Spyke

Defense stocks drop after Trump says Pentagon spending could be halved

KEY POINTS

  • Defense stocks dropped sharply Thursday afternoon after President Donald Trump suggested the U.S. could massively cut defense spending.
  • Trump has sent mixed messages on military spending throughout his 2024 campaign and in the early days of his presidency.
Defense stocks drop after Trump says Pentagon spending could be halvedhttps://www.cnbc.com/2025/02/13/defense-stocks-drop-after-trump-says-defense-spending-could-be-halved.htmlOpen linkView original on lemmy.world
lemmy.world

Who's to bet a load of shares get bought up, then suddenly this announcement is rescinded?

182

Playing the market based on the insanity dripping out of this guy daily, not a bad plan. If only there was some actual rhyme and reason to what he does.

51
MrEffreply
lemmy.world

I was already going hard on AI stock, then day of inauguration when he sent the clear message of where tech companies stand in running this country I dumped ALL investment money into AI stock. If I have to live in this hellscape I better at least get to retire in it.

12
abrakereply
lemmy.world

My brother, have you heard about the benefits of diversification? If you want to retire at all, don't put all your eggs in one basket.

27
Bakkodareply
sh.itjust.works

Everybody was panic buying ! Those stocks were fast as lightning!

20

No I got it, the song.

The thing is the first two posters changed the lyrics to fit the topic.

You just typed the lyrics to the actual song.

1
Sc00terreply
lemm.ee

I bought lockheed martin call options after the way the steel markets rebounded

Edit: just checked volume on LMT. 2.4M today vs an average of 1.35M. Yeeeeeeah. Lot more buyers than usual today

10
oyoreply

Yay for incredibly immoral investments. It's disgusting how stock trading has been gamified and divorced from what it actually is, owning and supporting a company.

4

Since the entire thing is contingent on China and Russia agreeing to half their defence budget too, the only thing to bet on is when it will be rescinded.

8

Work it baby, work it. Insider trading on steroids, or rather Adderall.

1
Rentlarreply
lemmy.ca

Seems like the strategy is for us Canadians to feel so sorry enough with the state of affairs over there, that we'd join the states out of sympathy. Nice try.

29

Probably Ukraine too. Let's just take over the planet and spread our terror democracy all over the world /s

6
someguy3reply
lemmy.world

Invasion of Canada doesn't need much military. It's just a fact.

-43
forrgottreply
lemm.ee

Lemme guess, it would only be a 3 day special military operation? 🙄

51
lemmy.world

Where have I heard this before?... I'm sure I've heard that before. Hmm, can't think of where tho. Starts with an R I think, leaders name starts with a P, but gosh darn it i just can't think of it. Oh well.

11
catloafreply
lemm.ee

Rwanda and their president Paul Kagame?

4

I think you need to read about what the Canadian military did in WW1 and why that is one of the reasons the Geneva Conventions exist.

Maybe it's best not to piss off Canada.

4
Pennomireply
lemmy.world

Crippling Canada’s military would be relatively easy. Holding the country would be absolutely impossible. It’s enormous geographically and occupation requires around 20 to 25 soldiers per thousand residents.

We would have to dedicate a cool million soldiers for the 40 million residents of Canada. The US had only 450k-ish army members in 2023, so that would be difficult.

27
Atomreply
lemmy.world

Not to mention triggering Article 5 for the rest of NATO and shattering every defense agreement at once. You know, Putin's wet dream.

35
Serinusreply
lemmy.world

If there's going to be a world war, I'd prefer to not be on the side of Russia and China.

6
lemmy.world

On the side of China? Their side is is sitting it all out and letting the U.S. and Russia devour themselves while picking up all the trade deals, currency holdings and eventually all the economical losses that will make it the strongest economy I'm the world by far. What do they have to do? Keep giving a nudge here or there, and watching egomaniacs devour their fellow citizens and the citizens eventually fight back to regain their freedoms. China wins every time Trump opens his mouth. But I don't feel they are on the side at all, just happily enjoying the little puppeting they need to do.

10

The US is basically China now. Xi remains in power because he convinced the Chinese people that China needs a strong man to run the economy and protect them from the evil foreigners. Trump has done the same. They're both corporate socialist countries now.

