That's because if you don't rewind far enough back, the next person won't see the unskippable FBI warning and will be immune from the FBI's effects for the duration of the film.

It's only a meme if it comes from the meme region of the internet. Otherwise, it's just sparkling silliness.

Misunderstood the assignment, the client asked for a heatmap, not a meatmap.

The quick call is usually under an hour, but the resulting series of touchpoints, meetings with several departments, vendor calls, and data deep dives will eat a month of my time and will result in the same outcome as the quick call... That's outside of our department's scope.

Did we find Saddam's hiding place?

This is how you distinguish the American Shorthair from other shorthair breeds.

Consider switching from SAD++ to SAD# for better .NET framework integration.

Epstein's estate? There should be no fucking estate, burn that shit to the ground and salt the earth so nothing grows again.

This squicks me out a bit. It paints the desirable outcome as masculine and misogyny being solely the purview of men.

Would I be wrong to say (this is a damn shitty example so clearly wrong to make a point): I support trans rights, but I do not support their preference to use of animal-derived hormone replacement therapy instead of synthetic-derived, as it conflicts with my Vegan beliefs.

Yes, because you've moved the conversation away from one of support to a tangentially related topic that you wish to engage on. While occasionally, this can be a teachable moment or an honest discussion, more often than not, it is used to derail or poison the topic.

I'll see you in three months.

Even more obvious solution: Let people use the bathroom.

Yeah, I think perhaps I'm taking a less charitable view of the phrasing than I could. I just tend to bristle a bit at what feels like gender proscriptive phrasing. "Stand against mysogny, even if nobody is watching." would be more inclusive.

Good name for a Bon Jovi cover band?

The way I see it, if you as a user like a comic enough to research the artist, and you discover said artist holds values that are offensive to you, then you’ve learned something valuable. Plus, you get to make up your own mind whether you want to continue following said comic/artist.

Or a person who liked the artist enough that they went to look for more views it under the context of "I like this artist" so they're more likely to rationalize or defend the extreme or questionable positions and the community remains complicit in platforming hate.

It is a fine line to walk as a mod (or person in power) to dictate what is and isn’t acceptable at any given moment.

That is literally the role of a mod?

I'm a little worried about the redhead with 😑 for a left hand.

I guess what I am trying to say is that I feel that the content is not always a direct reflection of the bad values that their creators/portrayers may have.

I think on its own that makes sense, but without some blanket bans on known hateful artists, people are getting exposed to the innocuous works, and then looking up the artists to find a backlog of hateful content. And bad actors are free to limit test what extreme they can go to before any mod response.

I agree. It is a core function of moderation to be able to take a definitive stand and say "We won't platform hate speech or those whose body of work is intractably entwined with hate".

Uncomfy feeling.

Nun Jovi if you want to break into Christian rock.