Spyke
lemm.ee

I hope this is the one thing that he actually follows through on. Drive a stake through it already

231

True, but the clients are still in their infancy. Liftoff has no support for it as far as I know. Meanwhile, I have the luck of running my own instance, so if the filter fixes it, that would be great.

When I still used Twitter, I was very glad to be able to filter out Trump, otherwise I'd see half a dozen tweets about him per day. We're kinda heading there with removed on Lemmy now, and I really don't even want to spend the mental energy it takes to ignore it.

Edit: meh. Using the slur filter just replaces "removed" with "removed". Time to investigate some other clients I guess.

1

If you’re using Lemmy on iPhone, Memmy (application) provides this feature. It works pretty well

1
Otterreply
lemmy.ca

So many articles about what he's pondering or what he might do

How about we read about it when something actually changes

23

But people keep talking about it and upvoting it. Please just downvote the musk spam. This isn't even about Twitter/x, it's just musk rambling.

4

This is fucking hilarious, the fact that this is so upvoted really tells you how geeky Lemmy is though!

35
filisterreply
lemmy.world

Both X11 and Wayland are competing display server protocols in the Linux ecosystem.

X11 is the old version that is now slowly abandoned in favour of Wayland, but still there are things like Nvidia with their proprietary drivers that run better under X11.

Hence the word play.

17
ඞmirreply
lemmy.ml

There are no X11 fees, this is a joke about X=X11 and not X=Twitter

9
ramreply
lemmy.ca

My mistake, I figured it was easy enough to confuse X as in Twitter with X as in several dozen other tech and tech-adjacent projects.

1

Can we just skip to the part where the servers get shut down? I'm so tired of hearing about this prick.

61

Nah, let's skip to the part where Musk tries to move them using cheap labour and a screwdriver.

Wait ... we already had that.

20
lemmy.world

They will? Or they're considering it?

Two very very different things.

50
lemmy.world

A service that I have to pay for AND it harvests and sells my personal data? SIGN ME UP!

31

If Musk wants me to use his shitty crap site, I will be charging him a small monthly fee.

6

At this point i think hes just mad he had to buy twitter and is just destroying it now.

30
Ejh3kreply
lemmy.world

I looked into it, and I am definitely interested. Do you have the unlimited plan? Because I 100% would burn through the other plans very quickly.

2
lemmy.world

“It’s the only way I can think of to combat vast armies of bots,” explained Musk.

8

Yeah that’s true. The headline is asserting something that I don’t think Musk has actually said he will do. On the other hand, I’m having trouble thinking of any random idea Musk has had that he didn’t attempt to follow through on.

6
reddthat.com

Thanks Elon, you're gonna make it really easy for me to eventually move on

23

I did that last night. The place has turned into cesspool anyway. My account was there just to watch the shitstorm develop but sure as hell it's not that interesting for me to pay anything to him.

4
lemmy.world

I will believe it when I see it.

Let's not forget that more than half of its user base don't have access to online payment. so I don't know how they are planning on keeping them

16

How is that going to allegedly stop bots ? they can be made to load the ad and then keep browsing ... just another attempt at raising revenue

4
lemm.ee

Blue tick users: We are already paying a fee

Elon: Yes, but what about a second fee? Premium tweets? Twitter awards?

15
Campareply
lemmy.world

Its better for me, but it might not be for you?

1

Me too, its just sometime fediverse still got censorship.

1

Since I left Twit-X, I've been feeling no sense of loss. Perhaps, a little smug in fact.

12
lemmy.world

The only way to fight bots is to charge users a fee? Gee, I wonder how all of these other sites do it. 2-factor logins, manual auth prompts, rotating passwords on suspected accounts.... a real unsolvable problem for the stable tech genius, I see.

10

This is the best summary I could come up with:


X owner Elon Musk today floated the idea that the social network formerly known as Twitter may no longer be a free site.

