Wasn't that, like, the whole premise? That in a world where "cavemen" (apparently neanderthals?) exist alongside humans as we know them into the present day, "It's so easy, a caveman could do it" becomes racist abuse?
I guess the best you could do with that premise are a series of Very Special Episodes, but I bet that's not what happened. I didn't watch the show, like most people I was like "This isn't going to make a show worth seeing.
The show you describe sounds pretty cool, but they just made the cavemen good at dancing, have big dicks, and I think they couldn't swim. It wasn't tasteful in the slightest
Any context making you believe this is false does not make it "literally" a lie. At best, it's "literally" the truth being portrayed in a misleading way (which, I really don't think it is).
Not really sure what your goal is anyways. They obviously didn't see the comment. Why spend time hyper-analyzing the probability of if they might have seen it or not?
The comment was bullshit in the first place and the fact that it wasn't AI was already pointed out. I am fucking tired of the slop police so maybe I'm being a bit too intense about it.
Maybe I misunderstood and he was agreeing with me that he didn't read the comments, but it just didn't come off that way to me.
Pedalling with crocs sucks. I do it sometimes when I go to my cabin and need to get back to the entrance 300 metres away. It's soft, pliable and uncomfortable.
I really want to know the original context of the photo. I suspect the face and hair are prosthetic and it's a younger rider doing something like a Jackass skit; like you say, the bike is easily upwards of $10k.
If you look at the frame of the bike, around where the rear shock is, it doesn't look right. Also, the scale is off, this dude would be ridiculously tall if this was a normal sized bike. Look at the size of the seat, for example.
Look at the frame. It makes no sense. The front wheel has both disk brakes and caliper brakes, but the bars have no brake levers. The front disk with different slots on one side. I could go on. On the other hand, there is a bike that looks like this, so I'm not sure any more. That front disk is definitely not right.
Mate you're confusing mtb suspension parts for brakes and slop. The brake handles on these are short to be used with just a couple fingers and angled downwards.
Edit: yeah, that's exactly the kind of bike I meant.
As for the brake disc looking funny, it is similar to photographing a fan or helicopter blades. Unless your exposure is extremely short it warps the shape a little bit due to the speed of rotation.
Those are usual inconsistencies and errors and artifacts, and a healthy amount of incapability to explain what you don't know. Those have existed since long before AI.
I've seen this picture many many years ago, before stable diffusion was a thing.
Iβm not sure about that, but it does have motion blur in the background, so unless itβs a fancy setup that tracks the movement of the subject, it was not an automatically triggered shot.
ehm... shouldn't the motion blur be on the bike and not on the surroundings with a static camera?
Yes but luckily you can add words to any picture and post it somewhere online and assert thatβs the origin.
source:
Some cameras are mounted on pivots and have subject tracking
Unlikely to get locked-in and moving this quickly
They used the CSI enhance feature.
Bradsquatch sighting.
And he still wont sign anything.
It's one of those rare descendants of Vikings. The Biking.
Not to be confused with the prominent lgbtq personality "the bi king"
A thing can be two things.
Diogenes never died
I heard Zeus retired and wondered what he was doing now. Cycling apparently.
Us kids call it shredding the gnar.
Gotta get your gnar on!
Naked Gandalf riding to the hand-off
Albus Dumbledore likes this
Geico caveman.
Weird Fact: The Geico Caveman commercial 'characters' ended up in their own TV series called Cavemen. It only lasted one season.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavemen_(TV_series)
It was super racist and Nick Kroll was in it
Wasn't that, like, the whole premise? That in a world where "cavemen" (apparently neanderthals?) exist alongside humans as we know them into the present day, "It's so easy, a caveman could do it" becomes racist abuse?
I guess the best you could do with that premise are a series of Very Special Episodes, but I bet that's not what happened. I didn't watch the show, like most people I was like "This isn't going to make a show worth seeing.
You weren't wrong
How's it compare to heil honey I'm home?
The show you describe sounds pretty cool, but they just made the cavemen good at dancing, have big dicks, and I think they couldn't swim. It wasn't tasteful in the slightest
Yeah I thought that's how it would go.
A guy with style
IT'S
Finally a good picture of Bigfoot.
Looks like AI to me.
You couldn't even look through the comments? It isn't.
Actually at the time I commented, I only saw other people in the comments who thought the same. π€·
Literally a lie but okay
You're gonna tell bro what he saw?
In the context and how he said it, it implies the comments came after his imo. It was already quite clear at a glance by the time he commented.
Why is he saying "actually" if he's responding to being told he didn't look through the comments, by affirming he didn't look?
They said "I only saw comments saying XYZ".
Your response was "literally a lie".
Any context making you believe this is false does not make it "literally" a lie. At best, it's "literally" the truth being portrayed in a misleading way (which, I really don't think it is).
