No, it's Javascript, keep up

I want to argue with this, but it makes too much sense

The topology enthusiast says the jug is full of glass

If you're having fun after 1600 hours, then you're not playing it wrong

I don't get it... How does this protect anything? If we want our packets to reach a web server, we need to write the server's IP address on them. If a snooper has the IP, can't they just lookup the domain name from a DNS server? Or is that not a service DNS provides?

If the IP address is encrypted, how will the routers know where to send the packets? Only solution I can think of would be onion routing... Am I wrong??

That's right, baby! GAME AH DAH YEEAAAR!

I personally finished "Inside" in one sitting without planning to.

Phrasing...

I see eye of newt, but where, prithee, is your...

sQuIrT oF lEmOn? 🍋‍🟩🤏

They're about to absorb so much knowledge

" - is not what the cat said

Word... Paragraph, even

"Blows up blender with mind"

I am hilarious and you will quote everything I say

With enough quantum tunneling, anything is possible!

They meant "single basket". It's not a good idea to mix your password manager with your 2FA. It might only take 1 breach in 1 service for your accounts to be unlocked by malicious actors, instead of 2 breaches in 2 separate services.

Is it because of the "Host" HTTP header? I always thought it was optional, since the IP address and port were handled by the network and transport layers respectively. Turns out it's required to resolve between different virtual hosts in the same server. Today I Remembered (TIR?) that virtual hosts are a thing...

Is there anything else that might indicate the domain name in the handshake connection?