Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

37 replies

sh.itjust.works

Betcha scrubbing them in the sink does too. It's just harder to set up a controlled study.

47

Yeah I wish they would have done that. Would be interesting to see. Hand washed plastic containers are subjected to much more mechanical scrubbing action, but much less heat.

17
lemmy.world

Dishwashers usually wash hotter than you do in the sink & reuse the water, so I'd imagine they also produce more microplastic in the process.

9
sh.itjust.works

Hotter yes, but no plastic-on-plastic scrubbing. And not reusing the water wouldn't change the amount of plastic, it would just be diluted in a larger amount of water. My guess would be, larger particles. But I can see why that would have to be its own, more complicated study. Because so many more variables.

5
lemmy.world

Do you know that water with microplastics doesn't cause even more microplastics? Seems reasonable to me - the existing microplastic should be ground even finer, and also cause more microplastic to be ground off.

2
sh.itjust.works

Interesting thought, we'll have to include it in our study. I posit that the microparticles from hand washing will be larger anyway, because method, and will include plastic from the scrubber as well as the containers.

3
lemmy.world

There's a good chance! Really depends on the impact of temperature, though since we're still waaaaay below the melting point of plastic, intuitively I'd agree with you.

2
sh.itjust.works

So where do we get our funding? I'm thinking about a billion, if we call it The Big Beautiful Golden Study, sponsored by plastic and dishwasher manufacturers.

1

No no no, you have to think about it differently. Neither of those industries will want to sponsor something like this. Instead we have to go with their natural enemies - and was is the opposite of plastic (i.e. what is non-plastic)? Obviously concrete!

2
mander.xyz

Basically any situation where plastic is warmed is a source of microplastic contamination

24
Wahotsreply
pawb.social

Probably mechanical abrasion too. Like car tires. Or your carpets/rug. Or your toothbrush. Or your nylon/sport/athlesure wear. Or soft, non-natural blankets, haha. I bet your furniture, too...

13
18107reply
aussie.zone

Just wash your dishes in a landfill.

15

water with cleaning chemicals probably leaches some out too.

1
pawb.social

And people are grossed out when they learn that people can have enough micro/nanoplastic in their brain to make a disposable plastic spoon (2g). :)

8

No offenses, but I'm gonna put a lot more weight behind a peer reviewed Nature paper, rather than some random podcaster.

The explained their methodology pretty well. They extrapolate the microplastics amount from a small bit of cortical tissue, and compared it to previous results. Yeah there might not be as much in other parts of the brain, but we don't have a reason to think it would be drastically different.

1
Match!!reply
pawb.social

the microsplastic keep my brain smooth and flexible :3

2

The overall plastic mass equated to about 6 milligrams per person per year, or about a quarter of the weight of a grain of rice

7
x00zreply
lemmy.world

It goes with the water that leaves your septic tank.

A septic tank is only meant to separate the water from oils and sludge.

2
lemmy.world

Really? So all my piss goes right thru and into my yard? If it filters out and stores solids wouldn't it also catch the microplastics too?

1

Depends on where you live. Mine goes trough the septic tank towards the sewer. A lot of houses also just go directly to the sewers.

And no, many microplastics are too lightweight to settle with the solids.

2

You reached the end

Cleaning plastic containers in a dishwasher is a source of microplastic pollution, study finds | Spyke