Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on sh.itjust.works

52 replies

lemmy.ca

I remember when Joe Rogan was going off on Biden for saying something stupid about naval ships or war or something. Then kept saying how he's not suited for office.

Turns out Biden was quoting Trump.

Rogan obviously backpedaled on that statement being suitable for the office of the president of course.

110

Probably should make sure to include the onion logo when posting screenshots from the onion

99

The problem is without the logo its too believable which means its not satire enough and just made up news and not funny. Most likely just giving them ideas.

37

To be honest, I found the screenshot elsewhere and it didn't even occur to me that it was an onion article because of how real it sounds, but I guess it adds to the comedic effect.

I'll add an acknowledgement and it's URL, since I can't switch the image. But hey, at least I didn't post it in c/nottheonion!

6

You can't use Daddy's words against him! That's not fair! - a bunch of fucking traitors

80

The implication was that they'd be nuking them. Which presumably means he was threatening to give them nukes too.

15
pawb.social

As a non-American, I've seen GOP used occasionally and never really checked what it meant (I assumed it was a US government acronym within the Republican party for something). I didn't realise it was another name for the Republicans, and worse still that it stood for 'Grand Old Party'. Wtf kinda dumb name is that

40
lemmy.world

The name is entirely ironic for several reasons. 1) The democratic party is older than the republican party by 26 years. 2).They have been nicknamed the Grand Old Party since the 1870s despite being founded in 1854. 3) The name was granted specifically as praise to the party for leading the Union to victory against the Confederacy in the Civil War, while many GOP members and supports proudly fly the confederate flag nowadays. 4) When they were given that name, they were the progressive party (relatively speaking) fighting for federal economic protectionism and civil rights, while the democrats were the ones were fighting for states rights and free markets. Yet they pretend to identify with "The Party of Lincoln" and cling to the "GOP" moniker to maintain the illusion of any real connection there.

46

That's actually really interesting, thanks! Yeah it sounds about right that they'd cherry pick the good bits and rewrite history to suit them...

17

The good ole southern strategy, basically some politicians decided to appeal to racist cockwhombles in the south to get votes, which flooded the GOP with former southern democrats, which made the original GOP politicians to switch parties.

Basically the parties did one giant flip and ended up in the same place with different names.

5
lemmy.world

huh, i would argue the democrats were pursuing a different type of federal economic protectionism that "coincidentally" lined up with making slavery legal in all 34 states.

3

Free Enslaved Markets

FR, though. We are talking Post-War here. But while enslavement was illegal, they still had the next closest thing for a long time... indentureship through share cropping (debt bondage), forced child "apprenticeship" for orphans, vagrants, and kids they just stole from their parents, and leasing prisoners convicted of such crimes as unemployment, loitering, and changing employers.

Generations after the Civil War, people. 190,000 black children were re-homed and force to work in agriculture or domestic jobs until adulthood. Convict Leasing didn't end in Alabama until 1928. Debt bondage wasn't outlawed federally until 1966 over 100 years later. And only mostly because it had already faded with the mechanization of the Ag industry in the decade or two prior. That is well into the Baby Boomer era. This is still relatively recent history.

4
lemmy.world

Blue tsunami or bloody civil war, November is gunna be wild.

37
adhdsergioreply
lemmy.world

Probably what's gonna happen then. In a way I want the gop to win, because not, the rest of the world will cling on to hope that the US can recover and become at the very least as reliable as it was before. I don't think it can

-14
lemmy.world

I really need people who say doomer shit like this to:

  1. Reflect on whether their words encourage solution-oriented thinking, or doomer thinking

  2. Learn emotional regulation

18
lightnsfwreply
reddthat.com

As an American I think the solution is for every other nation to work on excluding the the USA from everything they possibly can and get along without us. Trump's administration has demonstrated that we cannot be relied on as trade partners, military partners, or anything else. Our word isn't worth shit as long as our government is structured in a way that allows a new administration to come in and tear up everything that came before it. A blue wave isn't going to fix things overnight. There is a hell of a lot of work to be done before we can be relied on again. It's going to be years to fix things so we can be trusted again if it can happen at all.

5
adhdsergioreply
lemmy.world

I'll see what I can do for you, boss.

I am not an american but I can only assume from your butthurt comment that you are, so I hope you apply that solution oriented thinking and l will go and convince other compatriots to go and vote or protest

1
lemmy.world

“Butthurt” implies that I took your comment personally. I didn't, because it wasn't personal — it was a comment about the U.S., to which I feel no particular loyalty, and my issue with it is what pessimism like yours does when people express it out loud to strangers without offering solutions. Negativity akin to what you expressed has a paralyzing effect rather than a mobilizing effect.

Notice you answered my critique with a (poor) guess at the motivation behind my comment rather than a logical defense of your doomerism. Ad hominems only work on insecure people.

2
adhdsergioreply
lemmy.world

You literally said that you need me to do x and y. Y being learning emotional regulation. Now in your latest comment you also said you have an issue with pessimism like mine. When you discuss you and me that makes it obviously personal, so I'm not sure why the irony escapes you. However while a bit annoyed of this hypocrisy, the important fact is that you seem to have gotten lost in your own words and kept banging on about not providing a solution, when I clearly said voting and protesting would be the solution in a civilised society. I don't know what else regular people can do, and I'm not hearing any suggestions from you either. Now go and do your civic duty and stop wasting peoples time on the internet with big words that mean nothing

1

When you discuss you and me that makes it obviously personal, so I'm not sure why the irony escapes you.

Yes, discussing my personal thoughts and feelings is personal, and criticizing your words is also personal, I agree. But I used the word “personal” to describe being offended. I was not offended, as the initial comment to which I was responding was a broad comment about the U.S. I have no reason to take offense at that.

when I clearly said voting and protesting would be the solution in a civilised society.

You did not say this in your initial comment, you said it in your response to my comment. My original criticism of your original comment stands. You did not speak of any solution until I criticized you for not being solution-oriented in your comment.

1
ouRKaoSreply
lemmy.today

The fact that we have to ask speaks volumes about the current state of the US...

TBH I was 50/50 on if it was satire or not.

18
lemmy.world

Guys, let's stop quoting Trump. He says some really dumb and hateful stuff, so let's not repeat it and remind people that electing him was a mistake that they can't take back.

33

Found every national newsroom.

They have been sanewashing him since 2015.

14

Um... The voters knew who he was. They voted specifically for dumb and hateful

6

You also can’t tell because the image is extremely vague/fake looking in that it has almost no info to source it

4

Well fuck, this has to be Onion right? Right??

(please note that I am allowed to say fuck because I bribed @[email protected] , I mean financially supported the lemmy.world instance and you should too).

5

They did that completely unironically with Charlie Kirk, and it was more than urging. Reality outpacing The Onion yet again.

3

Trump invaded Iran to reduce foreign fossil fuel production competition with the GOP's gaslighting.

3
piefed.social

Wouldn’t put it past them. Biggest bunch of closeted snowflakes I’ve ever seen!

1