There is one big difference and no, China is not "sitting things out." A lot of the brouhaha over Greenland stems from China trying to use soft power to gain influence there. As they've done in Panama. Soft power means spending money and Trump's too simple minded to understand the concept of spending money to gain influence. So US soft power doesn't exist anymore which is why Trump can only make threats. It's the only lever he has because he doesn't know anything about the other levers. Of course his threats only further destroys US soft power, but Trump (along with most Americans) simply can't understand the concept so they see that as good thing. Hell they're trying to shut down USAID entirely, should be an indication they don't understand it at all.

China very much understands soft power and is using it everywhere. So that's what we have to look forward to... Chinese soft power being met with threats from Donald Trump.

2
lemmy.world

You guys are so enamoured with Nazis you forget Vietnam.

Previous losers willing to kill millions for a win.

18

Didn't they and Britain burn down the white house in the war of 1812? They seemed pretty fierce in WWII. As an American, I suggest we not fuck around, lest we find out. I'm much happier with Canada as ally, thank you very much. From wikipedia:

By the end of the war Canada had the world's fourth largest air force,[6] and third largest navy.[7] The Canadian Merchant Navy completed over 25,000 voyages across the Atlantic,[8] 130,000 Allied pilots were trained in Canada in the British Commonwealth Air Training Plan. On D-Day, 6 June 1944 the 3rd Canadian Infantry Division landed on "Juno" beach in Normandy, in conjunction with allied forces

16
sepireply
piefed.social

Found Putin's fedi account. 3 days to Ottawa, eh? Will work just like the last one, eh?

10

An occupation will. And the US has an extremely bad track record with occupations. That's just a fact.

You go on counting troops and getting boners when warplanes fly over sports arenas, while Canadians are figuring out how many strategic targets in the US are within drone range. This wouldn't be an overseas war where you just need to tell someone in uniform some bullshit "thank you for your service" remark and that would be your only exposure to it. It would be a guerilla war on the North American continent, and your dear leader is gutting the FBI's counter intelligence capabilities.

10
reddthat.com

We would probably surrender and then work diplomatically to regain independence or some other-outcome that would be better than blowing our neighbours up.

0
sh.itjust.works

What do you mean we? We literally cannot cede to a foreign power without a unanimous vote, which will never happen. You desperately need to read our charter of rights and freedoms, if you actually are Canadian.

E: see below for where it actually came from, I'm a wee bit daft.

2
reddthat.com

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms itself does not mention a requirement for unanimous consent. However, the Constitution Act, 1982, in Section 41, outlines the "unanimity formula," which requires unanimous consent from all provinces and both Houses of Parliament for constitutional amendments related to specific matters, such as changes to the office of the Monarch, the composition of the Supreme Court, or the amendment process itself[3][4].

Citations: [1] Unanimous Consent - House of Commons Procedure and Practice ... https://www.ourcommons.ca/procedure-book-livre/en/document?sbdid=37461d8b-10dc-48a4-99a8-8a843ba16e8a&sbpid=72cb21d4-6a4c-4343-a388-496b5b293b21 [2] Unanimous Consent - The Process of Debate - House of Commons https://www.ourcommons.ca/procedure/procedure-and-practice-3/ch_12_5-e.html [3] Amendments to the Constitution of Canada - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amendments_to_the_Constitution_of_Canada [4] THE CONSTITUTION ACTS 1867 to 1982 - Laws.justice.gc.ca https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/page-13.html [5] Amending Formula - Centre for Constitutional Studies https://www.constitutionalstudies.ca/2019/07/amending-formula/ [6] Charterpedia - Section 1 – Reasonable limits - Department of Justice https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art1.html [7] Guide to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Canada.ca https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/how-rights-protected/guide-canadian-charter-rights-freedoms.html [8] The Notwithstanding Clause of the Charter - Library of Parliament https://lop.parl.ca/sites/PublicWebsite/default/en_CA/ResearchPublications/201817E

1
kn33reply
lemmy.world

So... a quarter of the original left?

11
lemmy.today

Whelp, he's toast. The last Prez to threaten that got domed while visiting Texas.

67

Literally was listening to NPR on the way to work that day and Rumsfield was on talking about making cuts to the military.

20

Spot on. Johnson got the message and the 12 years were spent in SE Asia. In this case, the AI sector, especially Palantir Technologies, will be just as pissed off.

2
lemmy.ca

Wow, they tanked *checks notes* 1.6% and 3.6%. Woooow

57
sopuli.xyz

I'm guessing this is all just a ploy to make Lockheed, Northrup, and Raytheon kiss the ring.

