Spyke

Maybe if billionaire oligarchs fall out of windows and the world keeps turning, billionaire oligarchs weren't really needed either.

116
lemmy.world

Funny enough an AI would do his type of job very well. Spout bullshit and hallucinate an outcome, with just enough factual information to sound plausible. Sounds like a ceo to me.

101

in idiocracy, the AI controls the society , no bosses, no csuites, no middle management but it built its "AI" on stupid peoples experiences.

5

Self awareness at an all time low there Sammy boy….

54
lemmy.world

Well then say goodbye to all the CEOs. I’m sure an LLM could figure out how to do a better job than them and they have no golden parachutes either!

41
Frezikreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

One argument is that CEOs exist to take the blame when things go wrong. You can only do that once with an LLM, and then everything goes back to a human.

5

Yes. Line goes down, it's their fault.

They get a golden parachute, yes, but their purpose is to take that golden parachute.

3
lemmy.world

Jobs. Get.

I guess Yahoo’s headline writing AI doesn’t understand subject verb agreement. Unless Altman is talking about Steve Jobs, who is dead.

35

If billionaires meet Luigi, maybe they weren't even real people to start with?

26
lemmy.ca

look I love to shit on AI, but this is a fucking terrible misleading headline

The thing about that farmer,” Altman said, is not only that they wouldn’t believe you, but “they very likely would look at what you do and I do and say, ‘that’s not real work.'”

This, Altman said, makes him feel “a little less worried” but “more worried in some other ways.”

“If you’re, like, farming, you’re doing something people really need,” Altman explained. “You’re making them food, you’re keeping them alive. This is real work.” But the farmer would see our modern jobs as “playing a game to fill your time,” and therefore not a “real job.”

“It’s very possible that if we could see those jobs of the future,” Altman said, we’d think “maybe our jobs were not as real as a farmer’s job, but it’s a lot more real than this game you’re playing to entertain yourself.”

25

Reading it like this: He is right. But my conclusion is most likely very different to the one OpenAi is offering. Thinking of David Graeber.

2

I'm so sad to see the best possible way to legitimize a Universal Basic Income being wasted

11

And here I thought it was going to be him referencing Graeber in a way that indicates he never read the full book or understood its point. But nope, dumber.

Altman, if the masses are unemployed and you're fabulously wealthy, well, read a history book to see what happens.

6

If jobs replaced by LLMs and image generators aren’t real work, then what work did those steal from?

4

He's right. AI isn't doing a good job anyway. If a company can """replace""" (cut) jobs like that and survive, the position is useless.

The question is, is it truly so? Or did this move start the company's doomsday clock?

4

Looking at most of the comments, it seems reading past the headline isnt real work either, as no one wants to do it... lol.

3

Not with that kind of headline, no.
Great, so now I did read it and it was a waste of time. I blame you Bunny Boy.

3

You reached the end

Sam Altman Says If Jobs Gets Wiped Out, Maybe They Weren’t Even “Real Work” to Start With | Spyke