Spyke

Replies

Comment on

do you think the fediverse could replace popular social media

There is a powerful network effect to overcome here, and I don't think "being federated" is enough to overcome it for most people. Reddit and tumblr and discord offered us "what if all your forums/blogs/chatrooms were in one place" which is massively convenient, and why people flocked to those platforms. Thats a transformative user experience. being federated is transformative, but the change to the user experience -- beyond a larger barrier to entry -- is minimal. The point of mastodon is that its functionally equivalent to twitter without being centralized. But there are no decentralized places left on the internet, beyond those holdouts who are either very attached to their old technology or want to maintain their unilateral control over their platform, and who are unlikely to federate.

Comment on

Is there a way to create Super Communities?

I think this needs to be on the user end. I get that the fediverse can be confusing for people used to centralized platforms, but what's even more confusing is trying to participate in it while the details of which community you're actually posting in are obscured. [email protected] is run by different people than [email protected] or [email protected] and they may well have different rules and standards, and the user should be aware of this.

Now, if these different communities want to link up, or if [email protected] wants to have an "official" group on some other fediverse platform, the way many subreddits have official discords, they should have a way to do that, the same way many users want to be ablr to link their different fediverse accounts

gaming

Comment on

Indie vs AAA games

I almost always prefer a quirky game that does its own thing to a bland game with mass market appeal. Most AAA studios, especially as game budgets have exploded, are afraid to experiment with their gameplay or do anything new. Nintendo is probably the largest exception to this rule, but it comes with the caveat that they generally don't release new entries unless they come up with something new, which is sad for, like, Star Fox and F-Zero fans. But ultimately the more a game costs the less room there is for the sort of risk that makes for the truly special games

Comment on

Federated wikis?

Reply in thread

Reddit wikis are more about having a static page for information associated with a community than being a wiki proper. For example, music subs that maintain a "hall of fame" in a wiki page, or subreddit rules, or FAQs, etc. Not at all the type of stuff that would go on a fan wiki or wikipedia. This use case is valuable, although there are other solutions to the problem, e.g., sticky posts.

I'm not sure that would need to be federated. Maybe just to lemmy and other platforms with a similar model. But also, that should be up to the other instances, not us. If Mastodon figures out how to show a kbin "wiki" to their users in a way that is useful and makes sense, then why not let them do it?

Comment on

On federation and fragmentation

Reply in thread

Putting all the various "gaming" communities on kbin and Lemmy together on one page is a nice QOL feature but I'm not sure it's a good idea to present them to users as all the same thing. Gaming@kbin and gaming@lemmy and gaming@beehaw are different groups with different rules managed by different people and if users don't know that it's going to cause confusion in the long run

gaming

Comment on

Looking for a spaceship/sci fi game to play. Any thoughts?

Reply in thread

That would be weird for Outer Wilds. It's not really a game about figuring out a complex sequence of events that let you get the correct solution to the time loop, the way so many time loop stories are. There are a couple locations that can only be accessed early or late, but those locations only contain information; once you've reached them you have no need to go back on subsequent looks.

And since the game is about exploration, it doesn't really feel repetitive (at least it didn't to me), because you're always looking for something new

Comment on

I like this significantly better than Mastodon

Reply in thread

it only serves to bias us and disort reality.

Ehh, i mean it definitely does do that, but political discussion is also important to guide action. We can see plenty of political action that gets nowhere and does nothing, because the people instigating it do not have a solid theory of how political change is accomplished. Political discussions are how that understanding emerges.

That being said the internet, especially platforms like mastodon that encourage short posts, is rarely the best place for productive political discussion.

Comment on

Multiple reddit alternatives

Reply in thread

Look if people are getting mad because you're using "they" to refer to someone who has not disclosed their pronouns, then they're being unreasonable. But I've literally never seen that. What I have seen is people getting mad when someone uses "they" to refer to someone who has disclosed their pronouns. And often, this is something that is done by mildly transphobic people who aren't fully comfortable using, e.g., "she" to refer to someone who they feel looks insufficiently like a woman, but recognize that using "he" is wrong. Using "they" in this situation is just as wrong.

That being said, it doesn't help that there's no easy way to disclose your pronouns on this app. I'm a lot of discord servers I'm in, they use badges for pronouns so you can click on someone's username and see their pronouns. But no such option exists here