Spyke
lemmy.world

He is objectively one of the people who has failed this moment.

316

Me out now! Me out now! Me out now!

He's either kicking himself out of office, or demanding his own sexual liberation.

9
sp3ctr4lreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I can only imagine the thought in his head is:

If I say this first, and loudest, it therefore cannot apply to me, because I called it out.

Fucking terminal shitlib brain; everything is optics, history and context don't exist beyond when I want to A/B test some rhetoric.

55
Serinusreply
lemmy.world

Good. If Cory Booker sees the way the winds are blowing and wants to start pushing in that direction, good.

You can tell Fox News is scared because when I googled his name, I got

Top stories - Fox News- Cory Booker confronted with old clip of himself saying he loves Donald Trump

(The context is that he's religious and loves all people, including his enemies, but of course they leave that out.)

12

Google knows who you are and tailors your search results for you specifically, so the top results on Google aren't an indicator of a general trend, it's what they think you'll click on and/or ads

4
sp3ctr4lreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

At this point... basically only on doddering idiot dem voters who still think Bill Maher is worth listening to.

... I wonder if there are more detailed numbers on how his viewership stats break down...

6
lemmy.zip

who still think Bill Maher is worth listening to

Still? Maher was always a smirking centrist bell end.

1

I mean, yes, but he's just gotten worse and worse, and as best I can tell, his viewer demographic is roughly the same people who think the New York Times represents 'reasonable progressivism' or something like that.

2
ExFedreply
programming.dev

For those of us who are legit unaware ... what did he do (or didn't do) to get put on the shit list?

8

He confirmed a handful of Trumps appointees (one is a relative of Jared Kushner IIRC). He also hasn’t really done anything to stop all this outside his 27 hour filibuster , which didn’t actually filibuster anything.

I’m not as angry as others are about Bookers statement here but he still hasn’t done much to stop anything.

10
lemmy.world

Aipac Shakur has done nothing. Him and Schumer are both pro Israel and have rolled over and not fought for much.

6

Objectively fucking hilarious.

This man has been responsible for stomping down the voices who seek to replace him. AOC, Mamdani, Ossof, Platner...keep naming them.

He is no different than Schumer. Fuck both of you.

131

Yeah that was all practice for his upcoming imminent presidential bid.

Don't worry he'll do the same thing to the people that came before him too.

5
sh.itjust.works

Yep, we all agree, he needs to be replaced or taken out of the leadership position. We will not forget that he and schumer voted to end the shut down we were winning for no reason that I can see.

72
lemmy.world

Voting Score - 65%

Left Score - 73%

It looks like Booker isn't necessarily good, but more everyone else is absolutely terrible. Unless I'm not understanding how these scores work?

Edit: after looking it over, a lot of money for Israel, confirming Trump selections, and Crypto shit. Otherwise solid.

22

When your nonprofit is declared a terrorist organization (for being anticapitalist), crypo is key to bypassing the PayPal donation blockaid.

See Wiki leaks and Occupy.

5

New Jersey is also Big Pharma central, and Booker is their main Democrat. So if you've got issues with medical care in US, Booker is your top dog shitlib.

1
pelespiritreply
sh.itjust.works

Well fuck, that's embarrassing. I thought they were the same guy until I just compared a video of Jeffrie and Booker. I guess I put them in the same category of shitty.

https://newrepublic.com/post/195475/cory-booker-democrat-vote-confirm-jared-kushner-father-charles

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/1/14/14262732/cory-booker-senate-democrats

To be clear, these guys don't need to be perfect, but they clearly are looking out for their own interests.

13
Devolutionreply
lemmy.world

Easy way to know the difference between the two. Booker is fucking Rosario Dawson.

Jeffries isn't.

1
lemmy.world

Motherfucker filibustered for over 24 hours, fasted in preparation to do so, only to undo every fucking word he spewed by voting in Trump's nominees.

64
lemmy.world

It wasn't a filibuster. No legislation was being held up. He just gave a long speech as a performance piece. People keep trying to say he had the longest filibuster, but it literally wasn't one.

78

He’s the 2nd most pathetic out of all the Dems besides Schumer. This dude only cares for appearing to do anything, but never actually does anything because he’s a bought centrist.

13

He also said that “purity tests” within the party have led to more division in the US.

What he's saying is he wants more Conservatives in the Democratic party.

F this guy and his failure of Democratic leadership.

38

Schumer's preference for centrist candidates

That is code for zionist first candidates. His extreme loyalty to Israel is disqualifying.

35
lemmy.world

"'I’ve called for a generational renewal, because this left-right divide is killing our country and our adversaries know it.' He also said that 'purity tests' within the party have led to more division in the US."

yeah this is kind of the opposite issue of what anyone competent would want to address with chuck schumer

28

Its also just complete horseshit.

Anybody remeber how David Hogg was actually trying to do this, 9 months ago, earlier than that?

And... basically 0 large parts of the Dem fundraising apparatus got involved in any way?

And... because Hogg tried to do this... he got ousted from his position in the party?

https://www.aol.com/david-hogg-pledged-unleash-20m-193729589.html?guccounter=1

You uh, you coulda said something at that point, Cory.

Flamethrowers for the ratfuckers, thats how they clean em up in the sewers of NYC, I hear.

23

He's not the worst, but he's definitely part of the problem. When he calls for new leadership, he really means give it to him, and he wouldn't be much better than Schmuckie Boy. He'd be just as Zionist, that's for sure.

If Booker becomes president, MAGA will be back in power 4 years later.

