Spyke
slrpnk.net

While I wouldn't wish this on anyone, it's amazing how self-destructive this is. Greta is an internationally famous activist. Flagrantly violating and abusing a person with world renown - along with dozens of other activists - is a radically stupid way to hasten international isolation.

It is well known by most in Israel that the country simply cannot function in isolation. It will lead to collapse. In this, they are giving the flotilla far more power to eventually overthrow the ruling regime.

517
plz1reply
lemmy.world

They just assume Uncle Sam will bail them out, no matter what. They are not wrong, much to the frustration of a large portion of the US population.

232
quokk.au

I actually don't think that's true. One of the rare bright spots in Trump's generally unbroken record of catastrophe is that he is so unpredictable, and generally gives so little of a shit what happens to anyone outside himself, that the chances of Israel suffering some kind of great consequence and the US not bailing them out as we always do are greatly increased right now I think.

Also, yes, I think this is possibly the greatest fuckup Israel could possibly have committed right now. It may be what finally turns the tide against them, after so many decades of nothing. Outside of literally nuking Gaza or Iran or something, I honestly can't think of anything worse for them than physically brutalizing a universally popular Western media personality for literally no reason at all.

44
MisterOwlreply
lemmy.world

Problem is, she's not popular with the type of people who vote for Trump. His demographic would take Israel's side on this one.

17
quokk.au

I wasn't really thinking of them as part of "the Western world" tbh. I do understand that there's a loud contingent for whom she's just a stupid loudmouth FEMALE, maybe that is a fly in the ointment of my argument. I do think it'll still have a pretty significant impact.

9

TBF, if most of the Western world was not either tacitly or loudly supporting imperialism and having violence as virtue we wouldn't be in such a mess. Israel is a Franco-British creation nurtured by the USA, their first-born...

1
lemmy.world

Thats on borrowed time. Money to isreal is one of the only issues left and right agree with. Someone is going to take advantage of that eventually and isrela is gonna get disconnected from the US teet

21
4amreply
lemmy.zip

I know you are probably American, so am I.

We need to stop calling the Democrats the “left” party. They’re not.

14
nogooduserreply
lemmy.world

Isn’t it relative though? They’re left of the Republicans so they are the left most choice Americans have.

0

No because left means anti-capitalist. The Democratic Party is not anti-capitalist. Therefore, the Democratic Party is not a left party.

However, they are a neoliberal party. Which, when compared to the Republican Party's existence as a fascist party, does certainly make the Democrats preferable. But just because they are preferable does not mean they are left

7
redsandreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Uncle Sam has Congestive Heart Failure. Their position is tenuous to be generous.

5
arrow74reply
lemmy.zip

If only it were that simple. The US still has an insanely powerful military. Historically a nation in decline, with an unpredictable leader, and a strong military is not very good for the world

2

Rapidly shrinking and disabling that military. None of it matters though. We picked a doomsday, AI weapons.

0
shani66reply
ani.social

They've deliberately attacked the American Navy before and nothing came of it.

49

Insane. If this were any other country we'd glass the entire continent, but for a bunch of worthless nazis? We bend over backwards to help them even more. Infuriating.

3
kadureply
scribe.disroot.org

While I wouldn’t wish this on anyone, it’s amazing how self-destructive this is. Greta is an internationally famous activist. Flagrantly violating and abusing a person with world renown - along with dozens of other activists - is a radically stupid way to hasten international isolation.

You'd be correct most of the time, but this is Israel we are talking about. They know there won't be any consequences because claiming they did something wrong must mean you're a nazi, and even if you get over that, daddy USA is there to protect them anyway.

Israel could livestream a soldier killing Greta and they would face no consequences whatsoever.

79

They've gone so far over every red line that it literally doesn't matter anymore at this point. They're literally destroying an entire population - genocide - in full view of the world. What is some maltreatment of an activist in the face of all that? If indiscriminately bombing preschools and blowing up children with drones doesn't manage to do it, what will?

68
NABDadreply
lemmy.world

There are reports from American doctors who worked in Gaza of Palestinian babies being regularly shot in the head.

That was reported during the Biden administration.

Israel is murdering babies, and it hasn't affected their support. Why would this matter?

67

Palestinian babies

Plenty of people in The West^R^ don't consider them worthy of empathy, but a white woman of small stature who first became famous as a child might be a different story. We need a mass worldwide cultural shift to identifying all humans as part of the in group or we aren't going to make it through this century.

33

I should clarify what I mean a bit.

I'm not saying that brutalizing Greta Thunberg is the straw that is going to break the camel's back. I'm saying that it's an escalation of a pattern of behavior that I think is very likely leading toward a collapse of the zionist project at some point in the next decade.

The testimony of those doctors is absolutely part of the same pattern of behavior. And while a lot of folks have looked at the continuing genocide and concluded that clearly, nothing has mattered and nothing will, I believe it has, and it will.

It's hard to describe succinctly, but Israel today is far, far, FAR weaker than Israel 5 years ago. There is an inertia that lets them feign invincibility, but the country is truly in times without precedent. The longest war since its establishment was 118 days in '82. So much of the assumptions on which Israel relies -- constant readiness, bipartisan US support, the total support of Europe, constant Jewish immigration, a strong labor force, a booming tourism industry -- is in shambles. Internal divisions are rending their society apart. Their economy, international influence, and social institutions are in crisis.

In this context, this continued loss of an ability or willingness to be discrete in their atrocities really does bolster my conviction that in the next five years the country is going to collapse.

Unlike many, I don't say this lightly or with glee. I just say it because it's what I foresee.

7

Remember when Elon Musk did a nazi salute on the world stage for all to see? Remember how we were trying to rationalize what the hell he was thinking? The simplest answer is that nazis at some point just can't help themselves and they end up saluting because they love doing it, they just need to show people who they are.

Same logic I think applies here. Yes it is self-defeating, yes, it is stupid, and yes, it is gratuitous and dangerous. But these people working Ben Gvir's prisons? This is who they are. It's horrifically simple. The people working the Israeli prison system are low level functionaries of apartheid. These are not people who think in terms of strategy etc. If they had the capacity to think like that they wouldn't be there. It's as simple as that.

/Edit: typos

58

With some of the politicians in power these days, it will be pushed as finally putting an end to her climate lies or some other bullshit culture war topic.

28

If trying to exterminate a whole population did not do anything, I doubt abusing Thunberg will change things

17
sp3ctr4lreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Genuienly, how is it self destructive?

Is this the red line that's going to result in...

... anything negative happening to Israel?

Probably not, no.

What, is somebody go to war with Israel and the US over Greta, not hundreds of thousands being starved shot blown up and lit on fire?

10
Andyreply
slrpnk.net

I answered this in reply to another comment at greater length, but I'm describing this as a pattern of behavior that I think has already set Israel on a course for collapse in several years.

3

It's not. Nothing will change, the west will keep supporting israel while pretending not to

9

It is intentional. They want to flaunt their power. Look at what we can do and nobody will stop us.

