Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.ml
yepowertrippinbastards·Ye Power Trippin' BastardsbyFranklyIGiveADarn

Lemmy.world Admin MrKaplan rages over anti-Zionism banning users and defederating instances

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/46148690

Over the past few days, @[email protected]/@[email protected] has banned multiple users, blocked entire comms, and now defederated from Anarchist.Nexus over their anti-Zionist stance.

This extreme overreaction and general power trippin' bastard behavior stems from Lemmy.world's history of pro-Zionist views. And now MrKaplan is seeking out the flimsiest pretext to to enact his own personal vendetta.

Free Palestine, Death to Israel, Death to Zionism.

Lemmy.world is a ZioNazi instance. Avoid it like the plague.

View original on lemmy.ml
125

196 replies

lemmy.org

death to zionism! death to the iof!

free palestine. from the river to the sea!

46

You're one of the few good ones across the entire place. If they tolerate MWoG's Nazis and enable harassment, they're not a good sever.

7

Ayo. just left SJW -- it was my first lemmy acct created when i didnt know where to go. now im here. i like your username. thats all

4
lemmy.world

Thing is, that comment isn't Zionism. It was pretty mild and was basically just a call out of the hypocrisy of responding to evil by doing the exact same evil. It's perfectly reasonable moral stance, and you're free to agree or not - but it's poor form and will ruin Lemmy to ban discussion which is only pointing out the evil of genocide regardless of who does it. You can and should call out Isreal's evil. But I don't think we want to become the evil in the same way that some Jews persecuted by Nazis have now become the same evil. And of course context, and history of comments matter - but your knee jerk reaction was seemingly not about context or history, but simply not liking any discussion that doesn't fit your perspective 100%. And that's poor form - the whole point of Lemmy is for discussion, not a bunch of people blindly agreeing with each other. Now I'll probably get banned for saying all this, sigh.

-20
lemmy.ml

Yeah, equating calls to end Zionism/Israel with genocide/Antisemitism is absolutely Zionism, and banning isn't nearly enough, but it's all you can do to someone online.

Fuck Israel and any genocide enjoyers that defend it.

17

@[email protected] I think I speak for all of us when I say this blatant Zionist apologia is getting old, and I think it might be time to enforce golden rule #8 here. I assume reports against comments like these are being dismissed by LW admins.

12

I reported comments for a person denying the nekba and his comments are still there

1

Land back movements are not, and never have been a call to genocide. This is ancient racist hasbara. Do you think arabs have a "natural disposition" or whatever to kill jews or something?

9

What you are doing is openly promoting Zionist apologia with your attempt at defending a Zionist. It's not surprising Zionists don't recognize their own Zionism as Zionism when it is being talked about as it actually is, a harmful ideology.

15

He is a very well known zionist. Many of his comments war removed for lying about palestinian claiming they do not want peace

14

Thing is, that comment isn’t Zionism.

"See the thing is, he didn't say anything about Zionism, he just advocates it, disagrees with anyone who doesn't like it, and then says anytime you want freedom for people it automatically means mass murder because Zionist freedom is mass murder.

But he's not a Zionist, and don't check his history."

13
lemmy.world

I don't tend to check histories. I look at a comment based on the comment. If you want to ban someone for a particular comment that warrants it, I guess that's fine, but it seems wrong to ban someone for a comment that isn't bad, even if you think they mean in some bad way because of other comments

-4

So you don't think if someone has a history of being something, when they make comments defending it isn't suspect?

Why are you saying that guy is a weirdo? He's only saying r*pe isn't a big deal. You mean he's a sex offender? I don't look at people and their history, just the words they use now to justify their history.

3

Death to ideology, not the majority race holding the ideology.

slap

Don't even, you know better.

