Spyke
lemmy.world

I have a strong feeling they won't be removing the spying, AI everywhere, ads, and bloatware. Microsoft views those as positives.

289

Tech has long been in the era of surveillance capitalism. Windows, Chrome, MacOS/iOS(iAds, NewsApp, notarization security, mediaanalysisd, and the most locked down hardware on earth), Android, the majority of all of the apps in the various walled gardens are all out to extract, analyze and monetize every aspect of our digital lives... which is a lot of our waking hours.

As users of these services we all need to ask ourselves if the companies who now make up the lion-share our retirement savings, who collectively dictate how we view and interact with the world really have anything but their own best interests in mind.

Most people would say no but "what am I supposed to do?". People really need to understand that power like the kind that these mega-corps have is only taken and basically never surrendered willingly. Vote with your dollars now and for as long as it takes to see the fall of these vile companies.

61

Seems they're figuring out you can't sell ads and AI on your platform if nobody wants to use your platform.

22

If Microsoft walks back their use of AI in the development of Windows, that would be a major admission of failure on their part.

But it will probably help prolong their market dominance a great deal. Because up until they started destroying their own OS, all they needed to do to remain on the top was literally nothing.

9

Okay, that's easy: remove all the LLM slop. That'll start fixing it. Then get the ads out of the UI. Get rid of the MS account requirement, and make all updates optional. For a stretch goal, go back to making an OS that only does what the user tells it to, and doesn't have any function to phone home without direct user input.

100
vrekreply
programming.dev

Think back... XP had many complaints at release too, wasn't till sp2 or sp3 it was actually decent.

14
lemmy.nz

You couldnt unzip 2 files at once. Not untill service pack 1.

2

I think there might be around 10 people in the whole world that has ever bought WinRAR. The rest of us just kept closing the nag box and used the free trial indefinitely.

3
lemmy.zip

I think W7 would be the very last option, everything after that has been shit, and getting worse. I still prefer XP though, except for the hideous UI.

2

Don't get me wrong, it is (Jesus, I have a hard time using this word for ANY Winblows, but I can't think of anything else before coffee) good, no real complains other than the ridiculous resources usage, and the UI certainly beats the hell out of XP. But resources use is my issue, unnecessary background shit running all the time, whereas XP remained way lighter. As I said, anything after 7 has been consistent crap and has just been getting exponentially worse.

Anyway, Linux and Gnu has been my life for way too long now. I only know about Winblows issues because I come in here and hear my circle of acquaintances complaining, which only makes me laugh because they choose to keep dealing with that crap when there are so many options.

3

That's the secondary goal. I feel like there's enough 3rd party tools to fix that, that I want the repairs done in the backend and trust power users and user-devs to handle the UX.

1

No there's not. I tried several things, for my use there's no fix. It's not the point though.

I think we want the same thing ♥️.

2
sopuli.xyz

I wake up to a bright flashing of my phone.

It is 3am, damn I forget to turn my phone to silent.

I can't resist the urge, who would text me this time of night??!?

"hey I have been thinking about you, you know I think we could work it out together. I will spend 2026 improving myself I promise. Please baby I miss you"

"go to bed Microslop, you are drunk and you are the one that wanted the divorce because you left me for Al" I text back frustratedly and turn my phone to silent.

89
lemmy.world

Marketing bullshit. Microsoft isn't going to actually reverse any of the enshittification it's inflicted on Windows.

If you don't have any customer mandated software that requires Windows, I'm looking at you AutoDesk, then do yourself a favor and go ahead take the week to install and learn Linux Mint.

59

Enshittification, as always, is the word here. It's important to point out because to disenshittify(?) the product would need to turn back the wheel, including profits. Line go down.

With all the other lines going down, they literally cannot course correct here in any way that would matter to the consumer to rebuild trust. So much of their model is built off of force feeding users and directing their behaviors, the thing they absolutely hate.

7
Vupwarereply
lemmy.zip

I’ve been wanting to install Linux, but I don’t have a drive large enough to back up my windows installation.

2

Do you really need the entire installation? Would only the user folder(s) (C:\Users) suffice?

Alternatively, you could install Linux mint on a large enough USB stick and run it off there, if you don't mind the longer read/write times. You'd also need to change the boot order for it too.

9

You can install on an external USB drive. As long as it's USB 3, there will be little performance difference vs an internal HD (SSD likely slower, but good enough for everyday work)

1

Rebuild trust?