9

There's also a considerable portion of the world who hates Greta and is probably cheering them on. The first news story I saw pop up about Greta being kidnapped said Israel was doing the world a favour...

6

You make a good point. I think sadly it will not rise to the point of actual effect. It will inflame people who support her, and those folks are likely already inflamed over Gaza. Many others don’t give a shit about her or actively hate her, and they will either gloss over this or say “that’s what you get” or even “good.”

My own mother, who is a feminist and wildlife advocate, loves to repost FB memes about her being an unrealistic virtue signalling twat who perfoms a low-carbon image while still not living up to the humble standards of the elbow-grease-powered older generations. It’s sad. Greta is incredibly polarizing, and some people just hate her for being young and idealistic.

On the whole I don’t see this affecting anything. We live in an era of mutually exclusive mental models of reality and they can be incredibly well insulated.

5
52fightersreply
lemmy.sdf.org

We also have no evidence any of this happened. It is easy to make propaganda when we want to believe it.

-2
Andyreply
slrpnk.net

The beating and flag kissing is sourced to another captive, and might be exaggerated, but her general mistreatment was reported by Swedish diplomats after speaking to her. It's pretty credible, imo.

2
52fightersreply
lemmy.sdf.org

Do we have any sources that aren't biased toward making her treatment look bad?

1
Andyreply
slrpnk.net

Respectfully:

Are you genuinely interested in exercising neutral skepticism? Or are you just arguing on the Internet against claims that run counter to your preferences for what you'd like to be true?

(Be honest.)

1
0x0reply

neutral skepticism?

Not OP but yes.

But it really doesn't matter. All we'll get from this incident is word-of-mouth only.
Those nazis are brazen but not stupid, they didn't film it.

1
52fightersreply
lemmy.sdf.org

I sincerely believe that the world is a lot less extreme than what social media is telling us. Exceptions, yes, but those are exceptions. Most of the discussion that takes place anymore is driven by sociologically hacking us, done by interested parties to drive division and distrust. It happens on all sides. That doesn't mean you should drop your support for peaceful protest, aid delivery, etc., but it does mean we should be aware of propaganda and manipulation that confirms our own biases. The effect of the rush to extremes is that we then create extreme situations. The world is getting uglier and uglier, largely driven by this problem.

1
Andyreply
slrpnk.net

Does this cut both ways? Because I agree with what you: we should not reflexively believe sensationalist claims because they reinforce our preferred view of the world.

But under the exact same logic, we also should avoid dismissing sensationalist claims because they contradict our preferred view of the world.

Being aware of the manipulation you mentioned, and the fact that forces are trying to manipulate you in both directions on this issue... do you have any credible reason to dismiss testimony by Greta Thunberg to a Swedish diplomat regarding the treatment she experienced?

1

Sensationalists claims stop being sensationalist when they are confirmed with objectively verifiable facts. That's when claims should be accepted. Until then, the burden of proof is on the one making the claim.

1
guyreply
piefed.social

It is also probably not true. Especially if one consider what you pointed out

-11

The article attributes it's claims to credible sources. Do you have evidence to the contrary, or just believe what suits you?

1
sopuli.xyz

She’s still a little kid. They made her suffer.

I think that's needlessly infantilizing her. She's 22. She's not a "little kid". I think she's old enough for her opinions to carry weight, so how is she a "little kid"?

309
boonhetreply
sopuli.xyz

I'm not going to take political opinions from a 3 year old, which is about what I'm thinking when someone says "little kid". Teenagers, like she was when she got famous, can have enough context about the world that their opinions, particularly about things like sustainability, equality, etc, are valid.

79
sp3ctr4lreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I mean, I feel you, I remember aggroing over verbiage like that when I was younger, but as I am now approaching my upper 30s, I find myself referring to basically 25 yos and under as 'kids', its not necesarrily always meant in a demeaning, infantilzing way, can be meant more in the sense of...

... 'has their whole life ahead of them still, it shouldn't be marred or maimed or traumatized this early' /

/ 'they are adults technically yes, but they have far less experience than most other adults' /

/ 'they are too young to be beset by such cruelty and hardship, there should be other adults being better adults such that these awful things do not happen.'

I guess what I am trying to say is it becomes a kind of genuine, broad protective connotation, not trying to be belittling, moreso a lament that the world has failed.

Maybe call it a bungled attempt at intergenerational solidarity.

28
boonhetreply
sopuli.xyz

The thing is, she wasn't just called a kid, but a "little kid".

Sure, I'd call early 20s kids too. Hell, I'm a kid, I'm only turning 30 this year. But I wouldn't call someone a "little kid" once they hit their teenage years. The "little" is what makes the difference in tone. Could've said "she's just a kid" and it would've been a believable attempt at intergenerational solidarity.

20
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Keep in mind that we're talking about a translation here. The phrase quoted might not have the same connotations in Turkish as it does in English.

14

Oh shit I didn't ever clock that, yeah, yeah this kind of slight difference in phrasing between acceptable and unnaceptable stuff gets a million times more confusing when you are literally moving between languages.

Great example of that: Why are there so many different Bible translations and why do so many people argue about which one is better?

1
lemmy.world

I absolutely think of 22 as a little kid, but I was there when the last Woolly Mammoth died, so it’s somewhat relative.

62
boonhetreply
sopuli.xyz

Idk, to me "little kid" means "not in school yet". It's the "little" that makes the difference, compared to just calling someone a kid or kiddo.

26

I'm 46. Nobody over the age of 12 is is a "little" kid to me. I can't imagine ever calling a legal adult a little kid.

2
fishosreply
lemmy.world

Depends on how old the person saying that. I'm only in my late 30's and anyone in their early 20's does feel like a kid. Yes, 22 is an adult, but you've barely just scratched the surface of life experiences.

17
slrpnk.net

I agree. There are also a lot of older people on the flotilla and Greta’s age and mannerism could easily lead someone to refer to her in this framing. There are probably people on those boats who have grandkids her age and absolutely have kids her age or older.

12

Exactly! They're not infantilizing her, they're just describing her as they see her: as still basically a kid with one foot into adulthood.

I feel like it's mostly younger people disagreeing tbh. No one older seriously looks back on their young adulthood and goes "yup, I had everything figured out then! That was totally my peak!"....well, unless your Al Bundy obsessing over high school football games.

2
boonhetreply
sopuli.xyz

Thing is, the older people get, the more selfish they seem to get too. The entire world burning down in 10 years doesn't matter if you're 98. So more life experience isn't automatically more credible.

7
fishosreply
lemmy.world

That's a bullshit generalization, or "stereotype". Jane Goodall just died at a ripe old age and she was a saint. You're not debating, just throwing bullshit assumptions out and acting like you just wrote a thesis paper on experience.

2
boonhetreply
sopuli.xyz

There's always exceptions.

That doesn't change this:

And in general, if you look at politicians, the few who actually fight for the future are on the younger side (think AOC, Mamdani, etc). Yes, obviously there are exceptions. Bernie Sanders being a huge one.

0
fishosreply
lemmy.world

Cool, now let's talk about the overwhelming majority of today's youth leaning right. If young people are so much smarter why are so many of them falling into that trap?

