Spyke

Trump eyes privatizing United States Postal Service during second term

Summary

Donald Trump is considering privatizing the US Postal Service due to its financial losses, a move that could disrupt shipping and push hundreds of thousands of federal workers out of government.

Citing the USPS’s financial losses, Trump argued the agency should not rely on government subsidies.

While his specific privatization plans remain unclear, Trump previously clashed with the USPS during his first term, attempting to shift control of key functions like labor relations and rate-setting to the Treasury Department.

This move could significantly alter the structure and operations of the USPS if implemented.

Trump eyes privatizing United States Postal Service during second termhttps://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/dec/14/trump-united-states-postal-service-privatizationOpen linkView original on lemmy.world

the conservative push to destroy this incredibly successful organization continues. its already been punished more than any other entity by requiring things no other business anywhere is required to.

starve the beast. theyve forced it to make financial considerations that now put it in pretend financial trouble so they can point at it as a failure.

if the USPS was allowed to run as any other business today it would be far more successful on paper than it already is, but conservatives just cant live with that.

193
lewdian69reply
lemmy.world

Good thing the Democratic administration replaced DeJoy and passed some protections while they were in charge... oh. wait

101
Freefallreply
lemmy.world

Can't replace him until a board of people fire him...and they didn't.

40
lemmy.world

There were empty seats on the board that would have tipped the balance, sitting vacant for the entirety of Biden's term.

39
sopuli.xyz

Not to excuse Biden, because he has fucked up on multiple fronts, but aren't those appointments dependent on Senate confirmations and thus sitting mostly empty under Obama, which let the Cheeto Bandito take over in the first place? And IDK if the Senate would have confirmed any Biden nominees. Wouldn't have hurt to try though.

12
gruereply
lemmy.world

Biden appointed, and the Senate confirmed, enough postal board members to get rid of DeJoy if Biden wanted.

But DeJoy is still there, and it's 1000% because Biden did not want to get rid of him.

3

Biden has made 4 appointments that are waiting for the senate to confirm. The earliest is from February of last year. I think he should have started earlier but to say it's 1000% on him is false.

1

yep, the guy who demanded the dismantlement of all the new high speed sorting machines. proof biden is just a big ol conservative

-3
adarzareply
lemmy.ca

it shouldn't have to be 'profitable' in the first place.

40

yep. no one ever complains about the profitability of our 'defense' system which seems to do more selling than defending.

39

It was never intended to be. That's why it has the word "service" right there in its name.

The USPS spent $89.5 billion in operations this year, which means that even if they didn't collect a single dime from anybody they could serve everyone in the country with every package and letter that they already did in the entirety of 2024 for about 4.475% of the Defense Department's expenditures in that same time frame -- which are just under two trillion dollars.

The Defense Department as a whole Hoovers up about 24% the Federal budget.

Therefore the fact that the conservatives have successfully bamboozled everyone into believing that the USPS should be run as a "business" in the first place is incredible. Would you support about 0.1 percent of your Federal taxes spent on granting you free Postal Service access forever? I probably would.

28

Wait, is it possible to run national defense as a business that's for profit? I mean if we all have to live in a capitalist shit hole anyways why not go for broke?

4

We're watching in real time what we've criticized other generations for letting things happen. Wars, electric transportation, malls for developers, Citizen United, etc., etc.,

11

Success is measured in how many billionaires it makes. I don't see the USPS making any billionaires. /s

4
fedia.io

For fuck's sake, it's not meant to make money, it's a public service - it's literally in the name!

I wish more countries governments would get their head out of their capitalistic arses and understand that the services they run aren't meant to be profitable - that's what taxes are meant to be for!

159
rumbareply
lemmy.zip

You're going to have to get with the times. Everything has to make money or it's scrapped including us.

46
rumbareply
lemmy.zip

I love that so much I might have to steal it

3
lemmy.ml

As did I, brother.

Edit - I don't know why I keep calling you brother.

4
rumbareply
lemmy.zip

I just need to know if it's '80s wrestler, clergyman, or motorcycle club, I don't really mind in any case I just need to know what voice to read it in....

3

Hmm of those choices I'm going with motorcycle club. It's the closest for sure.

I can probably pull off 80s wrestler in a pinch.

