Spyke
Bananareply
sh.itjust.works

Interesting thing about that is that, while it's still common practice, a lot of more left-leaning women did away with taking their husband's name years ago

89
moist.catsweat.com

Yeah my wife and I just kept our name. Its funny because over the years we sorta wish we would have done the traditional thing as it would make a variety of things easier but now apparently its becoming a brilliant move.

61
lemm.ee

My wife did the same, but for unofficial stuff, she uses my last name as hers.

24
moist.catsweat.com

yeah its more problematic for official stuff really. like being in the hospital. Its not much but like you tend to have to make it more clear your the spouse.

20

a little conversation usually does but sometimes, if she is conscious, they have to verify with her and it can take a bit if they are to busy.

3
moist.catsweat.com

yeah it was a slow burn annoyance and she gets annoyed by it more than I but it took like 20 odd years to be like. This is sorta annoying. EDITED - hey so im rethinking and it started at about the 10 year mark and built up over time but as I said its little things. My wife has a lot of medical issues though so we might have more nuisance around it than the typical couple.

4
sh.itjust.works

In a sort of twisted way that could result in a blue wave if they disenfranchised ~half of their own voters and not the left.

13

They’ll presumably remedy this by giving husbands extra votes on behalf of their wives and children, as in Franco-era Spain.

22
lemm.ee

My wife didn’t take my last name and I’m so glad.

6
Bananareply
sh.itjust.works

My mom never took my dad's so I grew up with that being the norm, so I took it step further and my partner and I are not even married despite being together 11 years.

6

Yeah my partner and I didn't get married until 8 years deep, and that's going steady. We were fucking on and off for years before. We did it to appease our family. Never had any kids thank the hole in the ozone.

2

Tbqh i don't know if we are ever gonna get married, just because it's not the main priority, but I do make sure he's my beneficiary for most things.

2
Kalystareply
lemm.ee

I took my spouse’s name because I hated my old one.

But I will happily be a class representative for the lawsuit against this bill.

2

Power to you!! Totally get wanting to change your name, people have plenty reason to do so!

2
wirebeadsreply
lemmy.ca

Holy. Fucking. Shit. That’s bad. That’s oppressively stupid fucking bad.

Hey Americans: Don’t want to be oppressed or live in a fascist state? Immigrate to Canada! We’re hella friendly and open to people’s of all kinds, except MAGAs and Nazis and or maga-nazis

42

I mean, y'all gonna let me in? I need a place to crash for at least 4 years.

16
wirebeadsreply
lemmy.ca

Hmm. You all raise a good point. As Canadians, I think we need to make it easier for Americans to immigrate here.

We need to experience and expertise and we need to learn how to expedite that to bring the right people here to help expand Canadas capabilities.

Canadians, how to we make this happen? I have zero knowledge how to make this happen.

11

You guys seem to have a very open asylum policy. Give it a few years and a lot of Americans might qualify without you doing anything else.

5

I would move up there next week if it was that easy and didn't mean probably losing my awesome job. Oh, and it might be a bit disruptive for my family, too.

11

I was going to say, “no, stay and fight”, but on second thought I agree with this sentiment for more vulnerable groups like trans folks

9
lemmy.zip

I'm moving to Sweden but I'll be stopping by your way first! I'm too trans to let tsa look at my passport so I'm going to land travel to you all and take a plane out from there

8

Unless things have changed significantly at the border in the past few years, there's no process to leave the US. It's just the Canadian border guard checking things as you enter their country.

Of course, if the GOP decides to fully enact Operation: Handmaid's Tale, then that could change.

6
AA5Breply
lemmy.world

I’m still happy with Massachusetts, but my company is based in UK and we have an office outside Toronto. The road is paved

5

Toronto is the one city that everything else being even I think I might like to live more than where I am at.

3

Ha, if only that was an actual possibility. Most Americans will not qualify for immigration to Western countries.

I'd also hold off on thinking you'll be safe. Poilievre might be unpopular now, but there's a lot of time between now and the election. It's not a slam dunk for Liberal, fascism can absolutely still rise in your country too.

3
Kecessareply
sh.itjust.works

Eh...

We're not a consolation prize, they've let shit get fucked in their country for decades.

1

Yeah. You’re absolutely right, but there’s still a ton of good Americans that Canada could utilize to help us build our industry that we need.

We need more than just exploited real estate in this country, and I’m sure a ton of Americans could help us make that happen at an accelerated level.

I’d much prefer to take in Americans that are disenfranchised with their country, than have a disenfranchised country try and turn us into a new Guam.

3
moist.catsweat.com

so anyone who changes their name? So like a whole bunch of hollywood. two birds one stone I guess from their view.

12
AA5Breply
lemmy.world

It depends on how much paperwork you do when you change your names, how much autocracy you want to fight

When my ex divorced me she warned me me she wasn’t going through that again so I just need to deal with her keeping my name. She kept half of everything else of mine so I guess it’s no difference

2

Well that was the thing. If we did it off the bat it was like a checkbox, but to do it later is a larger nuissance than the nuissance of them being different.

2
AA5Breply
lemmy.world

Long term, this seems like an effective way to end that custom. What person would go into marriage changing their name when they know this attitude is at play?

11
lemmy.ca

It's cute you think that's not another right they'll quickly take away from women as soon as they can.

4
Kalystareply
lemm.ee

Republicans destroy marriage with this one neat trick!

If they force women to change their names with marriage, women will simply stop getting married.

1

Oh you sweet summer child...

