This happens to professionals in any line of work. And generally to people doing repetitive work a lot. In normal circumstances it's perfectly safe, until it's not because of an unpredictable situation.

Japanese railways use a technique called point-and-call to deal with it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZun7IvqMvE

Also she's down on her luck, and needs $10k to pay some debts. But no worries she'll pay it back soon, she promised.

We're in a huge recession, masked by inflated stock numbers.
Very few businesses are doing good, unless they're sucking investor money via AI promises.

I know this is a typical meme, but to be fair,
In the 6 companies I've worked in so far, I never saw the case of HR pretending to be anyone's friend in order to screw you.

It was always clear HR is there to enforce procedures and legal compliance, occasionally organize trainings, and not much more than that.

Cooling: Noctua is Austrian
Headphone & Microphone: Sennheiser

And next, were going to feed salmon remains to chicken. Close the circle of life.

I'm a fan of the 3-tier system:

1. Pedestrians
2. Human powered and human sized vehicles - bikes, scooters ... including battery-assisted ones
3. Cars and other motor vehicles (including powerful e-bikes)

In the best case there is space for at least 1 lane of each. If not, then some compromise must be made. Pedestrians should never be completely removed, so the conflict is between groups 2. and 3.

What to do should depend on the purpose of the road. Roads meant for long-distance travel prioritize cars, there is no real help there. Although I'd argue there should be a combined pedestrian+bike path alongside even inter-city roads.

On city streets see if there are any parallel corridors that go roughly in the same direction. Then you can divide the traffic onto different streets. One street for 1+3, and the other for 1+2. Or course this only works if you have nearby parallel streets.

The final option is combined low-speed zones where everyone shares the same space. It works great for neighborhood access, it's very inconvenient if you want to go a longer distance in car.
But if you're in a situation where the road is so tight you can't even put 2 proper lanes on it, that road should probably not be used as a thoroughfare.

An neither gives you an actually good car

As someone not using Threads this is a big surprise. I mean I'm surprised it didn't already have ads.

Is he using a random number generator?

eco-activist, women’s rights supporter, and anti-fascist

fighting for Russia

ummm, something doesn't compute

Trump swearing loyalty to King Charles wasn't in my predictions for this year

Google replicated the mental state if not necessarily the productivity of a software developer

If only this guy was a member of the US government, he could have done something

This is MS we're talking about. Preview and Viewer are probably made by two different teams in different countries, sharing no code, and prohibited from communicating with each other, even if they know about the other's existence.

And famously they fired all QAs years ago so there's nobody to test before releasing.

[object Object]

What if you take the measles virus, weaken it and infect people with that?

Cars. Basically every new model is always online, connected, and streaming who knows what data. Not to mention the awful UX of touchscreens.

Why should a car be connected to the internet? The infotainment is justified but should be controllable. And this includes EVs. Just because your wheels are moved by electric motors it doesn't automatically mean the entire car is "tech" and must be connected to everything and anything.

Is this a parody, or did someone actually brag on twitter about having sex? I honestly can't tell what's satire any more.