Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on sh.itjust.works

Is there a safe way to say you don't like something?

I was talking with someone today and realized I did something I do quite often that might be a trait that gets me into trouble: I boldly state my preference for (or against) something.

In this case, it was being tired of classic rock from a lifetime of overexposure. I think I offended the person, but saved it by clarifying that I'm mostly tired that there is a play list of seemingly 100-songs that have been in continual rotation for 50 years.

Anyway, it occurs to me that I'm just stating my preferences and I personally thing that's fine and normal, but that people get personally offended if you don't like what they like; which makes no sense to me. It's like if you don't like bland food, I'm not going to get offended because I can't handle anything hotter than black pepper. It doesn't ultimately mean anything significant.

Thoughts, ideas, suggestions?

View original on sh.itjust.works
57

59 replies

People talk about things they like, partially because they trust you to open up about them and partially because they're trying to relate. It's not really the same as responding to bland food, (unless bland food is your special interest) what's your favourite things, and how would you feel if someone said something derogatory or negative after you talk about them? (Not saying you did that, just that's a better evocation of the relative emotions)

Think of it like in improv theatre. The rule of the stage in improv is, you always say, yes and.... Because without saying yes and.. the conversation / performance dies. It also puts all the weight on the other person to think of and introduce a new subject topic, after you disparaged their last effort (sometimes that's how they feel). Probably the shortest way to explain it is you need to be careful not to yuck someone's yum.

It's not really about the topic, it's about the person bringing it to you.

Personally I like the challenge that it is to say something nice about something I don't like. For instance, I mostly share your opinion on music, but I could find a fun fact to pull out about a particular musician, I could find a particular talented musician to talk about, a childhood memory, something short if you don't want to continue the conversation much, something long if you've found something good to branch off into. Or instead just say "cool, what do you think about *insert favourite music here".

Personally for the music, I talk about Woking in a pub when I was younger and it ruining the songs for me, as they were played on repeat, every night. (Even though I never had a proclivity towards them)

Just think about something that gives them something to talk about after, or ask them a question about it, as it's about getting to know them. People want to know you care about what they like, not necessarily care about the things they like too. And you want to continue the conversation, what keeps it flowing.

1
retrolemmy.com

In this case, it was being tired of classic rock from a lifetime of overexposure.

I would have said something like "I mean they call it classic for a reason, but I'm burned out on the same 100 songs all the time." That way you're acknowledging that their preference is valid, which is what they really want. Although I actually would have monologued for twenty minutes about Blue Oyster Cult and all their awesome songs that aren't Don't Fear the Reaper and Godzilla.

5
sh.itjust.works

Yeah, i could have talked about the awesome celtic folk influences on Zeppelin, or how Paint it Black is a cool example of Phrygian mode... but, yeah, i honestly don't know if blank stares of confusion are much of an improvement.

4

My usual go to with music is to bring in the trivia. Specifically with the same classic rock being overplayed, I’ll complain by saying “Again? What about [album cut that nobody knows but is obviously better]? [Band] have so many cool tracks they never play.”

Fun side note: this is a common complaint my partner and I have. They need to take a year and not play Hotel California, Love Shack, Don’t Stop Believing, etc. Just give them a rest.

Some years ago, a local classic rock station announced an upcoming “double shot” of Golden Earring. I quipped, “What, are they just going to play Radar Love twice?” AND THEY DID. Single version followed by live version. I guess not even Twilight Zone rates.

1

I usually say something generic that makes it clear the “issue” is mine like “this isn’t my vibe” or “I’m not feeling this today” or like, “I’m not sure this is my thing” just super generic, no strong conviction and an I statement. But the important part is to suggest something else, otherwise I’m just offloading my problem, it’s no one’s problem but mine if I don’t want to listen to classic rock for example so if I just tell you “I have a problem” that implies I’m expecting you to fix it. If I give you a problem, like I don’t want to listen to this, I also need to provide my own solution. “This music is just not hitting for me today, could we try some alt rock instead?” and if they agree I provide the music. I’ve never had an issue with this method and I also hate when people offload their problems onto me without providing solutions so I try to treat others how I want to be treated and cover both parts, politely stating the problem and offering a solution.

