is shit. If you wanna design automated workflows from the shell, it can be quite flexible and powerful.
Like they used to have a website that would generate tags or like styled text. They used GIMP for the backend image generation. I thought that was a pretty impressive use case.
They had an update earlier this year that really closed the gap on a lot of features and tools they were missing compared to other more established cad packages.
How good is DaVinci Resolve on Linux? I have been wanting to switch for a long time now, but I read online that DaVinci doesn’t work that well on Linux, so has it gotten better?
It works best with NVIDIA drivers and with the least workarounds in RHEL type distros (officially it supports Rocky Linux).
Decoding and encoding is really limited, especially in the free version. There's details about codec support in their website.
If you pay for it, and you're already used to distros like Fedora, Rocky, RHEL it pretty much works out of the box. Only Fedora requites some tinkering. There's also tools and workarounds for distros like Arch AFAIK.
Whenever I open GIMP I always feel like an 18th century taxonomist's first time seeing a platypus and assuming it's an elaborate hoax cooked up by someone with far too much time on their hands. Surely this isn't software made by humans to do useful things!? This must be a joke!
Krita is mostly for digital artists and digital painting, while GIMP is more for image editing. They aren't made for the same purpose, even though both can do simple stuff from both worlds.
Yeahhh, I never understood that. It can't be that difficult to make a circle tool, right?
To be honest, I don't know how difficult it would really be, and I know it can be done with plugins. I also know it's not a tool that you end up using that much with the more advanced workflows (I myself haven't really needed it in a long time), but it would be nice if we had it.
It tends to be pretty straightforward about what an alternative can and can't do. The tags work well for searching so you can exclude paid or freemium apps.
OpenShot is also a remarkably capable and easy-to-use video editor - https://www.openshot.org/ . I use it almost daily for editing screen capture videos.
123 replies
Figma is NOT free software. It is proprietary, and hosted.
Resolve is also proprietary.
It said free. Not open source
Difference beeing, you can download resolve onto your pc and use it forever without updating, even if they decide to cancel the free version or get bankrupt. Figma runs entirely web based and if Adobe buys it it can be killed off at any point.
Penpot is a better option here.
Kdenlive is fucking awesome and should have been on this list.
People who promote gimp likely never actually tried to use that piece of shit. Try Krita instead, holy fuck is it so much better as a useable piece of art software.
Krita is not a replacement for Photoshop though. There is a difference between a software to draw and a software for image manipulation.
by the same logic, neither is gimp.
I learned Photoshop in high school, then tried to use Gimp in college. What a fucking disaster of a program.
Please... Let Gimp die already.. Krita is actually made by humans for humans
Gimp 3 is actually a massive improvement and they are releasing updates on a routine basis now. Try Photogimp if you like a more standard interface and layout
I saw it. It was... Ok
Yeah....GIMP is kinda shit. It's probably the one app I'd pay Adobe for to not use GIMP.
lol, I feel you,
you should try Affinity Studio. It's Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign in one
Well..... For quick text insertion, meme creation, or some very basic photo editing I still boot up Gimp.
But yeah... The newest version of Gimp feels like they updated from a very out dated version to a mostly out dated version.
Blender is an alternative to 3DS Max in the same way an actual car is an alternative to flintstoning a burnt out wreck. Even in college a lot of our very basic rendering exercises with Max got the whole grade just on demonstrating correct setup because the software is so prone to crashing or taking 20h to do what most alternatives (paid or free) can do in 20 minutes.
You're saying Blender is better? I've only used Blender, but I would believe it. It's like opposite of how I feel about GIMP.
Yeh, admittedly I have a lot more experience with blender than 3DS Max, but from performance differences alone I'm pretty sure if Max released today without its massive pre-existing industry adoption it would be laughed out of the room.
Pretty sure neither Figma or Resolve are free software.
A better, free-er alternative to figma would be something like Penpot which works pretty well and is easy to self-host.
Kdenlive is quite good and foss
Davinci Resolve has a free version that is missing some features. They are important features, mind. But it definitely allows you to edit videos and get a good feel for the software to see if you want to purchase it or you can just keep using the free version even.
So it's free*.
And the paid version is buy once and get a perpetual license. Very non-scummy for a full professional video editing tool.
On linux I just use Blender for video editing, it does about 95% of what I need
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software
As someone who loves linux and FOSS some of these are far from being replacements and some of these are even upgrades. It does depend on one's usage though. Like I couldn't tell a Photoshop power user that gimp is a full replacement. I could say though that blender is an upgrade from cinema 4D.
You couldn't pay me to use Gimp. The interface offends me.
