Because most people don't know. Most people are not spending hours online doomscrolling politics, pedos and such. I'm from Mr. Beast's area and no one here has a clue. Most of my coworkers do think a lot of his products are stupid, though.
They're not targeting me and you. They're targeting kids. Their whole thing is be kid friendly enough to take advantage of that lane while still being horrible people. Kids have always had a crazy "don't to this at home" type of influence in life. Evel Knieval. Pro Wrestling. Jackass. Now it's these guys. They're more insidious because their reach is way larger and easier to get. A smart person looks at them and goes 'this is shit.' What if you don't know any better? What group is that? Kids.
I'm aware Mr Beast exists, but I know nothing about him. I mean, I would have assumed he is awful, because money does that to people, but I'd have nothing to back up my gut feeling.
It's also not really an accident either. Their popularity is not fully natural.
All these companies, Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, tiktok, reddit, etc are not apolitical entities, they gain by pushing right-wing content to certain demographics of vulnerable users.
I've noticed that personally I can't use algorithmic media like this because it will shove that content like that down my throat and I refuse. But not everyone has that self-awareness and introspection. And some of the content is really subtle, not enough to be noticable at first.
Some don't know, some don't care, some agree with their actions/opinions.
While it's important every individual develop and maintain a moral framework, individuals rarely if ever use morality as the sole basis for day to day decisions/actions.
The world just doesn't operate on a solely moral basis. Some don't consider the morality of mundane acts, some find the morality of a thing excusable/justifiable when considered, and some come to find their morals agree.
Having read the comments section of those three to get an idea, you sum it up very well. Very many don’t care, are oblivious as to why the “charity” is played to so much (re: mrbeast), fully agree with them, and frequently enjoy them doing objectively bad that shit older people won’t, possibly out of vicariousness. They just wanna sit there and watch Ow! My balls!
Because there are a lot... A LOT of stupid/ignorant people in the world.
I have to interact every now and then with someone who is a MrBeast stan. He's in his 20s or 30s and has a kid of his own. He's also a fan of xxtentacion and even when he was confronted with facts about MrBeast being a scammer and abuser, and xxtentacion beating his pregnant girlfriend, he said it was just haters making up stories. I literally linked him an NBC article about whatever current controversial shit MrBeast was up to at the time, and he said that "y'know you really shouldn't trust .com domains."
Dude is a lost cause and he regularly tries to recruit others to watch MrBeast or buy his products.
I don't disagree with Mr Beast being a scammer and abuser, and I also don't disagree with a domain not being untrustworthy just because it's a .com domain.
That being said, I should point out that the news/media isn't exactly reliable. NBC is no exception. Even if the article is true (which it most likely is), I wouldn't blame someone for not trusting NBC.
That's not what they said though. They said a .com domain was not trustworthy. Its a disyrust of 'mainstream' media.
As you yourself point out, NBC is not automatically trustworthy, but the choice of domain is not the reason why. The billionaire and corporate influence, combined with clickbait journalism is why.
Someone not trusting NBC is fine. Someone choosing to believe that it's fake news just because it's mainstream media when it refers to verifiabke facts and a mainstream personality is a failure of our society to adapt to the online world. A failure of education and a failure of media control and regulation.
I get it that the media is captured by billionaires but my point is that I don't think that NBC, a network that has been around for 100 years, would put their reputation on the line to publish lies about a random wealthy YouTuber, who likely has lawyers on retainer that could sue for libel if they really were making stuff up.
Most of their subscribers are pre-teen kids and kids in their early teens who don't really have a strong enough sense of self to differentiate what they're being visually presented with with the external realities of that presentation. Combine that with parents that are too tired and too distracted with their own, quite possibly terrible media fixations and you have a perfect storm of negligence and predation.
I mean, Mr. Beast, as a whole, is a terrible thing, but his individual videos show people having fun doing interesting things, and you get to parasocially enjoy them. It's entertainment media geared towards kids, and it presents itself as being family-friendly, so the people who cannot look past the presentation believe it to be family-friendly.