  1. remove all telemetry
  2. remove all ai bullshit
  3. remove ads
  4. open source the whole code

Then, and only then, we might start to trust again.

57
lemmy.world

To add to this list

  1. Remove WebView apps. Eat our own dogfood and use MAUI.
  2. Go back to the classic Start Menu. Use API to make the whole UI available for customizations
  3. Get rid of the whole shitty "Settings" menu and go back to the Control Panel.
  4. Drop backwards compatibility for a bunch of crap. Stop pulling the 1980s forward, let that shit die.
  5. Address real modern issues with compatibility and performance with current CPUs
  6. Undo all the vibe coding.
  7. Focus on stability and performance, not trying to be "An experience". Windows runs apps, make it do that the best it can.
  8. For the love of everything holy, take a risk and modernize the OS. This goes back to 8. But as someone who makes Windows Server golden images for multiple platforms, FUCKING CHRIST. Having to use the Autounattend to even get anything started, and that's often (Even in Azure) just a minimal thing to get some client to do the real work, should tell you there's a problem. The Autounattend is poorly documented. I learned more from just building a basic VM on different providers and seeing what they figured out. I could write a god damn novel on the shortcomings of the initial installation and customization of Windows, but it's especially embarrassing for their Server platform
  9. Stop dropping support for the crap that works. Just so you can sell an inferior subscription version. WSUS being sunset is stupid. Having on-prem WSUS is always going to be faster and easier. You should focus on making that better instead of letting it limp along and then "Oh, we have an overpriced and slower option!" Get bent.
  10. Azure Local is a really fucking cool idea. That was an god awful pricing as far as I can tell. But neat.
19
infosec.pub

I thought of some of those, but decided to add my point (4) and allow the community to do it right.

3
kylian0087reply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Please dont do step 4. Devs will get heart attacks left and right if they see that piece of shit code.

5

No, it's a long-known fact that the Windows code has been shit for decades. That's been known since at least XP days I think. Pretty sure I first heard about it on TechTV

2

They can't open source their code because then people would rather rapidly discover all the backdoors they've built in for various US LE and Intelligence agencies.

1
lemmy.ca

Rebuild trust… by integrating more mandatory and default-on server-based features?

51

Migrating users might be a few, but they rarely go back. A few users monthly eventually become a lot!

8
lemmy.zip

They'll never read nor act on this feedback, but here's my list:

  • drop the AI
  • drop the ads
  • stop pushing services, namely cloud
  • stop requiring Microsoft accounts

Honestly win10 was great when it dropped. Not sure why we needed 11.

43

To be fair, I think they knew that. Which is why they said up front that windows 10 was the last windows you'd need. And then for some reason they kept going...

6

Somehow my 11 feels that way, being in EU, having it installed with the W7 license key that came with my laptop. Still, there are bugs that seem ludicrous to me, from a company like them, especially in the file explorer that cannot manage keyboard shortcuts properly when you move between tabs, or that don't highlight the proper file or folder you've selected. Same thing with how buggy Excel has become, especially with rendering when you switch between multiple files. Selections are offset from were the mouse is, that's crazy. Best solution I've found is a quick CTRL-N, CTRL-W that seems to reset it. Anyway, I've been using windows since 2.0 on MS DOS 3.30 or 5.0, Excel for about 20 years most of my life at work, and things are really not improving.

2
aussie.zone

Rebuilding trust for most companies means some bullshit marketing campaign. New catch phrase. Some promotion. It rarely means admitting fault and changing direction. It would take something really huge for that to happen. Perhaps a combination of AI bubble burst, leadership change, shareholder revolt.

Everything anti-consumer in Windows is a deliberate choice aimed at extracting more revenue from customers. This isn't unique to Microsoft. They exist to make money for their shareholders.

If like me you think a lot of companies have been incredibly short sighted and are burning their brands and customer loyalty for short term gains, just look at the stock prices. Short termism is making a killing for tech companies while the rest of the economy is treading water. Is it sustainable? I don't think so. Does it matter for Microsoft or any of the other tech companies?

I have been a customer of companies that were awesome for years then sold out and their prices sky rocketed. They were clearly bleeding customers but every time they did they just put the price up more. Some people always stay for some reason. This can go on for years. As long as they keep screwing people faster than people leave they are probably making a lot more money in the short term than they would have made with a longer vision. That is business these days. People aren't building products for the long term anymore. Now that thinking seems to have moved to companies. Modern business leaders are about gobbling revenues up like a locust plague then moving on to the next pasture.

