Spyke
nottheonion·Not The OnionbyNinjaZ

Men Face $1,000 Fine if They 'Discharge Semen' Under New Bill

A bill proposed to the Ohio statehouse will make male ejaculation without intent to have a baby, a fineable offense of up to $10,000.

The bill has been proposed by State Representatives Anita Somani and Tristan Rader, who wrote it to point out what they see as the absurdity of rules that control women's bodies but do not control men's. It has not been formally introduced to the House Floor yet.

Per Somani and Rader, men would face a $1,000 first offense, $5,000 second offense, and $10,000 subsequent offense fine to "discharge semen or genetic material without intent to fertilize an embryo."

Men Face $1,000 Fine if They 'Discharge Semen' Under New Billhttps://www.newsweek.com/men-face-thousand-dollar-fine-discharging-semen-ohio-2028909Open linkView original on infosec.pub
lemmy.ca

We could pay down the national debt in about 4 hours.

160

New business opportunity!

New fintech startup, Wankr, provides loans at 2400% to pay your wank-fines.

....Now to get $300 million in Series-A funding.

7
fedia.io

I mean tbf the GOP has a supermajority in the Ohio House so there's probably not much she can do other than trolling.

26
lemy.lol

Ohio voters recently passed a constitutional amendment guaranteeing abortion rights, so writing that bill here is certainly mostly a signal to national politics.

Also, I had a vasectomy, so would I still be able to wank away under the proposed bill? lol

23
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Also, I had a vasectomy, so would I still be able to wank away under the proposed bill? lol

Required, actually. With mandatory minimums for both frequency and duration.

7

Better get to practicing! I hear thinking about your grandmom playing baseball has a 50/50 chance of either being helpful or very traumatic..

1

How about proposing actual progressive legislation that would help her constituents, and calling out the Republicans who oppose it?

5

Agreed.

I get what they're doing, but they can look at the stats and see that Trump has broadened his coalition, in part, because of the fashionable hate directed toward men by people who consider themselves progressive, and stupid shit like this just adds gasoline to the fire.

11
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Seriously, I'm so tired oh these "Gotcha! Look at how hypocritical they are!" gestures. They're empty and a complete waste of time.

They. Do. Not. Care.

8

Less this. More beating the shit out of their opponents with canes like the old days.

2
pawb.social

It'd legitimately be hilarious if they introduced it on the House floor and the general response was, "Oh, yeah, this is perfect!" and it somehow passed.

44
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

It's already happened. Not this exact bill, but a "inception begins at ejaculation" bill. Forget which idiot Congressman proposed it.

I believe they actually did it before these people started to attempt to use it to troll people.

6

I thought that the first one I read about was a Republican, but it's definitely possible that I'm misremembering.

4

Yah, the at times almost universal male genital mutilation in the US goes back to religious nutjobs like Kellog & co to stop boys from masturbating. It's also what motivated Kellog, in his quest for the blandest food, to invent cornflakes, because, apparently, spicy foods make you naughty. Good Glob, I wish I was kidding.

12

As well as with homosexuality. People should definitely learn about the history of sodomite. Gang bangs of pastor were a thing.

4
lemmy.blahaj.zone

These performative bills are so dumb; you can't shame the shameless. Republicans are open hypocrites. You think they care about this?

Push laws for actual protections against people being hurt

81

Absolutely will not happen in Ohio, the only way the statehouse could do anything beneficial for it's citizens would be to have a massive gas leak

16

They aren't trying to shame anyone. They are just trying to get thier own names on the news. You mistake these poloticians for people who care about others.

1
person420reply
lemmynsfw.com

Tell me you didn't read the article without telling me you didn't read the article.

This bill was introduced by two Democrats to highlight how all these policies are being enacted by Republicans that target women but not men.

23
sh.itjust.works

Every sperm is sacred,
Every sperm is great.
If a sperm is wasted,
God gets quite irate.

76

The name seems like it has to have also been a dick joke, but I looked it up and apparently not.

Differing, somewhat confusing accounts are given of the origins of the Python name, although the members agree that its only "significance" was that they thought it sounded funny. In the 1998 documentary Live at Aspen during the US Comedy Arts Festival, where the troupe was awarded the AFI Star Award by the American Film Institute, the group implied that "Monty" was selected (Eric Idle's idea) as a gently mocking tribute to Field Marshal Lord Montgomery, a British general of World War II; requiring a "slippery-sounding" surname, they settled on "Python". On other occasions, Idle has claimed that the name "Monty" was that of a popular and rotund fellow who drank in his local pub; people would often walk in and ask the barman, "Has Monty been in yet?", forcing the name to become stuck in his mind. The name Monty Python was later described by the BBC as being "envisaged by the team as the perfect name for a sleazy entertainment agent".[24]

4

all the listed exceptions will be declared illegal in separate legislation.

16
grrgylereply
slrpnk.net

I haven't read the article yet but I'm really not understanding what they're even trying to dissuade here... Like what tort are they even punishing in their twisted little minds?

EDIT okay right away the article adds some much needed context:

The bill has been proposed by State Representatives Anita Somani and Tristan Rader, who wrote it to point out what they see as the absurdity of rules that control women's bodies but do not control men's.

It's like a protest bill.

13

the fake christians of America prove why freedom of religion also means freedom from religion.

28

That just makes having a wank more thrilling, getting close knowing you're about to reach a 100 grand fine that day.

America, edging its way to a theocracy.

19
lemmynsfw.com

So, what you're saying is I can move to Ohio, open a sperm bank that charges $100 per deposit, and make a mint?

11

So that you could legally ejaculate, paying $100 rather than paying much more as a fine.

7

This week Im going to petition the Michigan government to build a yuge wall between us and Ohio. I don't want any more chronic masterbaters roaming our streets, they belong in Cleveland.

10

Gun owning Americans, not being allowed to jerk off.

That's probably fine...

Right?...

9
fedia.io

The poor agents that will have to watch the recordings of proof of discharge in order to charge these men.

4
lemmy.world

Their bill has some exceptions, as it says men in Ohio will not be fined if they are using birth control, donating sperm, masturbating, or having sex with another man or member of the LGBTQ+ community. The bill is specifically aimed at men having straight sex without protection who do not then create a baby.

5

Doing some quick math, I have in my possession a 1.2 billion dollar RATM tshirt with Che’s eye stuck together for good.

4

This is uh...quite biblical actually, as someone got executed for this. They should make it punishable by exexution while they are at it. Why be a theocratic distopia only half-way?

3