Next week, all the classified work will be contracted to them for a steal of only thrice the price, but only once they've publicly kissed his ass enough.

44
lemmy.world

I don't like it when I agree with the general notion of something Trump says or does. Makes me feel dirty.

42
Sternreply
lemmy.world

Broken clocks. If its any consolation he could be, variously-

  1. Floating random shit. Common Trump talk.
  2. Actually wanting to weaken the U.S. militarily, to the benefit of his leash holders.
  3. Fishing for bribes.
20

Wait until you see how i gets halved. Im willing to bet they axe the VA, any scholastic programs, ROTC et al as most policies are about destroying America.

16

Thats the magic of trump though, when he's vague about things he can sometimes spin them as something agreeable. My guess is he'll keep the regime change bullshit and nix stuff like burn pit procedures, ukraine support, and veterans benefits

14
feddit.nl

Would be a good thing if it would actually happen but we all know it won't. Happy to be proven wrong however

36

The military is a jobs program. It’s paying for a ton of education and scientific research too. The first thing to go is going to be the scholarships not the guns.

8
lemmy.world

We spend more on our military than the next 9 countries combined not including our dark operations that we can't account for in our budget already.

We could cut our military in half and still be the best funded military in the world.

That problem isn't other nations, it's the US and the military industrial complex

24
Sc00terreply
lemm.ee

Have you ever read the unclassified annual threat assessment? There is an official report the intelligence comminity puts out every year detailing what other nations are doing around the world. And that's just what theyre allowed to tell us.

Ive read it, and if you look at what they detail out for chinas militarzation moderniation plans, theres not many reasons theyre doing what theyre doing unless to compete with the USA. Not to mention, chinas going faster than what originally was thought, and theyre becoming less reliant on other nations to do it. Thats just 1 nation. The usa has stuck its nose in too many peoples business that if they stop the arms race, there could be a lot of nations coming knocking. Weve painted ourselves into a corner (or at least have the perception of it).

Edit: all that said, theres definitely ways to be more fiscally responsible with our military spending... just look at the f35 or the sentinel program

5
shastaxcreply
lemm.ee

But we also sell a lot of that military equipment to allies, making everyone stronger and recouping some of that spending at the same time.

A quick search shows about $300b in sales last year with a spending budget about $800b. Of course, that depends on whether Ukraine survives to be able to repay its debt. But even if it can't, all the military spending goes to US owned companies or citizens (our soldiers) which circulates in the domestic economy.

-8

Considering how we've used that power in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Vietnam? Yes, its a good thing.

6
lemm.ee

If he actually halves Pentagon Spending, that would be..... the first good deed he's ever done.

27

I can see him doing away with seasonal clock shifts by accident at some point.

5
lemmy.world

He never will. He sent a message for weapon manufacturer CEOs to chip in, and off course they will gladlyl buy him just like how silicon techies did

4

Exactly, this is just fishing for a bribe, just like the tariffs. Bribe Trump enough and your program or industry will get a loop hole or passed over for 6 months or whatever.

5
SkyezOpenreply
lemmy.world

"Sir, half of our swastitanks have burned to the ground."

"Who attacked them?"

"Attacked?"

15

Are you kidding .... who the hell believes anything this idiot says any more. If any one does, then you are just as dumb or dumber than this orange cheeseball.

He is the master of deception, lies and misdirection .... he'll say one thing, everyone panics and runs around scared or angry and while they panic, he goes behind everyone to pull off some cheesy lame ass scam that would have been easy to stop otherwise but he gets away with it because everyone is preoccupied.

The stocks will jump up and down at his every whim and because he is the one directing the show, he'll profit by betting on when the fall occurs and when the rise returns. He'll skim off everyone's wealth over and over again until we're all bled dry.

21

It doesn't need to be halved. They just need to figure out where a large portion of the money goes, since they can't seem to account for it.

18

Please keep fucking with the defense contractors, surely they won't take any drastic measures against you

17
programming.dev

I had the “wait, a good thing?” reaction too.

But thinking about potential underlying motivations, it makes complete sense that the compromised traitor holding the reins would want to weaken the military at the same time as destroying the government.

Or maybe it isn’t to help other dictators, and he just wants the opportunity to weed out more people who are loyal to the constitution.