18

Zionism is an ideology and an overtly genocidal one, if they wanted to they could just drop it at any time

7
mander.xyz

Hilarious, i wonder if Dbzero will defederate too since they have the flotilla thing with anarchistnexus

Axis.world becoming fascist instance was going to happen eventually, they will probably call the flotilla instances tankie extremists to try to save face

42

That's exactly what they'll do. It's the ultimate libs move, everyone to their left or makes them feel uncomfortable with capitalism is an extremist, apparently.

8

Axis.world becoming fascist instance was going to happen eventually, they will probably call the flotilla instances tankie extremists to try to save face

We've been call Tankie extremists for wanting Harris to support popular polices and illegally send weapons for genocide.

Even within their electorial framework of "change" they still get mad at wanting to end genocide. Fuck em.

6
piefed.ca

I’m calling for everyone to mass instance block world. Keep their blunders contained.

28

what comms do you recommend for news? i had LW blocked for a while because i found their consistent tolerance for mods promoting moral apathy unacceptable, however, then i found myself out of the loop news relevant to me.

i guess as long as i'm asking, i encourage others to post more to [email protected] and some US focused news community or another. i know Beehaw has one but i can't find it right now

20
tidderuufreply
lemmy.world

Got a suggestion on which instant to go to? I feel like I'll be permabanned from a .CA because I own a firearm.

7

I've been happy here. I don't think I've seen anyone complain about the culture.

4

I'm not sure what would make you think that. When I see discussions about Canadian firearm rules in [email protected] and elsewhere, it's usually reasonable and level-headed.

The only exception I can think of is if someone is threatening to use the firearm illegally, which then becomes a legal matter for law enforcement.

3
Bazellreply
lemmy.zip

It will be such a waste to defederate one of the biggest instances because of this idiot...

Edited: clarification.

-4
lemmy.ml

the 1 idiot is the head admin that can just unilaterally decide what to do. Meanwhile hexbear has huge threads voting on who to defederate, but guess who is known as "aUtHoRiTaRiAn"

20
Bazellreply
lemmy.zip

Doesn't matter whom hexbears vote to defederate - a lot of other instances defederate them firstly, usually. Secondly, problematic admins can be in any instances, but still people do use that instances because of all the other content placed there.

-4
Bazellreply
lemmy.zip

Sounds reasonable but still problematic to migrate.

-4
slrpnk.net

how is it problematic when a community member consistently causes problems in your community to disengage from them? i must be missing something

10

The problem is that it is not just a comunity member or a guest, but an admin, who runs all the instance. For example, you have a big old community on that instance and you cannot easily just migrate to another instance just because of you do not like the admin. You either coop and remain there or is forced to make a bold move. You sure can ban a random guy from your comunity without a problem, but not if this guy is an admin of your instance and is a jerk, that can avenge you by messing with the whole community.

P. S. Sure, I could have missed something.

-3
lemmy.ml

No they don't? Afaik hexbear is the one to defederate? Also anarchist flottilla are the only other ones to hold defederation votes, so my point still stands.

6
Bazellreply
lemmy.zip

There are 3 main reasons to defederate instance, that I have encountered: political/social views; incompatible instances policies(like protecting spammers/trolls or just 1 admin hates others); technical issues(like connection lags). Unless instance is politically neutral or matches to the hexbear(like ml), it often defederates hexbear or any other instance(ml is an exception here since it is like the main developer's instance and so on).

6

Have you been paying attention to Jordanlund? This isn’t a one off thing.

15
Bazellreply
lemmy.zip

For me this is the first time here to see an admin of world does this shit. I don't deny that I could have missed something.

8

Its mostly been mods before, but always with admin backing. Using size to say 'you cant defederate from us'.

Longer wait bigger problem.

10

Seeing as this all started because one person said the FHF enables Zionism and censors pro-palestine content, which was then censored? Yeah.

16
Goferking0reply
ttrpg.network

Or him ignoring Jordanlund complaints that involved him censoring pro Palestinian news or stories about Israel.

12
lemmy.world

Let's not forget the roles lund and squid played in turning wirld news and political memes into their personal safe spaces and echo chambers.