There's a certain portion of people for whom an entertainer being a horrible person is a selling point. They like it when Logan Paul comes into a new hobby as a tourist, drives it into a commodity speculation market, then runs off with the money. It makes them feel good and superior. "Fuck those people who got scammed or screwed by externalities," they think. "Fucking idiots following the social contract, buncha NPCs. Not like me and Logan Paul. We're real people." And then they get scammed or screwed by externalities, and they blame poor people, or trans people, or immigrants, or someone else who has no social power because it can't be the fault of someone like Logan Paul. He's a real person, not one of those dregs of society screwing everything up for them. So they cheer on the people fucking them over and blame the people being fucked over with them. And it's very easy to stop: If an asshole can take power through structural incentives, we should change the structure to disallow such power from being amassed. But nobody wants to change the structure, because someday they could be Logan Paul, with all the money and the fame, and you can't take that from them, no matter how many people get fucked or scammed.
I understand the concept of taste and having not the same as i do. I understand that kids, young, dumb, horrible[...] people exist. I understand that not anybody is a terminally online old fuck who remembers the good old pre web 2.0 days and is hypercritical of most modern online content. Then there is that orange fuck...
Still i also just dont get it. Its just garbage made by garbage people acting like garbage. Its so bad. Its so obvious. Why all these fucks still have careers just doesnt make any sense to me.
I think this is a rare case where i'm not out of touch and its the children who actually are wrong.
When you say "we all know", who are you talking about? Everybody that you know? That's a social bubble, a self-selected subset of "everybody."
"Horrible" is in the eye of the beholder, and people have differing opinions on stuff. You probably like and subscribe to someone that lots of other people would consider "horrible" in turn.
33 replies
Because there's a lot of people out there who are also terrible people.
Because most people don't know. Most people are not spending hours online doomscrolling politics, pedos and such. I'm from Mr. Beast's area and no one here has a clue. Most of my coworkers do think a lot of his products are stupid, though.
My wife who is normally a pretty well read person feels that MrBeast is great and is “one of the more generous content creators “
Some people just don’t wanna take their head out of the sand for crappy videos
They're not targeting me and you. They're targeting kids. Their whole thing is be kid friendly enough to take advantage of that lane while still being horrible people. Kids have always had a crazy "don't to this at home" type of influence in life. Evel Knieval. Pro Wrestling. Jackass. Now it's these guys. They're more insidious because their reach is way larger and easier to get. A smart person looks at them and goes 'this is shit.' What if you don't know any better? What group is that? Kids.
I'm aware Mr Beast exists, but I know nothing about him. I mean, I would have assumed he is awful, because money does that to people, but I'd have nothing to back up my gut feeling.
And I've never heard of KSI...
There are plenty of horrible people that exist
did you care about things like that when you were 14?
also you're vastly overestimating the average person's knowledge of such things relative to us chronically online folk
It's also not really an accident either. Their popularity is not fully natural.
All these companies, Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, tiktok, reddit, etc are not apolitical entities, they gain by pushing right-wing content to certain demographics of vulnerable users.
I've noticed that personally I can't use algorithmic media like this because it will shove that content like that down my throat and I refuse. But not everyone has that self-awareness and introspection. And some of the content is really subtle, not enough to be noticable at first.
Example
The same reason Chris Brown still has female fans. They're rich and famous.
why mr beast is horrible?
Watch the Folding Ideas videos about his participation in the Beast Games.
Wait, why's KSI horrible? Not caught up with news about him.
Idk, I just find his laugh funny, which is why I watch him when he occasionally comes on my feed.
Why is facebook still a thing? Or Xitter?
Some don't know, some don't care, some agree with their actions/opinions.
While it's important every individual develop and maintain a moral framework, individuals rarely if ever use morality as the sole basis for day to day decisions/actions.
The world just doesn't operate on a solely moral basis. Some don't consider the morality of mundane acts, some find the morality of a thing excusable/justifiable when considered, and some come to find their morals agree.
Having read the comments section of those three to get an idea, you sum it up very well. Very many don’t care, are oblivious as to why the “charity” is played to so much (re: mrbeast), fully agree with them, and frequently enjoy them doing objectively bad that shit older people won’t, possibly out of vicariousness. They just wanna sit there and watch Ow! My balls!
I mean who is the president of the us?
Elected not once... twice.
Enh. “Elected”.
Look at some of the long term representatives long before. Same story. That can go for both parties, btw.
Same reason Carlin didn't go after the politicians. There wouldn't be a problem if the demand wasn't there. The public sucks.