1

This is funny because I am drawn to people that just come out and say their outspoken and blunt opinions (about relatively safe topics, music is def fair game!).

I perceive it as very genuine and demonstrates comfortability/closeness.

Maybe that’s the flip side of this coin though!

3

It may help if you try to sound like you almost liked it, but don't. "It's not really my thing," "Tried it, but I just don't love it," and "it just never really worked for me" are examples. Explaining that you feel like you have given it all the chance it needs, and ultimately decided it's not for you. You're not trying to emphasize negativity, just a lack of positivity, if that makes sense. This helps avoid implied criticism of someone else's tastes while conveying your preference.

2

It really can be as simple as not stating your opinion as fact. I'm not saying that you do, you're not that specific about how you phrase things. But a lot of people will say about a particular movie, "It's bad", when what they should really say is "I don't like it". When you say that something other people like is bad, you're not just criticizing the material, you're insulting their judgment. But if you simply say that you don't like something, well, that's your opinion, and you don't have to defend that at all.

1

I have found, for reasons I can't explain, people respond differently to "I don't like it" and "I don't enjoy it"

I'm hoping to learn why this has one day, as alas yesterday and everyday before it was not the day

1

I often find saying that I'm not into X lands better than saying I don't like X. It's just an euphemism for the same thing, but it matters.

Also it's kinda important that your preference announcement makes sense in the moment, like when someone links you a rock song, saying you're not into rock is different than saying you don't like the song, but that would be an appropriate moment. If you go into a bar and there's rock background music, saying that you don't like it feels unprompted.

If coworkers/friends are talking about going to a rock festival in a bar, it's appropriate to say you don't like the music if they invite you, but inserting your opinion into their planning feels like you are rejecting their plan, which again will make them take it personally. You probably aren't against them going a bunch of days, getting hella drunk and having a good time while listening rock, you just don't like the music.

So yeah, appropriate time (when prompted or if not saying it will result in you not enjoying yourself) and appropriate manner (soft terms and extending the answer a sentence to give a bit of context) usually helps, a lot.

Just making a tone that with friends I oftentimes intentionally use extra harsh terms because it's funny and there's confidence, but if not, soft terms always.

1

I mentally stumble reading "an euphemism" my brain cannot make that sound correct

1

It's really all about how you say it. You can make it known that you dislike something without making the person feel like you're belittling their opinion.

In that situation I think I'd say something like, "I used to be pretty into that era of music but it really got played out for me so it's not really my jam anymore"

This shows that you have respect for the thing they like

2

Honestly, if someone gets butthurt if I say I don’t like certain music, that’s a them problem. People tie their identities very strongly to their music preferences and they sometimes take it as an assault on their character. What you said in this case was a valid observation and I don’t think you should assume any responsibility for their reaction.

But if you’re trying to learn to be more diplomatic, something like a simple, “eh, that’s not really my thing,” gets the point across just fine. It’s an “I” statement which avoids putting people on the defensive. Works for just about anything.

33
lemmy.world

Conversation have a flow, and sequence of performances from each participant. Saying "I'm tired of classic rock" is a stop point for the conversation. If you use this wording you are not making a space for their next response.

Instead you could consider saying something more like "I'm not really into classic rock, do you have anything else?" Or even more directly just add "Do you have anything else?" to the end of your original statement. If you close the conversation around classic rock but open a new one about another genre or a request for their other preferences the conversation can go forward.

That said, this is all masking. If you are not interested in maintaining that relationship it may be more trouble than it is worth then ending things there may work for you. If someone required that level of emotional work from my end but did not reciprocate by adopting strategies that worked with me I would feel it was pretty unfair and not really worth my time. Being flexible and kind is something that should be reciprocal, not one sided. Masking costs you something and you not masking costs them something. Meeting them half way may make sense, but it may also be pointless if they won't actually meet you there.

10
sh.itjust.works

Why is not liking something any more of a conversation stopper than liking something? I mean, if they don't like classic rock, they can talk about how they don't like classic rock, just as if they liked Charles Aznavour, we could talk about we like Charles Aznavour.