11
Goferking0reply
ttrpg.network

Idk. Wasn't squid one of the ones Jordan banned immediately as soon as they had a grey reason too?

3
lemmy.world

Squid operated as both super poster, super commentor, super mod, and super confused around Zionism and Israel because they took everything critical of Israel as an antisemitism. They modded many of the major communities and created some of the strongest echo chambers which are still in place (world news and politicalmemes are some of the worst) where a very strict but unspoken orthodoxy is maintained.

Really I just highlight them as yet another power tripping mod., and that as an issue, mod power and the ability to implement a form of censorship, even if implicit, through moderation, is substantial. World news and politicalmemes are basically broken subs because of moderation abuse, and squid was a primary contributed of the abuse.

Lund on the other hand, for all the shit they get, I actually think is very fair in their application of the rules. The only issue I have is that the rules they insist on are outdated and stupid. Not being able to post video content or sites like dropsite or zeteo; it's buffoonish. They treat news media as if it's 2004 and nothing has changed in media since then. I agree with their arguments about reliability and editorial boards, but litterally, so many independent media have editorial boards and standards (they issue retractions et..). And not allowing video content? I mean come on grandpa...

10
Goferking0reply
ttrpg.network

Oh shit I was mixing up that awful mod with other accounts. So glad that one is gone. Although slightly sad can't remember the accounts I was thinking of

3

If they're going to defederate from anarchist.nexus they should defederate from us too. Anarchist.nexus is managed by the same admin team and has the same anti-Zionist policies as this instance.

By the way just created [email protected] for people to post about this more.

18
Grainnereply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I keep forgetting about them, but they're good also.

Also you've only heard?

8
maamreply
feddit.uk

More people need to spread out to reddthat, lazysoci.al and scribe.disroot.org.

6

It's incredible, a suite of pure FOSS services that isn't profit first? A beautiful thing.

7
lemmy.zip

I'm new here but I saw this yesterday and I hope it's not all like this?

14
Grainnereply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

It's mostly just a few bad instances, lemmy.world, piefed.world, feddit.org I think are the main offenders.

17

lemmy.ca has been engaging in it too. Although it might be just one of their admins acting alone since they aren't german or part of FHF.

5
Grainnereply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Lemmy.ca is in cahoots with them. Someone messaged the admins a few days ago about it all and they ignored it despite being online and posting.

2
Shadowreply
lemmy.ca

We're not in cahoots with anyone on this, we're just busy. Please keep in mind we're all donating our time and just because we're browsing and commenting, doesn't mean we have the time / energy to sit down at our PC to dig through mod logs & user history to look into things right away. I personally do most of my lemmy surfing on mobile, not well suited to digging into mod logs.

We'll get back to that message, just give us time. We all have busy lives outside of lemmy too.

10
Grainnereply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I’ve been informed it’s been about 5 days since the message was sent, is there some sort of ETA on when a response can be expected?

4
lemmy.dbzer0.com

They are neoliberal DNC types.

Calling everything "Nazi" is lazy and whitewashes a big chuck of zio-aligned mainstream politics that doesn't explicitly identify as righter-than-center-right.

-3
sh.itjust.works

Those who conduct or support the genocide of a 'lesser' people are nazis. Whether they do so out of hatred or greed, the result is the same.

8
lemmy.dbzer0.com

"Nazi" is not a generic synonym for "bad person" or "mass murderer" or "genocider". I know it's common place, but this is the laziness I'm talking about. If we start using every word by its generic connotations or goodness/badness, then these words will no longer serve as a distinctive epistemological tool.

And there is actually a historical irony here, in the context of doing this with Zionism. The soviet union and its bolsheviks actually supported the Zionist entity in its first decade of existence, and actively so. Massacres against villagers and other events from that era didn't cause any deterrence to that support. They even went as far as making Arab communists work as what would effectively be described today as Mossad agents. This alignment only started to shift circa ~1958.

