Faulting regular people for doing things to stay alive is quite a take when the bulk of emissions causing global warming and other environmental disasters is coming from the ultra rich and corporations.

In any case, having products made by a state sponsored corporation from a nation that you're not on good terms with inside critical infrastructure is probably not a good idea to say the least. Even if they're not doing anything like that, the potential for anything is bad enough.

...yes?

Not American so I have no idea what this means? I don't suppose this has anything to do with Greece?

Reading this and the Wikipedia article on it, that sounds really awful and barbaric?

That almost sounds like a medical version of Papers Please which is a really cool idea that I'm surprised hasn't been explored before.

What a petty little bear

Unless we consider every manager above the manager directly responsible all the way to the top, just sounds like a way for them to scapegoat someone and get away scotfree.

Is Nintendo big tech though? They seem kinda too specific to a sub section of an industry unlike the other companies that typically come to mind when big tech is mentioned.

Oh man, I second EoS. It's the best Pokémon game in my opinion. I'm quite surprised they haven't remade it given that they remade Red Rescue Team.

I guess it makes sense for you but not everyone here is from the west and the west has no exclusive ownership on democracy.

It's not mutually exclusive you know...

The selfie method stands out: on-device processing with no video retained is a meaningful privacy distinction.

Yea I don't buy it

If Discord is going to be abandoned by people, I wish we'd go back to proper forums that's much more accessible and searchable. Continuing down this road is just going to lead to the continued burying of useful information behind these services.

Is this really a surprise to anyone outside of the AI hype machine?

That's not the point they're trying to make I think. It's more of an attack on perfection. Like "the alternative is not perfect either so why not just stay with Chrome". It's not a very strong argument in general but it might be enough to keep people from switching.

I'm assuming they mean authorized by the resort rather than the government.

Nintendo does, GameFreak and The Pokemon Company on the other hand..

Man what in the world are they doing.

This all just sounds like the publisher or MBAs speaking. Did they ask the actual developers on their opinions?