"We need Christian men leading the fight against abortion," arguing that women's suffrage was a mistake, and accusing Hawkins of emasculating her husband by being "busy jet-setting."

This is only the first step. It will not stop until women are property.
If you don't get married than your father will own you until he decides who you will marry.

0

Yep, that's in there:

House Republicans passed a bill (which stalled in the Senate) this session to require citizens to have a passport or birth certificate matching their name to vote.

6

In British Columbia, there is no legal requirement to change your last name after marriage, and either spouse can legally use either last name at their leisure without any bureaucratic change. It is a genderless law.

Fuckin A, now I am really appreciating that.

4

Also to make it harder for people with non western names to vote

4

My wife and I were talking about this last night. She chose not to change her name when we got married, as she's been down that road before and has no desire to do it again. I'm totally fine with it, she's been able to grow and discover things about herself now that she "wasn't allowed to" in her past marriage, and I love helping her realize that. We also just got our passports the other day - work wants me to get mine and paid for it, so she got hers as well.

3
lemmy.world

Remember the MAGA women wearing the "You Can Grab My Pussy" shirts? Not all Republican women are going to be upset by this.

124
sh.itjust.works

I had to look that up to see if it was real, and sure enough—but I honestly shouldn’t be surprised. Utterly fucking revolting. On the other hand, the tee website display of a black man wearing it while saluting is pretty hilarious

39
TomMaszreply
lemmy.world

You have to be very careful searching for this.

22

Pride parades are morally disturbing to the fascists, but it’s fine when they parade their own authoritarian fetishes.

Rise of the Cult of Stupid, again.

cf. Salo by Pasolini

17
reddthat.com

This isn't a leaopards eating faces thing for republican women. These women derive social, economic, and political benefits through their association with the men who hold power in our patriarchal system. By aligning with backwards gender roles or evil ideologies, they feel protected and valued within the system even as it restricts their autonomy. They know what they're doing.

106
LadyAutumnreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

They do, but there is an assumption that the relationship between women like that and the wealthy ruling class men they attach themselves to is reciprocal. It, of course, is not.

Take the woman who has a child by Elon Musk. Her and Musk had a romantic getaway and brief liason. She clearly wasn't upset at being pregnant by him. There was an assumption that she'd be cared for. Even if not directly, indirectly. She definitely did not anticipate that she would actually be confined to an apartment 24 hours a day, entirely neglected without any contact from the father of her child. Nor that she'd be left with a child to raise on her own, and no support either financial or emotional or in terms of literal labor.

Call her ignorant and bigoted, both are valid criticisms. But she absolutely was not anticipating this outcome. There is a presumption from conservative/fascist women that they occupy a position of hierarchy over non-fascist/non-conservative women. That by virtue of supporting fascism and patriarchy that fascist men will afford them personhood. They don't believe in any of the assertions of feminism. They instead believe that women who suffer at the hands of men simply deserve it. That all women are judged in some kind of meritocracy, where belief in fascism and support of fascists itself is a determining factor of merit.

They are infuriatingly wrong. But do not be so quick to mischaracterize all conservative/fascist women as knowingly participating in the elimination of their own rights. They are systematically indoctrinated. Inexcusably, I will add. There is no justification for supporting fascists, no justification for supporting violence against women. To combat the ideology they espouse it is crucial to understand not just what they say but what they think.

39
nickiwestreply
lemmy.world

There is a presumption from conservative/fascist women that they occupy a position of hierarchy over non-fascist/non-conservative women. That by virtue of supporting fascism and patriarchy that fascist men will afford them personhood. They don't believe in any of the assertions of feminism. They instead believe that women who suffer at the hands of men simply deserve it. That all women are judged in some kind of meritocracy, where belief in fascism and support of fascists itself is a determining factor of merit.

This may be true for some women, maybe in the "tradwife" and white supremacist circles. But if, as you say, it's critical to understand what these women think, you have to understand that they are not a monolith. There are other motivations to consider.

I was raised in a fundamentalist, evangelical church. Within that community, there was no presumption of a hierarchical position over other women. There was only our god-given position to be subservient to our fathers, and later, our husbands. We could either obey the divine plan to someday reach heaven or disobey it and be resigned to hell. There was no in-between.

Now, a reasonable person would see this as patently ridiculous. But the problem is that reason has no place in this worldview. You doggedly follow a literal interpretation of the King James Bible, or you go to hell.

Many years ago, when I was 16, I had asked for a particular privilege. And my mother agreed to grant it if I would listen to some audio tapes that she had of a series of sermons from a woman. Now, that was unusual in itself, because women are not allowed to teach men within fundamentalist churches (Because The Bible Says So™). So this was definitely a teaching that was only meant for women. What I heard was horrifying.

The entire point of this sermon series was to teach women how to be good, submissive Christian wives. The lesson of one tape was literally that if your husband commanded you to commit murder, you would have to do it, because God put him in charge of you and your duty to God was simply to follow orders from your husband.

A woman would not be judged for breaking a commandment if she followed the direction of her husband. The husband would be punished for causing someone to break God's commandments, but the wife would be spared because she was simply doing her duty as a wife to follow what her husband said.

Women's agency is completely removed in this scenario. Which sounds exactly like what the men described in the article want.

Again, the problem here is that reason has no purchase in this worldview. No amount of evidence or argument is going to change their minds or magically give them a sense of agency.

18
slrpnk.net

Can confirm, was also raised as a woman in a fundamentalist church. We didn't stick just to the KJV, but then the pastor would turn around and preach out of LaHay's Left Behind series too, soooooo.