Should we call the soviets from that era "Nazis"?

If we want to principally oppose Zionism, and we should be, then we need to be educated, informed, and diligent against falling for traps like those from the mainstream right-left political theater.

0
sh.itjust.works

Those who conduct or support the genocide of a 'lesser' people are nazis.

I think that's a good enough approximation. And the current nazis are very much conducting the genocide of the native people. I said nothing about "bad person" or "mass murderer".

Should we call the soviets from that era "Nazis"?

I think we should definitely criticise the Soviet support for all sorts of nationalisms in general, and this nationalism in particular. Yes the Russian Empire was cruel towards (most) minorities, but that doesn't mean you need to create political entities that do not have the population or economy to support themselves. Cultural freedom might have been a better aim.

However, the wish for a 'Jewish' state is still understandable, if it recognises an equal Palestinian state. The Israel of the 1950s was still problematic, but a far better country than the Israel of today.

2
lemmy.dbzer0.com

And the mask is off.

Massacres in 2024 are abhorrent and a very big deal. Massacres in 1948 were unfortunate, preferably not mentioned at all.
Population displacement is abhorrent and criminal in 2024. But it was "understandable" in 1948.
Colonialism in 1948 was okay whenever it had good enough red paint!

Many of you are not against Zionism. You are specifically against the Jabotinskyists leading the Zionist entity's scene today. And the opposition itself is not that genuine. It's just a part of the moral posturing arsenal for scoring points in the right-left political theater.

1

Sorry, how did you go from 'the wish for a Jewish state is understandable' to 'massacres and population displacement are unfortunate / okay'? Colonialism is never okay. But there are levels of evil. The Israel project was misguided from the beginning, but it could have been justified in the immediate aftermath of the holocaust. Now? Not only are Israel's actions openly genocidal, there's no reasonable justification for attacking every country in the region.

You are specifically against the Jabotinskyists leading the Zionist entity's scene today.

I don't know about this. Has there been a change in Israeli leadership? I thought the change in policy was due to US influence.

2

Don’t worry, you’re on one of the good instances.

10

Mostly not. I never see any of it, but I have taken to block any and all US politics (but even before that, it was seldom). It is there if you want to find it and feel like having pointless arguments with people.

5
lemmy.world

A zionist scum who is not currently loving in palestinian land and not involved in murder do not deserve to die . The guy advocating for killing all zionists deserve it, the other guy using the terms zionazis and shitlib do not

11
mrdownreply
lemmy.world

No, only once they start stealing palestinian land or doing terrorism against them

0
lemmy.ml

Yes, anyone willing to even speak in favor zionism at this point is fair game

-3
mrdownreply
lemmy.world

So you want to kill 21% of americans since the evengelical are zionists?

-1
lemmy.ml

Fuck yeah, another group of unrepentant fucking devils whose absence from this world would only improve it

-2
mrdownreply
lemmy.world

You want to create a civil war where not even you would be safe

-1

Everyone will be safer after it's done, that's worth more than my personal comfort

-2
lemmy.world

I have no idea what's going on here, should I move my account to another instance? For reference, I mainly use lemmy for fun and not for politics or drama like this. Also, created this account years ago when there were fewer instances.

10

The answer as always is do what you want. It's the fediverse, you're not tied to one account on one instance. If you're looking for the instances with the least defederation lemmy.zip is a good bet. I'm very happy on lemmy.ml and lemmy.blahaj.zone for wider federation and hexbear.net for the instance culture

12
lemmy.world

Who is "FHF"? If the reasons stated in the modlog are true, these seem justified.

I've had a consistent antizionist stance and never got banned from lemmy.world. You can't advocate murdering zionists who aren't actively involved in murder themselves.

3
Samskarareply
sh.itjust.works

FHF is fediverse hosting federation, the organization that runs Lemmy.world.

Aggressively calling the admins Nazis is a perfectly fine reason to ban someone.

