I don't really understand how they consistently manage to screw things up. And they always say that the features are coming, but they never do.

I'm still bitter over Inbox.

I used to be excited about new things from Google. Tried to get into every beta, downloaded the newest released apps etc. But not anymore.

I just read about tasks being removed from Google Keep. Then the feature removal from nest hubs. Do they have a unified strategy at all? Or is it just the whims of a manager's daily musings that drive what development does?

No definitely don't sideload a YouTube client that doesn't play ads!

What's a personal?

So she was 12 when she did it, but is still a danger to others 10 years later if I'm reading correctly.
Was the psychiatric hospital meant to rehabilitate her?

I've also found (I'm a teacher) this generation is far less proficient at search. They (generalisation) type a whole question into Google, and read the Google created text box to get their answer, taking it as gospel - regardless of if Google has completely gone off the mark.

Contrast this to a generation that grew up with needing to refine search terms with key words, who can find far more relevant info quicker.

It's hard to get them out of the rut and teach them to be more critical of sources. They're so used to having what they need served straight up for them. LLMs (AI) are feeding into this more - they struggle to believe that AI hallucinations exist until I show them.

Again all this is generalisation - when I say 'they' I don't mean 'all'.

Wow did not realise that three of our states don't have a minimum working age - NSW, Tasmania and South Australia.

The worst part is it's not just 'they'll kill whales, trust us', it's that they've cited a study in a journal to support their claim - but the journal says they have no record of the study being published or existing in the first place!

"It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life."

• Picard

Q292640261046a:

Detecting multiple leviathan class lifeforms in the region. Are you certain whatever you're doing is worth it?

How many halves fit into a quarter? Half of them

.

Not a meal - that's just the burger. $8.30 AUD (5.42usd). Ridiculous.

And there's quite a few missing!

That first comma is a bit out of place - 'why won't you just try, Linux?'
'seriously Linux, just try your vegetables'.

One of the best techniques for catching llm use is interviewing, which is now an approved technique in my jurisdiction.

They often don't have any idea what it is they've included, and cannot explain it or offer any further detail.

there's never been a "Papal starship"^[citation ^needed]

That didn't happen.
And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
And if it was, that's not a big deal.
And if it is, that's not my fault.
And if it was, I didn't mean it.
And if I did, you deserved it.

So the issue comes when using tables.
Make a table cell end at the bottom of the page, and you'll likely have a new blank page appear at the end.

The reason is because word needs a 'new paragraph' marker (the backwards p symbol) after the table. This delineates where the table ends - it's part of the formatting. You can't delete it.

Ways to get around it:

• Don't make you're table go to the end of the page.
• Reduce the font size of the new paragraph marker to 1 (you need to enable show formatting marks). You can probably fit this at the bottom of the page without losing much space.

That makes sense - never considered cave artifacts to be an example of survivorship bias before

Introducing the B-52X.

Iirc just recently they started giving out blue ticks to people with lots of followers, regardless of if they wanted it. Then this week they make it so you can't hide them. It seems like a dim move - piss off the people who bring lots of traffic to your website, but actively decided to not get a blue tick, by forcing the tick on them.
If they didn't leave beforehand, maybe this would make some people/orgs consider leaving?