42

I read the statement as 'We're going to stop announcing controversial changes and spend more money on propaganda firms who will fill your social media with fake users who have a bunch of stories about how trustworthy Microsoft is'

11

Some people always stay for some reason.

It's because they have such a huge market share that people don't even realize there are alternatives. Or the alternatives are so far behind that they're not really a viable option for most. What's the alternative to Microsoft? Apple who also sucks, or Linux which is really hard to get into for the average person. What's the alternative to streaming? Buying physical media, which is going away, or pirating and hosting your own shit. What's the alternative to Amazon? Buying locally, but you have to get off your ass and the costs are going to be much higher and it's going to be difficult to find a lot of niche items. Especially now that a lot of malls are dead. There's countless other examples but those are the main ones that came to mind. These companies just have built up so much inertia in people's lives that it's going to be a long while before they feel the effects of their enshittification. There's also a factor of a lot of people just do not think very hard about the products they buy. I've watched people by cars on a whim for fucks sake. They see an ad for something and it gets in their brain that they need to have it or think that a product must be better because it is more expensive without much critical evaluation. I think the economy going to shit is going to hit these companies worse than the consequences of their own actions will for a long time.

1
lemmy.ca

MS is about to learn how hard it is to build trust in commercial markets, and why it's a terrible decision to set that on fire for a short term profit. Honestly, it's hard to find a better example of a company that had a more comfortable and ideal position in their market, that just decided to disrupt itself without any pressure or prompting. You wanna gamble, you gotta be ready to lose.

35

Man… :( please don’t do that. That’s super boring. They were doing so great pushing people to use Linux.

33
lemmy.world

It should not be hard to browse local files on a computer. 

27
Insekticusreply
aussie.zone

Thanks. I think I just puked in my mouth.

"Everything will be a service. You will own nothing. You will accept this reality"

8
freedomreply
lemy.lol

You will not just accept, you will embrace. You will feel cold and empty when you taste freedom, for you will not understand it or know what to do with it.

4
lightnsfwreply
reddthat.com

I mean, kind of. Not owning anything or being able to do what we want with our PCs will really free up a lot of time for other hobbies such as hunting billionaires for sport.

4
lemmy.ml

Microslop is going to spend 2026 improving Windows 11.

Why bother? Just upgrade everyone to Windows 10.

25

Not like that. More like building trust by like telling you "trust us bruh". See how we did that? See how by calling you bruh we sound more down to earth and trustworthy?

5
lemmy.sdf.org

It seems like we’re at a real turning point for Linux adoption. I’m an Apple nerd, but I love seeing people switch to Linux and write about what a (mostly) positive experience it is. Cheers to my fellow nerds getting off the screaming pile of garbage MS if forcing on people who just want a computer that works.

20

After a win11 forced updated made my nontech 75 years old father laptop nearly useless he ask me if linux could give it a second life i’ve been a user for at least 15 years so i was more than happy to install it

His laptop is like a new one sure he had to learn a little after so long on windows but it’s mostly really user friendly now except for some minor problem everything work out of the box (wifi,bluetooth,printer etc)

I doubt microslop could ever get most new linux user back once they get the hang of it

8

Translation: They going to try to “marketing” their way out of this hole.

Nothing about Windows or Microsoft will fundamentally change.

17

Don‘t forget the bribes! They‘ll bribe their way back into government ministries that ditched them in no time because Macroslop is just reliable like that.

2
lemmy.world

Maybe if they keep making it worse and worse it will kind of circle back to good.

16

“I see you’re trying to edit this config file and respect your choice to do so. May I take this task over from you? No wait, I’ll make a test run and save it elsewhere for review. No wait, that’s too forward of me, I’ll delete it instead.

Come to think of it I’ll delete myself as well, goodbye”

clanker.exe terminated

9

Unfortunately, if the gaming community has taught me anything, it's that standards drop along with industry quality.. all it takes is waiting out the old people and giving garbage to the young people who don't know any better, and taking away all other options

2
lemmy.world

Good luck with that - you would need to scrap the entire operating system.