When I was 17, I went to a youth christian convention, and during the main speaker, they had the thousands of teens and 20somes in the audience participate in a mass marriage to god. They said that god would provide a good husband for me.

Then I got raped and made the mistake of turning to the bible for comfort. The bible says that women who get raped in the city should be put to death, and women who get raped outside the city need to marry their rapist. Now, the text I read made it sound like it wasn't really the location, but whether or not she screamed, and I had screamed, so I reasoned that I needed to marry the man instead of killing myself.

10
nickiwestreply
lemmy.world

I am so sorry that happened to you and that the place where you turned for help just added to your trauma.

4
slrpnk.net

Well, good news is that I've been out of that fuggin cult for nearly 20 years now, and therapy has done so much more for me than religion ever has.

6
LadyAutumnreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

I really appreciate you sharing your own experiences here, having experienced life in these fundamentalist communities. Youre right, there definitely is far more nuance to the beliefs of right-wing women than just "they feel and think X way." For what it's worth I'm sorry you went through that. I hope that you're in a safer and happier place now.

It is bleak how little we can do for women who are fully indoctrinated into that worldview. They will push back against women's rights every time. Liberation could possibly change some of their minds, but it's impossible to predict. Deradicalization is not a task based in repeatability. It isn't something we can do reliably. It depends entirely on the radicalized individual.

3

Yes, I'm living my best life now in spite of everything I was taught in my formative years.

You're right about that whole last paragraph. Of the dozen-ish kids from my small, rural church who were in our youth group together, I'm the only one who got out. The rest of them are raising their own teens in the church now, most of them still even in the same town.

I don't know what made me so different. I always had a keen sense of logic, and I was just rebellious enough to question things. I also had access to "heretical" art that helped me feel less alone (shout out to '90s alternative rock). I wasn't the only one of us who went to university, but I was the only one who moved out of my family home to do it.

I don't think there's anything I could say to any of them now that would make them reconsider their worldview. Of course, that works both ways. I know they consider me a sort of "fallen woman" for having strayed from the Straight and Narrow™.

2

Damn, I saw the same kind of thing. Most of the non denominational churches are poisoning society for a sliver of power, if only over the women.

2

The wondrous simultaneity of having free will while being a product of the universe that created you.

When push comes to shove though, what do we do, remove a person's agency and look at the environment, or allow them their agency and make them responsible for their choices?

I feel like answering this paradox is akin to reconciling quantum mechanics with general relativity.

4

I read years ago that white republican women will put up with being treated as lesser in their circles in order to treat others as lesser. So they're fine with being spoken down to and shuffled aside so they can feel free to yell at minorities.

32

I mean, to be fair, I wouldn't mind fucking the mailman for some qualudes either.

2
lemmy.world

Imagine how little self-respect you'd have to have to be a woman and vote Republican.

102

Making sure that women have very little self-respect is one of the primary functions of American Evangelicalism.

45
lemmy.ca

Well surely it was never going to affect them. They are one of the good ones, it's the others that need to be controlled. Why would they ever come for me if I am living a proper God fearing life?

18

Lydia, it's because you vote for forcing others to do things they don't believe in, not the specific things that are targeted at this moment

1
lemmy.world

Not a USA citizen, but a Hungarian, but I think some stuff still holds ground in the USA ground: They primarily think these right-wing radicals are just "jolly little conservatives", and not radicals, since they call themselves "conservatives". Contrary to the naive liberal belief, conservatism isn't just a jolly little belief of personally held traditions and healthy patriotism, it's just "fascism lite" which will turn full-out fascism once the checks and balances are removed, or getting extremely frustrated with social change.

And also there's the whole "you will get more conservative as you get older" propaganda, which makes a lot of young people "skip the liberalism and fast-forward to the inevitable", and they either want to remain conservatives because "jolly little belief of personally held traditions and healthy patriotism", or they believe they can't leave. Many also go down the hate road, and they'll get called all kinds of names if they forgive wrongdoers who were part of a minority, and they don't weaponize that wrongdoing into genocidal thoughts. We seriously need to counter this whole "you will get more conservative as you get older" with something. Can someone contact Innuendo Studios? I have an idea for an episode of "The Alt-Right Playbook" if he still haven't made one on this topic.

8

You get more liberal when you get older. puts on pirate hat and racks shotgun

2

They unironically think Harris was some kind of monster and that it was all worth it to keep trans out of sports.

7

There is a real lack of critical thinking, too. I legit know a few Republican women that honestly think that not eating meat will make a man effeminate, and that men that eat meat are more manly.

Obviously due to stupid marketing, but even in their cinematic universe where this is "true" it makes no sense and has no consistency. I've asked them if they think that women that eat meat are going to spontaneously sprout a penis.

1
commanderreply
lemmings.world

🥱

Yeah, the longer we go without acknowledging it, the more you prove my point.

-5
lemmy.world

Well, if we stopped babying women and treated them like adults, then maybe this would seem more farfetched.

How do we treat women like babies? You keep popping up here and you never provide examples or evidence to support your perspective/argument.

Unfortunately, most women think being treated as an adult is being "unfair" to them because they're so used to being treated like children.

How to tell everyone you are an incel without directly saying so. When did trolling become this sad.

1
commanderreply
lemmings.world

How do we treat women like babies? You keep popping up here and you never provide examples or evidence to support your perspective/argument.

That's because I get censored without being able to engage in an actual discussion.

How to tell everyone you are an incel without directly saying so. When did trolling become this sad.

Lol, keep covering your ears to truths you don't like. I don't expect more from you people at this point.