Oh shit, it's almost like making generalizations leads to you spouting bullshit out of context. I can just as easily paint today's youth as absolute morons.

But you're so ready to be like "old people dumb and evil" that you forget this is all about calling Greta " a child". You know, like your grandma might do to your adult self because, from her perspective, you still are.

Go touch some grass you fucking loser. We're talking about someone being abused and you're nitpicking over the definition of "child". You've missed the mark so far you're not even in the same stadium.

0
boonhetreply
sopuli.xyz

I'm talking natural leanings vs all the young people currently being exposed to right wing propaganda which is different.

There's a common saying "you'll grow out of liberalism" among older conservatives.

1

Oh, you have a SAYING?!? Omg, another vague generalization? Holy shit, how have we as a species survived for so long without your wisdom, Plato??? You need to tell the masses!

Hey everyone, this guy has boiled down all of politics to a few simple sayings! We've found the Messiah!

Fucking dumbass 😑

Again, this is about someone older referring to a young person as "still a child". That's it, you fucking tool. How daft are you?

0
BangCrashreply
lemmy.world

I feel that anyone in their 30s is a child.

You've only had 15 years at being an adult what would you know

1

Yes, I am still young and there's much to learn still. Just there's EVEN MORE OF THAT for younger people. It's called perspective.

0

There's 150 comments in this one post, having a couple about this one thing - which I also thought was off - is fine and good.

It's ok for people to point out bad things in something you agree with overall.

11
boonhetreply
sopuli.xyz

I'm sorry, I just think that the zionist actions are bad by default but news articles shouldn't minimize the people that defy them?

2
D_Creply
sh.itjust.works

That's fair. And I completely agree with you, in general

But, you knew there was a but coming, it was the person who saw the beating that actually said she is a kid. And, in this case at least it seems, that the media was just quoting them.

Plus, in my view, the sentence of "Israeli terrorists beat a kid" is worse than "Israeli terrorists beat an adult".
So, to me, it looked like you were nitpicking and trying to minimise their actions by pointing out Greta isn't a child. It seems I got that bit wrong and I apologise.

2
lemmy.world

Israel is a fucking terrorist country. IDF is a new SS. They are new Nazi.

169

They will never live this down either. Netanyahu's government has destroyed Israeli reputation for decades to come.

7

And if you know the history of Zionism, then you'll know that both the Zionist and National Socialist parties in pre-WWII Germany and Europe complemented each other.

The Nazis got going before the Zions did, but both are siblings of each other.

The Zions have had time to more perfect their fascism tho

2

For those of you doubting the claims for lack of evidence, stating that you'll "wait for the facts" or evidence before allowing yourslf to be outraged—

Where is your outrage for the countless other people who were there who personally testified to being beaten, abused, and paraded around like trophies?

There are already multiple interviews with Chris Smalls, a black American labor organizer, who directly confirmed that he had been beaten, choked, packed like a sardine into a small cell, sleep deprived, strip searched, and completely brutalized by the Israeli navy and prison system.

Ask yourself—why does this need to have happened to the appropriately aged, white, European female on a 4k, live streamed or recorded feed with corroborating testimony by the Israelis and the national newspapers of the country of origin of the supposed victim—why is that the bar you've set for credulity?

What does that say about you or your reaction to the situation?

Wake. Up.

Fuck the details, fuck the squabbling over what constitutes "roughness" versus physical assault. Fuck the inclination to want to hear "the other side" of the story. Things are going horribly wrong in Israel/Palestine—in a place that we've all been told over and over is supposed to be demonstrably above reproach. If even half these claims are true—if even a single one of them is true—what GOOD is it preserving the supposed beacon of democracy in the middle east when they treat foreigners this way?

Even if you think these activists are mentally unwell, or menaces, or being performative, or just doing this for "selfies"—so what? We all know these activists are obviously not terrorists and at least some of them genuinely believe what they are doing. None of this justifies their treatment. Nothing justifies the richest and proudest countries on earth—however much you might agree with that claim—what GOOD is that if our prisons condemn people to absolute squalor and abandonment to the whims of their guards?

HOW is this any different from the indignity camps? These peoples possessions were seized as trophies , their clothes taken, their bodies crammed together like chattel. Do there need to be ovens for there to be discernable lines? Must you feel the radiant heat on your own brows before you'll indulge the sensation that something isn't right here?

Wake. Up.

137
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Idk why this is treated as though its so inconceivable. Greta is hated by conservatives around the world. Most countries have already condemned Israel. They only care what Trump's regime thinks. Their prisons are notorious centers of physical emotional and sexual torture. This is relatively mild treatment in comparison to many of the accounts I've read. It's still awful, but if they were going to invent a story about how vile the Israeli prison guards were, this wouldnt be noteworthy in any way. Barely even scratches the surface of the things that happen in those prisons.

133
Lumisalreply
lemmy.world

English really needs to stop calling the right wing "conservatives". We don't call them that in other languages, and they literally don't try to conserve things, but instead always seek to destroy.

51

I prefer "reactionary," because it accurately describes their political philosophy and tactics.

Also, it really pisses them off.

17
lemmy.ml

Not all the right wing is conservative of course and you are right about it, but you are wrong about the meaning of conservative, being a conservative mean those who in politics uphold the value of tradition, oppose any progressive ideology, and aim to preserve traditional social and political structures

11

At their core, Conservatives are cowards, afraid of EVERYTHING: Democrats, Liberals, Minorities, other religions, other countries, poor people, women, women's private parts, gays, and anyone else who wants society to improve their lives.

Conservatives are fully satisfied with the way things are, and are terrified that any changes in society would be at the expense of the superior situation that they have created for themselves over centuries.

Their overwhelming need for control over all else has allowed corruption in every form to take root, and they feel far less need to end that, than their need to punish their perceived enemies.

So the result is the MAGA Party, whose primary function is to support the concepts of greed, treason, racism, corruption, incompetence, ignorance, intolerance, and pedophilia.

7
lemmy.ca

This is a terribly written comment.. There is a better way to say what you're trying to say. I think. I'm not 100% on what your point really is.

-14
TWeaKreply
lemmy.today

Their point is right there taking up half the comment:

being a conservative mean those who in politics uphold the value of tradition, oppose any progressive ideology, and aim to preserve traditional social and political structures

In other words, they're "conserving" traditional values.

However this isn't really true, and @[email protected] is correct that this isn't really what they're doing. It's how they think they're behaving, but they have a distorted view on history and see it through rose tinted glasses, often trying not to conserve but to "restore" society to some half-cocked version that never really existed.

14

Absolutely true, but all of that is just the marching orders from the leadership to keep the rubes occupied and distracted, while they fulfill whatever personal agendas they have, mostly stealing as much as possible, but also committing treason, getting their rocks off abusing people, and kissing their Fuhrer's stinky ass.

1
lemmy.ca

Presumably because anyone with half a brain would realize that she should have gotten a far more diplomatic treatment regardless of how much of a genocidal asshole they were. The fact that she is getting treated this way shows how far Israel has devolved to and how much more people people should be protesting any interaction with the country.