Like I have a story about getting SO sick of listening to classic rock at work and the same damn songs over and over again, that I went on Limewire or whatever it was and downloaded EVERY version of Bohemian Rhapsody I could find. I found a heavy metal version, I found an Australian Outback version, I found (of course) a bluegrass version, and (my favorite), a celtic version (Hibernian Rhapsody by De Dannan--go listen to it! It's amazing)!

I burnt them all onto a CD and casually popped it into the boom box that played the FM classic rock radio station all day. It started with the original Queen song so nobody suspected anything was amiss. Eventually, probably by the second cover version, people got upset (because they are boring as fuck) and so they went back to the radio.

Guess what the next song we had to listen to was.

I see a little siloheutto of a man!

1

Why is not liking something any more of a conversation stopper than liking something?

Ever heard of "Yes, and" in the improv scene? Giving a negative without then giving an out to the other person to keep talking puts the responsibility of finding a different topic on them. Do that several times, and people get tired of finding new topics.

Often when people ask you if you like X music, you can say that no, but I like these other music styles. That opens the conversation so they can find songs in your style they like and keep the conversation flowing. If they then trash you that's not on you tho.

4

People have conversations to connect with others and gain comradery. Responding with a blanket "I don't like this" statement cuts off the conversation and can make the person feel like they are being belittled or ostracized. Basically its like you are taking the conversation and throwing it in the trash.

It's not just about your opinion, it's about the other person's opinion AS WELL. The goal of a conversation is not to just be direct, it's about gaining perspective and understanding.

For example, I fucking HATE country music. I've grown up in an area where 99% of the radio stations are country music. My entire life has been me trying to avoid hearing country music as it is EVERYWHERE around me. If someone starts a conversation with me about country the music, the first thing I want to say is I HATE IT! But, I've learned to avoid doing that. Instead I ask them what is about country music they like or how long have they been a fan of it or who their favorite artists are. Something that is in line with the conversation they are having so they feel that I am engaged and connecting with them. After that, then I tell them that I fucking HATE country music and provide a few details as to why I hate it. But I always ensure I am not belittling them or their opinion when I do that, I just share my personal experience and reinforce that I am happy they enjoy country music as much a they do.

It's not just about sharing your negative opinion on the matter, it's about understanding the other person's position or feelings on the matter. You can share your negative opinion, you just need to ensure you acknowledge the other person's opinion as well.

I will say that your explanation of the same 100 classic rock songs being the reason you hate it is 100% accurate and I totally agree with you. It is an excellent point and easy to prove. So sharing that opinion isn't a bad thing at all. But it's really easy to derail a conversation if your response is just a negative without having engaged with the person first. Try engaging with them first so they feel like you've listened to their point and then gently bring your opinion into the conversation.

3
Optionalreply
lemmy.world

Frampton’s a cool dude. A genuine musician. Don’t hassle him for being overplayed, it wasn’t his idea.

1

Yes, I'm sorry to have dragged him into this discussion because he does seem like a genuinely cool dude, but there is this DELICIOUS reference to High Fidelity (which I added to a comment).

He is also not really "classic rock" by radio standards these days, at least not FM radio standards; you can probably hear him more on pop oldies stations on AM.

One of the things I've noticed about FM Radio classic rock is how performatively masculine it is... Frampton is very much not like that.

2
sh.itjust.works

In a conversation where we are talking about our respective preferences, I wouldn't find such a comment offputting. Outside that context, I might wonder what you want me to do with that information. And especially when such a comment seems to come out of nowhere, it can come across as entitled or selfish in the "I'm the main character" vein.

If you can state your preference without intending to declare it superior to my preference, then I find little to criticize about it. If you don't intend to imply that my liking what you dislike is somehow wrong, then I don't mind.

Stating this kind of preference boldly could be interpreted as trying to be authoritative on the subject, and especially in matters of taste, your opinion is no more valid than anyone else's, nor is it any more important. You might not intend it that way, but I could easily imagine a listener interpreting you that way.