2
Obireply
sopuli.xyz

I'm no economist but at some point doesn't that fall apart? If everything needs to be generating then aren't we creating a vacuum at the bottom or whatever? Money has to come in and go out equally in the end, no?

11

It does, and that's manifested in increasing labour requirements, and consumer spending.

The US solves it by using slaves and debt.

10

The model has to change once you reach the vacuum state. Usually via violent implosion.

5
lemmy.world

The postal service doesn't lose money, it costs money.

By this logic, the interstate highway system and the military both lose billions! Is Trump going to privatize them too?

117
lemmy.world

Thats not even a true statement.

The postal service makes money, but any surpless is automatically taken by Congress.

In the early 2000s the GOP passed a law requiring the postal service to upfront load the retirement funds of new employees, creating a massive debt burden.

Also, Congress has removed their ability to modernize equipment and fleets, forcing them to continue repairing aged equipment.

Not to mention, DeJoy, Trump's installment during his first term, has done everything he can to dismantle any modernization because he wants the Post Office sold at rock bottom prices so he can buy it, get this, because he owns competing companies.

88
danreply
upvote.au

modernize equipment and fleets

They're getting those new electric trucks though.

6

And the company making them isn't doing the best job at it... Even though they got a shot ton of money and have only made like 90 of these things of the 3000 they are contracted for

3
Tikiporchreply
lemmy.world

I, too, have trouble remembering how many "L" s are in canceling.

11

Further reading: https://www.nalc.org/news/the-postal-record/2022/may-2022/document/Postal-reform.pdf

I skipped to the part about 2003 - if my reading comprehension is right, USPS was in the black. When congress noticed, they made financial magic by using the pension funding mandate to help hide how bad the federal deficit had ballooned during that administration? This is such political theater.

Yeah, I consulted chatgpt for sources on the history behind why that 75-year funding requirement was enacted. The other link it gave me was this: https://www.epi.org/press/news_from_epi_retiree_health_pre-funding_is_primary_cause_of_usps_shor/

Was there a better reason Pension Funding was even brought up as an issue worth legislating for? Was there some scare trend of businesses scamming people out of their pensions? Source?

1
enbyechoreply
lemmy.world

Don't forget National and State parks - public lands in general. WhY ArEn'T tHeY tUrNiNg a PRooooFiT??

9
CitricBasereply
lemmy.world

You're right, and that one isn't even hyperbole. They earnestly want to turn the parks into oil fields and cut down the forests.

2

Don't tell the Trump administration about the toll highway system in France

1
lemmy.world

Every thing the gop has done to the usps had hurt it more... but everytime I hear "it doesn't make money" well it did before the absolutely idiotic idea to make sure pensions were super funded forward. Ontop of that. Why the fuck does a government organization need to make money? I hate this whole "run a country like a business" bullshit so much. Money makes everything worse.

85

USPS doesn't lose a dime. It's a service. It costs money to run.

You know, like a government office does.

29

Same for public transit.

A bit of compensation isn't a crazy idea, but it doesn't have to break even with the money it does bring in. It's not like we have a ton of toll roads either, it's not an issue to spend billions on another lane or two.

23
buttfartsreply
lemy.lol

The GOP exists to oppose anything that serves the common good. They exist to transfer public wealth to private interests. That is their entire mandate

3

Which is why they want to privatize everything... easier to grift from. I just find it hilarious that they take full power, fuck everything up, lose power and point to things saying "see it doesn't work!" And their lapdogs just eat it up. Yes when you cripple something it will fail, and then you blame it or the dems and hey you get to do it again!

1

Its almost funny how cartoonishly evil the Republicans are. They literally are shutting down all public utilities, giving contracts to the rich, spending trillions in the name of "cutting spending", kicking out random people, and im pretty sure a Republican has openly decared friendship to be his greatest enemy (because "woke" or smth). If this was a simulation the developers are getting extremely lazy with this plotline, the villans are literally just evil.

80
weeeeumreply
lemmy.world

Its cause people are delusional and think they are the party of "small government" just because they lower taxes in the short term.

4
fedia.io

Citing the USPS’s financial losses, Trump argued the agency should not rely on government subsidies.

It already doesn't. USPS is entirely internally funded. What a fucking idiot.

72

Much of their operating costs is due to the insane pension funding they have to do. Way more than other parts of the government.

33
lemmy.zip

Oh, the financial losses that can be directly linked back to Louis DeJoy's actions while in charge to actively sabotage the service, the same DeJoy that Trump appointed to sabotage the service?