Unfortunately, it isn't the only Middle East country who behaves like shit, whom people in other countries have protested, and whom their governments don't care. But at least the fiction of what Israel was trying to project itself as has toppled considerably.

21
LadyAutumnreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Of course she deserved better treatment. So did Sophie Scholl. It's just very odd to act like this is not a believable thing that Israel, famed mass murderers of children, would do.

Israel hasn't devolved, the state was founded on acts of colonialist genocide. This is what the state of Israel has always been.

11

At the same time, she is also a public figure. If they had treated her well, they would have less of a leg to stand on. Whereas mistreating her just raises the question that if they are treating a relatively known public figure in that way, what happens to the less-known people, who don't have as much of a platform to speak out on.

8

And Greta isn't the only person claiming that they did awful, abusive, hateful things. Chris Smalls got it, too.

Chris Smalls gave a chilling interview with Amy Goodman where he basically said that the Israelis treated him worse than he's been treated in his entire life as a black man in America. That's saying a lot.

The full interview.

10
mrdownreply
lemmy.world

They abused her less than some other people so it is ok. What kind of dumb logic is that?

3

Where did i say it was okay? It is abhorrent. I said that if they were going to invent a story about her graphic torture, this abuse is comparatively minor compared with other accounts from Israeli prisons.

5
lemmy.world

Throw another war crime on the fire...

Can we just jump to tribunals yet?

111
chlorokenreply
lemmy.ml

Why are you still posting? Literally everyone is tired of you.

-5
chlorokenreply
lemmy.ml

I decided to demoderate Jordan in the communities we are in together, as I just am tired of all the drama. I hope he understands that.

1

Your psychology is remarkable. It's a shame you aren't a top mod anymore.

0
sh.itjust.works

I think there were already plenty of reasons before that, so the condition is unnecessary here.

edit: maybe you really meant if(true) so it's fine.

52
lemmy.world

Yeah, you’re right. This isn’t the only reason to “fuck Israel”. There are a lot of reasons. It’s lost the right to be a country.

9
Taldanreply
lemmy.world

It's lost the right to be a country

That seems rather extreme. It's never really been a thing to wipe out other warmongering, genocidal countries. Why them?

-9

Indeed. Why them.

How about a man-made famine. How about supporting illegal settlements. How about cutting off any hope of an independent state.

If any country did what they are doing to Palestinians, we’d call it a holocaust.

10

They have lost the right to an exclusive ethnostate, just like the Afrikaners lost theirs. They should have every right to leave peacefully in a post apartheid democratic country with the same rights as their Palestinian fellow citizens.

6
Danquebecreply
sh.itjust.works

Something very similar was seriously considered for Germany at the end of WW2. Basically, wipe out all industry of Germany, make it an agricultural nation, and skilled workers can migrate to other countries. That's about as close as it gets to remove a country.

With that said, I believe Israel should be allowed to continue existing. But it should go trough a process like de-Nazification.

5

well it was never thier country to begin , the allies forcibly extirpated the palestinians and gifted them a country they dint establish at all.

2
lemmy.world

Swedish gov should cut all ties for this terrorist state torturing their citizens.

84
Slotosreply
feddit.nl

They are too busy renting prisons in Estonia.

17
ManixTreply
lemmy.world

There is nothing wrong with the prisons in Estonia.

What is the point of your comment?

5
ms.lanereply
lemmy.world

I'm sure there are nothing wrong with the prisons in El Salvador either...

-9
ManixTreply
lemmy.world

Are you seriously comparing Estonia to El Salvador? Do you know anything about Estonia?

14
ms.lanereply
lemmy.world

Comparatively, the Prisons in USA vs. El Salvador are likely equal.

Comparatively the prisons in Sweden vs. Estonia will be similar.

But you're still sending prisoners off to a foreign land, might as well start calling you Britain.

1
M0oP0oreply
mander.xyz

Don't bad mouth Estonia without reason. The comparison to El Salvador is insulting.

15
lemmy.ml

This is another pivotal moment. WE can speak out and make our elected officials (wherever we are in the world) KNOW that their political careers and their parties future depends upon their actions.

77
cub Guccireply
lemmy.today

You do not govern their careers. They know it and they do not care

25
lemmy.world

You only ever had the illusion of power. Power resides with capital, and as long as capitalists are allowed sole ownership over the means of production, the people will only ever be able to expend titanic effort gathering enough power to gain a temporary reform.

3
lemmy.today

Power resides with capital,

No it doesn't, that's just propaganda to make us feel weak and controlled. If capital was all it took, then the American Revolution and the French Revolution would have been won by those with the most money, along with many other insurgencies throughout history.

There are many, many examples where those with money lost their power to those without.

1
lemmy.world

Both the American and French revolutions were bourgeoise capitalist revolutions… and neither led to significant gains of power for the people of the nations, just for the bourgeoisie who led the revolutions.

4

Not the point. The assertion was that power comes from capital, and as wealthy as the Founding Fathers were, their wealth was NOTHING compared to what the British or French governments held. Being outnumbered by an angry violent mob is far more powerful than money.

And I don't think your statement holds with the French Revolution. The elites didn't launch the revolution, they lost their heads to it.

My point is that while capital certainly helps, it is not the only factor in the success of a revolution. America has nearly unlimited resources, and yet we lost both Vietnam and Afghanistan to guerilla insurgencies. Nearly all successful revolutions consisted of the powerful corrupt being crushed by their victims.

And not all revolutions are about giving more power to the people, many are just about kicking out the corrupt criminals who are exploiting the nation. They don't always expect that they will benefit with more power, they're just happy that people aren't being snatched off the streets, or tortured, or drafted into wars of economic opportunity, or starving, or the economy looted, etc. Most don't expect to have a say in who the leaders are, they just feel like they have to be better than the current psychopaths.

1

Yes, but you and I have to organize in our communities where we live to make that happen.

2
hcfreply
sh.itjust.works

That commenter said "we", not "I".

Are you saying that we—collectively—don't bear any democratic responsibility for the people that we elect to office? Or are you cynically implying that the original poster has no power over the situation?

I don't get the sense that you're trying to attack that person, but what do you gain from public displays of cynicism to remind people that they are powerless?

If nothing then please reconsider. 🙁

2

Are you saying that we—collectively—don't bear any democratic responsibility for the people that we elect to office?

This. Democracy is no more

1

Heads should roll. Quite literally. That is the only message they will understand.

3

They literally call Palestinians (not Hamas, Palestinians) "human animals" and "vermin", just like the NAZIs used to literally say that Jews and Roma were "subhuman" and "vermin".

25

Let's be honest, they don't really see non Jews as people either. Zionist ideology is based on Jewish supremacy. They see Christian evangelical Americans as useful idiots. Everyone else is beneath them.

0
scalareply
lemmy.ml

Religion is an excuse for violence. Prove me wrong.

26

Religion is just another excuse for violence.