-9

.world politics try to pretend to be neutral on israel, but any mention of accusing them of zionism, or any people linked to israel is a potential violation to them, they will call you anti-semite(insinuate)

10
lemmy.world

Banning a guy literally calling for murder in his username is very much YDM.

Using dumbass terms like 'zionazis and shitlibs' (learn to articulate your point instead of repeating dumbass memes) and posting swastikas is BPR.

-3
lemmy.ml

look how the zionists keep crawling out the woodwork.

posting swastikas

you mean the swastika of david?

9
FauxLivingreply
lemmy.world

look how the zionists keep crawling out the woodwork.

See:

(learn to articulate your point instead of repeating dumbass memes)

-8
lemmy.ml

Ok more clearly: Putting "kill all zionists" in your username is good and based because it makes zionists like you reveal yourself.

1
mrdownreply
lemmy.world

Zionists are using the same methods and rhetoric as the nazi. Shitlib refer to the part of liberals who refuse to critisize it side. Both terms are very valid to use

4
FauxLivingreply
lemmy.world

I know what they mean.

You should also know that those terms are so overused as insults that they effectively don't have a definition other than:

Shitlib/Zionist - adj. 'a person who possibly takes a different position as me, idk I'm too lazy to actually understand them but I want validation from the Internet and these words get me upvotes'

1
mrdownreply
lemmy.world

No. They are insults to terrible people justifying the unjustifiable and has very concrete definitions

-1
FauxLivingreply
lemmy.world

What they mean and how they are commonly used on social media are two different things.

Someone called me a zionist in this thread. It wasn't based on any kind of reality as I never stated any opinion in any comment here about Israel and my comment history is certainly anti-zionist. They were not saying it because it is definitionally true, because it isn't.

They called me that because they perceived me as being on a different 'side' than them and know that using that term as an insult in a space like this is guaranteed to put them on the right side of the dogpile.

They were not using the term as it is defined, i.e. a supporter of zionism. They were using it as an insult to attack me, i.e. 'hey this person is bad, get them!'.

4
mrdownreply
lemmy.world

Someone called me a zionist in this thread. It wasn’t based on any kind of reality as I never stated any opinion in any comment here about Israel and my comment history is certainly anti-zionist. They were not saying it because it is definitionally true, because it isn’t.

Let see. Do you believe that the way Israel was created was illegitimate ? Do you agree that Israel alone is the only responsible for Palestinians being occupied for 78 years? Do you agree that Palestinians has the right to armed resistance?

4

Not that it matters at all for my point but, yes, yes and yes.

The person is an idiot, they have no idea of my opinions. Their label wasn't about my opinions, it was an attempt to provoke a mob response from other low-effort readers.

-1
Limonenereply
lemmy.world

Most zionists are not settlers. To be clear, killing settlers can be justified as defensive, so nobody should be banned for a name like "Kill All Zionist Settlers". But there are like 800k settlers, and hundreds of millions of zionists. You can't ethically kill someone just for having an opinion, even a reprehensible opinion, if they don't even act on it.

-2

Most zionists are not settlers

This is a lie

You can’t ethically kill someone just for having an opinion, even a reprehensible opinion, if they don’t even act on it

Also a lie, also supporting a genocidal ethnostate in any way is acting on it

2

And the other 2 banned who didn’t say that and only rightfully called the ZioNazis?

3
maamreply
feddit.uk

I love how the fediverse instances are like dark souls covenants.

14
FauxLivingreply
lemmy.world

People are anti-discrimination except when it's the discrimination that they like, then it's wholly righteous and those dirty deserve what's coming to them.

2

Discrimination against people who actively choose to be fucking evil is a good thing, you definitely deserve it

-1
FauxLivingreply
lemmy.world

Exactly the level of performative tolerance I'd expect from blahaj.zone members.

-3
Godricreply
lemmy.world

No, you misunderstand, it was calling for the murder of The Bad Guys.