To answer your question more directly, stating a preference somewhat tentatively or meekly can convey an appropriate amount of humility. That tends to make it safer. As with most of these situations, the more your listeners already trust you, the more boldness you can safely get away with.

I hope this helps you somehow. Peace.

7
sh.itjust.works

Yes, I meant boldly as in baldly, as in plainly, not as in authoritatively--it is just my personal preference.

2

Among people who trust you, I would expect no problems. Among those who don't (yet), I would expect a variety of interpretations, ranging from "That's just their opinion" to "They seem to think their opinion is the only one that matters!" and "I guess since I like it and they don't, they look down on me".

Folks routinely conflate directness with self-importance, even though I value directness for its clarity. They often see directness as self-assuredness, then mistake that for self-importance or self-absorption. 🤷

1
sh.itjust.works

If you are a man, please consider that you may be saying things authoritatively "by default" or without meaning to. Society teaches all of us to subconsciously give more weight to what men say, especially if they say it with any confidence.

1

I'm aware of this dynamic, but what do you want me to do about it? I do leave room for other people to talk, especially a woman who gets talked over.

1

It's kind of the same issue as people not liking it when you correct a mistake they are making even if you think it might be helpful for them. Usually the thing I have to remind myself is that if they don't ask they probably don't care so I would probably just avoid sharing my thoughts. Only when I know / trust someone well am I likely to share opinions more freely. I guess maybe this counts as masking but it's kind of like a 'live and let live' kind of thing.

3

As my grandma used to say, “Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one and they are all shitty.” If somebody is going to get offended by yours then that is their problem.

That being said, tone matters, in my experience a lot more to neurotypicals than to we neurodivergents. Sometimes I have to rephrase something because the first way I said it came off as assholery even though I didn’t mean it that way.

5
fedia.io

The key is to be as diplomatic as possible in just saying it's not really your thing and then changing the subject. Especially when someone's trying to bond by sharing their interests, the worst thing you can do is insult the things they like. If you have to, avoid any direct criticism, just make it clear that it's your own subjective taste.

And I say this as someone who has literally built a brand on being a hater for some specific hot-buttons of mine, and even lost friendships over it. In the right setting there can be a time and place for hating, but it's not when someone else is trying to talk about what they like. Just change the subject if you can't say anything nice.

5
sh.itjust.works

Yeah, I can see in the context of someone talking about how they LOVE classic rock is would be a bad move; in those cases, I keep it to myself, or talk about what I do like about it... but in the absence of knowing their preferences, I blurt out my own, because I feel like that's part of THEM getting to know ME.

And thank you. Understanding that people are really just looking to bond over shared interests is helpful.

1

Even unprompted, it's usually better to talk about the things you like rather than the things you don't.

2

I'm still pretty bad at navigating social situations, so bear that in mind, but I've found that there's a difference between volunteering preferences vs being asked. If a group of people are chatting about all the things that they are doing with AI, then me saying something like "yeah, but AI sucks and it's worthless, it's unethical and hallucinates most of the time," isn't going to be well received. However, perhaps they'd ask how I'm using AI or such. I could mention that I don't use AI anymore. Then if they ask me why not, then they've requested my honest opinion, and they need to be prepared to hear it. If they push back, then it's like hey, you asked, did you only want me to tell you what you wanted to hear?

I'll also say that people that dominate conversations and insult others that don't agree with them drive me away very quickly, because that's abusive or bullying behavior, even if they do it with a smile or joke. Other people seem to like that kind of behavior though, because they're almost always popular for some reason.

5

I stopped trying to bring up AI at my workplace since it was clear that management had decided it Was Very Important for People To Learn and the organization is nothing but a bunch of perfomative cocksuckers (or, to be gender neutral, providers of oral sex). Personally, I don't see much application of AI to a social welfare agency, but I know when stating my opinion is just going to alienate me even more. The reality is that learning AI is way to curry favor with management, and speaking against AI is a way for people to mark you as a troublemaker.

Anyway, I quit on Sunday.