The NAZIs put the Roma People in the same category as Jews - so, to be exterminated as an ethnicity ("curiously" there are no Oscar Winning films about the plight of the Roma People, nor has Germany tried to make amends with them) - and yet they tend to be Christians, same as the NAZIs.

Ethno-Fascists regimes are dominated by Psychopaths and Sociopaths, and these people don't care about Religion beyond it's immense utility as a tool to manipulate other people.

18

Maybe religions are an excuse for trying to achieve certain political goals. E.g. a Christian in the USA might say "we have to ban abortion because God says abortion is wrong". And a settler Jew in Israel might say "we have to occupy the West Bank because God says that land belongs to Jews". And a conservative Muslim might say "women should not be allowed to drive because God says so".

4
Art3misreply
lemmy.world

There have been a lot of libs coming over to lemmy ever since the crackdowns on reddit. Among... Others

37

Yeah I've noticed a lot of the engagement to what's said here is similar to r/worldnews a lot of the time. There just needs to be more communities on other instances so we don't have to deal with the enlightened centrism that dominates reddit on here too and the libs can have their own space aswell

21

Anyone who volunteers to moderate stuff that isnt their own server is pretty sus imo. Even more so for those that do it with an iron fist

11
lemmy.world

You got three downvotes and three upvotes. It's not that big of deal.

35
sp3ctr4lreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Its funny that you think I personally care about what people generally think of my opinions.

Its terrifying that you don't realize that anyone who downvoted that was confident the notion of me stating something that would probably eventually happen was... not likely, not the case, for some reason... but they were also too lazy to explain why they thought that.

-28

You cared enough to link back to a previous comment from 4 months ago to show everyone and say "see see I called it!"

21

You response to this news is to complain about having been down voted? I can't imagine why

21
CanadaPlusreply
lemmy.sdf.org

Much better. Shitty conditions and some kind of flag parade were definitely included. The beating bit is less clear, and a bigger claim since actually producing deliberate, visible injuries would be a dangerous move on their part.

39

Bing Crosby, of White Christmas fame, was accused by one of his kids, for using a bag of oranges to discipline his kids.

1

I saw that earlier and it's really shitty that they have her in a cell that is giving her rashes (probably from bedbugs) and that they're doing some stupid thing with flags. She did nothing wrong.

Still not the same magnitude of what is described in the X "quote" which has zero sources and no way to verify their translation, for me anyway.

The X quote which has zero source that lines up with it:

“They [Israelis] dragged little Greta [Thunberg] by her hair before our eyes, beat her, and forced her to kiss the Israeli flag. They did everything imaginable to her, as a warning to others,”

30

The same quote is also in the guardian article.

“They dragged little Greta [Thunberg] by her hair before our eyes, beat her, and forced her to kiss the Israeli flag. They did everything imaginable to her, as a warning to others,” the Turkish activist ErsinÇelik, a participant in the Sumud flotilla, told Anadolu news agency

14
CanadaPlusreply
lemmy.sdf.org

Given Lemmy's proclivity for rage jerking, and the fact Israel isn't stupid, I do. It's not a matter of moral capability.

3

Same, it's a tweet of one guy, who might use this to cause an outrage. I'll wait for Greta's statement about this

7

The most expected outcome of the expedition.

Exactly the kind of thing Israel would do. Very consistent and predictable of them.

58
hcfreply
sh.itjust.works

The irony (for anyone not clear on it or not catching it) is that the Israeli military forced the captives to wrap themselves in the flag of Israel—which prominently features the star of David—so that soldiers could take pictures of them that could be circulated to humiliate the activists.

Where else have we heard of people being forced to wear the star of David so that everyone could point and laugh and humiliated them?

Israeli soldiers are so eager to "tea bag" their enemies with their own flag that they're unable to see the irony.

20

I mean no offense on the whole, but its quite ironic given the reports on how they treat Uyghur folks.

...Kinda like Israel's irony here. And the US, and, you know, a whole lot of countries right now. Trauma tends to get passed down, it seems.

11

Wow, Israel really is the only democracy in the Middle East!

51
don
lemmy.ca

Congratulations Israel, I permahate you now

50

No no no, not you! Very sorry ! I hate Israel.

25

israel has reached terminal rogue state status: they don’t give a fuck what their image is, they know they’ve got the backing of the imperial core no matter what, so they don’t even bother with excuses anymore

death to israel and to all of those who support its genocide

42
lemmy.zip

If this is true this is some crazy shit. She just wanted to feed hungry people and fight for climate change. And they do all this shit to her?

What the fuck is wrong with human beings this past decade?

39

Pieces of shit being called out for being pieces of shit aren't usually reasonable people to begin with. Give them an inkling of power and authority and this is what happens.

8

Al Jazeera has a different report. They say she was dragged, not beaten.

I cannot understand the language spoken in that X video, there is no translation, and there are no free publicly available no-login X.com video translation options that I can find.

Additionally I cannot find the cnn turk video from this activist on the internet anywhere but this x link.

I would be very surprised if they actually did what this post describes because everyone would be outraged. She's a sweetheart and so many eyes are watching what they do.

37
3abasreply
lemmy.world

because everyone would be outraged

People who heard the story and voice of Hind Rajab and weren't outraged would not be outraged by anything. They would at most do what you just did: deny the monsters who shoot kids in the head would do anything to an adult they publicly stated they will treat the way they treat Palestinians hostages.

35
lemmy.world

Greta is a well known white European lady though, the impact this would have in the West is way higher. Whether this would have any radical effect on anything is still to be seen, though.

6

Is it not. Pro israel countries don't care about the skin color of the people opposing genocide. Normal people are already outraged by what happen in Gaza

6

I ran the X video through a translation app using Turkish to English and got this, which doesn't really say much. Guessing the translation is terrible.

The translation I got from the video clip in the OP x post is:

"They're all politicians. They all tried to treat us like bugs, but they treat everyone like that. They tortured greta very badly in front of our eyes. Get up."

"Evet"[sic]

Guessing this^ was an error in my translation app.

"They persecuted Greta. Greta is still a little child."

"They killed them. They made them kiss the israeli flag. So they did the same thing as the nazis"

Maybe someone who speaks turkish or whatever language is being spoken can help us understand the beating claim, because so far there is no source for that.

14

—All of them, [including the] politicians, they attempted to treat us like insects and they treated everyone the same. They heavily tortured Greta before our very eyes.

—Really?

—Yes. They were very cruel to Greta. Greta is but a little child. They dragged her, made her kiss the Israeli flag. I mean, they did the same things the Nazis did.

I think the torture he's talking about is the dragging and forcing her to kiss the flag but the reporter also seems to think a sort of harsher torture and i think that's why he uses "being cruel" when continued.

Here's the text if anyone wants to run it through other translation software.

—Hepsi, siyasetçisi, hepsi bize böyle böcek muamelesi yapmaya kalktılar ama herkese böyle davranıyorlar. E, Greta'ya çok ağır işkence yaptılar, gözlerimizin önünde.

—Gerçekten mi?

—Evet. Greta'ya zulmettiler. Küçücük çocuk daha Greta. Onu süründürdüler, İsrail bayrağını öptürdüler. Yani Naziler ne yaptıysa aynısını yaptılar.

