Also left out of the headlines: she exhaustively tested thousands of traditional herbal remedies, not just one. She kept the one that worked.

It started with basic indifference and became a feature.

In the beginning, people were manually receiving and reviewing resumes given to them in person.

This moved online and, for a time, normal humans continued to upload their resumes. Humans continued to review them.

Eventually someone decided they wanted to spam resumes, like someone swiping right on every potential Tinder match and turning people down later. This spam became problematic, so companies needed a way to automatically filter folks. Extracting info from PDFs wasn't easy at the time.

Having a form to fill out prevented some spam and let them do keyword searches and filtering, but more importantly now it gives them two things: It prefilters people who don't care enough to complete it and add a sight sunk cost bias to folks who are on the fence.

You've invented Groupon!

I had to noodle on this one for a while and ask around. I think, and this is only a guess, that this might be "consensual non-consent", which is a role play of sexual assault.

MRW someone asks me how to nod.

A US $1 weighs 1g according to a random website I found on the Internet. I tested and it's close enough.

As of today 2026/06/02, a gram of gold is worth about $140 assuming it's minted and the purity is known.

That honestly surprises me. It means that gold and bills (assuming c-bills) are within an order of magnitude of each other.

Worst case with bill denominations: half a million. Best case with bill denominations: 50 million dollars.

Worst case with gold: $140/g less 10% worst case for verification and bulk buy discounts. $120/g ballpark. $60 million. Best case with gold: ~$70 million dollars upper bound for known minted purity.

So gold has the highest potential return but also the highest overhead.

I'd probably go gold. Even if I lost 50% due to overhead, I'd be able to pay my mortgage and my brother's student loans and for my mum to live in a nice place.

Honestly, any of them would be a life changing amount of money.

Good info. Thank you.

There's no meeting in the middle with folks who are trying to make a white ethnostate.

I'll debate with my friends about lots of things: is it worth adding a new tax? Is the needle exchange program appropriately measuring their numbers? Does it make more sense to build a homeless shelter next to the other one in the tenderloin to keep disadvantaged folks next to their peers or should we build it farther north so we balance people across care facilities.

These are the things we debate.

Things like, "do trans people deserve human rights?", "are concentration camps okay?", and, "are we cozy with state sanctioned extrajudicial murder?" are not up for debate. The answers are "yes", "no", and "no", and if anyone disagrees with that fuck them. They are a waste of my time and emotional energy. They will never be convinced.

I'm triaging. My friends and family and community need my limited energy. They deserve it.

Pee is stored in the Balrogs.

I was just explaining to some of my overseas friends how embarrassed and ashamed I was of the current administration, domestically and abroad.

Less than 24 hours later, this fucking disgrace.

Oooh. This was a good one. Took a lot of think time and I was almost convinced it wasn't possible. Thanks for sharing.

Do I have to wear the lace all the time? I don't look good in lace.

And honestly probably not; not because I have any objections to her being the breadwinner or have any weird ideas about who raises kids, but mostly because I'm not sure I could do it. I'd be a pretty shit father.

I'm super picky and not very good looking, so my "swipe right" rate is less than 1%.

I used OkCupid a while back. Found myself in a relationship for about six years. Eventually we decided to kinda' go our separate ways.

Used it again. Got back into a relationship. It's been ten years.

My one regret is that when I was first using the site about 15 years ago I sent them 5 bitcoin to turn off ads for six months.

I feel like they're a boon to someone like me who doesn't like to ask people out or even express interest in folks. "People should be able to go about their lives without someone like me hitting on them," and that kind of thing. An app is a good way to opt-in to solicitation and has a low barrier to entry.

Let's try a proof by contradiction: begin by assuming that potatoes have the ability to think, then derive a contradiction using logical inferences.

If a potato had the ability to think it would find my personality respulsive, as any thinking creature does.

If a potato found me repulsive, they would do everything in their power to locomote away from me, or at the least not attempt to take root.

Based on the potatoes that I purchased at the supermarket last week and forgot about, I can say that potatoes will attempt to take root in my presence, a fact incompatible with sentience. We've arrived at a contradiction, therefore potatoes lack sentience.

I might have felt sympathy, but I'm too busy caring for people that he himself hurt. They deserve my attention more.

You don't run over a crowd of people, crash your car, and then get to lament that there are people in front of you at the emergency room.

If each job takes 30 minutes to apply to, that's 50 hours per week, assuming you don't stop to eat or rest. I think my average job application takes a little longer unless I fill it with bullshit answers.

That's assuming you're just filling applications. It doesn't include finding them. I think in the time I was unemployed I passed over a few hundred absolutely reprehensible and morally objectionable positions.

Why so much ghosting? My speculation is perverse incentives of the modern world. Recruiters and HR need to justify their ongoing existence so they open positions that don't need to get filled so they can spend time filtering candidates. Meanwhile, candidates need to turn to auto filling jobs because and bulk applying because there are so many of these ghost jobs that recruiters who do need people can't get matched up. This turns into a race to the bottom of automation and counter automation where everyone loses.

Unlike javascript, where at least it is an interpreted language people can audit, you would have to reverse engineer these binaries to figure out what they do.

If you cargo install something you get source code (unless the library packages a binary, but that's the same as if it were JS or Python or C). Rust dependencies don't become binary until the final product.

Auditing Rust binaries isn't much worse than auditing minified and uglified JS. I've done both.

EDIT:

Rust

Rust is doing pretty poorly right now.

among the 999 most popular crates on crates.io, around 17% contained code that do not match their code repository.

https://kerkour.com/rust-supply-chain-nightmare

I just went through the article and I don't think I agree with the assessment that "Rust is doing pretty poorly right now." It feels disingenuous, given the content of the article you linked:

826 crates match their upstream repositories at the revision they were built at. 74 crates have revisions that cannot be found in their repositories, whether due to later squash merges, rebases or revisions simply not being pushed. 73 crates do not have VCS info, either because they were built with old Cargo versions, built with --allow-dirty, or not built from a repo clone at all. 77 crates do not declare a repository in their Cargo manifest. 7 crates would match their upstream repository but for one or more symlinks being incorrectly handled. 3 crates declare repositories that do not exist. 3 crates have submodules that do not exist. 3 crates cannot be found within their repositories. 3 crates cannot be built due to cargo package errors. ... Only 8 crate versions straight up don’t match their upstream repositories. None of these were malicious: seven were updates from vendored upstreams (such as wrapped C libraries) that weren’t represented in their repository at the point the crate version was published, and the last was the inadvertent inclusion of .github files that hadn’t yet been pushed to the GitHub repository.

No. It's because I'm an undisciplined fuckwit. Good guess, though.

This is definitely a joke. Taking something to an absurd extreme is a valid source of humor and I feel like this does a solid job of parody. Nice little references thrown in, too.

At the same time, Poe's Law: "Without a clear indicator of the author's intent, any parodic or sarcastic expression of extreme views can be mistaken by some readers for a sincere expression of those views."

If we could accelerate at a constant 1g, flip, and decelerate at a constant 1g, the trip would take ~152 years... from Earth's perspective. If you were onboard, time dilation would make the trip about 10 years.