1
lemmy.world

That's because I get censored without being able to engage in an actual discussion.

I just asked you to give your reasoning and you are bitching about being censored. I'll ask again, how do women get treated like babies... Or do you not have the ability to articulate your point?

Lol, keep covering your ears to truths you don't like. I don't expect more from you people at this point.

Only an idiot would think that was a good reply.

Try again?

0
commanderreply
lemmings.world

You're not the one with the power to censor me, and I've been censored already for trying to discuss reality.

I can tell you're upset at me because I say hard truths you don't like. I'm going to block you now because you're going to keep pestering me to satisfy your herd mentality.

Goodbye.

1

You're not the one with the power to censor me, and I've been censored already for trying to discuss reality.

Why can't you answer my question?

I can tell you're upset at me because I say hard truths you don't like. I'm going to block you now because you're going to keep pestering me to satisfy your herd mentality

You have yet to present a single truth so far, so why would I be upset? You can't even explain your "truth" when asked multiple times.

Goodbye.

Run away.

1
sh.itjust.works

I can't help but think of how this cartoon from the beginning of November got it completely backward

91
rumbareply
lemmy.zip

Thank you I absolutely love Photoshop battles this was like 90 seconds in Gimp.

I would have preferred to have folded the uniforms, tucked them under their arms and gotten rid of some of the white space in the upper right but time makes fools of us all.

It's kind of unfortunate the community never took off over here.

11

Man I'd love to see Photoshop battles make a comeback on Lemmy. Seems like the perfect sized community for it.

8
feddit.nl

Look at how Teheran women were dressed in the 70s, and contrast that to how they're dressed now. The same future awaits American women.

68
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Margaret Atwood is rolling in her... checks google... Well-appointed Canadian home.

32
elucubrareply
sopuli.xyz

Yeah, no. US society is nothing like islamic societies. A faction if the rabid right thinks like this, and the rest of the right may agree to an extent, but they are aware that they can't sell that to the majority. Plus, too many women jusdges.

-66
lemmy.world

All it takes is heavy propaganda that exaggerates the upsides and downplays the downsides, while shutting down dissidence.

40

And they will still hate Muslims (and label all of them insane radicals) for Islam's views on women. Even though Islamic views on women are actually better than what Christian nationalists believe.

16

''Everyone is too reasonable for this to happen, despite the fact that the people in charge of every branch of government have repeatedly made it clear this is what they want to do''

Yes, most people are against this. Also most people are pro choice, or at the very least pro choice in cases of medical necessity, rape or incest, and most people are against laws specifically designed to ethnically clense the US of Hispanic people entirely, or laws that prevent children from accessing modem healthcare, or an unelected billionaire acting as though he's the president.

Most people being against something doesn't mean they won't do everything to make it happen. This has been in the works for the federalist society and so called family values groups and fundamentalist Christian nationalists for my entire life, this isn't an accident that is happening now.

29
lemmy.nz

You being pessimistic does not make you wise.

It does, apparently, make you condescending. But not wise.

-25
lemmy.blahaj.zone

And you saying "yeah, no" doesn't constitute a rebuttal. There's nothing in the Qur'an that isn't in the Bible vis-à-vis the treatment of women. The only difference between Islamic societies is that they've convinced more people to take it literally, and it absolutely can happen in the US.

25
lemmy.nz

I didn't say yeah no

I said the person I responded to was being rude to the person they responded to

It's possible to disagree on a subject without implying the person you disagree with is a dumb child.

-7

I do not get any better or worse sleep by telling you you're rude. You may be under the delusion you are responding to someone else.

-5

Tis is gonna be one of the most delicious schadenfraude of all. They think they are safe, but soon enough they are going to discover how important is being a white straight able-bodied male for these fascists. And how unimportant they are outside of a bedroom or a kitchen.

65
lemmy.world

You're overestimating Republican women...

Ever hear one of those stories about a Military wife who believes Rank is sexual transmitted so she has all the authority of her husband?

That's how they think.

It's not that all women are lower than all men, it's that the wife has the defacto "rank" as the their husband.

Disclaimer:

Obviously I'm not saying I agree with it, but that's how they think and why they're ok with this.

You have to think like them, they're "property" so treating a man's wife badly is like going up and pissing on his giant truck, the man will "handle" the offense. And the only way for a woman to gain social ranking is marrying a "powerful" man.

A frightening amount of woman think that's a good system.

69

Bruh...

The county I grew up in voted 95% plus trump in the last three elections.

It was weird to run into anyone who didn't think like that till I was over 18 and in college. Even then at a red state college, lots of women viewed themselves as status symbols. Their self worth was solely determined by the "best" guy that would date them.

Like, for large parts of America that's still the norm. And no amount of "Yaaaas Queen" social media posts will change their thinking. It's not even that they're trapped and need saved, that's the life they choose a lot of the time, you don't have to grow up in it.

But everyone still acted shocked women were voting for trump.

If we dont understand why they're doing it, we'll never change their minds.

19

I will not enjoy seeing all American women being marginalised. I will, however, enjoy seeing Americans finally exercising their right to protest a fascist government.

49

If you think the average guy is going to be treated any better I've got a bridge to sell you

24
Ixoidreply

But rather than treating their wives better, MAGA men are looking at making it illegal for their wives to leave them. >

5
lemmy.world

Project 2025 will create the Christian Taliban. I highly doubt the dumb fuck female MAGA voters will realize what they voted for.

62

Some of them want to be subservient. I've heard some even lament voting before. The Christian brainwashing is pervasive to all parts of life.

29

It won't affect republican women because the people running those voting stations won't enforce the rule for "their own".