Try Photogimp
You couldn't pay me to use Adobe. The predatory pricing, required internet, Linux incompatability, file scanning, Adobe Bridge, bad privacy policy, bloated install, useless launcher, DRM, and use of AI offends me.
Techphobic, nonprofessional opinion.
Lol the funniest part is I have a dual Bachelor's in CS and Graphic Design, and can spell technophobic correctly
can you spell inferiority complex?
You can theme it to change icons and sizes and such, which helps a little. But I agree, the interface is a nightmare. Ever since v3 came out, my layers window has disappeared and I can't find it. That's a kind of important panel to hide away :(
Try either crtl +L or from the top menu Windows > dockable dialogs > Layers
figma is not free software, and neither is davinci resolve. use penpot and kdenlive.
I’ve been pretty happy with kdenlive myself.
Free as in beer, not as in speech, and DaVinci Resolve at least has a $295 upgrade for additional features, although last time I looked that upgrade is included with certain hardware purchases from Blackmagic.
Yea it's not free but it's a once off, keep for ever price.
I'm happy with that
I still like the traditional model for paid software where you pay once, and then future major upgrades can be purchased for a discount; it seems like a fair way for the developer to support continued development while allowing the customer to decide if they prefer to stay on an older version.
Yea I'm completely stepping away from all subscriptions.
The only subscriptions I will pay for is for things like Email etc.
As the person offering the service needs to keep their servers running etc.
Affinity Studio should be added, not FOSS but free. I t has a polished UI
I don’t speak polish though
More people know Premier, but Natron is designed as a clone to the foundry's Nuke.
A better photoshop alternative is photopea. Gimp is it's own mess.
Can you download and install Photopea or does it still require a Web browser and an online connection to run?
No official version that ive seen, but it seems some people have made offline versions.
Here's a flatpak: https://flathub.org/en/apps/com.github.vikdevelop.photopea_app
Uses an electron wrapper according to the page. I have not used this personally so can't say if it works well or not.
It's been a while since I paid attention to it, but last I heard Natron wasn't maintained anymore since it was having trouble getting developers.
Anyone have the one where it's all vim lol?
Gimp is apparently great if you start with it, but it is not a substitute for Photoshop.
Can confirm. Never used photoshop, Gimp seems fine to me.
Krita had been great for most of my work.
Photopea. It's not open-source but it's "freemium". It's like a web Photoshop.
Idk about the rest of the software on this list, but presenting gimp as an "alternative" to photoshop seems disingenuous to me.
Gimp is an alternative to photoshop in the same way that a 56K modem is an alternative to a 1 gig fiber line. Yes, they technically do the same job. But to suggest that your experience is going to be comparable to photoshop is a stretch.
The image doesn't say it's a replacement, it says it's an alternative. What piece of sofware would you suggest instead?
I'd suggest Krita before Gimp, and even Affinity (although I'm sure there's a gotcha coming with that one)
Krita is the way to go. Even has AI retouching add-on if you're into that.
I've been using Photoshop for 24 years and I gave Affinity a try. Affinity still has a lot of kinks to work out. Cross compatibility wrt brushes and tools is spotty at best, unusable at worst. UI and workflow/workspace definitely needs improvement. No right click to adjust brush size and no saveable workspace option was a dealbreaker for me.
But is Gimp Affinity's Gimp? Or is there competition there?
GIMP is also a massive pain in the ass. Paint.net is the one piece of software I still miss after moving to Linux.
Da Vinci Resolve is great though. Crazy that it's free and Linux compatible.
I'm switching to Linux right now and I haven't really looked into replacements for each piece of software. Used Paint.net for at least 10 years, tried Gimp first but didn't like it. What do you use?
Try Pinta. Unless you do digital painting/illustration, then go for Krita.
Same with Inkscape IMO. Anyone have a different alternative?
Dunno how advanced its vector graphics features are, but krita does support making them at least, you could try that. The overall interface is good at least.
Photopea is pretty good for casual use
Gimpshop i think it's called at least tries to make the GIMP workflow and UX (including keyboard short cuts) not completely, well, gimped.
Yeah GIMP is shit. Anyone who says otherwise has no idea what they’re talking about. Inkscape is better than gimp but still suffers from UI issues.
Depends what you are doing. If you are drawing-krita, if you are manipulating images-gimp, making svg stuff-inkscape. I've been using gimp long enough that the newest photoshop makes me want to crashout.
Quality features often confuse people.
Nah, pretty sure it was the ai jammed in everything.