25
blackn1ghtreply
feddit.uk

thecanary is not a reliable news site. They're effectively the daily mail of the left.

6

I dont understand how this shit gets upvoted so high....

Its the same thing maga people do: "the mainstream media is biased, so i'll just get my news from random blogs and websites...."

lemmy has become the lefty version of this

1

It's insane that journalist still fucking link to x.com which cannot be viewed by any body. Might as well link 127.0.0.1

6

Right wing religious nutters are well known for treating people like shit. The modern violence, on those dried rocks, originates from around 1917. Albert Einstein is 100% correct.

21

Regardless of what your opinions on Palestine might be, Israel really isn't beating the allegations right now.

I remember what I learned in school about this, it was described as a territory dispute between two equal belligerents. Maybe that was true 30 years ago, I don't know, but it really doesn't describe what's going on right now.

The war is over. Israel won, Palestine barely even exists anymore. This is the part where you're supposed to facilitate aid and win over the losers to your side. dafuq flavor of genocide you dune Israel?

of course, nobody who needs to read this will ever see it. I'm just upset that this kind of thing can even happen in current year.

Of course the second, I'm looking at current events like it's still 2015. not sure why I'm doing that, but fuck does current events make me miss 2015.

17

These are completely the justified actions of a state operating with the highest of intentions /s

5

As an aside- does the article's source (thecanary.co) have anything to do with Canary Mission? I would assume not, based on the content, but what's with the common bird theme?

4

I didn't realize internationals were involved in the flotillas and really thought the name drop made this the onion for sure

3

Why are they quoting this activist calling her a "little kid" That's really insulting.

That this kind of thing is happening shows this is a military force of thugs with no strong leadership or discipline.

3

If I'm not mistaken, the guy is a Turkish journalist. I'm not Turkish, but I wouldn't be surprised if they use something that in English would be translated as "little kid" to mean basically any young person, including young adults. We do this too in Greek, and we're related enough culturally. In that case it's not infantilisation, it's cherishing of youth.

8
slrpnk.net

Not saying it's definitely the case but the conspiracy minded part of me can't help but notice the attack on the synagogue in Manchester was very conveniently timed around when the flotilla arrived in Israel. Could just be coincidence of course but we've seen what they're capable of making happen. This would be very easy for them. And this isn't to have any disrespect towards the victims of the attack, even if it was a false flag or whatever it doesn't make it any less of a tragedy. Plenty of Jewish people suffer generally because of Israel too

Edit: well guess I offended a bunch of people with this. Nice to see that we're being no different to reddit here and just downvoting people we don't agree with, even if that person isn't being shitty about the opinion they're expressing and isn't claiming it's true anyway, and not having an open discussion about the thing that's been said

-3
yeahiknow3reply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

We have enough conspiracy theories right now. Let’s stick to the facts and maintain some epistemic hygiene.

8
knowonereply
slrpnk.net

So we just don't consider anything could be true unless we know for absolute sure it is? So we shouldn't even entertain the idea that Epstein didn't kill himself, as well as many other things? I understand that we shouldn't go about throwing out theories and believing them completely without some solid evidence, but I think the other extreme of "epistemic hygiene" hinders us too. Certain things could turn out to be true and us ignoring suggestions of that earlier on could mean we don't realise later. Again I'm not saying that the possibility I bring up in my original comment is likely or anything, just it wouldn't surprise me really. There's so many examples in recent years of powers distracting us from the bad things they're doing with other things

-3
yeahiknow3reply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Epistemic hygiene doesn’t require you to believe only things that are “absolutely true,” since that would exclude literally all empirical claims.

It does require you to proportion your beliefs to the evidence. Big claims require a lot of evidence. The idea that Epstein didn’t kill himself enjoys some degree of confidence (say, 75%) because of circumstantial evidence (not to mention motive and opportunity).

6
knowonereply
slrpnk.net

Ok so...how have I said anything that goes against that? I've not once said I believe it or that others should and that we should have solid evidence before we believe something. I like the throwing out philosophy terms you're doing in order to try and talk down to me too

-2
yeahiknow3reply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I wouldn’t be surprised if the pope died. However, I wouldn’t bring up the possibility that the pope is dead every time he gets mentioned (absent evidence).

3

Nice editing and erasing most of what you said in this comment. Realised you've been talking shit eh?

0

Didn't realise "plausible" was a synonym for ”true". Do you wanna stop strawmanning me or? And you are doing it to try and talk down to me, be real. You can be "precise" without using those terms. It has similar energy as someone weaponising psychology terms in a conflict in order to try and seem like the one in the right by virtue of being "more intelligent"

-2

stop just commenting here on lemmy. Get your social media accounts back. Add each other. Post this stuff everywhere. Take back all these spaces. It's like 15 minutes of work to actually accomplish something instead of just being mad. If you're willing to protest but can't be bothered to create a login then there's something wrong. Posting content is a form or protesting in today's world.

-9

"They dragged little Greta (Thunberg) by her hair in front of our eyes, beat her, and forced her to kiss the Israeli flag. They did everything imaginable to her as a warning to others.

She’s still a little kid. They made her suffer"

I seriously doubt this is true.

and

Greta Thunberg is 22.

-15

This whole flotilla thing was a propganda mission (everyone knew the boats were never going to get to Gaza), those participating are going to say anything to promote anti-Israel propaganda.

Geta Thunberg is 22 years old, she's an adult. The "little Greta" bullshit is really grating. To be clear no one (whether an adult or a child) should be treated in the ways that have been alleged (which is how Hamas treats their prisoners, where's the outrage over that?) but come on people, stop playing it up like Thunberg is a child. It just makes it obvious that she's being used as a prop in their propaganda.

-42
guy
piefed.social

lol hard doubt

edit: to all those who can't employ critical thinking, representants for the swedish ministry of foreign affairs met Greta Thunberg on Saturday and received no reports of violence. She says there has been too little to eat and drink, she suspects there's bed bugs and she stated that she had to lay on hard surfaces. Nothing about what this article states, so unless it happened right after the embassy left, this is bull and only meant ragebait.

edit2: I would advice everyone to apply critical thinking when reading this article. It is framed in such a way as to invoke rage in readers and is probably not true.
Swedish representants for the foreign ministry has met with Greta which stated that there was lack of food and water and that they have to lay on hard surfaces in addition to receiving harsh treatment. No mentions of violence.

Now harsh treatment could cover a lot, but the fact that she hasn't mentioned that they were inflicted violence is a pretty strong indicator that this is not true.
In addition, swedish media hasn't covered this story which I have no doubt they would pick up on pretty fast since the flotilla and the genocide is well covered in media. This would be headlines to say the least.

-69
mrdownreply
lemmy.world

They dragged little Greta [Thunberg] by her hair before our eyes, beat her, and forced her to kiss the Israeli flag. They did everything imaginable to her, as a warning to others,” the Turkish activist ErsinÇelik, a participant in the Sumud flotilla, told Anadolu news agency.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/04/greta-thunberg-israel-gaza-sweden

Even if they didn't beat her all other thing she experienced is still terrible and worth being raged about

37
lemmy.ca

You’re of course welcome to believe whatever you want, but from my perspective the state of Israel has lost so much credibility they’re on the same level of standing as hearsay from the flotilla. Hatred and violence is now the norm over any political issue.