4
Krikreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

A passport always contains the current last name. If you took on a new one you have to get a new one issued. That's standard pretty much all over the world.

Edit: Ok, a lot of users wrote that there's no ID card/paper that's common in other parts of the world. In my country a driver license is not enough to prove my identity because it's not an ID card.

Guess you are fucked then.

-4
lemmy.ca

Birth certificates can't be changed and need to match, and that's one of the forms of ID listed.

Passports aren't free, and not everyone has one to begin with. This blatantly stonewalls women, especially underprivileged women.

25
sopuli.xyz

Some states allow you to update your birth certificate after a legal name change. It's definitely not universal, and much less likely in red states.

1

Some states allow you to update your birth certificate after a legal name change.

This also has a fee attached.

It’s definitely not universal, and much less likely in red states.

Yeah, even just checking, and it looks like Massachusetts doesn't allow name changes for this purpose, and really only does it to correct mistakes at the time a record was made: "For example, you cannot change your birth record solely for a legal change of name. "

Did they even think any of this through? LOL

3

No one in my family has a passport. So with this law only the men could vote, unless they spend the money to get a passport despite not aiming to travel.

10

Most citizens in the divided states of southern north america do not have a passport though. And a birth certificate doesn't have your current last name on it if you took someone else's in marriage. That's the point.

8
boonhetreply
lemm.ee

Americans are pretty weird about their ID things.

Other than a driver's license, most of them don't have any ID.

They don't have any sort of unique ID number either. They have a social security number, which is not guaranteed to be unique. Two people can have the same SSN. One person can have two SSNs. You're apparently supposed to keep your SSN secret, but they're assigned somewhat sequentially and they get leaked a lot. It's a clusterfuck.

7

SSNs are guaranteed to be unique upon assignment. The problem is that so many leaks have happened that nearly everyone's has been stolen and is being used in some type of financial identity theft. The thieves are the people with two (or more) SSNs.

5

It is supposed to to keep your SSN secret and not carry the card with you everywhere but you have to memorize it and everyone and their dog is gonna ask for it. It is kinda scary how many times you have to give it out to random people over the phone or email.

3

The sad thing is this is kinda solved in the advertising space. Like, they know who I am, uniquely, including emails, phone numbers, and drivers license. The data is available, but banks (the primary users of the SSN) are perpetually stuck with 30yo tech.

3

SSN is about the worst identifier, but they have revamped the process to remove some of those issues. It should no longer be possible for people to be issued the same number, and they're no longer sequential or assigned in geographic blocks.

Doesn't change the existing ones, but going forward.

1
JohnScigreply
lemmy.world

really... yeah, let's shed a tear for the poor republican women, waving "Mass Deportation Now" signs. They didn't seem to care about dehumanization so much then. Now they are the ones being dehumanized, hopefully they'll remember how that feels come mid-terms.

13
commanderreply
lemmings.world

Stooping to their level doesn't make us better than them.

Try to understand that most of them don't know any better and are just trying to look good in front of their peers who also do not know any better.

0

Look, I try. Most of the time. I'm trying to be empathetic and nice and inclusive. But sometimes I wonder while fully grown adults can't use Google. Why they would believe the most obvious lies ("they're eating the dogs" is a great example - an absurd lie that was debunked 100x by every outlet within days). Again these are fully grown adults who choose to be hateful, angry and wilfully ignorant. In fact they revel in that ignorance. Warnings are "alarmist", factchecks are "biased", opponents are "traitors". These are fully grown adults that would trade the price of eggs for suffering of thousands of "illegals" and they entrust this trade to Donald Trump, a man who in his life has never taken a shot into a toilet that wasn't made out of gold. Like yeah, sure, THAT guy is gonna care about the poor.

My point is, we're all adults, we all make our choices as best we can. But if you keep making the same terrible choices and yell at anyone who tries to tell you they are bad choices, well... You deserve what's coming to you, because you've unleashed that on all of us.

1

Dehumanizing? I am just saying they should get what they asked for. But here the thing: being a minority isn't a choice, being gay isn't a choice. Being a republican is. But if that is dehumanizing then so be it. They can join humanity again whenever they want.

6

I've fought tooth and nail against accepting this, but looking at their plans it's becoming unavoidable: This will not end without violence.

45

They're already in peril from cholesterol poisoning. Humans are HORRIBLE for a food source

3
midwest.social

What if wanting to believe that there is some nice place that good people go when they die, leads people to support the mass murder and immiseration of countless women, children, queer people and BIPOC?

40
rumbareply
lemmy.zip

Religion is, and probably always has been a means of control. That's not to say that it is that at every level, or that it's only that. Religion is designed to bring you comfort and assistance in your times of need, while charging you a fee for the service. The business has to run, the staff and bills have to be paid, the top officers need to be fabulously wealthy. Not all religions are against Women, Children, BIPOC, and LGBTQ, but if you're trying to exert control, they make easy scapegoats. White men make all the money, Let us hold down all these minorities so you can smother them to make yourself feel better, now pay us.

One of my friends attends and assists with a great little church. It's a small, modest community church. The pastor is gay, and drag queens come to read stories occasionally. The place is just kept up with. They're not squeezing 30% out of the community. I'm not one for church, but I approve of what they're doing wholly.

28
infosec.pub

Religion also conditions you to out source your moral judgements. This allows someone to use their authority to convince people of immoral things.

14

Totally agree, but why is your username the noise made by my old 28.8k modem?

