Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world
politics·politics bySunflier

House passes SAVE America Act anti-voting measures in budget reconciliation, stock trading bills

The House voted 216-214 on a budget reconciliation framework that includes $10 billion worth of election-related grants over a 10-year period for coaxing states into adopting anti-voting measures like those in Trump’s pet proposal. The $95 billion package also includes funding for the Iran war and bailouts for farmers hurt by Trump’s tariffs.

It’s still unclear what will be in the final reconciliation bill; now that the budget resolution has been approved, individual House committees will go about drafting the legislation. The reconciliation process allows Senate Republicans to bypass the filibuster’s 60-vote threshold and pass legislation with a simple majority.

House passes SAVE America Act anti-voting measures in budget reconciliation, stock trading billshttps://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/house-passes-save-america-act-anti-voting-measures-in-budget-reconciliation-stock-trading-bills/Open linkView original on lemmy.world
309

39 replies

JasonDJreply
lemmy.zip

So do they. But instead of letting themselves accept that girldick into their lives (it's not even gay if the girl uses her own dick!), they fill their void with fascism.

12
JasonDJreply
lemmy.zip

You've gotta understand the cognitive dissonance at play.

If you get fucked by a transfem with long hair, tits, and a dick....that's woman enough for it to not be gay. 2/3 is a majority.

3
Ironchicoreply
lemmy.world

And yet the American populace will do absolutely nothing.

-19
Ironchicoreply
lemmy.world

Mass protests, general strikes that last for more than a Sunday afternoon. Don’t need to throw fireballs to enact change, but you do need to make your voices heard. Yet Americans just keep sitting on their butts. If the majority of Americans are against what’s happening, where are they?

-11
gwulggreply
lemmy.zip

So many of your comments are this condescending idiot shit, so I guess if all Americans just posted like smug dipshits like you everything would be perfect

11

No my solution is to post like a condescending idiot like you

3

Mass protests, general strikes that last for more than a Sunday afternoon

Joke's on you, our protests took place on Saturday afternoons!

4
lemmy.world

Welfare for farmers… wait a second, isn’t that socialism?

89

The reason many conservatives don't like socialism is because the wrong sort of people will get nice things. That's it. If white people benefit then it's cool.

They are bad people by any reasonable metric.

47

Farmers are often depicted as a profession done by poor people, the reality in the US is that the poor people got bought out decades ago, most farmers are actually gigantic land owners and often millionaires

15

No. Socialism would be if the government nationalized Monsanto and then cut checks twice a year to every US citizen distributing the profits.

They're just doing fascism. They're enriching their wealthy buddies and further consolidating entire industries under corporate ownership. They may also be doing what they can to prop up the food industry because they know people will lose their shit if there's nothing to eat.

13
sh.itjust.works

Government funds to farmers to help with the rising costs and effects of war? This feels like a word that usually isn't associated with capitalism.

44
Septimaeusreply
infosec.pub

True but I’d wager this is an 11th-hour attempt to buy back heartland wallet voters they’ve been hemorrhaging for over a year. Hopefully they take the bribe and still vote against him.

2

Wouldn't be the first time Donald Trump just started handing out checks and hoping for the best.

But it's easy to take someone's money and still hate the guy signing the check. Ask any wage laborer.

2

it is when you consider that farms are mega corps these days. they don’t care about a little co-op in Shelbina, MO.

8

Yeah see, they're just throwing everyday struggling farmers a bone!

Oh wait no, it's not that at all. It's that they know they need to prop this industry up as widespread access to food is probably one of the last things keeping people from revolting

3

They don't have a majority in the Senate for it even if the Senate accepts it as a budget bill, which is not guaranteed.

24
sh.itjust.works

Where were the fillabuster avoidance strategies when dems were in power FFS. Dems are shit at politics and power.

15
chaogomureply
lemmy.world

The House doesn't have a filibuster. It never has. The Senate has the filibuster.

19
lemmy.world

And they’re trying to pass it off as a budget related bill which is immune to filibusters

11
arrow74reply
lemmy.zip

I even think the current administration's courts and administrative process of the senate has already kicked back similar bills. They aren't allowed to just slip in anything to budget reconciliation bills.

But I'm not confident it won't go their way, as precedent. Means little

4

I even think the current administration’s courts and administrative process of the senate has already kicked back similar bills.

It has. The Senate parliamentarian is an office (currently held by Elizabeth MacDonough) who, among her other responsibilities, decides whether or not bills qualify for the budget reconciliation process under the Byrd rule and are thus immune to the filibuster rule. She has had her work cut out for her lately. With the passage of this in the House, you can expect to hear Trump spouting off again about replacing her.

Fun fact, if it wasn't for the Senate parliamentarian and her staff, Jan-6 could have been a lot worse.

Separate and apart from the nuances of the Byrd rule, it is worth being reminded that it was the Senate parliamentarian and her staff that had the quick sense to remove the Electoral College voting boxes from the marauding Capitol Hill rioters on Jan. 6, 2021. Had it not been for their quick action, the threat to our democracy that day would have been even deeper.

4

I think you’re right though I feel like I remember at least one that they waved through though it wasn’t really qualified

1

dems do it on purpose because reps are just fine with the anger that comes from them being “worse.” because in reality reps and dems are the same: capitalists.

2

You reached the end