They murdered it so they could sell it off, don't let them claim otherwise

66
lemmy.world

Pretty sure the issues started well before that fuckface was in charge.

5

USPS is obligated to deliver everywhere. Uncle Steve who lives out in the middle of buttfuck nowhere gets mail service just like Cousin Roger who lives in the middle of town. Shocking literally no one, having to deliver to multiple Uncle Steve's costs way more money then it brings in.

Then there's inflation, and also just less folks sending mail as a general thing because e-mail is instantaneous and free.

The pension funding requirement was the overwhelming majority of their losses, but that's been resolved as of 2022.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/06/politics/biden-postal-service-reform-law-signing/index.html

13
lemmy.world

Fuck the fascists. We fought the British over less tyrannical shit than what Trump is promising.

52
yiffit.net

Wow, so wild that the agency you crippled with a nonsensical pension funding requirement is no longer running as efficiently as you demand! what a huge surprise, no one could have seen this coming!

Super cool that the Democrats didn't reverse that insane requirement btw.

43

Super cool that the Democrats didn't reverse that insane requirement btw.

The Democrats did reverse that insane requirement. In 2022.

6

Yes, but to be fair to them they did actually manage to reverse that particular nonsensical requirement.

2

doesn't USPS have some special legal status? how are supposed to be things like court orders delivered if not by national mail carrier?

38
lemmy.world

It isn't a business, it is a service, it costs money that our taxes pay, so we don't have to pay shitty private companies. (And it still makes money) "Let's make the Mail just like ISPs" is a stupid take.

36
catloafreply
lemm.ee

We should be making ISPs more like the mail.

11

Fun fact, lots of ISPs basically are, and Trump wants to ruin that as well. The coop I work for has a FANTASTIC network, and the pay is excellent as well. If it becomes a shitty profit seeking private company, that will all change.

1

... it costs money that our taxes pay ...

Nope. USPS is entirely internally funded. No tax money goes to it at all.

5
retrolemmy.com

Given the country's current mood, is it really wise for the oligarchs to threaten the livelihoods of the very group that gave us the expression going postal?

36
lemmy.world

United Tesla Shipping...UTS

United Tesla Institute... UTI

Shipping Tesla Institution...STI

So many possibilities!

23
binary45reply
lemmy.world

Call me dumb… but what does UTS actually stand for?

6
towerfulreply
programming.dev

Google says University of Technology Sydney.
Adding "medical" to the Google search returns.... University of Technology Sydney, and a health consultant in Australia.

So... I'm going to go with University of Technology Sydney.
While Google results have tanked the past few years, I can't find a combination of keywords that even suggests some sort of sexual/urinary ("naughty bits") infection.

DuckDuckGo returns Ultimate Tennis Showdown.
Adding "medical" suggests to add "syndrome" and got me to "Ulnar Tunnel Syndrome" ("ulnar neuropathy at the wrist where it passes through the ulnar tunnel")... So, too much masturbation? I'm struggling to make it naughty

5

Yeah… I looked it up on Wikipedia and got similar results, plus a river… IDK what they were trying to go for.

3

Its just like the UPS but with a T. They could also have the all new USTS!.... The United States Tesla Shipping!

2

Nah, Elon's all about dat X. He'll just call them all X.

4
lemmy.world

I'm not an accelerationist, but what's left to do now except bathe in the worm glow of our country burning down?

There is no arguing that America doesn't deserve all the bad things, and maybe a good old fashioned conflagration would straighten the survivors out for a generation or two.

23
lemmy.ml

I’m not an accelerationist, but what’s left to do now except bathe in the worm glow of our country burning down?

Well it's certainly not enough to just luxuriate in the chaos. Every time Trump makes things worse it's our job to point it out and explain why he's doing it. People won't radicalize on their own! They'll just blame immigrants and woke and DEI etc etc.

13
yesmanreply
lemmy.world

Do you hear yourself? You want revolution through explaining?

Trump supporters are not confused progressives. Trump is what America wants, He's what America is. He's what America deserves. Trump is more American than bullets and ground beef. He hasn't overthrown the founders, he's fulfilled their vision. We're not going to change that by scolding people on the internet.