5
Juicereply
midwest.social

Religion takes the best parts of human nature, and convinces people that these things come from some big other, who is always watching and judging us. It turns us inside out, and the world upside down. I don't get mad at god or judge people for being religious but anything that convinces good people that they are fundamentally evil is itself the opposite of goodness.

It is absolutely a method of control, its no coincidence that the emergence of basically all the major religions coincides with the rise of class domination.

"With or without religion, good people would do good and bad people would do evil. But to make good people do evil takes religion."

13

I also try not to judge people simply for being religious, but it's pretty damn hard when it's the direct cause of their affirmative stance on things like anti-vax, anti-abortion, anti-contraception, anti-science etc.

Of course there are people with those stances who aren't religious at all too, but they do seem to be in the minority.

6
rumbareply
lemmy.zip

I know a couple people who swear that religion turned their life around. I swear they're the nicest most pleasant people I know. They claim that when they were teenagers they were consistently stealing things and breaking into places and it wasn't until they found God that they stopped.

The one guy was a little more analytical than the other guy. He looked me dead in the eye and said I don't know that God is up there watching, But I do know that in the time when I needed somebody to be watching, I felt he was and I made better decisions.

Now, I think that this is an outlier case but I'm apprehensive to just completely discount religion even though I know in all cases it's control. A lot of churches do have reasonable positive outreach for the money. Of course for each one of those you've got another church out there really everybody for 30% in no matter what their situation is.

4

I really understand that it is a nuanced issue, people are extremely intricate and surprising creatures. People have a way of taking the worst circumstances and making them wonderful. If a little God makes your life better, fucking go for it. My granddad, one of the sweetest most caring men I ever met, his final words were, "God in heaven..." And then He passed. At which point it doesn't matter if heaven is a "real" place, it is real because it is real to people who believe in it. On the other hand, many atheists are insufferable and just as ignorant and entrenched in their negative belief as the worst religious people can be. I've studied religions and was deeply Catholic until I was about 30, so like 15 years ago. I love to discuss theology. Personally I read the Tao te Ching and it helps me connect with my spirit, and I want others to have that, whether it comes from religion or music or just other people.

But the parts that are a mechanism of control are just too ingrained into it. I believe in freedom and human self-creation. If religion helps you accomplish that, go for it: praise Jesus, God is Great. But if it doesn't, then to the extent that it actively prohibits this then it is to that extent that I oppose it. Sometimes its a little, sometimes its a lot.

3

I don't get mad at god

Right, because it would be like getting mad at Santa Claus.

3
lemm.ee

My prediction for a future military incel recruitment poster:

Join the America Russia North Korea (ARNK) alliance in our war against the WOKE DEI Euro Chinese Soros COMMUNIST SCOURGE and you will be guaranteed a VIRGIN wife! ENLIST TODAY!

36
Zinkreply
programming.dev

Shorten it to just ARK and it will be even more on the nose with a biblical reference!

19

Considering that if the US started to support NK against South Korea, I don't think it is inconceivable that they would become just one Korea. (By North overrunning South)

2

Republican women: dehumanizing themselves to pwn the libs since Reagan.

36

It’s weird having a branch of my family that has these values and family structure. They’d probably support the idea of the male head of a family having the only vote. And yet, they clearly don’t agree that men should be able to beat their wives, because it happened to one of their daughters and they quickly helped her leave her abusive husband. Good people with very backwards ideas.

2
fedia.io

They needed conservative women to vote this felon. And now they don't need them because he plans to stay forever. This will happen with everyone that supported him. He has disdain for everyone except himself. He will turn on everyone. His ego is massive and he is power trippin' right now. I can't wait until he tries to fire the Supreme Court and not replace anyone. Trump Jong Un coming soon. When they complete a border wall with Canada, we are locked in.

27
lemmy.world

For the believers, I think that tmany would be fine with this. It reinforces their preferred structure of a patriarchy in which they have a well-defined place and role (head of the domestic household, subservient to the man). No worries about having to deal with a fickle job market or figuring out what you want to do with your life. Your life path is set (get married, raise kids, take care of family), and, for some, that well-defined role the status that it conveys is really comforting. It provides a sense of security.

It's why, I expect, while there are many who fight it, there are plenty of women in Muslim societies who are fine with things as they are. We emphasize with those women who chafe at that and fight it since we've history valued the individual rights of self-determination and freedom, of course.

Thats a big allure of the American taliban to some folks. It provides structure and defined roles in a chaotic world.

Of course, republican men like it for the power, but more importantly, that women voters mostly vote against them. Stopping women from voting would cement them in power.

25
KeenFlamereply
feddit.nu

If you gloss over the fact that it could be FUCKING VOLUNTARY instead of hate crime. your point is valid for anyone that loves to be forced to do things they don't believe in

2
lemmy.world

I'm not arguing for it, I agree that it's fine if it's a free choice. I don't think personally that it's a good one, though.

My point is that many of the women pushing this on the republican side view all of this, including their own loss of rights, as a positive likely. It's not like a "leopards eating faces" or "voting against their interests" situation where they might be reachable.

1

But they are. As soon as they don't want what they vote to force. It doesn't matter what specific type of faschism or what rights they are removing, if they are removing rights they don't need they are still being eaten by leopards once they fall down the other side, accidental or not

1

Incels are finally having their moment. Next they will propose laws requiring hot girls to date them.

20
lemm.ee

Incels aren't getting shit out of this, this benefits rightwing patriarchs who have abused wives at home.

Incels are alone in a basement or some shit dreaming about being the rightwing patriarch but the rightwing patriarch doesn't likely feel anything but disgust for the incel. They'd purge the incel in a heartbeat if they could.