Also, if you disagree with me, you love genocide and are A Bad Guy.

-1

Disagreeing with murder means supporting genocide.

Therefore I support murder-free genocide!

Wait...

2
lemmy.ml

Killing evil people is good, fucking duh, the only people pretending otherwise are either incurable morons or also evil, if not both

-2
Godricreply
lemmy.world

Yeah! Killing The Bad Guys is good, everyone who disagrees is a moron or a Bad Guy in disguise, or both! You get it!

0
lemmy.ml

It's actually really easy to be on the right side of this, if you fail to do so people are going to assume some negative things about you and they're entirely correct in doing so

-1
Godricreply
lemmy.world

Glad we understand eachother's views. It's very, very easy to be on the right side of an issue when that issue is the mass-murder of people that are "The Bad Guys".

1

If by "the bad guys" you mean the folks currently committing genocide then yeah, kill them, fucking duh

-2

Bans seem fair and warrented given the history of these users.

-10
lemmy.world

Did y'all see the user was “MurderZionists” and was then calling people Zionists?

It’s a valid ban. Next case.

People who need to scream about murdering others, 4chan is that way. Go there.

Israel is committing war crimes and genocide, but you gotta be this tall to ride, y’know. Everybody’s got one.

-11

What a shock that the DNC-defender also supports Zionism. Weird how saying "Murder fascists" gets you (and an entire instance) banned, but not commenting on and even defend fascists murdering doesn't get punished.

14
lemmy.ml

Israel is committing war crimes and genocide, but you gotta be a libshit and refuse to want to stop it.

9
lemmy.ml

Israel is committing war crimes and genocide, but

Lol fuck off clown

6
Optionalreply
lemmy.world

O noes did someone ring the bell down at the all-nite .ml comrade jerkapalooza? Here they come! So to say.

-10

Oh my. We definitely will uproot the zionism in Lemmy by ... let me check ... getting defederated. Great LARPing. Also BPR.

Lets instead come up with methods that might actually be useful in pushing back zionism on Lemmy. Because for sure this aint it.

-12
lemmy.ml

What's your plan, just ask the Zionists nicely to quit banning people?

18
slrpnk.net

Yes I love answering good faith questions! /s

Dunno, maybe instead cosplaying militancy, instance admins and supporting users could try to build a coalition of instances & communities to pressure lemmy.world to change their stance on zionism but also on their admins power tripping.

So like this but online.

-6
slrpnk.net

i disagree. the fediverse is a vote with your feet situation from my observations of it the past 10 years. with lemmy.world, we have

  • asked nicely, and seen them do nothing
  • asked rudely, and seen them perform the theatrics of something all while doing nothing
  • created easy paths for people to follow away from the most influential lemmy.world communities, and still the problem persists
  • and now we're here. it seems like lemmy.world's administrators will never change. i treat their users like they're capable of change, just not necessarily aware, however, lemmy.world's size has created in their admin team's minds an attitude that they know best for the fediverse. i even find the name of their umbrella org, Fediverse Hosting Foundation a little concerning. it seems to de-emphasize their role in hosting a section of the fediverse and implies a higher degree of central importance than i'd ever want

but then. i'm just a rural boy from a dead mining town in what the early anarchist philosophers in Russia called a "resource colony," "internal colony," or "sacrifice zone."

15
slrpnk.net

There is a difference between asking nicely / rudely and speaking collectively with the ability to present actual consequences, such as defederation of most non lemmy.world instances or full boykott of all lemmy.world communities.

3
lemmy.ml

And how exactly do you plan on "pressuring" them? Be specific

10

A) dodging the question, I don't need to have my own plan to criticize yours, if you actually had a good plan you'd have no reason not to answer plainly, you've got nothing

B) my plan is dedederating, fucking duh

7

tbh, I don't think db0 is prepared to take down the datacenter FHF is hosted at. Otherwise we would get 404 errors from .world instances.

1