21

I'll stare directly at the sun, but never in the mirror

It must be exhausting always rooting for the anti-hero

3
lemmy.today

“Americans want a new generation of leaders that show that they can lift the whole country up,” Booker added. “It is time for a new vision of our country that is far more uniting that brings people together, doesn’t deepen divides.”

And I want to see the Epstein class in a supermax prison. You know, let them see the kind of prison system they advocate for first hand.

18

He desperately wants to be the Obama redux who shows he's the bigger man by just forgiving all the crimes of his opponents. He dreams of an America where a black Muslim immigrant can share a Pepsi with the tatted up ICE agent in army surplus sent to deport his family.

8
sp3ctr4lreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I want to see them literally in a supermax prison.

As in, structural components of the walls.

Toss em into the framing, who cares if they get impaled on the rebar, pour the concrete.

Better idea, don't do that with a prison, just make a new monument or something, the shame cube.

4

I like it, but bones don't have the best structural integrity. Maybe they can be encased in concrete sculptures on the roof?

4

If you smelt it you dealt it. Get out and make room for someone who actually gives a fuck

17
piefed.social

Senator Andy Kim countered accusations that the Democratic party is divided, saying “this is the most united I’ve ever seen the Senate Democrats,”

That's not a counter. Just because this is the most united he's seen the Democratic party does not mean that it is united. Divided is the natural state of Democrats. It the words of Will Rogers, “I’m not a member of any organized political party…. I’m a Democrat.”

15

Oh you mean Senator Andy Kim who voted to confirm Kristi Noem, Marco Rubio and Sean Duffy? That Andy Kim?

6

Just another example of Democrats acting like they oppose themselves in order to crush thier opposition.

15
8oow3291dreply
feddit.dk

So on one hand people here hate the Democrat leadership (with good reason). But now when this guy is speaking out against the Democrat leadership, you criticize them for internal division?

1

He's part of that leadership. He's part of the problem. We want real change for working people, he just wants to change who's getting the corporate bribes.

8

He wants to maintain the current right-wing leadership, not to put someone in charge who'd actually do anything differently. Replacing Schumer with another corporate stooge is a guaranteed way to continue losing elections and capitulating to MAGA.

7
Soupreply
lemmy.world

You have to actually listen and pay attention to more than the most absolute surface level stuff. He wants people who are worse.

The enemy of your enemy is not your friend if they’re just looking for a power grab. In fact, they could very likely be a lot worse.

5
8oow3291dreply
feddit.dk

Possibly - but the people here complaining were not very articulate about it...

-2

The Democrats always seem to be coopting the people's movements in order to dilute them and render them meaningless. People hate the Democrats. He's trying to coopt that energy into making the Democrats stronger so that people will feel like they did something and nothing will change.

1

Complaining about purity tests is often a dog whistle to say that the rights of minorities and women are expendable.

12

David Hogg was working towards exactly that until the DNC ousted him. God forbid politicians do any fucking work.

12

Yes the Dems need to be near completely replaced including this moron. Anyone not bare minimum left of center (and that starts at being against capitalism) needs to go.

11
lemmy.world

I wonder how many people are confusing booker and Jeffries. Is booker (senator from NJ) in a leadership role? While he sucks for his own reasons, if he wants to boot Schumer, I'm with him on that at least.

7

I have a very hard time watching Cory Booker speak. He over-emotes to the point of me feeling vicarious embarrassment.

3

Let me guess, he should be leader? Even though he's part of the leadership that failed the moment?

7

There is no leadership that can make a system designed from the ground up to screw workers and minorities in order to enrich billionaires work in the interests of workers and minorities. You can’t reform rot.

7

They need to come up with new and innovative ways to dump their entire base in favor of the mythical moderate center.

5

"We need new democratic leaders who are centrists unlike Hillary 'third way' Clinton, Joe 'tough on crime' Biden, and Kamala 'the cop' Harris."

4

Lmao democrats are actively complicit in this moment and the many countless moments in the past [pick a time range] that led to this moment

3

Yep I'm definitely out of it. My brain subbed in Doctorow and I was trying to figure out wtf he did to justify the comments...

2

In concept, he's right.

Democrats have spent far far far too much energy focusing on controversial wedge issues like gun control and trans issues.

If they focused on the issues that virtually all Americans can get behind, things like fixing our healthcare, getting corruption out of Washington and other parts of government, holding large corporations to account when they destroy our economy and ruin the environment, and overall making life and upward advancement affordable for average Americans, they would absolutely clean house in every election.

Instead they spend a ton of effort on things like gun control (which does nothing for their base but only alienates rural moderates and Republicans that might make the switch), and spend a ton of time getting bogged down in debates over stupid shit.

When that happens if they had a half a brain they would be doing table flip moments like why the fuck are we talking about which bathroom somebody uses when millions of Americans can't feed their fucking kids? Why are we obsessing over what kind of ID gets you into a voting booth when the middle class is dying? Why are we wasting billions of dollars in Iran when the same money spent here at home would fix healthcare or hunger or education? Are our own citizens not worth the time or expense? And why do we have national policies that encourage a CEO to amass more wealth than all of his hourly employees combined?
And if any of these things are important to us, why then could the Republicans as a minority grind the government to a halt under Obama, forcing us to negotiate with them, why can't we do the same? Why aren't we doing the same?

Get a bunch of Democrats to say this every time, every camera, every interview, and that they will stand up against their own party when it doesn't work to fix this, that's how you win elections.

2

Throwing everyone under the bus to safe ur own ass.. smooth criminal here

1