Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world
politics·politics byMicroWave

Six senators call for Trump administration to 'immediately reverse course' on Russian diesel plan

A bipartisan group of six senators on Sunday called for Donald Trump’s administration to “immediately reverse course” on a plan to purchase diesel from Russia as part of an effort to lower high fuel prices.

Trump shocked lawmakers when he announced on social media Friday that he struck a deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin in a phone call. He said Russia will immediately supply more than 300,000 tons of diesel to the American and global market, followed by an additional 500,000 tons in November and 1 million tons “immediately thereafter.” Russia will deliver an additional 3 million tons “within a short period of time” after that, he wrote.

Four Republican senators and two Democratic senators signed onto the statement released Sunday in protesting the deal. They said the administration failed to consult with Congress or submit any explanation to justify its decision as required by statute.

Six senators call for Trump administration to 'immediately reverse course' on Russian diesel planhttps://apnews.com/article/trump-diesel-russia-ukraine-senators-protest-93fa63c8a88e538f1456e7d448fc550dOpen linkView original on lemmy.world
497

61 replies

danc4498reply
lemmy.world

Literally it was a message they sent. Next I suppose they're going to do something about it.

16
lemmy.world

Look I get it, but for the moment let’s be glad these six are doing something.. a lot more than the absolute nothing - or bootlicking - the others are doing.

15
danc4498reply
lemmy.world

I'm skeptical of any republican that has had the opportunity to keep Trump in check, but has not. This feels like an attempt to make them look better before rhe midterms.

11
lemmy.dbzer0.com

let’s be glad these six are doing something

No. This is LITERALLY the least they can do apart from nothing. And 94 senators aren't even doing THAT much.

That's as worthy of celebration as Mitch McConnell completing a sentence without having a stroke or Hakeem Jeffries neglecting to call a common sense progressive candidate with more popular policy positions than himself "dangerous" or "extreme left".

6

Yeah it’s this bad, I know. It’s not that I disagree (although it’s probably dangerous to even do this under Trump), and I’m definitely not celebrating. Still, I believe complaining should now start with the other 94.

2

I'm sure it was intentional (and absolutely fine) that there were more Republicans than Democrats as well.

1
huquadreply
lemmy.ml

There are (half) dozens of us!

11
lemmy.today

Susan Collins is very concerned. She might write a letter.

49

Syphilitic old shitstain betrayed the U.S., E.U and Ukraine in a single phone call.

36

Alternative headline:

94 senators in favor of or indifferent towards heavily sponsoring the war crimes of a geopolitical adversary.

It's not as snappy but more relevant to the state of things

36
Sunflierreply
lemmy.world

94 senators in favor of or indifferent towards heavily sponsoring the war crimes of a geopolitical adversary.

94? Dems hold 47 seats and their actions have been carte blanche in favor of Ukraine. So, their position is well known. Its 49 Republican senators that act indifferent.

7
lemmy.dbzer0.com

their position is well known

Yet their silence amidst the most blatant act of favoritism of the second Trump infestation is deafening.

2
Serinusreply
lemmy.world

You think the message will have more of an effect if it's signed by 46 Dems and 4 Republicans?

8
lemmy.world

Trump (Krasnov) can't unsuck Putin's dick.

35
bremreply
lemmy.world

That's an emoji I can't unsee. I'm in shock and vomiting at the same time.....

7
piefed.social

300k tonnes of diesel isn't that much in the grand scheme of things.

14
lemmy.world

In 2025, distillate (or diesel) fuel consumption (excluding biodiesel and renewable diesel) by the U.S. transportation sector was about 2.94 million barrels per day, or about 123 million gallons per day.

123,000,000 gallons per day. Diesel weighs 7 pounds per gallon so 861,000,000 pounds or 430,500 tons per day.

This first shipment will not cover 1 days fuel cost. But what it will do is give a big pile of money to Putin.

45

Just bought the midterms with taxpayer money.

13

Wait that means...

