Spyke
hochreply
lemmy.world

You gotta wonder if today's fight with the previous commander of the ISS had anything to do with it.

It would be the most petty, dumb, and childish thing to call for the de-obiting of the ISS over a tweet, but my expectations for him get lower each day.

83

Musk is such a miserable pile of trash that it's insulting he even has a 1/100th the influence he has

38
feddit.org

Oh, so Elon offered a nonsensical rescue plan for publicity reasons and is upset that it was turned down?

Funny. Just like when these people were stuck in that cave in Thailand and Elon offered a nonsensical rescue plan for publicity reasons and was upset that it was turned down.

15

This is the Thai cave rescue all over again.

So far he hasn't accused anyone of being a pedophile yet, so Yei?

1
lemmy.ca

Where would they get the materials, machines, and tools needed to build a space station on the ISS?

1
Davereply
lemmy.nz

The book A City On Mars is a great read about why everything Mars settlement enthusiasts want to do is a bad idea, and yes it covers the problem of a private company controlling your air supply.

32
slrpnk.net

Reaching escape velocity is expensive. We can be more efficient and still achieve the same result using a minuscule fraction of the propellant and none of the rocket framing.

13
Sturgistreply
lemmy.ca

FALSE!

The blade is pulled up by human work, muscles are fueled by food.

6
moodyreply
lemmings.world

I mean we're already sending rockets up there. I'm sure we can afford to dump him out on the way.

5
riodoro1reply
lemmy.world

MelodiousFunk does have a point. Shooting him is cheaper.

5
lemmy.world

Trebuchet? Cheap? ✅. Easily assembled and transported? ✅. Low tech not needed any rare earth materials? ✅. Sufficient to launch him at least 150 m? ✅. Low survivability rate for potential additional yeeting? ✅.

5

Hmm, I think we shouldn't rule out other simple machines with wooden frames and French names just yet.

3

Just hogtie him and leave him on the lauch pad. We get rid of a problem, and the problem is turned into mostly it's component atoms. Give giving the circle of life a little help!

4

To be clear, I am not advocating for shooting Musk. I am saying we can ignite a fraction of the rocket fuel without any of the containment vessels or expensive infrastructure. While there will be no liftoff, it would certainly be uplifting.

2
lemm.ee

Why wouldn’t he? Now even more money can flow towards spacex’s not-gonna-happen goal of going to Mars.

41

Simpsons did it first! In an episode the rich and smart were sent on a ship as the earth is ending. Thought the smart folks will just be replaced by AI at this point. Once it becomes a reliable repository for knowledge - meaning no 'need' for fart smellas smart fellas.

The conclusion of such an approach is even broached by Wall-E, disney of all folks.

8
teftreply
lemmy.world

Cheaper to shoot him into interstellar space. Less Δv needed that way.

16
lemmy.nz

I dunno, what if in a couple million years some alien civilization finds what's left of him and resurrects or clones his brain? I don't know if we should take that risk..

8

Elon Musk is also an idiot so why should we be listening to him? He already sees business opportunity for his bullshit SpaceX or some shit.

26

Remember the 4chan post about a crack in the ISS.

Accelerationist pepperidge farms remembers..

12

I think that's probably the instigating factor. He saw on Twitter that the ISS has a big crack and the government is covering it up, he decided it's true because in his mind trolls on the internet have a higher level of authority than any expert or scientist, and now he has to insist on deorbiting it to prove himself right instead of backing down or listening to any reason to the contrary.

9

You reached the end