Because there are a lot... A LOT of stupid/ignorant people in the world.
I have to interact every now and then with someone who is a MrBeast stan. He's in his 20s or 30s and has a kid of his own. He's also a fan of xxtentacion and even when he was confronted with facts about MrBeast being a scammer and abuser, and xxtentacion beating his pregnant girlfriend, he said it was just haters making up stories. I literally linked him an NBC article about whatever current controversial shit MrBeast was up to at the time, and he said that "y'know you really shouldn't trust .com domains."
Dude is a lost cause and he regularly tries to recruit others to watch MrBeast or buy his products.
So basically half of internet? What a stupid stance.
I don't disagree with Mr Beast being a scammer and abuser, and I also don't disagree with a domain not being untrustworthy just because it's a .com domain.
That being said, I should point out that the news/media isn't exactly reliable. NBC is no exception. Even if the article is true (which it most likely is), I wouldn't blame someone for not trusting NBC.
That's not what they said though. They said a .com domain was not trustworthy. Its a disyrust of 'mainstream' media.
As you yourself point out, NBC is not automatically trustworthy, but the choice of domain is not the reason why. The billionaire and corporate influence, combined with clickbait journalism is why.
Someone not trusting NBC is fine. Someone choosing to believe that it's fake news just because it's mainstream media when it refers to verifiabke facts and a mainstream personality is a failure of our society to adapt to the online world. A failure of education and a failure of media control and regulation.
I get it that the media is captured by billionaires but my point is that I don't think that NBC, a network that has been around for 100 years, would put their reputation on the line to publish lies about a random wealthy YouTuber, who likely has lawyers on retainer that could sue for libel if they really were making stuff up.
"i DuNnO, mAn. TrUmP sUeS pEoPlE a LoT, sO tHeY mUsT bE fAkE111!!1!!1!"
Because sheeple are horrible
Because the subscribers are horrible people too.
Most of their subscribers are pre-teen kids and kids in their early teens who don't really have a strong enough sense of self to differentiate what they're being visually presented with with the external realities of that presentation. Combine that with parents that are too tired and too distracted with their own, quite possibly terrible media fixations and you have a perfect storm of negligence and predation.
I mean, Mr. Beast, as a whole, is a terrible thing, but his individual videos show people having fun doing interesting things, and you get to parasocially enjoy them. It's entertainment media geared towards kids, and it presents itself as being family-friendly, so the people who cannot look past the presentation believe it to be family-friendly.
Apart from Logan Paul, what have they done? I don't follow celebrity drama and stopped watching mr beast after he stopped reviewing youtube intros
There's a certain portion of people for whom an entertainer being a horrible person is a selling point. They like it when Logan Paul comes into a new hobby as a tourist, drives it into a commodity speculation market, then runs off with the money. It makes them feel good and superior. "Fuck those people who got scammed or screwed by externalities," they think. "Fucking idiots following the social contract, buncha NPCs. Not like me and Logan Paul. We're real people." And then they get scammed or screwed by externalities, and they blame poor people, or trans people, or immigrants, or someone else who has no social power because it can't be the fault of someone like Logan Paul. He's a real person, not one of those dregs of society screwing everything up for them. So they cheer on the people fucking them over and blame the people being fucked over with them. And it's very easy to stop: If an asshole can take power through structural incentives, we should change the structure to disallow such power from being amassed. But nobody wants to change the structure, because someday they could be Logan Paul, with all the money and the fame, and you can't take that from them, no matter how many people get fucked or scammed.
I understand the concept of taste and having not the same as i do. I understand that kids, young, dumb, horrible[...] people exist. I understand that not anybody is a terminally online old fuck who remembers the good old pre web 2.0 days and is hypercritical of most modern online content. Then there is that orange fuck...
Still i also just dont get it. Its just garbage made by garbage people acting like garbage. Its so bad. Its so obvious. Why all these fucks still have careers just doesnt make any sense to me.
I think this is a rare case where i'm not out of touch and its the children who actually are wrong.
When you say "we all know", who are you talking about? Everybody that you know? That's a social bubble, a self-selected subset of "everybody."
"Horrible" is in the eye of the beholder, and people have differing opinions on stuff. You probably like and subscribe to someone that lots of other people would consider "horrible" in turn.
Everyone that follows them is a terrible person. There are a lot of these arseholes around,