Trespassers will be violated.

"Money doesn't buy happiness" was first coined when people could afford a house with an average income. We're starving and that one time our grandparents over-ate at a buffet is being shoved down our throats.

Totally unjustified, what did our drones ever do to them?...😬

I agree, everyone who doesn't like all of star wars is a big dumb idiot. Only smart guys like us can appreciate. I mean "somehow" Palpatine literally did return. Heh. Dummies.

I'm curious what's at the other end of your analogous remark, go on.

Hasn't he "died" like 3 times in the last month?

That's...good?

Oh...to be honest I think I read the prompt backwards. As a rule of thumb, anecdotes should always be taken with a grain of salt when presented with contradictory empirical evidence.

A Kortoise

Ah, gotcha. Going forward I'll refrain from joking about a different perspective, even if I actually fully agree with the original post. This place rules.

I thought it said "Water behind bars" and I was like damn that's a fantastic analogy.

It was a metaphorical starving Jake, we're not really being punished for the time our grandparents went to a buffet. Thank you for your sincerity though god bless.

That would have been such a great answer. Unfortunately my previous statement was just taken too literally and I got referred to ebt 🙃

Isn't it 3 to cast face down, 2 to flip, then 2 to equip? Asuming you aren't just casting and equiping for 4

Empirical VS anecdotal evidence.

Ah yes, Shark Boy.

I mean with the way the data is presented it definitely is agreeable that the rise in complaints is directly tied to the quality/performance of the flight industry.

But, on principle alone I refuse to openly accept correlation as a causation for two data sets, and always leave room for expansion and more dots to connect. Without that in play, it's easy to convince anyone that all spurious correlations have a cause/effect relationship.

So a total of 7 mana to add 3 attack?

I do, not monthly but enough to say that my own anecdotal experience would agree with yours and this article's perspective. That doesn't stop me from taking a jokingly objective stance. First comment I made was just the reverse angle of the same data set.