Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on infosec.pub

26 replies

Flock cameras are probably less than 1% of the total surveillance state (that needs to be dismantled)

2
lemmy.zip

The people taking down flock cameras are heroes not criminals.

27

I think its the funny way of saying how its done without condoning it publicly.

1

And slower. Great for plumbing, not so much a 3" aluminum post with 1/4" walls

But hey, I might be wrong. 30yrs in the trades, but I've never tried cutting down an aluminum post with a pipe cutter

Also if the method varies from person to person, or one person uses a unique method, it's easier to get multiple vandalism charges to stick

11
CubitOomreply
infosec.pub

Would a straight cut be easier to add a union joint to and thus make the cost of repair slightly lower?

I guess it would depend on priorities

4

Nah, they wouldn't bother repairing the tube regardless of how it's cut. If they did and the repair broke, hitting someone, they'd have to take the liability. For a company with their funding, a length of ally tube and the cost to dig it into the ground is fuck all.

edit to add: but multiplied by hundreds of them being cut down, it's not not fuck all. and it's funny.

1

And all the onlookers suddenly become Skyrim guards... must have been the wind

22

Is a criminal to a criminal really a hero? Does a double negative become a positive? I think so.

9

Actually, it would be extremely lucrative if flock was the people cutting down the cameras, wiping them, and selling them back to the user/municipality at the replacement cost stated in the contract, and using Antifa as a cover.

7

This is horrible! No one should definitely do this!

I glad the word is getting out, finally we can see for ourselves exactly how this crime is committed so we know what not to do in the future. Knowledge is power.

71

He was the punkest motherfucker I ever did see

Aw, hell, he's even more punk than me!

Edit: kerning

11

I can’t take this person seriously. So thirsty for attention.

-7
lemmy.world

Notice how he didn't cut down the real flock camera, because he's not actually about that

-7
valarreply
lemmy.ca

Right, why didn't this guy film himself cutting down a real flock in his video about how to protect your identity that he posted to his public account. /s

50
Stache_reply
lemmy.ml

I’ve seen this guy online before, he’s building a homestead out in the middle of the desert in like Arizona or something. No way he’d risk his account/income, I’m sure he checked with a lawyer before posting this

12

So would I, were I publicly giving out advice for getting away with illegal activity. Doesn't undermine the message though, imo.

6

You reached the end