16
lemmy.world

There was a theory that Microsoft could just release a Linux distro with a first party windows skin on it

5

If planned obsolescence wasn't a concern this would be a decent way to improve - use the Linux kernel, ported or recreated interface and a compatibility layer for games or whatever it is that keeps people on Windows.

1

They can't scrap their whole operating system: the only thing keeping people on Windows is its backwards compatibility.

1

Reminds me of Vault 111, where the overseer is the friendly dictator that knows best and should never be questioned. Seems like a fitting version number

2

lol

Lmao, even

Also, hi from bazzite, which runs the vast majority of games I’m interested in flawless, and usually with even better performance than W10 (let alone W11)

14

… but it was already too late. They alienated their users completely and Linux is soooo nice.

13

Too late for me. But thanks for telling me my computer wasn't good enough for Win 11 and forcing me to install Linux. It was a breeze, and computing is fun again.

13

and computing is fun again.

I agree 100%. I've been trying to put my finger on why.

Maybe it's because using Linux doesn't feel adversarial?

Maybe it's because Tux Racer comes pre-installed with some distros and brings a whole vibe?

Maybe it's the software center that prominently displays a warning for anything that isn't completely free in either price or freedom?

The Linux Software Center feels like my happy memories of getting to spend $5.00 in a 10 cent candy shop.

Maybe it's because it is where many librarians, educators and free thinker gather, and their fingerprints are on everything?

Sorry for the random walk comment. I just keep thinking I should figure out the elevator pitch for why Linux feels more fun.

6

Next week:

“We’ve listened to your feedback and have made the hard decision. Copilot will henceforth bear the likeness of Clippy”

13
lemmy.world

Hey Satya, just give us Win10 back and fuck off, you bald fraud.

13
scalareply
lemmy.ml

We have that. It's called Linux

6

I use both Windows and Ubuntu/Mint for personal use, WSL for personal dev environment (because MS SQL Server on Docker limits what I do), Ubuntu/Redhat for dev/test/prod environments.

I like Linux but it can be a hassle with little things so Windows.

1
phlegmyreply
sh.itjust.works

Nah, windows 10 was still sluggish spyware/adware.

I would only ever consider switching back to windows if they updated windows 7 with the latest kernel/security updates.

No apps, ads, ai, or shitty UI frameworks.

A functioning offline-only search, a cohesive/responsive UI, and control over if/when updates get installed.

1

Thought about that but some newer storage and network connections may not be supported.

1

The problem is upper management. Without touching that there is no hope for improvement.

12
lemmy.ml

I personally just want a glorified calculator (that works on text too) I can trust in doing what I tell it to do. And not some "experience" that does all kinds of unspecified things in the background. But that's just me.

11
Mist101reply
lemmy.world

Wait, so you're telling me Dell that you don't want their new AI laptop? But it's how those ahead get, uh, behind, or whatever the buzz phrase is now.

6

The phrase used to be like "move fast and crash" or something similar.

2

Let me guess: instead of improving their products, they're going to get the US security industrial complex to silence the critics.

10

See and this is why they are losing so much trust, even a child can tell you its 7, 8, 9, 10 and not 7, 8, 8.1, 10

2
lemmy.world

I guess I have to thank MS for pushing me into using Linux Mint. And I love it.

10

They were so successful in pushing, I installed Linux Mint on my 3 PCs, laptop, wife's laptop and friends laptops. Not a single complaint so far (it's been about a year).

2

Microsoft is working to rebuild trust in their turd prison

Ooohh wow, they are? I'm so happy about that, I can't wait to get my hands on their turd and be told what to do and be limited to only their wishes and pay them through the nose!

I mean who wouldn't want to work with a vibe coded piece of shit that can only run on the most expensive hardware? Who wouldn't trust a company who left security holes open for half a year causing the US government to be hacked by China, just because they didn't wanted to look bad nad potentially lose money?

The company that constantly non stop has done everything to get themselves more money, at the cost of software quality l, consumer sanity and everything good since it's founding some 5 decades ago is now telling me they really do care about me? The company that wants to add advertising into fucking basic software like operating systems juuuuust to squeeze some more money out of decades old products, that wants to monitor your every move so they can use and sell your data, wants .... Me? They real care about me, the end user?

Go get pounded by a bag of umbrella dicks you motherfuckers

9

Yah, that's bullshit. They hate their users and want them dead but buying things somehow.

