Spyke

Let's try a proof by contradiction: begin by assuming that potatoes have the ability to think, then derive a contradiction using logical inferences.

If a potato had the ability to think it would find my personality respulsive, as any thinking creature does.

If a potato found me repulsive, they would do everything in their power to locomote away from me, or at the least not attempt to take root.

Based on the potatoes that I purchased at the supermarket last week and forgot about, I can say that potatoes will attempt to take root in my presence, a fact incompatible with sentience. We've arrived at a contradiction, therefore potatoes lack sentience.

11

If only we could cozzen the oligarchs into thinking that potatoes are a better source of power for the A.I. data centers, we could avoid a 'Matrix' style dystopia.

2
lemmy.world

First you have to define what "think" is.

Is it being self-aware? Is it responding to stimuli? Is it having brainwaves, or just a brain?

Then you have to ask if thought is something we would always recognize. Could something think in a way that is totally recognizable to us but is still thought? Do computers think? Why or why not?

7

First you have to define what “think” is.

That’s your answer right there—just define thinking as whatever a potato doesn’t.

7

You reached the end

How can I prove that potatoes lack the ability to think? | Spyke