Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on reddthat.com

55 replies

x0x7reply
lemmy.world

But they are cutting the subsidy for creating more poor people. If they benefited from poor people existing they wouldn't do that.

5
AngryRobotreply
lemmy.world

They're too short-sighted to see that. They're also booting out many of their cheap, opressed labor that are also consumers and taxpayers.

6
haloduderreply
thelemmy.club

Yep. It's all about breeding anyone out of the gene pool whose families are in a position to resist the ruling class.

There will be 2 kinds of people in the future: the haves, and the have-nots. Just like in the past.

We only have ourselves to blame. For decades now, we've been fighting the people who fight back instead of just simply fighting back (or doing nothing). That kind of cuck-behavior catches up with us, and now it's too late to change course.

1
lemmy.world

Having to pay, to give birth, sounds shocking to some if not even many civilized countries

72
Squizzyreply
lemmy.world

I dont have private healthcare and our health srvice is shit but I have mever put my hand in my pocjet beyond parking for any pregnancy related anything, and my kids have been to GPs and A&E without charge.

ThebUS is a shithole country

20

Here's how it works in a poor third world country: https://archive.is/FL9qe (Original Washington Post article)

It's not just ER. Family medicine, dental, vision, full cancer treatment, palliative care... It's all free, including drugs, for every human, citizen or otherwise, legal or otherwise. There was a conscious decision not to restrict healthcare access and not to employ people to restrict access.

6
x0x7reply
lemmy.world

Technically you don't have to. People have been having children since at least the 1500s, and they didn't have medicade. There is nothing illegal about simply having a baby.

-7

So, folks only started having babies in the 1500s? In your mind, how did people procreate before that?

2

Yeah.. humanity has moved on. We dont let people die just because we dont need them

2
lemmy.world

 Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins laid out the administration’s vision in blunt terms on Tuesday. “There will be no amnesty. The mass deportations continue, but in a strategic way,” Rollins told reporters after meeting with Republican governors. “We move the workforce towards automation and 100% American participation, which, again, with 34 million people—able-bodied adults on Medicaid—we should be able to do that fairly quickly.”

Slimey piece of dog shit.

34

Just to be clear they are counting every single adult on Medicaid as "able bodied" which is far far from true for Medicaid.

15

All of those “able bodied adults” on Medicaid will of course be able to do farm labor.

Just like my younger sibling, who has a genetic disorder with scoliosis that makes him look like Quasimodo and had three open heart surgeries before the age of 18.

12

I mean Germany requires people to work if they are on welfare. And their job placement program can even place you as a prostitute.

-5

If I was “pro-life,” I would be investigating the fact that black women in the US are 3.5 times more likely to die in childbirth than white women are.

10

Wait a minute, if we cut this and birth rate falls, economy also falls because lower population usually leads to smaller growth in economy. Now if we deport hardworking immigrants, it will also be worse off for the economy.

What's the goal here? Make things worse?

33
Notyoureply
sopuli.xyz

Yes. Rich people make bigger gains when the economy crashes. They can buy up assets for cheap. Look at all those 'record breaking profits' made during COVID.

11

It is actually how the system works, just on steroids. Capitalism has the innate tendency for monopolization. At the end, the whole world will belong to one person and that person will rule everything. its just totalitarianism with extra steps.

3

This of course will turn the US into a 3rd world economy and lose its status as a world power. The countries that will do well over the next century are the ones that can prevent oligarchs from dismantling their economies and destroying their society.

4

Seems like a win for housing affordability and climate change though!

1

This article doesn't even touch on the fact that Planned Parenthood can no longer take Medicaid because of this budget bill.

30
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Wait, you guys have to pay for births?

Don't you have problems with sinking birthrates?

26

Do you not understand we have a class issue? Any cost the oligarchs can pass off onto the proletariat is done with gusto.

6
dickalanreply
lemmy.world

Healthcare being free and available, the fact that this confuses you so much means you are definitely too far gone and probably some Republican

2

seems like an uncapitalistic system. what's next, giving away food to children? letting people use roads for free? Who decides what healthcare the person recives if not their own wallet?

-7

I don’t know ask what they do in Norway or Sweden or anywhere else where the quality of life is so much fucking better than America

4

Omg dude, taxes.

We tax people, we fix things.

We tax people, we provide healthcare.

Currently you tax people and fix nothing and aid no one. I believe we all threw tea off of a ship 300+ odd years ago over something similar.

1

US: Land of the Free™️*

* terms and conditions apply, see Capitalism and Free Market for more details. Federal, State, and Local Government reserves the right to selectively enforce additional fees and conditions

17
lemmy.world

Was. It was. Well I mean it will be till next year then instead we will have lots of uninsured births and I assume a huge uptick in unskilled at home births and a huge uptick in dead babies. MAGA and MAHA indeed.

19
feddit.nl

MAGAmorons: HAVE MORE BABIES ALREADY GEEZ!!

Also MAGA: let's cut Medicaid to feed the poor poor billionaires.

🤡 🤡 🤡

18

Baby not guaranteed to be inserted to the same mother

4
lemmy.sdf.org

At least the religious idiots who have nine or twelve children will go bankrupt.

13

You haven't seen many Mormkn plural families, have you? Theyre on as many govern,ent subsidies they can possibly get.

1

All three of my children were born due to Medicaid. No way would I have afforded even one of my children births. My youngest is 16 and without Medicaid guess I will pay out of pocket for his healthcare.

12

So what you are telling me is that if we cut it we'll have fewer poors?

7

I always point out that the capitalist robber barons profit directly from having a pre-born, pre-literate workforce pool, they just want it for free.

Part of their whole socialism for costs capitalism for profits thing.

7

At least if it does come down to civil war the conservatives would already have destroyed their communities.

"We must be blessed because Gawd took that one too!" Fucking idiots.

4