7

Hey Microslop use Cortana to replace your shit CEO and the whole C-Suite

7

... genuinely, how can they possibly expect to regain or have any trust after turning W11 into a constant wiretap via Copilot, that spams ads all up in your OS in every place, and then also just handing over the bitlocker master keys to the FBI?

You would have to be very uninformed or delusional at this point to think that Windows and privacy/security exist in the same universe.

The only thing they have going for them is inertia.

And they're now hitting the point where backlash against them is snowballing much faster than they could possibly reverse course on their own internal inertia and actually make any real changes.

And yes that applies to their consumer facing shit as well as B2B.

6

Don't forget competition, Linux has been gaining market share year over year

2
lemmy.ca

Ha. I thought this was from The Onion the first time I scrolled past it. What a hilarious joke. I hope it back fires so people and countries continue moving away from Windows.

5

The biggest problem is that even if they fix it, it will take ages for the people that left to believe it is actually fixed. We can't take MS's word for it... And even then we will have no trust they won't just slip right back into this hellscape a couple years (or months) down the line.

5

Fire your current dipshit in chief, issue abject apologies and realise you peaked with 7.

4
lemmy.world

My 4 part plan to put Microsoft back on track.

1: Re-open support for Windows 10 until at least 2 years after the release date of the next version of Windows.

2: Commit to making the next version of Windows less intrusive, cleaner, more reliable, and a small as technically possible.

3: Fully fund the open source projects that Microsoft relies on for their products.

4: Make Co-pilot an optional toolkit that runs in the background, with tight, easily configured controls and hook-ins to other applications and data.

Please put me in charge of Microsoft. I'll do it for a measly 10 million dollars a year. You'll save so much on my salary alone, you practically can't afford not to hire me.

4

Win10 is dead. There no going back.

There’s no next version. It’s all iterative.

I agree that they should lean into open source though.

2
lemmy.ca

Looking back, these will be the times that trump destroyed america and microsoft destroyed itself. Maybe america destroyed itself and trump was nothing more than the guy who squeezed the pimple.

4

one quiet “merp merp” from a three-foot tuxedo in the back of an otherwise completely silent and unimpressed audience

3
mesareply
piefed.social

Probably. just remember windows 10 is the last OS you will ever need. MS assured us :D

9

"That was a typo, we meant it's gonna be the last Windows you'll ever want, not need" -Microsoft probably.

1

Microslop has been a rotten cesspool since it's birth. 50 years of consistently fucking over it's customers, then promising to change followed by more screwing so please forgive me when I say to this Don't... Talk ... Shit ...

3

why even bother, windows isnt even 10% of their income. Just milk that cow and try to not let everyone know that azure is all running linux.

2

I hate Windows, always did, always will. My final trial with that garbage system was last April when I installed Fedora on a bootable thumb drive. I might be one of the few people left who couldn't care less what microsoft does. Here's hoping they only make decisions that make people trust them less.

2

They shouldn't have done their update today then. My fonts look like ass.

2

I haven't had any trust since in Windows since about mid Windows 7 and that was probably unfounded.

2

I wouldn't. Why would I bother at this point. Their commitment is to making money, not customers.

7

"super stable, backward compatible system without "AI"" Sounds like Linux 😁

3

Same song and dance since at least Windows me. Overtime it keeps getting more bloated and focused on advertising. If you got to use Windows at work, it is what it is but at home, get over it and switch to Linux already. It’s very clear that all the complaining of the world has little chance to ever get Windows to be what people want it to be

2

That is corporate speak for Microsoft is going to spend millions on a PR campaign.

2

Way too late, at least for me.

I've switched over to CachyOS on three devices. My main laptop, a spare laptop(for the wife to try), and a gaming PC. All three are great and easy to use. No stupid pop ups, no AI, and I don't have to worry about it not booting up compared to Windows(which this was the opposite 10 years ago!).

At this point even if they make a great OS and call it Windows 12 I have zero faith that they won't reverse and make Windows 13 terrible.

At least with Linux I have a dozen or so options to choose from and they all work just fine. So if CachyOS becomes terrible(doubt) then I'll switch to something else.

At this point Windows needs to go above and beyond and be stable for YEARS and multiple versions before I switch back, which big doubt.

1

It's definitely fucking not doing that. It may say that it's going to work hard on it's problems but like any 'too big to fail' monopolistic piece of shit company, they're going to continue doing whatever the fuck they want and ignoring their end users.

1