So then you admit that pre-AI Photoshop was significantly better than gimp. Thanks
Oh. Hands down. I miss the old creative suites. But the current product? Glitchy pos. Fuck em. Once you use gimp for a few years the pain dulls. Now how you think inkscape is comparable to illustrator is baffling. Is illustrator also a shitshow now?
I wouldn’t actually know. I don’t use Adobe Products.
But if you exclude the AI features, and don’t make “anti-ai” your entire personality, gimp is pretty shit
The GUI/UX is shit. If you wanna design automated workflows from the shell, it can be quite flexible and powerful.
Like they used to have a website that would generate tags or like styled text. They used GIMP for the backend image generation. I thought that was a pretty impressive use case.
Imagemagick.
I need a Lightroom alternative, on linux.
Edit: Looks like rawtherapee is a good one. Funky name though...
Darktable is what you are looking for.
Its always the Linux app names.. Surprised Klitoris doesn't exist yet.
Never really used Lightroom, only looked at the interface once or twice. But I think Digikam could be an alternative to replace it.
I’m also in search for a light room replacement but heard dark table has better raw processing.
Also another q: can rawtherapee can catalogue videos?
Any one else looked into Graphite? I first found it as a vector editor, but it seems to have widened its scope a fair bit
Figma ballz
Not much what's updog with you?
What's up dog?
Don't forget about FreeCad!
They had an update earlier this year that really closed the gap on a lot of features and tools they were missing compared to other more established cad packages.
I like Freecad. I use it because it's FOSS. But it's not as easy to use, sadly.
Yeah its insane, i actually feel like im using fully fledged 3d mechanical modelling software now.
Figma? No, I won't fall for that again!
"Not much, what's figma with you?"
It’s figmover
You know, just hanging with Candice
Try PenPot instead.
How good is it in comparison, feature wise?
Maybe a version or two behind on extra stuff, but core features And workflow are very similar.
How good is DaVinci Resolve on Linux? I have been wanting to switch for a long time now, but I read online that DaVinci doesn’t work that well on Linux, so has it gotten better?
Worked fine for me when u used it the other day to make a quick video. Cachyos amd card
Depends on what you use it for i guess
Have to try it out some time
It works best with NVIDIA drivers and with the least workarounds in RHEL type distros (officially it supports Rocky Linux).
Decoding and encoding is really limited, especially in the free version. There's details about codec support in their website.
If you pay for it, and you're already used to distros like Fedora, Rocky, RHEL it pretty much works out of the box. Only Fedora requites some tinkering. There's also tools and workarounds for distros like Arch AFAIK.
On the paid version there should be no problem with codec.
Yes, but there are limitations depending on hardware. Intel and AND don't get the best encoding and decoding performance.
Surely there's something better than Gimp.
Whenever I open GIMP I always feel like an 18th century taxonomist's first time seeing a platypus and assuming it's an elaborate hoax cooked up by someone with far too much time on their hands. Surely this isn't software made by humans to do useful things!? This must be a joke!
Krita, definitely, though it's still not as complete in capability it's a much better analogue
Krita is mostly for digital artists and digital painting, while GIMP is more for image editing. They aren't made for the same purpose, even though both can do simple stuff from both worlds.
Except easily drawing circles on GIMP's part.
Yeahhh, I never understood that. It can't be that difficult to make a circle tool, right?
To be honest, I don't know how difficult it would really be, and I know it can be done with plugins. I also know it's not a tool that you end up using that much with the more advanced workflows (I myself haven't really needed it in a long time), but it would be nice if we had it.
Seconded. Krita is significantly easier to use then GIMP.
Isn't krita for painting and photoshop for photo editing? Does krita do RAW, color grading and such?
I use this site a lot
It tends to be pretty straightforward about what an alternative can and can't do. The tags work well for searching so you can exclude paid or freemium apps.
Important one:
Adobe acrobat: fork to the eyes. (Jokes aside, I'm using Stirling pdf viewer right now, it's nice)
https://rawtherapee.com/
edit: RAW image editing
Wow that was a RISKY click based on that URL
Not a good product name 😬
OpenShot is also a remarkably capable and easy-to-use video editor - https://www.openshot.org/ . I use it almost daily for editing screen capture videos.
This image is crusty
This year i first saw an ad for Photoshop, i see this as a sign of them losing. Keep up the good work folk!
Is there anything to sort of replace InDesign? I am doing cruel, time consuming, and unspeakable things with latex atm.
Isn't that the best way to spend time with latex, though? .. oh. oh wait, you don't mean bdsm...
honestly, it does not feel dissimilar.
There is Libre office draw and scribus that I know of.