Spyke
lemmy.ca

They're just making themselves look trashy and desperate.

What might work is making their software better than everyone else's. But that requires effort and skill and managerial competence.

190
floofloofreply
lemmy.ca

I bet they still have some good devs who are continually thwarted by management.

12

I mean they're exclusively writing tools for power users for eventual implementation to mainline as they develop and test simplification that doesn't alienate the power user.... So managers can't really say they're doing anything bad or dumb ever because it's power user features then porting.

2
pdxfedreply
lemmy.world

Just imagining Clippy in front of a cracked mirror, "jessss a little more rouge and you can't have too much mascara...."

9
lemmy.world

But if we are being honest, if you don't care about privacy, it is a good browser. Its better than chrome. You can check the performance of of both on the same machine. It also has better pdf rendering.

6
Zephorahreply
discuss.online

It’s trash. It front pages clickbait and bullshit, has no privacy, and with so many other options why bother?

13

I am not saying you should use it, i was addressing app quality. The original commenter wasn't talking about business practices but app quality. Which is why isaid "privacy aside". Privavcy is very important and i would never have someone use chrome or edge but that wasnt the topic.

7
Quazatronreply
lemmy.world

You could paint it gold with premium genuine alpaca leather interiors, and I would still not use it.

It's only function is to download a better browser.

5
lemmy.world

We started to use ad blockers in the early 2000s because no one could trust they were the 999,999 visitor to the website.

It sounded (and stills sounds) scammy.

49

It started with pop-up blockers.

Opera was the first major browser to incorporate tools to block pop-up ads; the Mozilla browser later improved on this by blocking only pop-ups generated as the page loads.[citation needed] In the early 2000s, all major web browsers except Internet Explorer let users block unwanted pop-ups almost completely. In 2004, Microsoft released Windows XP SP2, which added pop-up blocking to Internet Explorer. -Wikipedia

1
mander.xyz

Let me guess... Existing users are excluded from participating? Cause I ain't got no pop up banner anywhere. Or is cause I'm European?

36
Valmondreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

You're not as much excluded as not included (in the shortlist. Are you a relative to gates?).

5
beepreply
piefed.world

Are you sure?

I downloaded it 2 weeks ago and it had no auto updates warning.

1

I dunno? You had my upvote but I didn't follow the link. No auto update. RSS reader? :) The typo?

I'll now go give it a peek 😉

2

Wow, the days of dodgy toolbar extensions never truly went away. They just evolved to become part of your operating system.

The thing that actually baffles me about this is how this looks in the face of their next major competitor in the consumer market, Apple and their macOS.

macOS (or any other Apple product) has never (to my knowledge) had anything like this and it would be extremely out of character for Apple to suddenly change that. With all other manufacturers raising prices (including the Surface as of today) and the MacBook Neo directly competing with the mid tier PC laptops, this is what Microsoft decides to do?

At some point, one would hope that the average user starts to ask the question, can I have a computer that won't pull this bullshit on me? But I think unfortunately most typical users (especially anyone daily driving Edge) just think there's too much friction to move away from Windows, and so they stay, continuing to get fucked in the ass by megacorps.

But hey, I'm not in the running for a free car like them. Not like I'll install Edge onto my Mac or Arch Linux computer and sync my shit with OneDrive.

21
lemmy.world

Hey Microsoft, how about innovating instead? Edge is a Chrome engine browser like dozens of others out there. Why not write a new browser engine to give customers a choice? Or at worst, how about contract with Apple to license Webkit bringing a third solid choice for a browser engine to Windows. You're not going to out-Chrome Google Chrome browser, so stop trying.

20
lemmy.world

Thats the description of both Vivaldi and Brave browsers, which also haven't out-Chromed Chrome. Both are Chrome engine with built in ad blockers.

4

Exactly, the average person using installing browser add-ons. They want a lightweight, simple browser from a familiar brand that just works. Adblocking alone isn't enough to convince Average Joe to switch, when they don't even know that adblockers exist.

1

I'm gonna go out on a limb and play the devil's advocate. Edge actually makes a lot of optimisations and improvements that are merged into upstream chrome. While Microsoft is the shady corp that is forcing the ai garbage and data collection, the Devs are actually very competent.