14

This may signal he is getting pushback from the military which is a very good thing. If he is serious about Canada and Greenland he will need a strong military. It makes no sense to start cutting the budget now.

Refusing unlawful orders is always cool and moral.

13
lemm.ee

My mind came up with a terrible what-if today:

What if Musky is becomes the first trillionaire in the next year or two and then deploys a Tesla-bot army?

13

For his own sake, he should hope that his bot army performs better than his swastikars.

18

I'm thinking it's more for bunker bots that he provides for all the other rich fucks, they all know the world is dead and the biggest issue the rich fucks have is loyal security when it's bunker down time so it's going to be some AI gun turret shit

2

well, tesla already was given a $400 million contract for armored teslas, so...

2
lemmy.ca

More than this, the idea that the US will reduce defense spending at the same time as others are increasing it is laughable. The whole "NATO has to start pulling it's weight" thing will result in US military power diminishing vs the rest of the world and will result in more US military spending in the long term, not less.

6

And another enemy agent is working right alongside him, hollowing out entire departments and agencies.

3
reddthat.com

Been saying it, dude is a gene stealers cultist trying to weaken the country.

11

The cutting the defense budget in half or an alien asset. Cause this timeline well off the rails.

1

you think hes not gonna just send nukes and sharpie 51 over it on the map?

2

Well, even if defense spending were slashed, the current oligarchy is gutting health, education, environment, and occupational programs, so those "savings" won't be reallocated to anything actually beneficial to society. We'll be lucky if that money even stays in the country. We're basically witnessing an estate sale for a deceased America.

24

Realistically speaking... Is anything gonna happen?

Fuckers are just gonna invest as always, capitalism knows no morals.

8

Good time to buy then. He already pledged to increase funding to Israel. Just need to research what company supplies the most weapons for them and invest there.

8
lemmy.world

Infinitely many monkeys on infinitely many typewriters with infinitely much time.

8

"I am going to take over the world"

"And they will pay for it"

-Some idiot apparently

8

In case y'all forgot Trump's last term, his general pattern is to constantly announce insane plans and only follow through on a fraction of them. Cutting the pentagon's budget in half is one of the distractions. Some General will dandy himself up in his class A and jingle some blueprints for a useless wunderwaffe and the defense budget will go up.

6
adarzareply
lemmy.ca

just last month lord diaper reiterated again that nato members should be spending five percent gdp on defense (up from the treaty's two percent). he's been whining about this one for like a decade now.

now he wants to spend less than even that two percent.

i think someone in the admin shorted some defense stocks, and this asinine statement is just to make a quick buck.

8

... or is this money thing just a distraction ? ... if they are going for fascism and totalitarianism ... if they get it, they won't care about money, once they have uncontested power. I say they are close to this point except for maybe the military who may oppose them.

3
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Tariffs, military spending, deportations, fossil fuels - did he fire his economics person?

6
lemmy.world

If Trump fucks with the rich folks - those who have their hands in the pocket of our tax dollars - we'll be talking about President Vance next week.

6

i agree.

our defense budget is larger than the next 9 defense department equivalents in the world combined.

5

Wow something I actually agree with (even if I know the money won’t be going back to the taxpayer)

4

I just don't even know how I'd react if he successfully cut the defense budget in half. Would i have to join MAGA at that point?

Because... yeah, I hate everything he's done or let others do so far. His Cabinet is/ will be a nightmare. I assume this defense cut would come with more egregious tax cuts for the billionaire class.

But cutting that much from our stupid war budget ... man that's such a nice thing to get...

4
TehWorldreply
lemmy.world

Defense contractors are mostly publicly traded companies. Raytheon, Lockheed, Boeing etc.

8

As opposed to having the government directly design planes and ships and stuff? Even in ‘communist’ countries such as Russia and China, they have companies that compete for business. Remember that essentially all the billions spent with these defense contractors is employing and producing products here as opposed to overseas.

4

If this happens, the US MIC will shit all over the MAGAts. How many fucked up MAGAts work in the defense industry? Exactly, fuck them and they can join the "Parasite Class."

3

This is a perfect opportunity to clean house of all the leaders he know aren't loyal to him.

2

Oh if anyone is going to be successful in Kennedy-ing a President, it would be the military-industrial complex.

Keep cutting spending Donald, you're doing a great job!

1

Or MIC will just arrange for another president that won't cut their funding. Either is a net positive.

1