Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.zip

75 replies

King was probably like "Holy shit he actually did it. I'd better give him my daughter before he cuts my dick off".

In all seriousness, there is some fucked shit in the Bible.

9

The Philistines on the battlefield watch as David goes about his work with great enthusiasm.

6

The Old Testament is a treasure trove of such things

Times were WILD

10

Here's another fun one, from
Awkward Moments (Not Found In Your Average) Children's Bible - Vol. 2: Don't blame us - it's in the Bible!

53

What I read was two woman saying, "There are no other men around and we're useless unless we make babies." Guess it's both? 🤷🏼

31 One day the older daughter said to the younger, “Our father is old, and there is no man around here to give us children—as is the custom all over the earth. 32 Let’s get our father to drink wine and then sleep with him and preserve our family line through our father.”

11

If you love what you do, you'll never work a day in your life.

18
lemmy.zip

The same David that later sent a man to die in battle so he could steal his wife?

42
SkyezOpenreply
lemmy.world

And God punished David by...

Checks bible

Having his 10 wives raped. Hmm. Really showed him.

34

This always gets me. Christians get on their knees and worship this guy who might rape their wife if they disappoint him

6

Don't forget also having the illicit child die in agony over the course of seven days.

15
piefed.social

It seems relevant to point out that the "Philistines" were Palestinians

62

Ya. Thats why Palestinians call Palestine 'Falasteen' nowadays. Its the same place with the same name.

5
egretsreply
lemmy.world

In terms of region and name, sure, but probably not in terms of distinct ethnicity and culture. Philistia was most likely a mix of Greek immigrants and Canaanites, but they got totally absorbed by the Babylonian empire -- there's no direct cultural inheritance.

45
decoloreply
piefed.social

Fair point, but I think it's a relevant historical mirror. Israeli government references the fight against these Palestinians constantly, in the context of genociding the current day ones.

18

Israeli government references the fight against these Palestinians constantly

I didn't know this! I feel my context makes that even more absurd; even if a historical feud justified their actions in the slightest, which it obviously doesn't, it's not even the same cultural or ethnic group.

14
Akasazhreply
lemmy.world

And that they are a semitic people as well, so killing them would be anti semitic

18

Imagine being an ancient Greek and thinking "Oh look at this lovely coastline. It's so peaceful and fertile. I will bring my family out here to start a vineyard and an olive grove, and we shall thrive for generations to come!"

Less than two generations later, he's forced to watch as his sons and grandsons are slewn for their foreskins, his daughters and granddaughters carted away in chains to be made concubines, and then finally being slewn himself for his own foreskin...

1
discuss.tchncs.de

Rationalism it was: instead of bothering with heads they proved the number with foreskins. Much lighter and safer to store for longer time.

31
Barley_Manreply
sopuli.xyz

I think the reasoning is that since Jews lacked foreskins but their neighbors the philistines had them, bringing the foreskins showed that it was not Jews you went out to kill. It's like if you wanted someone to kill 100 rattler snakes and as proof you bring 100 rattlers as that's their distinctive body part.

64
lemmy.world

I mean, the "logic" that led to the Israelites not having foreskin to begin with isn't exactly rock solid.

15
bad1080reply
piefed.social

yeah but how else are you going to give hepatitis to a baby?

9

(Some) Jews do that as part of the circumcision ceremony—Metzitzah B'Peh.

4
FuglyDuckreply
lemmy.world

Historically, heads weren’t all that common. Usually only for specific bounties where you’d need to show it was the right person.

For more general things, scalps, ears, and fingers were all far more common.

I mean think about it. It’s gruesome enough on its own. But, fondling dead guy dick is… especially unpleasant. (And they probably stank.)

18

"Especially unpleasant"

After the first five they wouldn't even flinch. No different than taking a scalp, or the head. A veteran warrior would already have done so much worse, this would be an easy task.

8
username_1reply
discuss.tchncs.de

Especially unpleasant for XXI century guy? Yes. Might have been totally indifferent 2000 years ago, though.

9
lemmy.world

Did David even think about THE SMELL!?

22
bremreply
lemmy.world

A bag of dickskins is gonna stink...

9

Who are you to assume what happened to my theoretical foreskin?

9
lemmy.world

There are limits to what people will do to help their friends get laid. We haven't found them yet, though...

12
Varestireply
lemmy.zip

Search said it was this one, but I'm not 100% on that.

Edit: Replied to wrong comment on accident.

34

Look at the big brain on WhiskyTangoFoxtrot!

4
NeatNitreply
discuss.tchncs.de

heads up, OP tried to reply to you but replied to the wrong comment

13
lemmy.world

Sometimes I leave it, if the comment is general enough that maybe people won't notice. Or I'll edit the comment to make more sense.

The fun ones is when I comment on the wrong post, like I click the post above or below and make my comment.

2

The bigger problem is that the person you should have replied to doesn't get the notification

3