Spyke
87Sixreply
lemmy.zip

Every day I learn a new word from you intelligent fucks

25

I was thinking that, then I saw Hannah Montana in S, so it can't be little-endian

9
Morphitreply
feddit.uk

I heard they replaced snaps with their own package format.

15

It's a bit shifty though, the packages are all over the place and you need to actually look for and vet package vendors instead of just trusting one for-profit company to handle it all and not enshittify.

9

Did you know that Ubuntu actually started as a Hannah Montana Linux spinoff?

3

::: spoiler sudo apt install sudo apt install deez nuts -y # haha gotte :::

3

It's where the name comes from, yes. Ian and his then girlfriend Deborah.

I knew neither.

2
lemmy.ml

I get what Canonical was going for with snaps but wow did they ever ruin Ubuntu's reputation. It used to be the clear choice for anyone who wanted a generic Linux where you don't have to configure everything yourself. Sure some people didn't like Unity but the core distro still worked well and was stable. With snaps, package management has become more complex than other distros while decreasing performance if memory limited (and who isn't nowadays). The number of times I've had something not work in the "stable" snap package is far too many, and it's pretty much always fixed by installing the same package with apt.

I get the reasoning for sandboxing applications, but they needed to wait until it was more stable to make the default. At this rate I doubt we're ever going to get a truly mainstream desktop Linux distro rivaling macos and Windows...

21
lemmy.world

In my opinion, Linux Mint has filled this gap. If anyone asks its a good recommendation to ensure they don't have to jump through hoops to get a stable system out of the gate. Essentially the stability of debian and usability of Ubuntu without snap

15

100%. It's the goto starter distro for good reason. Ux is familiar, and it works ootb.

They've also got the LMDE, which is mint based on Debian rather than Ubuntu. Haven't tried it personally, but I've heard good things from people who are determined not to touch anything Ubuntu adjacent for whatever reason, whilst still providing an ootb environment that is stable and ux friendly.

Ubuntu is Debian based anyway, so I'd imagine parts of Ubuntu have been pulled out to bridge the gap between Debian and mint, but given mint are anti snap; that's something that definitely wouldn't be copied over to LMDE (and like you pointed out, is disabled in standard mint anyway).

4
evolreply
lemmy.today

Yeah it also created yet another distribution method which is annoying. We have wayy to many in Linux

5
evolreply
lemmy.today

Reminds me to make a new distro that has the one True package manager

6

I liked unity when they were trying to do interesting changes. I especially liked the attempt at making apps work with the menu at the top of the screen instead of the top of the window (Mac OS style).

When they gave up on that, it became pointless with nothing useful to add.

2
BenjiRenjireply
feddit.org

What were they going for with snaps? I'm really not trying to be snarky. I genuinely don't understand why my favorite OS that has become more and more stable and usable since I first started using it, has now switched to this crap. I now need to reconfigure snap profiles to make normal usage possible? Wtf!

I need to switch.

3

Snaps bundle dependencies and sandbox applications. The dependencies aspect is what matters more to me, but apparently there's also security benefits if you were to try to install a malicious program.

You can remove snapd, doing so also removes a number of built in apps. But at that point you may start questioning why you're not just using Debian stable and add the stuff you want. Both of these options pretty much defeat the point of what Ubuntu was.

2

OP forgot to put the legends: S - Sucks Ass A - Ass B - Barely C - Ckinda mid D - Dope F - For Real For Real

18
feddit.org

Huh, apparently Lemmy tries to turn that into a Lemmy link (and fails)? Both Voyager and web appear to turn it into some variant of instance.tld/nyarchlinux.moe

The actual link should be like this: Nyarch

Unless that breaks too? IDK what happened here.

2

Why is the best in red and worst in green? I never understood this rating scheme's color choices.

3
slrpnk.net

It's because the meme format comes from Japan. Red is a lucky color, and S is the highest grade you can get there. It's similar to how they associate white with funerals, so brides wear red for luck instead.

3

idk, im used to it now. but when tierlists first got popular i thought S was the worst

2

It’s not suppose to be. Typically S Tier would be considered the highest ranking, the colours are certainly throwing it off.

1

I see you are not serious about the list. If you were you'd have red star Linux and justin Bieber Linux up there with Hannah Montana Linux and amogOS

2

I give this tier list an S for not including the only distro that deserves its own tier below F:

2

Would be better if specifically Windows 11 and 8.1 were at top of S tier above the other versions

+Windows Me. Still the GOAT

1

I barely remember WinMe...

As I installed over it with 98SE on a laptop. Didn't even hear the screaming.

2
lemdro.id

It's an automatic downvote for not including NixOS, despite having other niche distributions on the list (what even is the one at C tier?). Also, Windows? That is not even closely related to the Unix family of operating systems, let alone a Linux distribution.

-7