Not really sure what your goal is anyways. They obviously didn't see the comment. Why spend time hyper-analyzing the probability of if they might have seen it or not?
Hi, I'm from 10 hours into the future, I looked at every comment on this post and not a single other one called it AI.
The comment was bullshit in the first place and the fact that it wasn't AI was already pointed out. I am fucking tired of the slop police so maybe I'm being a bit too intense about it.
Maybe I misunderstood and he was agreeing with me that he didn't read the comments, but it just didn't come off that way to me.
Bigfoot riding a bike
Bigcroc. Bigfoot's consumer culture cousin.
Christ on a bike.
Pedalling with crocs sucks. I do it sometimes when I go to my cabin and need to get back to the entrance 300 metres away. It's soft, pliable and uncomfortable.
I dunno man, I pedaled on flip flops I bought from some tourist trap in Ocean City for years and it never bothered me much.
That's the second coming
I don't know, but they have more money to burn than I do.
I really want to know the original context of the photo. I suspect the face and hair are prosthetic and it's a younger rider doing something like a Jackass skit; like you say, the bike is easily upwards of $10k.
He is...
The most interesting mountain man in the world.
Santa Claus in the off-season
Rad as fuck, that's who he is!
video of the ad campaign: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jL4AI2kp3o
does not contain the exact picture, but definitely part of that campaign.
Winter is coming
This is easily my favorite photo of the day. Why's he looking directly at the camera? Seems like he's in the middle of a pretty fast turn.
Its from a commercial, I'd link to it if I could remember what they were selling.
That's disappointing.
Idk it was a really good commercial.
Still disappointing that it wasn't a real capture. Oh well, the internet lets me down again.
At least it's not AI slop.
I swear this image has been around for ages, way before AI could generate anything this well
The scary/annoying part is, from now on there'll always be a little voice in our head ask: is it AI?
And the answer is βnoβ most of the time.
yep: https://imgur.com/gallery/imagine-catching-this-on-trail-cam-is-that-you-god-tPKixSo
It looks upscaled or something though. And did the guy always look like that? π€ I easily may be misremembering of course.
If you look at the frame of the bike, around where the rear shock is, it doesn't look right. Also, the scale is off, this dude would be ridiculously tall if this was a normal sized bike. Look at the size of the seat, for example.
It's a Specialized S-Works Epic - a high-end cross-country bike. With the saddle dropped, I think any normal sized rider would look the same.
Check out the 9-minute mark on this video for a comparison - I don't know if it's the same version of the bike, but it should be comparable.
I'm gonna need some evidence for that.
It doesn't look like AI. The bike and everything makes sense. I can even read S-WORKS on the frame.
lol what an edit without telling people that you originally said it was AI slop without making that note in your comment
Who, me? π
It's not AI, it's from the specialized EVO ad campaign like 5 years ago.
Is it?
Look at the frame. It makes no sense. The front wheel has both disk brakes and caliper brakes, but the bars have no brake levers. The front disk with different slots on one side. I could go on. On the other hand, there is a bike that looks like this, so I'm not sure any more. That front disk is definitely not right.
https://www.specialized.com/us/en/s-works-stumpjumper/p/175248?color=281582-175248 It's not AI slop.
Sasquatch has some dough on him
After seeing the price of the bike I can see why he can't afford to wear clothes
So this is not AI but an AD?
Mate you're confusing mtb suspension parts for brakes and slop. The brake handles on these are short to be used with just a couple fingers and angled downwards.
Edit: yeah, that's exactly the kind of bike I meant.
As for the brake disc looking funny, it is similar to photographing a fan or helicopter blades. Unless your exposure is extremely short it warps the shape a little bit due to the speed of rotation.
front disk appearance is caused by motion blur and narrow focus.
Those are usual inconsistencies and errors and artifacts, and a healthy amount of incapability to explain what you don't know. Those have existed since long before AI.
I've seen this picture many many years ago, before stable diffusion was a thing.
I'ma gonna go with not AI on this one, even the motion blur seems to be ok, idk
But he has the right number of fingers!
Iβm not sure about that, but it does have motion blur in the background, so unless itβs a fancy setup that tracks the movement of the subject, it was not an automatically triggered shot.
Obviously it's still fake or set up to some degree.
I remember that commercial
In some places in the UK, this question would be casually answered with "Oh yeah that's Pedaling Patel, he's always out on a Thursday."
At least it's wearing (under)pants.
German Twitch streamer Knirpz 50 years into the future is who that is. The crocs are clear giveaway.
Old Merlin
Riding that Specialized Stumpjumper. Bro has exquisite taste.
S works at that. Exquisite and expensive.
That's probably the most real.person you'll ever see in your life..
pity itβs not real
That's Gandalf on his day off.