Seems to me most likely answer is Greta complained about abusive treatment to the embassy but they decided not to raise it publicly in hope of getting better food/bed for her — lacking a Time Machine and all. Ie being diplomatic…

28

I agree. I don't think Israel has any credibility at all after these last years, but my point is regarding this article and that one should apply critical thinking to spot misinformation and propaganda, which this article most probably are.

I don't think that is the case though. Ulf Kristersson said that those who traveled with Ship to Gaza can just about suit themselves with what happens and that they can expect no help from Sweden. But the strongest indication is that no Swedish news has picked up on that story which most certainly be the case if it was true.

-7

You're being a cynical asshole. Even if you're right, the way you phrase it is so needlessly abrasive that you won't convince anyone of anything. You're just airing out your shitty personality for everyone else to deal with, and it's quite sad and concerning.

Get help.

Separate from that, the statements made in the email from the Swedish embassy that were sent to the Guardian don't contradict the other flotilla activist's claims. In fact, the embassy's email at least partially corroborates the claims—depending upon how you choose to interpret Greta's statement that she was being subjected to "harsh treatment". At no point did the representative refute the claims.

I think a modicum of critical thinking would easily lend credence to the claim that <country that's starving children and has sniped them in hospitals with quadcopters> might be abusive to an activist who's attempting to defy their mission.

It's equally reasonable to expect that an embassy would hesitate to repeat the claims/accusations without additional evidence so as not to cause any unnecessary diplomatic tensions, especially with Greta still being in custody.

But again, I wouldn't expect someone exhibiting such a shining personality such as yourself to stop to consider that perhaps the representative was being diplomatic about what claims they were willing to repeat. You know—because assholes generally know fuck-all about when/how someone is being diplomatic.

19
floofloofreply
lemmy.ca

Or unless Israel had threatened her that there would be repercussions for telling the truth.

11
guyreply
piefed.social

In the scopes of "you're allowed to tell about lack of food, water, bed bugs, harsh treatment and laying on the floor, but nothing about kissing the flag because then!" I hear you mate but that's unreasonable. Read this critically and you will see the ragebait and narrative it tries to promote. Just such things as

They dragged little Greta (Thunberg) by her hair in front of our eyes, beat her, and forced her to kiss the Israeli flag. They did everything imaginable to her as a warning to others. She’s still a little kid. They made her suffer

-14

That's testimony from another activist. Seems to have been corroborated by Swedish officials and others in a Guardian article

“Another detainee reportedly told another embassy that they had seen her [Thunberg] being forced to hold flags while pictures were taken. She wondered whether images of her had been distributed,” the Swedish ministry’s official added.

The allegation was corroborated by at least two other members of the flotilla who had been detained by Israeli forces and released on Saturday.

“They dragged little Greta [Thunberg] by her hair before our eyes, beat her, and forced her to kiss the Israeli flag. They did everything imaginable to her, as a warning to others,” the Turkish activist ErsinÇelik, a participant in the Sumud flotilla, told Anadolu news agency.

Lorenzo D’Agostino, a journalist and another flotilla participant, said after returning to Istanbul that Thunberg was “wrapped in the Israeli flag and paraded like a trophy” – a scene described with disbelief and anger by those who witnessed it.

25
slrpnk.net

There are mentions of pictures, and she herself was aware such pictures may exist and asked whether they had been released. So, no, you’re misled. Forcing detainees through beatings and physical force into interacting with the Israeli flag is a common humiliation practice by Israelis if you know anything about them. It’s pretty much standard practice. They wouldn’t think twice about doing it to their newest victim regardless of who “she thinks she is”.

4

Yes but

Another detainee reportedly told another embassy that they had seen her [Thunberg] being forced to hold flags while pictures were taken

is not the same as

They dragged little Greta [Thunberg] by her hair before our eyes, beat her, and forced her to kiss the Israeli flag. They did everything imaginable to her, as a warning to others

I don't doubt she has been forced to pose with a flag and thus ask wether those pictures has been released.

-3
ynthrepicreply
lemmy.world

She's Greta. She would show her bruises to make the case against Israel. She'd never be silent if it was as bad as the article claims.

-4
knowonereply
slrpnk.net

Have you considered that maybe she's very traumatised both physically and mentally at the moment and is recovering first before she steps out into the public eye again?

4
ynthrepicreply
lemmy.world

Sure, but she provided enough testimony for this niche news website to publish this story? Occam's Razor holds for now.

-3
knowonereply
slrpnk.net

Where in the article does it say she gave testimony herself? Also it isn't that much of a niche news site, it's one of the biggest left wing news outlets in the UK, probably the second biggest after Novara

4
ynthrepicreply
lemmy.world

If she didn't give testimony, who did? Why do you insist the article is credible?

1

I'm not a chatbot, you can read the article yourself and find out these things. I haven't insisted the article is credible. Go back and read what I wrote and you'll see that

0

You're being intentionally obtuse and stacking edits onto your initial comment to belabor an awful, specious argument.

That you would continue to die on this hill, after conceding the point about dehydration, rashes, painful concrete surfaces, and degrading photography–

That you would call the activists liars, whilst Israel’s foreign ministry posts on X that all detained activists were "safe and in good health" and Israel's commitment to the "dignity" of prisoners afforded by international law—

That you would weasel out on the smallest of words—"harsh" treatment—while the Italian legal representation for the flotilla explicitly alleges multiple instances of both physical and verbal abuse against the activists in custody—

I think it speaks volumes to your (lack of) moral character. You know you are wrong. You're tripling down on being a cynical asshole.

Get your head on straight, "mate".

3
lemmy.today

Is it possible that greta herself was provocing the israelis? She doesnt seem to be the type to sit silent. And she probably feels like they cant do anything to her, because of her fame.

-92
lemmy.zip

NOBODY should EVER be imprisoned, starved, and forced to kiss things. Hope you can sit silent if that happens to you. Absolute useless person blaming the victim.

55
mrmanagerreply
lemmy.today

The victim plays a part in how they are treated. You can compare with walking up to an American police officer and acting all cocky. These people hate when they are not respected. If Greta was not famous, this behavior would actually be quite dangerous and she could get killed.

-58
lemmy.zip

What makes you say Greta was cocky? She deserves to be tortured for sailing on her own terms doing her own thing? You're acting very cocky and I don't appreciate your lack of respect for basic human rights.

25
mrmanagerreply
lemmy.today

Doing her own thing? You know she is a famous activist right? She went on that boat knowing what would happen of course. This media attention is also what she wanted to happen.

-28
TWeaKreply
lemmy.today

This is classic victim blaming. "You knew you would get attacked, so it's your fault, not the attacker's fault."

Her goal is to get food to starving people. Media attention furthers that goal, even if they don't succeed directly in delivering food.

