Spyke

The Council Will Decide Your Fate

Machine is a HP ENVY x360 Convertible 15-eu1xxx with the touch screen. Ryzen 7 5825U, touch screen 16gb RAM.

Top recommendation of within one hour of me posting this decides what distro I install. Please not Hannah Montana linux or even worse, Arch.

I leave the decision up to you.

Edit:

The winner was linux mint. I've downloaded the ISO and am installing now. I hope my boss doesn't get pissed.

View original on lemmy.world
niftyreply
lemmy.world

I expect a screenshot of your desktop running it when you’re done polling this thread

Brb downvoting all the other OS ^^

43
lemmy.world

Well technically Mint won. But don't worry, you did get second runner up. Maybe next month?

10
niftyreply
lemmy.world

Aw that’s okay, OP. This you btw?

Edit I am just kidding, hope you enjoy your new distro! :)

9
ReallyZenreply
lemmy.ml

For a better touchscreen experience, try the Gnome Desktop. Some people hate it because ...because people, but I love it on my exactly-same-but-not-same latitude 7389 (Arch BTW) and thinkpad 390 yoga (Debian).

I actually like the lack of endless customisation options ; I really just change the background, install the Cube and the Wobbly Windows and I'm back to work. Which I should be at right now, sigh.

14
lemm.ee

I use touchscreen on kde plasma and it works fine. Firefox just needs some customizing

9
ReallyZenreply
lemmy.ml

I've found it depends on version / distro. My Debian install of Firefox doesn't feature gestures, which is frustrating all the more because the Epiphany browser has them. On Asahi, where it feels super natural on apple hardware, it woks excellently.

Now these gestures... I found myself swiping 2 fingers to go back in my file browser a lot recently and I don't know if I come from the future or if I'm being a slightly uncoordinated smooth brain.

4

Its likely just a setting in about:config

Or install Firefox from the official deb repo, or from flathub

2

Am I the only one kinda upset that it's not referred to as 'CinnaMint'?

12

I would have recommended mint too. Currently running it since I betrayed debian or it betrayed me.

Debian would be my next recommendation however pure debian is a bit tricky for beginners especially.

5

Great choice. Put it on my parent's old office PC after yet another malware incident. Never looked back. Machine instant feels fresh and snappy again. It still runs of an HDD and has only 4GB RAM since one of the 4GB died along the way. Still a perfect office machine.

4

Idk if this is your first brush with Linux, I only recently had my own. Let us know if you need any help, but I promise that if you just follow the instructions, and you can, you'll get through it. ChatGPT can also be useful for bridging small knowledge gaps in tech and IT.

9

yep, mint always, if OP don't like the mint looks i sugest them fedora atomic(silverblue or kinoite)

12

I have bounced around a lot and found myself just wanting something stable with enough "newness" to still feel good. I started with mint and I ended on mint.

Definitely the best one directly following windows, and in my opinion best one overall.

8

It is a sad story. Keeping it in legendary meme status is the best way to remember it IMO.

10
Prunebuttreply
slrpnk.net

I took a look at NixOS. Am I correct in the assumption that I'd need to take a bachelor's degree to actually get how to use that thing and I'm shit outta luck because I'm an embedded programmer?

6
mellowheatreply
suppo.fi

Just taking Advanced Functional Programming should be enough.

I have taken such a course, actually, but frankly my NixOS configuration is just a bunch of copy paste from all around the place. I think I could've pulled it off before going to college.

4
Voroxpetereply
sh.itjust.works

No, not even slightly.

I played around with it for an hour and had the whole thing figured out.

There's one config file, you add the packages you want to it. Done. Once you've got the syntax the rest is a piece of cake.

3

I know about the config file. But updating, flakes, home-management, etc make my head spin.

2

Makes about as much sense as buying a mac with apple silicon to develop x86 linux apps or windows to develop linux apps.