Edge has one huge benefit which causes me to use it across Windows, Linux and even android and that is extension support on all even mobile. No other chrome based android browser has mobile extensions and a competent or seamless sync both figured out. I like being able to check something on my phone and seamlessly pick it up on any other device.

I like Vivaldi's workflow but they have yet to add mobile extensions.

6
lemmy.world

I'd need a reason to use Edge. If it used a different browser engine, that would be a compelling reason.

1

Did you use IE when it was still around? Edge is their “new” offering, because of how terrible their own engine was. Moving back to their own engine would be a step backwards.

5
Katana314reply
lemmy.world

Right now, Chrome is basically IE6. It rushes in standards with little compliance, bloats your memory, and everyone is forced to use it. All browsers are just skins, and if Google's recent Android moves are any indication, they'll likely close off source at some point so they can load it through with spyware.

In terms of making a bad situation slightly better, I'd be in favor of MS re-vamping their browser division. It has little to do with AI or murdering Palestinians though, so I doubt they will.

1
KairuBytereply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

As a web developer, I would happily support current chrome over literally any version of IE. It’s not even a contest.

The majority of standards are properly implemented in chrome, and it tends to be edge cases that are not. Whereas for IR you needed IE specific “hacks” to do a number of everyday things.

1

Of course they’re implemented properly in Chrome. They wrote those standards, and pushed them through without review. Hence why technologies like WebRTC and simple gradients had about 8 half-working implementations in Chrome, while the later IE team put a hand up and said “Hang on, let’s implement this the right way and agree on a spec.”

The way you describe IE-specific hacks was true up through around IE9. Once they got to Edge, they retired importance of major versions and insisted people auto-update their browser, getting companies off the idea of retaining an old browser for “compatibility”.

They were doing the right thing for a short time before the end. I suppose a lot of people didn’t even see that period.

2
Hanrahanreply
slrpnk.net

Edge is a Chrome engine browser like dozens of others out there. Why not write a new browser engine to give customers a choice?

they tried that with Edge 1.0

3

Writing your own rendering engine that works exactly like chrome, has the same features and preferably no exploits is not something you or even a big company can whack out in a week or so. You need to support js, css, html, hardware acceleration, https, certificate checks, support notifications, location, camera and mic, video play and a whole lot of other features you take for granted. A modern browser is light years away from the first browsers that came out around 2000.

1
baatliwalareply
lemmy.world

Bro yapping about something he knows fuck all about. MS has contributed a ton to upstream Chromium, from page rendering improvements to improved efficiency for battery consumption.

-5
leminal.space

Not about to listen to supposed expertise from a comment that begins with "Bro yapping", lmfaooo

-3

No need to trust. They gave very concrete references that would be easy to check.

1
lemmy.world

Microsoft is a very large lumbering giant that seems to lack a cohesive vision forward, especially on the consumer front. Every single piece of consumer facing software lacks a cohesive design language, and seems to be regressing in usability. No one is truly primed to replace them yet in either the corporate or consumer businesses however, something like the MacBook Neo can certainly take a few points of market share away from the standard consumer

17
frongtreply
lemmy.zip

This is what happens when they get MBAs in charge. Same thing happened at Apple. The original guy with a vision in charge (Gates, Jobs) goes away and the company suffers for it.

3
lemmy.world

What vission did Gates have beyond using money to crush competition? Being a pedophile?

3
4amreply

At the time of Gates, they wanted to monopolize the operating system market because that was the way to lock people in. People owned hardware and in order to make the most money your needs your OS to be their platform so they had no choice but to pay you.

Now in 2026 everyone’s OS is Chrome. So the goal is to make everyone depend on your cloud storage, on your productivity suite, on your chatbot, your automation platform, your cloud database. Then you give them just a state and then rent it to them in perpetuity.

This is why they don’t mind making RAM too expensive. Drives people to inexpensive devices and subscriptions for services for the hardware they can no longer afford and don’t have the skills to maintain.

6

Steal the best parts of every other system, make Windows easy to develop for, and corner the business market.