21
mrmanagerreply
lemmy.today

I agree with that, she is trying to do good here. I dont think im victim blaming since I dont see an activist provocing Israeli soldiers as being a victim. She is trying to achieve her goals.

-7

Why do you think she provoked the Israeli soldiers? She might not have done. The Israelis might just be treating her badly because they don't like her.

3

Yeah, I mean you never explicitly stated it wasn't the fault of the Israeli's here. But I think that is still implied by what you said, and that's why people are raging against you.

There's a nuanced issue here about fault and responsibility, I think. The Israelis are absolutely at fault for any mistreatment of Greta (or any prisoner), and the Israelis are responsible for their actions, but Greta is also responsible for putting herself in harm's way. However, Greta isn't necessarily at fault for doing so, and furthermore her responsibility for her own actions must in no way detract from the responsibility nor fault by the Israeli forces.

Responsibility isn't portioned out in percentages. Someone can be 100% responsible for something, but someone else can also have some responsibility. However, fault is portioned out, and a victim is in no way at fault for the fault of their attacker.

But your original point was that Greta "provoked" the Israelis. This is you implying fault. And I don't think you can reasonably justify this assumption.

1
Havaldreply
lemmy.world

So in your opinion if a prison guard beat up and maybe even killed an intimate that would totally be justified as long as the inmate was shouting verbal abuse at them beforehand? What kind of fucked up logic is that? If a prison guard can't take verbal abuse they're in the wrong job.

Physically attacking someone simply because they're shouting abuse at you is never a measured response and prison guards especially should be held to a higher standard than that.

It doesn't matter if "these people hate when they are not respected", neither police officers nor prison guards can hit people whenever they feel like it.

24
mrmanagerreply
lemmy.today

Of course and I agree with how it should be.

However, in the real world, that is often how it is. I dont support that behavior but I also dont think its reasonable to ignore reality completely and act surprised when the obvious happens.

This is strategy on her part, thats all it is, and you guys are thinking she is victim of abuse.

-23

Of course and I agree with how it should be.

I'm glad we're on the same page on that at least.

This is strategy on her part, thats all it is,

Of course it's a strategy. This is literally her job, putting herself in situations like that to shine a light on it. That's what activists do. It's on the rest of us to do decide whether it's worth doing something about to combat those issues the activists are highlighting or deciding that we don't care.

and you guys are thinking she is victim of abuse.

Just because she put herself in that situation on purpose doesn't mean she's not a victim.i don't think she particularly enjoys getting beaten. I'm pretty sure she would've preferred if the Israelis had let the ships pass but they all knew this wasn't just a risk but the likely outcome.

and act surprised when the obvious happens.

Exactly zero people are surprised that's how this whole thing ended.

2
lemmy.zip

Nobody likes being disrespected, who cares if you're an "American police officer". They are not special.

So you're saying nobody can disrespect an American police officer or have their own opinion? If an American police officer gets their feelings hurt, you're saying it's okay to imprison and torture anyone who disrespects them? Hope you never disagree with a police officer and are imprisoned and tortured.

Honestly, your opinions are useless drivel. You aren't famous anyway. What makes you think your opinions aren't going to get you killed?

12
mrmanagerreply
lemmy.today

Of course im not saying its ok, but clearly its asking for problems if you do that. In this case, greta was asking for trouble because its her strategy to win minds and hearts by getting publicity like this. She knew you guys wouldnt ask what she was doing and you would only focus on the Israeli response to what she was doing. :)

Anyway, I guess you dont see any strategy here and just a innocent women being abused... :)

-16
jelareply
lemmy.today

This type of conceded, complaisant attitude is why everything is as bad as it is. How about instead of being a keyboard warrior you make yourself useful? Maybe it's people like you who don't deserve this privilege of victim blaming for staying away from anything scary or worth fighting for. The fact you put a smiley face after the phrase "innocent woman being abused" would make anyone who is not a psychopath sick.

8
mrmanagerreply
lemmy.today

The smiley was because you guys dont seem to realize all of this is her strategy, so its funny how you all act like an innocent women is being abused, when that is not what is happening here.

-8

Fuck you are sick.

It does not matter if she goated them or not. There is no situation where the things they are doing are justified.

There is nothing she could have done that would require them to act like they did.

Give me one example what she could have done where beating her up and forcing her to kiss a flag would apropiate responce.

4

Holy shit, having a strategy and using it is inherently bad? Israel has way more "strategy" and they're getting their way with it. Clearly this isn't about her using "her strategy" and you have a problem with what she's trying to accomplish.

You want to murderer children. You want innocent people to suffer. You are such a degenerate. I hope people treat you the same way when you suffer.

2
Megabazosreply
lemmy.zip

Of course they were expecting problems, as they tried to get to Gaza before, so they knew that they could expect Israeli interference. But the way the Israeli authorities are dealing with this is out of proportion. Like Chaotic Altruist was saying, trying to do a morally right thing and sail to Gaza to bring survival goods, should never result in violence and humiliation.

6

Of course it shouldnt, but we live in a world where it absolute will give problems. We didnt wake up yesterday and now we are completely surprised the world is what it is today.

-5

She is not the first to be treated badly so shut the f up with your dumb apologia

2

Obviously there is a strategy here.

Israel wants to starve people to death and have everyone else just let it happen.

Greta wants to feed those people and get some news time so others might join in and help.

Israel detained her and are now imprisoning and committing light sexual assault against her.

You also have a motive. You want to protect Israel and question Greta's motives. You are effectively a Zionist with the way you are questioning this. Should other people also be tortured if they try to help those who are starving to death because they deserve it?

You are effectively an Israeli asset. You are supporting the genocide by questioning any opposition to it. There is very little we can do to oppose this and you're helping it. Stop it now.

1

So speculation, victim blaming and general lack of humanity. Yours is an opinion i should listen to and live by......

10
MrFinnbeanreply
lemmy.world

Imagine if somebody would kick your ass because you write stupid opinions online and then some asshole would say you are responsible for your ass whoopping.

10
mrmanagerreply
lemmy.today

I think the example with the police officer made a lot more sense, since one side being an authority is the point here.

-16
Aequitasreply
feddit.org

This is a good example of Gramsci's concept of hegemony. Americans no longer question whether arbitrariness and violence by authority are acceptable. They are so used to it that they perceive it as natural and normal and even defend it.

In a democracy, however, this is absolutely unacceptable. The police are not allowed to mistreat anyone or use unnecessary force. Under no circumstances. No matter how the person behaves. They have no more rights than anyone else. Authority is not a deity. Stop acting like it is.

5

You are like those wife beaters defenders. She provoked her husband so her husband has to abuse her

14
Avicennareply
lemmy.world

Is this one of those "well she was wearing a skirt though" arguments? Victim blaming is rarely done in good faith.

11
mrmanagerreply
lemmy.today

She is not a victim, she is an activist with a strategy here.

-10

Still the same argument and mindset: "well if she did not want to entice men why did she wear a skirt"

7

This was abused so she is a victim. Being an activist doesn't change that

5