I understand, I used to think just like you. I used to be a patriot. I've voted for every Democrat presidential nominee from Gore to Harris. But these days I'm writing to the State to take my name off those goddam rolls. I suppose you'll take a dim view of that, but no bullshit about civic duty, democracy, or engagement could ever compare to the tangible material benefit of avoiding jury duty.

I don't wanna save America anymore. In fact I think her decline is funny and I'm tired of pretending it's not.

1
Echreply

Yeah! Fuck all the people who will be hurt and killed throughout. That's funny!

2

Who gives a shit about Trump supporters? The vast majority didn't vote for Trump if you count non-voters.

Also don't dare call me a patriot. Death to America!

No arguments that the internet is a worthless place to educate people, though. This is just for fun.

-3

Because a lot of mostly innocent people get hurt the most when it all collapses around us, and most likely you'll also be hit by the effects of the collapse. It's why it's so important we work to fix the broken things and change what is wrong, and to be there for other people when things do break down rather than just wipe our hands and let the whole thing fall uncontrolled and unprepared.

4

Yeah, good luck with that.

Sincerely,

The UK, where we already had that stupid fucking idea.

18
lemmy.world

The Postal Service is in the United States Constitution, Article I:

Section. 8.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

Clause 7:

To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

US Constitution text / archive.gov

17

Republicans wish to destroy any public service. That has always been their mission.

17
lemmy.world

And how would you privatize an entity that's in the Constitution? I wonder how that'd look....

13
sh.itjust.works

Meanwhile in France

"Post offices are everywhere, private banks don't have locations outside cities... How about we create our own bank linked to the postal services!"

12

Does everything have to be a business to this guy? Some things are government services bcz they need to be done, and private businesses wouldn't make money off it. Not everything needs to be an attempt at making money off people.

12

My country did that long ago. Works worse every year.. sometimes I have to wait for my Mail for a week. Used to be 24h.

8

There's a HUGE real estate incentive here. Yeah the service can make tons of money for whatever company comes in but the real estate imo is the big one.

6

i didn’t think they will be able to. all the kleptocrats will make sure that there’s some legal document that will guarantee that they get hugely compensated in the event that the government tries to take their property back.

8

Americans will give Democrats exactly 4 years to fix the damage and then vote for Republicans again. Bush and Trump are two of the worst people to ever hold the job and it still didn't cause any lasting animosity.

4

I'm actually surprised that the USPS still exists in its current form. In several European countries, there's now very limited postal service because people just aren't sending regular mail anymore. It's all email and packages. As a result, public postal service have either been more or less shut down or privatized into a parcel service.

-4

Meh. The usps delivers mostly junk mail. Occasionally they deliver a bill. The packages they deliver could be covered by others. There will be gaps in rural areas of course. But those are the people who steadfastly vote for smaller government. So they most be okay with it. I say, let it go. Junk mail will cease because a private business would have to charge to much. Bills and such would go electronic... like the denial letter from anthem that they rufused to tell me the contents of. That all sounds good to me.

-27
lemmy.world

You know what else the USPS delivers? Anything to a rural address that UPS and FedEx and the others won't deliver to. Because those private companies can refuse to deliver to places but the USPS can't. And you know what is in those packages? Things not easily gotten to rural places. Like medication.

14
lemmy.world

I literally said that. The people in rural areas overwhelmingly voted for this. It's their will. They don't like programs that only benefit specific groups like the poor or disabled. Rural is just another group right.

-4
lemmy.world

I don't think all those indigenous villages on islands in Alaska voted for this.

4
lemmy.world

I have read enough of your comments to know that you know the difference between overwhelming and all.

1
lemmy.world

Sure. I do. I don't know how you could know what the people who live in areas that only the USPS is willing to serve overwhelmingly voted for, but feel free to show me those statistics.

And the ones who don't? Fuck them?

1

That is about rural Americans, not Americans who live in areas that only the USPS is willing to serve. There is a massive difference.

I'm a rural American. You have to go down a country road and up a highway for about 10 minutes to get to the nearest town. UPS, FedEx and Amazon all deliver right to my door.

1

You must be high. I didn't provide any evidence. I just gave an opinion paired with a comment about obvious hypocrisy.

-3
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Ohh I'd love for you to elaborate on why... Why is calling someone out for a bad take something that belongs on reddit?

1

It's the equivalent of name calling unless you support it with some kind of explination. So it adds nothing to the discussion.

1