1

That’s the thing. You have to be some kind of influencer with followers on state backed social media to win.

Someone like MKBHD, to use one example, isn’t going to talk about the guy on Lemmy with no followers who won. He (or someone like him) might talk about a Twitter user with thousands of followers who won so they can cross traffic.

Microsoft and Google want you to use their browser so they can sell your data. Your data, on its own, isn’t worth paying you anything for. So they won’t do it. What contests like this pay for is organic exposure. Which people like us can never give them, which is why we don’t win things.

9

For years they ran a program to reward people for using Bing (they still technically do, but the payouts are next to nothing, maybe $5-10 worth of gift cards per year).

10 years ago you could accumulate a passive income of several thousand dollars per year by farming Bing Rewards, Perk (before that company went under) and a few other programs.

13

This disease is simply testing AI systems on your browsing data. It's trying to collect data from your services and analyze it with AI. That's all. If something is offering you big rewards, free services, or discounts, it's probably using you as material for its services.

12
feddit.org

Should you ever feel the urge to do something wild and stupid: yes, actually Microsoft offers an official Linux version of Edge.

10
Randelungreply
lemmy.world

Currently, for some inexplicable reason, Teams calls are broken on my Debian Trixie in all browsers except edge. I suspect foul play.

14

That's crazy. It must just be super easy considering it's chromium now.

3

I have edge installed on my steam deck, I used it to play bf6 on game pass before they jacked up the price last year.

2

Yes but they do zero tests on the build, if it compiles, it ships. For example it crashes if you try to open a file dialog and the copilot button is not working and can't be hidden

2
lemmy.nz

You know that edge injects a popup into the chrome download page begging you to use edge. It says something like "Hey dont you know that edge is actually built on Chrome as well and blah blah blah copilot AI"

8

Not in the slightest bit anticompetitive. Nope. Not at all. whistles

2

One of the last things I used to respect about Microsoft was when they kept up the development of their own rendering engine, even as Chrome ran away with its popularity. IE6 was a monster, but for a time MS was doing a good job as an underdog by pushing standards compliance. Even if it wasn't as nice as Firefox, it was important to have more horses in the game of competing browsers rather than creating a monoculture around Chrome.

Needless to say, the Edge appearing in this contest is nothing like what I ever had hope for.

8

"our browser is so good, we have to offer bogus prizes to get people to switch to it!"

8

Well, cars suck and 1million would be nice but still won’t but me a home where I live.

8

Native persistent pop-up that doesn't go away and stays on multiple tabs is truly the best way to advertisme your browser /s

6
reddthat.com

I used to use Edge at home, then ditched it. I used it recently at work and it is getting really enshittified. Now I'm between Cromite which works until suddenly the interface freezes, or Ungoogled Chromium which I haven't got to work on the work laptop (it works now on my home Linux so whatever).

Edge used to be so much better before today.

5
d3lta19reply
lemmy.ca

Try out Firefox. It works incredibly well

4
Kjellreply
lemmy.world

Or Librewolf, which is a fork from Firefox and removes the telemetry that Firefox collects.

3

That's too extreme for most people. A lot of people do want certain services to remember they logged in for example. Waterfox is typically the better recommendation - or, was. I'm less trusting of them after they chose to use Brave Browser code for an AdBlocker

3

Edge before it adopted Chromium was an excellent browser - fast, standards compliant, rock solid. Adopting Chromium is basically them doing the absolute minimum to ship a browser at all without showing someone else's logo. We use Edge at work - Chrome and Firefox are also supported - and it shocking how many MDM policies we have to have to make Edge usable.

1

I can use Edge. I offer cloud based edge user experience for $14.99 monthly. Microslop is free to reach out to me any time so we can hammer out an agreement. Smugface.jpg

3

How about you give me $1 Million AND the car, and I promise that I'll use Edge for an extensive* amount of time!

2

Win a car that may be will be spying on you (don't worry, no one will ever win the million dollars).

0
lemmy.world

I'm ok with being broke but still using Opera.

Yes I know it's Chinese compromised. Yes I know all tech company bent the knee to Trump. I just prefer Opera because edge is crap, Chrome is bloated, and I've never liked Firefox.

-1