2

In this case, it's easy to just say that you would like to listen to something else. You don't have to justify or explain. Its better if you don't. Music is a matter of taste. And, yes, if somone presses you for a reason why, saying you're overexposed is plenty valid.

However, assholes exist. And some people believe that their tastes ought to be universal. Sometimes, you'll just have to confront the fact that it isn't about the musical choice at all.

5
sh.itjust.works

Bluntly and without artifice."i'm tired of classic rock'' or such.

As opposed to, "I like a lot of classic rock songs--I have a Zeppelin CD in my car right now--but, overall, I think I've heard enough of the limitted play list that's available on commercial radio."

6

Biggest problem is that it shuts down the conversation.

If you partner it with what you do like, you at least give an opportunity for the conversation to continue in a different direction.

8

I get it, it's just not really my thing, tbh. I'm more into x

2

“I’m not feelin’ ___ (right now).”

“I would prefer something else (at the moment).”

2
aussie.zone

I say "not my cup of tea". States I dont like it, doesnt say that the thing they like is bad

3

When I was a kid/teen I realized that if I told my mom I did not like food she cooked she got defensive and mad at me. But if I said I did not appreciate it she would let me have less of it, or let me prepare something for myself instead.

1

This is the best way. The euphemism also seems to soften the blow somewhat vs. “I don’t like X”.

1
fedia.io

So... it does matter to them because they are looking to build connections with people and one of the ways we do that as humans is by talking together about things we both like.

So they get offended I think (I'm not sure) because they like the thing and they therefore attach it to their identity as a person, and because they feel snubbed that you didn't embrace their attempt to find common ground to build a relationship on.

I have a terrible habit of letting my mouth talk without thinking consciously about how people will react, and I've been burned by this in the past as a result. I tried to understand (when it was explained to me) but honestly, I'm mostly just going off what other people think here. If people are offended I generally view it as a them problem.

2
sh.itjust.works

I guess I see liking things and not liking things as equally valid insights into who people are.

3
fedia.io

Because it does give that type of valid and important insight. But... To them is like an attack. If you don't like their thing they automatically seem to view that dislike as you actively attacking their thing. I think it makes them feel bad for liking it maybe?

1
sh.itjust.works

It's like the blind leading the blind here lol

Yes, I think it's that some people think that connection is about superficial similarity, so they might think you're not going to like them if you don't like the same things they like.

3

But is it like for no particular reason? Is that what you mean by "boldly"?

1

I don't think there is anything wrong with plainly saying you do not like something. If you're aggressive about it, like interrupting people going about their lives to tell them you don't like something they chose then that is a problem. Or if you insult the person while saying you dong like something. For example, "anyone who likes that music is stupid, a loser, etc."

1

I wouldn't know, I'm very blunt and explicit when I say I don't like something....And yet most people hear the opposite of what I say anyway

1
feddit.online

Don't pay them any attention. Music is subjective and options don't matter.

Country is just emo cowboy garbage and people who like it should feel bad.

0
SailorFuzzreply
lemmy.world

Country has a lot more range than people give it credit for. Most people hear "country" and they think of CMT, Toby Keith, Garth Brooks..... but that's just "pop".... seriously it's just Pop Country. Like there's Pop R&B or Pop Rock... but we of course understand there's more to "rock" than just Nickelback and Creed. But Country never gets the same level of scrutiny. People hear "bro country" once and think that's the whole genre.

You're listening to the most bland made for mass consumption version of the genre. Just like "techno" can be split in drum-n-bass, phonk, trance, etc... Country splits into many more complex genres. There's bluegrass, outlaw, honky-tonk, and even gothic country.

Look up more artists, you wouldn't judge all of rap by Vanilla Ice.

4

"I hate country" is a perfectly valid was of expressing that you hate what most people conceive of as "country" music--the stuff they hear on the radio, the socially normative trash to bottlefeed alcoholic manchildren through a thematically impoverished nipple of watered down rock.

But I agree with you that country has some really amazing range to it, though I'd have no idea where to listen to new stuff that doesn't suck.

2

Jokes aside, Pete Drake's wonderful pedal steel on George Harrison's All Things Must Pass has helped me enjoy a bit of country music.

1