15
Snowclonereply
lemmy.world

It's more about doing everything they can to increase white birthrates. This us very much to secure white identity and majority.

3

Ok so

As a single WASP (ok well, I grew up protestant) male in my 30s, who has the confidence of an abandoned kitten, how exactly does this benefit me?

Like I feel like this is supposed to be about men like me getting more power over women. But I fail to see how that helps me at all.

All I can see is that they start here, remove voting rights next, then they remove the ability for women to be licensed to be doctors, or lawyers, dentists, etc. That's gonna fuck my life up immensely.

Just so women can't have a say? Why?

Conservative views on women are absolutely confusing. I know we have to abandon logic with them, but maybe that's the part I don't understand: how the fuck do I think without logic?

18

That's the thing: it isn't. The patriarchy is bad for 95% of men, as well, but a huge chunk of those believe it's good for them because at least they're not a woman.

24

It's not about what's good for you, it's about what's good for the people in power. And as women increasingly turn away from the Republican party, they're going to want to disenfranchise them.

15
lemmy.ca

Conservatives believe hierarchies are natural and unavoidable. If you can push someone else down on the hierarchy then that will put you higher up on the hierarchy then you were before. Shrinking someone else's piece of the pie leaves more pie available for you.

Leftists believe in making a bigger pie.

6

Do remember that it's only some men that will get that power, not all men. WASP is just the start of the verification process for you. The lie that men like you will get this power is what gets regular joes to buy in without realizing they'll never see those promises materialize.

I've worked enough retail to know that there are plenty of people out there who will gladly jump at the opportunity to be a petty tyrant themselves.

3

I actually think it's more targeted toward the Andrew Tate and Fresh and Fit follower types, and the propaganda does appear to be working on younger men, who are rapidly becoming more "conservative." They're extremely insecure in their masculinity, and think the subservience of women would be affirming.

Of course, it actually just hurts everyone, barring the people that benefit from keeping the working class divided.

3

They are fine with women being doctors and dentists. They won't have any respect for those professions if they are female dominated, but they are caring roles so they fit into the fundie worldview. Lawyers might make them uncomfortable. They would be fine with women as paralegals, but they would want a man in the courtroom and the boardroom.

None of them should be paid well enough to live truly independently. Can't have women building wealth outside of marriage. It's a process really. Give them a couple generations in power and they might clamp down on employment outside the kitchen or the nursery.

1

It benefits you, because with almost half the population removed from the paid labor pool, you are more likely to earn more, and get jobs you likely would not have gotten before.

1
lemmy.world

When are they going to start coming for the black folks so we can watch Clarence Thomas squirm?

17

Maybe he'll get fired for being a DEI justice. I honestly don't want whatever would replace him tho.

17
Lemminaryreply
lemmy.world

I don't know who that is, but she needs to make that happen.

3
lemmy.world

I'm not from the US: What happened to Katie Britt, who gave her response to Biden's State of the Union address from her kitchen? Is she happy now? I mean, not that I wanted to criticize anyone, but that was totally obvious even before the election.

16

Can't wait to see all the videos of right-wing women surprised: "What?!! No one told us he was going to do this! We thought when he said he hated women he was only trolling/owning the libs/joking around!"

14
lemmy.world

I mean, a major problem in society is that two incomes are required to pay off a mortgage - and making one member of that equation unable to work society wide would solve that, leading to mortgages and hence housing price calibration (calibrating it to a single wage income)....

...but I was kind of hoping that wouldn't be a product of gender segregation. Also this seems like it's going to affect a lot of other things and people women's autonomy and hence freedom and safety in jeopardy.

No Bueno.

14
earlgrey0reply
sh.itjust.works

I think it’s adorable that people believe that the capitalists would do away with female labor instead of going back to the good old days of just devaluing it. The myth that women didn’t work outside the home is a fiction. Only the upper classes could afford such a luxury. Poor woman always had to work, often for much less pay.

34

Poor woman always had to work, often for much less pay.

Exactly. Women always worked - they were just segregated into lower paying jobs and had less rights (pregnant? no more job for you! and since you’re desperate, enjoy the shitty working conditions).

There will always be poor single mothers that have to work to support their family. They just won’t have labor protections.

12
lemm.ee

Realistically, the loss of women's income would lead to a housing crisis as millions of families are unable to pay their mortgage, but it's naive to think housing prices will plummet. Plenty of vulture capital firms and the like will happily scoop those houses up to rent back to us in perpetuity.

12
4amreply
lemm.ee

Except the amount they’d need to rent them for just to break even would still be just about as high as the mortgage payment would have been, so they’re gonna lose out there, too.

4

Even then, they still own the housing stock as assets, which they can hold indefinitely. Their financial backing and ability to weather financial storms is much higher than the average American family. The goal is to remove ownership from the lower classes and ensure the plebs can only rent. It's more about control than anything.

2

No, I'm saying it would calibrate housing prices as mortgages failed... Ao it would be a long term solution not some patch up job.

In a world where only men can work mortgages would be calibrate to singilar male incomes.

1

A better calibration would be a three day week so one person could work and one person could do household stuff on any particular day and you still have a day to enjoy together.

4

Sad to see that people thing this is the working class fault and not the rich class fault. Just like everything from recycling plastic global warming, and child marriage

1

This is creeps like Stephen Miller and the other nazi goons. Trump is an idiot. He'll do anything if you compliment him enough.