2
lemmy.world

this is not how Guix works - please don't blindly spread misinformation

2
lemmy.world

add channel nonguix install firefox

since when is "adding a channel" not part of the "stock" system? if that were so nothing would ever be part of debian based stock systems

my point being: you can and probably should try to bring it into your workplace

0

since when is “adding a channel” not part of the “stock” system? if that were so nothing would ever be part of debian based stock systems

That's literally what it is? You're trying to make a Theseus ship argument where there is none. By your logic, ubuntu would be stock debian. "it's just a few apt repos with their packages installed"

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

0
slrpnk.net

Debian Bookworm – yes, it’s boring – but that also means no surprises or gotchas – it just keeps truckin’ along

EDIT: if you ever do feel Arch-curious, start with EndeavourOS instead

40
TrickDacyreply
lemmy.world

Why endeavor? I recently tried arch for the first time and I've had a really great experience. It runs great on my raspberry pi 5, a device not actually supported by it. It actually feels and works a lot better than the two other distros that do officially support it: RPI OS and Ubuntu.

4

Personally I would say start with Arch and if you like it use endeavorOS. Endeavor is just easy install for arch(and the only one I've tried that actually achieved it well) so if you already know the inner workings it saves a lot of tedious install work and has some nice QOL defaults already set like yay colorized

3
Telodzrumreply
lemmy.world

I don’t think there’s a good reason these days. With ArchInstall, the process is as easy as other distros and then all you have to do is install a DE and you’re all set. Arch used to have a much higher barrier to entry; that just doesn’t exist anymore.

3

So their reasoning may have been a graphical installer? I also wanted that but since I used a tutorial to get arch installed and working on my raspberry pi, I didn't actually use a graphical installer and I didn't miss it.

1
lemmy.ml

Can’t beleive that Uwuntu didn’t come up…

26
lemmy.world

Atomic

The whole system is updated in one go, and an update will not apply if anything goes wrong, meaning you will always have a working computer.

Well having a working computer would be an improvement.

17

I was playing with Silverblue but had to switch out because it didn't have DisplayLink drivers or a flatpak for VMWare Horizon which meant I couldn't connect to work

1

How 'bout you decide for yourself? Despite what highschool and webster's dictionary suggest, what's popular has no bearing on what's right. In fact, what's popular has occasionally turned out to be Very Wrong.

13

Such a great distro to have everything running quickly, always smoothly up-to-date with everything.

It's the distro I also install to compooters of friends and family.

1
lemmy.world

Interesting, good to know. I'm not quite there yet, but my next build will 100% run linux, I just haven't decided on the distro yet. Thanks for the info!

2
lemmy.world

Not sure how much experience you have with Linux but if you know the basics (and perhaps a little more depending on your definition) I personally would recommend EndeavourOS. I have fedora on my laptop but I'm not that happy with it, while EndeavourOS on my desktop is running nicely. I use i3 but am switching over to hyprland though I have to do that manually. The installer has a lot of options for wms and other packages though which is why I like it. It also has some GUIs for updating the arch mirrors and everything else you might need to do the first time you run it.

2
lemmy.world

I'm not going in totally blind - I have experience with using linux on the server side. I've just never used it for a personal desktop environment.

1

Then it might be nice to start off with whatever distro you were using so you're familiar with the package manager and then just get yourself a DE/WM (or Wayland compositor but I think Wayland isn't quite far enough to start off with yet although I've only used Hyprland) that you'll be happy with. Then when you've gotten used to everything it's much easier to try out new stuff.

1
yiffit.net

THERE ARE FIVE LIGHTS Linux

Or just go NixOS so you may continue some amount of torment

8

If you like how Mint looks, install Mint. If you prefer KDE or GNOME, install Fedora Silver blue or Kinoite.

8

I would have said CentOS but then Red Hat turned out to be shitheads. Fuck it. Gentoo.

7
lemmy.world

MX linux looks sick af. I was expecting more meme recomendations, but aye, voting is only been going for 7 minutes.

I think I could deal with Hannah Montana linux. I don't know if I could deal with Arch.

2
lemmy.world

Red Star OS

Oh god.

But yeah, its kinda a meme thread. I was gonna load whatever was the top comment and try it out for at least a week.

2

Works great, I very very rarely have issues. Avoid updates for the month after the new stable and you're good.

2
lemmy.world

Why would your boss get pissed? Does he care about the O.S people are using?

3

Most corporate environments would not be ok with you randomly deciding to replace the OS, yes.

7

for more touchscreen usage,pop!_os

otherwise, kubuntu or some other kde de distro

2