Thats about $500m of diesel purchase.

Essentially that's a transfer of $500m cash to Putin. Putin is collecting dues.

8

But it's enough for them to blame the Dems when things aren't magically fixed after they win in the Midterms. The idiots eat that shit up because they have absolutely no idea how a national economy works. Republican economic policies are consistently bad for everyone that's not in the 1% and yet they vote for them all the time because they're told told policies are good for them, regardless of the reality they deal with daily.

12
tburkholreply
slrpnk.net

I feel like that's the worst part of this: he's undermined what had been a reasonably unified international campaign for what, like 2 days of diesel?

7

Not even a single day's worth. It's less than the transportation sector uses in a day.

4

Even if they had it loaded it would be 3 weeks away.

2

Imagine if he just struck a real deal with Iran. This crisis, of Trump's own making would resolve itself.

13
lemmy.world

Here is my thing. How in the world is JD Vance not quietly building support for the 25th? Like that might be the only thing that could save them in the election.

But even if they still plan on cheating, Trump is literally nothing more than a liability at this point.

11
spongebuereply
lemmy.world

I mean, if we knew he was doing it, it wouldn't be so quiet. Too much of his cabinet (which would need to vote for it) are unwavering Trump sycophants, but maybe there are enough not-Pete-Hegseths that he could pull it off.

But for Vance's own sake, he may be best off waiting until after midterms/inauguration in case he needs to cut any deals with the next Congress.

7

Plus if he gets in after midterms he can serve two more terms (theoretically).

2

Probably because Vance has to be one of the most unpopular people ever. Seriously, they're hanging on because of the cult like devotion to trump. Nix him and go to Vance? Their support drops from high 20s to sub 10s

6

Wouldn't doing that with less than half a term left mean that he could then only be elected for one term? So to maximize his own (and Thiel's) potential power, he'd want to do it right after January 20th. IANAL and obviously IADNACL.

2

If Vance was plotting this, the 25th is not the way to go. He would need to get half the Cabinet on board, and then when Trump inevitably challenges it it would take 2/3 vote in both houses to toss Trump out.

It would be much better if Vance simply built up support for an impeachment vote. Trump is doing a ton of things that would have gotten anyone else booted by now. And then all that's needed of a simple majority in the House with no Cabinet input. Still 2/3 of the Senate, but that might end up being only about 15 Republicans after the elections.

1

It's performative. Russia doesn't produce nearly enough disel to satisfy US needs.

This is so that when Ukraine inevitably blows up more Russian refineries Trump can withdraw whatever support is left for Ukraine.

10

Oh oh. trump is going to be in big trouble for not consulting congress. This is the one thing that they absolutely will not stand for. /s

9
lemmy.world

Seems like a better idea to try undo the damage you caused yourself in the first place

9

Six!? Why, that’s almost seven senators! That will surely get his attention.

4

Governance by platitudes is as useless as me coming up with a creative metaphor.

2
lemmy.ca

There is no deal for diesel imports from Russia. A lifting of sanctions on Russian energy is relatively inconsequential because Russia has enough customers for all of its energy exports despite the sanctions. Russia does have a current diesel export supply problem. It will still export to friends of Russia over the US, although this does represent global pricing relief. No US refinery will take the political hit of importing Russian diesel/oil. Ukrainian nazi rulership did express openness to an energy ceasefire declared by Trump. Some global pricing relief after mid terms could occur if they obey. Iran can transship diesel through Russia if price is high enough.

Still, purpose of sanctions relief on Russia is to counteract military strike plans on Iran, and Iran's retaliatory capability. Zionazi Russophobe vermin senator posturing does this BS fully knowing US is not going to import any Russia diesel.

-13

No US refinery will take the political hit of importing Russian diesel/oil.

Don't blame me I voted for Shell

4

Imagine coming here and saying that Ukrainian leadership acts like nazis instead of the countries doing the invasions. So very Russian of you (where in Russia everything is opposite of truth and reality)

2