7

There is some phrase involving (symbolic) intercourse and uncovering knowledge describing the sequence of events rather well. What was it again? Have sex and be enlightened? 🤔

9
lemmy.world

Surviving humans, take note:

Per Syndicate rules, subsection 543 of the Precious Elemental Reserves Code, having failed to file a proper appeal for mineral and elemental rights within 50 solars of first contact, your planet has been successfully seized and is currently being mined of all requested elemental deposits by the assigned planetary regent.

Every interior of your world has been crushed and all raw materials-organic and inanimate-are in the process of being mined for the requested elements.

Per the Mined Material Reclamation Act along with subsection 35 of the Indigenous Planetary Species Protection Act, any surviving humans will be given the opportunity to reclaim their lost matter. The Borant Corporation, having been assigned regency over this solar system, is allowed to choose the manner of this reclamation, and they have chosen option 3, also known as the 18-Level World Dungeon. The Borant Corporation retains all rights to broadcast, exploit, and otherwise control all aspects of the World Dungeon and will remain in control as long as they adhere to Syndicate regulations regarding world resource reclamation.

Upon successful completion of level 18 of the World Dungeon, regency of this planet will revert to the successor.

A Syndicate neutral observer AI-myself-has been created and dispatched to this planet to supervise the creation of the World Dungeon and to ensure all the rules and regulations are properly followed.

Please pay careful attention to the following information as it will not be repeated.

Per the Indigenous Planetary Species Protection Act, all remaining materials-estimated to be 99.999999% of the sifted matter-is currently being repurposed for the subterranean World Dungeon. The first level of this dungeon will open approximately 18 seconds after the end of this announcement. The first-level entrances will be open for exactly one human hour and one hour only. Once the entrances are closed, you may no longer enter. If you enter, you may not leave until you have either completed all 18 levels of the World Dungeon or if you meet certain other requirements.

5

Ok, i would like Americans to guess what approximate percentage of the venezuelan population WANTED to vote against Maduro on last ellections.

3

So surprising, things have really changed since the "grab her by the pussy" days

3
lemm.ee

I too wish to own republican women again. Hell I'll work hard so I can afford whole binders full of women.

-1
Triashareply
lemmy.world

It's an older meme. We thought Romney was so awful back in 2012. We do miss the days when McCain was the nominee.

2

we thought palin was batshit insane. rep, knows how to one-up each other.

2

Right, I fucking hate that bush Jr looks like a fucking primo candidate now

1
Shoureply
lemmy.world

Well that's the most delusional thing I've heard in a while.

Did you know that women's brains develop faster? Different sources say different years, but it seems to lie between 1 to 5 years on average depending on what age you look at.

Estrogens stimulate development of the frontal lobe. Executive functions, risk-assesment and empathy to name a few tasks it does. Which plays a role in why girls with a developmental disorder, are often able to compensate enough (masking) to keep up with their peers, or even be in the top of the class. Boys on the other hand are less lucky, and their grades are affected more clearly by the same disorders. ASD, AD(H)D, dyslexia/dyscalculi to name a few. Interestingly, hyperlexia is almost only seen in girls. While it is a developmental disorder, it often works in their favor in school settings. Estrogens appear to play a role in language development.

Estrogens also improve memory and learning. It's why women have a better memory than men on average, and why they are outperforming men academically on average. Yes, women will remember everything you said to them. For good and bad purposes.

Estrogens also play a role in social development. Which is why girls often prefer playing with toys that have a face on it, and integrate social feedback more often. Part of the reason girls are held to higher standards, which results in girls working harder in school, and suffering more often from performance/achievement related stress.

If anyone has a child's brain at 30, it's you mate.

3
commanderreply
lemmings.world

Sure bud.

I never commented on their actual brain development, only how society treats them which is objectively true and has a real impact.

It's sad watching how desperate you are to avoid reality when you don't like it, but I don't expect more from you people at this point.

-2
Shoureply
lemmy.world

You didn't read my comment, did you? I mentioned in my comment, that society holds girls and women to higher standards, and it's effects on performance. Which is the opposite of pandering.

0
commanderreply
lemmings.world

that society holds girls and women to higher standards

Uhh...

Yeah, this is what I mean by bending over backwards to enable their delusions. The problem has gotten so bad we don't even realize it's there.

-1
commanderreply
lemmings.world

If you don't want to believe something, you'll find ways to never believe it.

I'm not answering your question. I'm talking about you, specifically.

0

Except there is scientific evidence that women are held to higher standards. You're the delusional one here.

0
gedaliyahreply
lemmy.world

Make sure you click the dropdown menu and "View comment moderation history" to see what they're trying to censor from us.

"They" is the same thing as "us" on Lemmy. Where do you think you are? If you don't like the rules of a community or instance you can literally just make a new one.

5
commanderreply
lemmings.world

No rules were being broken.

I said uncomfortable truths you don't like and you abused your power to censor them.

You're literally obscuring reality from the community, which is why most of them are living in lala-land.

-2
gedaliyahreply
lemmy.world

Misogyny/sexism is a violation of Rule 1.

Posting removed material is always grounds for removal. If you ever have questions or wish to dispute a moderation decision, please message a mod directly. As I mentioned, we are just members of the community who volunteer our time, so we certainly can and do make mistakes. Such issues are discussed by the moderation team when necessary and decided by consensus.

All moderation decisions are public for review on the modlog. Be aware that direct messages on Lemmy are not private or encrypted.

3

It's not being misogynist or sexist. I mentioned how other people treat women, which invariably has an effect.

If you want it to stop being true, the answer isn't to censor it. It's to acknowledge it as a problem and then we can do something about it.

0