In a live-streamed conversation with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday, Musk said the company was “moving to a small monthly payment” for the use of the X system.

But since Musk took over the platform last year, the company has been pushing its users to subscribe to its paid subscription product, X Premium (previously Twitter Blue).

X doesn’t disclose how many paid subscribers it has, but independent research indicates X Premium hasn’t attracted a majority of X users.

Platformer last year reported that Musk was weighing the idea of putting all of Twitter behind a paywall, in fact.

The larger conversation between Musk and Netanyahu today focused on AI technology and its regulation, though the topic of hate speech on X came up.


The original article contains 498 words, the summary contains 148 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

8
lemmy.world

I’ve deleted my account way before Elon bought the company and haven’t been back since. When I was super active on Twitter which was many years ago and they said I had to pay a small fee every month I would have stopped using it right away. I don’t see the benefit of having social media and I sure as shit won’t pay for any of them. I’m in my 40’s so maybe it’s just me or my age but I can’t imagine anything on those platforms that would be worth a dollar a month.

Sounds like he’s trying to recoup lost revenue and I can’t imaging this is going to work out well for them.

8

"Let's make the content creators pay to make their content for us" has been the dumbest trend in the past few years

9

I use it to follow some art accounts but they usually also have a 2nd account somewhere else like DeviantArt or Pixiv.

Also the Progressbar account just tweeting how far along we are in the year.

Nothing of high value is lost.
No meaningfull comments were written like on Reddit, nobody uses it like imgur or gfycat so what purpose does it fill except doom scrolling?

4

Right now it's an idea, but Musk's ideas tend to become reality more often than not. I already stopped Twitter, they do this I'll be gone for good.

7
sh.itjust.works

they need to do way instain with ceos> who kill thier own prodduct becuse the product cant frihgt back it was on the news this mroing a ceo in ca who kill his three prodduct. they are taking the three prodduct back to nationalization too ceo to rest my pary are with the end users who lost their social media; i am truley sorry for your lots

0
communick.news

Look, we can hate Twitter and Musk all we want, but (a) the headline is absurdly false and (b) charging small amounts from every user instead of having an ad-funded business is probably the most honest and fair way to have a healthy internet and I for one would welcome the change. If Twitter becomes paid-only and removes all advertising and tracking (that's the the big if) it can find its way to become the only sustainable and (dare I say?) ethical social media network around.

I strongly believe that a lot of the decline in the quality of civic debate and the increasing polarization of our society is unhealthy and can be traced back to the point where online media started depending on "eyeballs" and advertisers. (Don't believe me? Just check the headline and read the article, now see how it outright LIED in the headline to make you click). Every news media channel became more and more tabloid-like in a desperate attempt to keep their viewership numbers, quantity over quality became the norm and everything became a "market audience" segmented to perform well to specific editorial guidelines.

To have meaningful change and actual progress, we need to have a healthy media that is focused on pursuing the truth. The current landscape is just a popularity contest. If people are able to vote with their wallets and if they become more than just a number , the people holding the megaphones will win more by paying attention to us than by treating us as cattle who can be milked out.

5
lingh0ereply
lemmy.film

charging small amounts from every user instead of having an ad-funded business is probably the most honest and fair way to have a healthy internet

I agree, but wouldn't you think it's far more likely that they would charge small amounts from every user AND have an ad-funded business?

20

This is why I am not holding my hopes up for Twitter, but I do believe that the Fediverse can work because we can have many different small service providers that would all compete for its customers, and not having ads would be definitely an advantage.

4

He still shows ads to Twitter blue subscribers, of course he would keep showing them to everyone if he charged them

14

Lol but it will still be owned by Elon so I'm out. He draws the wrong crowd.

11

And people will still insist on remaining there. I'm convinced Musk could shut down the site tomorrow, and people would continuously refresh until it somehow reappears.

5
lemmy.world

Very misleading title. Apparently floating an idea is now committing to implement a policy.

4