The title is misleading at best. I'm sure 30-50% of the content are bots, but the link to Moscow is... let's say tenuous. There is no good source for a blackout in Moscow, only in a minor city (100k inhabitants) of the Moscow area called Zhukovsky according to one of the comments in the post. Russia is a country with 150 million inhabitants, searching for blackouts anywhere in the country on one event of reduced bot activity isn't real science, and doesn't point to any kind of causation.

Further down in the post, if you read it, you can even see OP was using problematic methodology and had to point to another post. You're literally just going by the words of a random reddit user at this point. This is conspiracy theory level shit, guys, you can do better than this.

Edit: link to the corrected reddit post by the same user. Look at the fifth graph provided. Amazing that 350 people upvoted this conspiracy shit, you guys have a serious problem over at .world

Edit 2: @[email protected] do you have anything to reply at all to this? Don't you think your post is disinformation, or at least the title?

purposefully designs the overpass to pass over a black community and evicts them all

*This is actuslly how roads were built in cities the past century. The project "segregation by design" has extremely good archiving of this

"AlJazeera is Hamas Ruzzian propaganda!!"

Active class warfare zone

Libtard is used by the right wing, no communists I know will use anything ending "-tard" because there's ableist meaning there. Lib is not a militaristic bad sounding word, it's the shortening of "liberal" or "libertarian".

You're telling me that pro-genocide Zionist media will not faithfully report on Venezuela? Can't believe it!!!!!!!!!!!

You can do both, I don't see the problem with doing anticapitalist propaganda on the internet, it's probably what pushed me most towards organizing

I don’t understand why they are still in place

The US is explicit about this: "every possible means should be undertaken promptly to weaken the economic life of Cuba. If such a policy is adopted, it should be the result of a positive decision which would call forth a line of action which, while as adroit and inconspicuous as possible, makes the greatest inroads in denying money and supplies to Cuba, to decrease monetary and real wages, to bring about hunger, desperation and overthrow of government"

I don't believe the USA is buddies with Russia, though, they have opposing geopolitical interests. The fact that the USA is pulling out of Ukraine now is not because they're buddies with Russia, but because Ukraine is a broken toy now that the EU has fully antagonized Russia as a consequence of the invasion and has subserved itself to NATO and agreed to the 5% military expenditure (mostly to buy weapons from the USA military-industrial complex)

Reminder that China's competent government has done exactly this, and as a result they produce 93% of the world's solar photovoltaic panels.

Yes, Cuba is a good example

Only state violence is actual violence! Kulaks enslaving peasants and starving them to the point that their life expectancy is 28 years of age is just basic economics! /s

250 years of a successful democracy

Lmfao. Jim Crow was a successful democracy? Literal slave ownership before that? Invasion of Iraq was successful Democracy? Bombing of Vietnam?

Even if you take the most extreme interpretation of US responsibility possible (eg adding another 1-1.7 million people for "luring" the Soviet Union into attacking Afghanistan), you don't get to 25 million

Bullshit. One single US (+EU) policy, economic sanctions, has murdered 38 million in the past 50 Years and keeps murdering 500k yearly. One single policy.

Roosevelt was already an imperialist... See Big Stick Ideology

Hey, cool that you're questioning it tbh, thanks for considering the possibility that western mass media lies about the "Uyghur genocide" in opposite to how they lie about the Palestinian genocide

Hey Cowbee, I see you often here, commenting on the election results. This will be ignored by liberals because they're too far into propaganda, so instead I made a little copypaste explaining why there cannot be free and fair elections in Venezuela. Feel free to use any or all of it:

Maduro is not an illegitimate leader. The Bolivarian revolution was widely supported among the people of Venezuela and freed millions from poverty, until USA sanctions demolished their economy. The express purpose of USA sanctioning, according to the US government is to, and I quote, "bring about hunger, desperation and overthrow of government". USA+EU sanctions additionally murder half a million innocents per year according to recent serious sociologic and medical studies.

By defending regime change under extreme economic sanctioning, you're approving the murders of 38 million people over the past 50 years of economic sanctions, and directly supporting the CIA strategy of "impoverish them until they change their minds".

I'm seeing this post trending on the frontpage, seems like a lot of people care. You can keep malding, though, that's amusing too

Hey, this ragebait took me quite a while to make, not that low effort. Did you see how I even tilted the text?

The solution is collective ownership of housing. Housing is a right, as much as healthcare or education, and centralizing and socializing housing would ensure affordable access for everyone, as it has historically.

Housing could be owned by unions, by local councils, by the central government or by all of the above, and then rented at maintenance costs to tenants under no threat of eviction. This was the case in the Soviet Union for example, and led to the total elimination of homelessness and to the average rent costing 3% of the average monthly income.

"Conspiracy theory" for libs is anything that deviates from western state propaganda.

To paraphrase Michael Parenti: teachers and farmers, when they unionize they meet in rooms, and discuss their interests, goals, their plans and their actions to reach these goals, what propaganda they need to create, this is obvious to everyone. But when I suggest that the rich and powerful do the same, they call me a conspiracy theorist.