Spyke

Replies

world

Comment on

Women in China are telling each other to bring their boyfriends to see 'Barbie' — and to use it as a litmus test for their thoughts on feminism and patriarchy

Reply in thread

I think it's healthy to observe your partners reaction to things. Especially when it comes to things that are quite important for a long term relationship, like their thoughts about gender roles. If you organically went to see the movie and your partner is clearly displaying red flags from it, then that's just good (not the red flags but that you now know).

I guess the trickery of going to assess them specifically can be seen as a asshole move. But I think it's a good move compared to alternatives ^^

Comment on

ChatGPT use declines as users complain about ‘dumber’ answers, and the reason might be AI’s biggest threat for the future

Reply in thread

I'm sorry but this sounds more like a conspiracy theory then a real concern. Occam's razor probably says it's expensive to run the service at full power. ChatGPT already generated a cult like following for AI so no need to spend a ton on the service and they can profit of the hype.

Not that openAI is held back by a government that is somehow afraid that it will empower the people, to do what? Revolution?

196

Comment on

Titta

Reply in thread

Can confirm as a swede almost everybody knows english ^^ Most exchange students at the university I studied at had issues learning the language as everybody just defaulted to speaking english with them. The people I know also don't really care about Swedish either, not very nationalistic in that sense.

Comment on

How will lemmy instances survive if they get too big?

Reply in thread

I'm posting from a self hosted server running on a raspberry pi! While no long term test has been carried out yet, it's really snappy :3

I wonder how the network will scale if more and more would self-hosts small instances with just 2-4 users. If it would decrease load or increase load on the instances that hold popular communities.

Comment on

2 authors say OpenAI 'ingested' their books to train ChatGPT. Now they're suing, and a 'wave' of similar court cases may follow.

Reply in thread

Was also going to reply to them!

"Well if you do that you source and reference. AIs do not do that, by design can't.

So it's more like you summarized a bunch of books. Pass it of as your own research. Then publish and sell that.

I'm pretty sure the authors of the books you used would be pissed."

Again cannot reply to kbin users.

"I don't have a problem with the summarized part ^^ What is not present for a AI is that it cannot credit or reference. And that is makes up credits and references if asked to do so." @[email protected]