Spyke

Replies

news

Comment on

Republican Mayor Physically Charges at Resident as He Loses It

Reply in thread

Okay, let's take a look at your sources here.

Let's just go over your first one:

While 2013-2016 had on average 38 federal charges involving threats to public officials per year, that average sharply increased during the period of 2017-2022, with the average number of federal charges increasing to 62 per year. It seems the clamor of threats to public officials has grown louder since 2017, with gradual, steady increases.

The next figure states 42% of them were against elected officials. Okay, fair.

Of those offenders who displayed an ideological orientation, the majority were anti-government, anti-authority violent extremists (AGAAVE) or racially motivated violent extremists (RMVE) in nature. Of the total count of ideologically motivated threats, 43 percent were motivated by AGAAVE ideology. For example, in 2016, a Huntington, Maryland, resident threatened to kill President Obama and multiple members of Congress including Senators John McCain, Mitch McConnell, Hillary Clinton, and Orrin Hatch because of “government corruption out of control” and what the perpetrator described as “treason against America” by officials who “sold out America.”29

Okay, there's maybe some equal opportunity stuff here....

Moreover, a portion of the threats were motivated by both AGAAVE and RMVE. Related to what other scholars have observed regarding composite violent extremism,30 23 percent of the ideologically motivated threats analyzed involved both AGAAVE and RMVE extremism. For example, on April 16, 2019, a Tamarac, Florida, resident communicated a threat by telephone targeting Representatives Eric Swalwell, Cory Booker, and Rashida Tlaib, expressing anti-Black and Islamophobic racism along with anti-government sentiments. The perpetrator also claimed the government was planning a gun confiscation while using racist and xenophobic language to describe certain groups of people.31 This particular example and the overlap between racially motivated and anti-government sentiments more broadly reflects the long-standing co-mingling of anti-government and white supremacist extremism as illustrated by the founding role white supremacists played in the late 1960s with the emergence of the anti-government Posse Comitatus Movement (which argued that any authority beyond the local sheriff is illegitimate). The Posse Comitatus Movement had spillover effects32 that influenced both the emergence of the Sovereign Citizen and Militia Movements during the 1990s and more recently.33 The intertwined ideological and organizational histories of white supremacist and anti-government extremism renders distinctions among types of threats difficult and sometimes misleading.

Finally, racially motivated white supremacists have been designated as the most persistent and lethal ideological extremist threat in the United States, and 19 percent of the ideologically motivated threats to public officials were solely classified as RMVE.34 While the authors did identify salafi jihadi orientations and issue-specific (e.g., animal rights and environmental-related) grievances in the cases, those were clearly much smaller in number, representing six percent and nine percent of the ideologically motivated threat cases, respectively.

Hmmm.....wait, this doesn't seem like BoTh SiDeS here....

Me thinks you should maybe actually read the sources and get a actuall understanding the sources you're using to back up your claim that violent rhetoric on the rise is irrespective of a party or ideology here.

Comment on

DCCC Releases Its First Anti-Trans Ad, Supporting SC Democrat Nancy Lacore

Reply in thread

You mean anti-trans laws like these shitty centrists voted for to get passed?

https://www.them.us/story/eight-democrats-house-dont-say-trans-bill

or

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5085485-cuellar-gonzalez-transgender-athletes-bill/

or

https://www.witn.com/2025/12/18/rep-davis-among-3-democrats-who-vote-pass-bill-criminalizing-gender-affirming-care-minors/

With shitty centrists that run anti-trans ads and then vote in anti-lgbtq laws, who needs Republicans.

You can argue until you're blue in the face that they're the best Democrats can do in a Red state, and I'll even give you an inch on that one, but that's still not an excuse for a shitty person with such pathetic morals that they can't stand up for human rights and Democrats, including Talarico who I think is still a decent candidate despite his own massive betrayal of the trans community, should and need to do much better.

Comment on

DCCC Releases Its First Anti-Trans Ad, Supporting SC Democrat Nancy Lacore

Reply in thread

Get your ass in there and vote in every god damn primary for the progressive, stop donating and volunteering for any centrist, stop donating to any Democratic group that supports centrist and instead donate to progressive only-groups, donate and volunteer for the progressive running in the Democratic primary, be better than Tom Morello and if you're in a nice safe, Democratic stronghold, organize and do a small but significant mass protest vote.

Just spit balling ideas that I've been doing for a decade and a half, minus the last one, now that you can actually do to actually defeat republicans with people who will actually push back against them.

Comment on

Trump officials asked CISA to secretly hack a voting machine — and not disclose any vulnerabilities they found

The CISA employees repeatedly told the political appointees that their request was impossible, in part because the agents capable of pulling off such an operation had just been laid off by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency initiative. The appointees eventually stopped pressing CISA.

So once again, democracy saved only due to the incompetence of this administration and Musk.

Comment on

If you chose not to decide, you still have made a choice…

Reply in thread

your refusal to vote didn’t stop any of it.

You literally said your. You didn't say they, or Abandon Harris voters, you said you. You just got all emotional and you did a ad hominem there bucko.

The only thing that is pathetic is your lack of being able to discuss issues without being all butt hurt and just repeating the red herring of surrendering instead of addressing the argument that a protest vote can have impact.

You can talk the harm that comes from a protest vote, I'm not even arguing against the fact that a protest vote can result in shit results but that's not what I argued is it? You just can't hold a conversation of ideas and that's okay.

Great conversation.

Comment on

If you chose not to decide, you still have made a choice…

Reply in thread

Now we're into ad hominem attacks! Awesome!

And man, you've got projection issues to assume that I didn't vote and taking things so personal over a discussion about not voting/protest votes being a vector for change.

ETA: So just for the record since you're getting all emotional here, while I do not agree with the Abandon Harris movement, I understand why they did it, and post election analysis did show that even with their non-vote, it would not have affected the outcome of the presidential race in that state. I still don't agree with what they did and I'm pissed that they had the audacity to complain about how things got worse for Palestine and themselves after Trump took office but even with that disagreement with their actions, I can still at least acknowledge their impact post election and how this Democratic primary season we saw a lot of progressives win and a lot of them running on the fact they were anti-APAIC and I maintain that the Abandon Harris PROTEST was one factor in that movement.

Comment on

Vivek Ramaswamy’s Disgusting Amy Acton Ad Blows Up in His Face

Acton’s campaign responded with its own advertisement Tuesday, in which her brother Philip Stearns discussed the abuse they experienced as children. “I experienced a lot of abuse, but Amy always got the worst of it,” he said.

“Shame on Vivek. It’s the contempt he has for Amy. It’s the contempt he has for Ohio. He’s not fit to lead,” he added.

He's never been fit to lead anything.

news

Comment on

Tennessee responds to Dolly Parton sister's election "rigging" post

Reply in thread

Again, I hate defending newsweek because yeah, they don't exactly put out great and insightful articles but damn, here I go because I think you're wrong in your premise.

  1. Journalists put things in quotes or put things like "purported" in headlines like this to provide some distance between their reporting of a person's claim and not present it as fact which would put them in the sights of a libel suit, especially with this batch of sue happy morons in power. Not saying that there's not disingenuous journalists that abuse this for fear mongering but I don't believe this is the case here.

  2. Yeah, not a great article I do agree, it's a bunch of BS fluff all around the substance but this seems to be the only source that's reporting on what the Tennessee office's non-response response which I think is worth noting and without this crap article, which I agree is mostly complete bullshit, unfortunately I would not have know that they were being shitty in their official capacity, which is what I think should be discussed and brought to light. I mean I'm not watching the Tennessee's office for a response and neither are you.